69 members have voted

  1. 1. Which team will win the Constructor's Championship?

    • Infiniti Red Bull Racing
      39
    • Scuderia Ferrari
      13
    • Vodafone McLaren Mercedes
      4
    • Lotus F1 Team
      6
    • Mercedes AMG Petronas F1 Team
      5
    • Sauber F1 Team
      0
    • Sahara Force India F1 Team
      1
    • Williams F1 Team
      0
    • Scuderia Toro Rosso
      0
    • Caterham F1 Team
      0
    • Marrusia F1 Team
      1
  2. 2. Which driver will win the World Driver's Championship

    • Sebastian Vettel
      29
    • Mark Webber
      0
    • Fernando Alonso
      19
    • Felipe Massa
      0
    • Jenson Button
      4
    • Sergio Perez
      0
    • Kimi Raikkonen
      5
    • Romain Grosjean
      1
    • Nico Rosberg
      1
    • Lewis Hamilton
      9
    • Nico Hulkenberg
      0
    • Esteban Gutierrez
      0
    • Adrian Sutil
      0
    • Paul Di Resta
      1
    • Pastor Maldonado
      0
    • Valtteri Bottas
      0
    • Jean-Eric Vergne
      0
    • Daniel Ricciardo
      0
    • Charles Pic
      0
    • Giedo Van Der Garde
      0
    • Jules Bianchi
      0
    • Max Chilton
      0


Recommended Posts

It's a weird situation as it's not entirely Pirellis fault, they're being forced to make ###### tyres to make it more entertaining if they wanted to they could easily make a tyre that wouldn't need replacing but pit stops create strategy and make the race more entertaining.

Personally I'd like to see Pirelli dropped for next season.

 

I'd like to see the return of constructors getting to choose their tyre manufacturer, even if there's just two to choose from, like the Michelin vs. Bridgestone days from the last decade.

  • Like 2

Wow, that was without doubt the most crazy Formula 1 race I have ever witnessed. The tyres were already a question mark and now safety is concerned there simply must be a change.

 

Blaming Pirelli is easy and without doubt they do share a lot of the blame but Formula 1 also needs to work united to solve this problem. Pirelli need to be given substantial enough tests with current machinery to develop a suitable product, and a change to these tyres has to be forced through whether Ferrari and Lotus like it or not. It's very lucky that nobody was injured as a result of today's action.

 

Man of the race: Lewis and Webber both recovered brilliantly.

 

Reject of the race: Formula 1 as a whole. They need to stop fighting each other and work together to develop tyres fit for purpose.

I doubt its an issues with the tyres, I agree in general they need to work on them but the blow outs where not their fault.

BBC covered it nicely...not sure if Sky did. (unsubtle dig :shiftyninja: )

 

1st reason its probably not the tyres....its not happened this season before (except when contact like a wing end plate has been involved)

 

2nd reason, the kerbs at Silverstone have recently been replaced 9this was mentioned by the BBC), then after the race Gary Anderson went out to turn 4 where Hamilton and Massa had their problems and you can clearly see the kerb has a inch or so drop on the inside, and it was covered in rubber where the drivers left wheels were going past the kerb and onto the green concrete between it and the grass, then as they moved back onto the track the kerb was catching the tyres.

There was a good shot of Vettles' tyre (which I can;t find online) looked like someone has tried to take a slice out of it...luckily for him it didn't fail...but it wasn't tyres randomly blowing up, the kerbs were damaging them.

 

Best solution IMO...grind the inside of the kerbs to make it a bit more rounded. Let Perilli focus on the other tyre issues and the tracks focus on the kerbs.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98GB1I2TyrE

  • Like 1

F1 Fanatic's raised an interesting point: could Webber have won the race if he pitted on the final lap?

 

Here?s a curiosity: take a look at lap 29 on the lap chart. The running order was Vettel-Rosberg-Raikkonen-Sutil-Alonso. From the data it appears as though Raikkonen had just overtaken Alonso and Suti on that lap.
 
But he hadn't: Raikkonen actually pitted at the end of lap 29. The reason he was classified ahead (as reflected on the FIA?s official lap chart) was because the configuration of the pit lane entrance at Silverstone is such that a following car can reach the timing beam more quickly by going into the pits.
 
If you have a look at the circuit layout you can see why: cars coming into the pits only have a right-hand turn to negotiate (and, of course, they have to slow down for the speed limit). Whereas those completing the lap have to go through the slow Vale left-hander and then Club.
 
Which leads me to wonder, could Webber have won the race by pitting at the end of the last lap? Raikkonen gained 2.3 seconds on Sutil with his in-lap and Webber began the final lap 1.1 seconds behind Rosberg.
 
 
Finding this moment from 1998, I assume the answer is yes...
 

 

 

F1 Fanatic's raised an interesting point: could Webber have won the race if he pitted on the final lap?

 

 

 

Charlie Whiting said anyone going into the pits to gain an advantage would be considered off track. So they would have to give the position back.

  • Like 1

Charlie Whiting said anyone going into the pits to gain an advantage would be considered off track. So they would have to give the position back.

 

 

Ahh right. That settles that, then.

Apparently Pirelli and some of the drivers disagreed with the contention that the kerbs were the source of the problem. I'm not sure that the kerbs are the whole story to be honest. They may be part of it and sharp kerbs should of course be fixed but the tyres need to be sorted as well

  • Like 1

I doubt its an issues with the tyres, I agree in general they need to work on them but the blow outs where not their fault.

That's not the position of teams and drivers. More importantly, we're talking about damage occurring after very few laps - tyres are usually able to take considerable punishment (i.e. coming into contact with other cars) without such blowouts. It seems likely that the curbs played a role in the tyre blowouts but they certainly weren't the only issue - we've seen far too many issues with the tyres this year even before Silverstone.

 

BBC covered it nicely...not sure if Sky did. (unsubtle dig  :shiftyninja: )

I don't know what the point is that you're trying to make but Sky's coverage is dramatically better than that of the BBC. At first I was very sceptical of the move to Sky but it's been a blessing for the sport and especially for fans.

That's not the position of teams and drivers. More importantly, we're talking about damage occurring after very few laps - tyres are usually able to take considerable punishment (i.e. coming into contact with other cars) without such blowouts. It seems likely that the curbs played a role in the tyre blowouts but they certainly weren't the only issue - we've seen far too many issues with the tyres this year even before Silverstone.

 

 

I don't know what the point is that you're trying to make but Sky's coverage is dramatically better than that of the BBC. At first I was very sceptical of the move to Sky but it's been a blessing for the sport and especially for fans.

For fans who can afford to pay through the nose.*

  • Like 2

That's not the position of teams and drivers. More importantly, we're talking about damage occurring after very few laps - tyres are usually able to take considerable punishment (i.e. coming into contact with other cars) without such blowouts. It seems likely that the curbs played a role in the tyre blowouts but they certainly weren't the only issue - we've seen far too many issues with the tyres this year even before Silverstone.

 

 

I don't know what the point is that you're trying to make but Sky's coverage is dramatically better than that of the BBC. At first I was very sceptical of the move to Sky but it's been a blessing for the sport and especially for fans.

It is the position of some teams and drivers but not all, Kimmi said in his interview he thought it was kerbs as did some others, can't remember them all, Hamilton was quick to blame Perelli in his interview, Martin Whitmarsh, as a team principal was far more diplomatic about his answers as he should be currently cause they don't have all the facts.

I didn't say there weren't issues with the tyres...in fact quite the opposite "Let Perilli focus on the other tyre issues" i.e. the degradation and poor performance etc..

But as far as the blowouts themselves the facts so far point to the kerbs. i.e. the kerbs were replaced recently, sharp bits or kerbs were found and there have been no other random blowouts at other races this season.

 

My problem with Sky isn't their coverage as such, it just that they throw their money around to the detriment of fans who can't afford a completely ridiculous ?50+ per month Sky deal...If they want to broadcast it fine let them, but don't out price the BBC so the rest of us can't watch it. just cause they're greedy.

I like the inclusion of a penalty points system (which almost directly emulates British driving licenses). Is it me though or does it seem a bit lenient? Nothing happens until you get 12 points, then you're simply banned for one race. I reckon they should have included grid penalties at lower tiers; 3 points = 5 place grid penalty, 6 points = 10 place grid penalty, 9 points = start race from the pit lane. Or is that a bit harsh?

 

Speaking of penalties, I bet we'll see more gearbox penalties next season what with the change from 5 races per gearbox to 6.

 

 

Oh, I'm watching P3 right now; Sergio Perez had a tyre failure during the session. No idea what caused it; McLaren simply say "instantaneous tyre failure".

 

I don't believe this is completely replacing the penatly system, I think drive through's, grid penalties etc will be still there but points will be included so that if a driver (Grosean) commits enough penalty worthy incidents then they will also get a race ban. I think it's to stop people causing issues every few races, and maybe getting punished for them but it still happening regardless.

 

Vettel DNF. I can't help but chuckle.

 

I am ashamed to admit that I shouted "in your face" when that happened   :blush:

 

 

 

I don't know what the point is that you're trying to make but Sky's coverage is dramatically better than that of the BBC. At first I was very sceptical of the move to Sky but it's been a blessing for the sport and especially for fans.

 

Coming from someone who watched on BBC, switched to sky and has now had to switch back to the BBC but I completely agree. Sky has a much better team (Brundle and Kravitz alone) and seem to know what they are talking about. I can't count how many times I shout out drivers names when the two BBC commentators get it wrong (Sutil instead of Di Resta)!

My problem with Sky isn't their coverage as such, it just that they throw their money around to the detriment of fans who can't afford a completely ridiculous ?50+ per month Sky deal...If they want to broadcast it fine let them, but don't out price the BBC so the rest of us can't watch it. just cause they're greedy.

 

In this case it's not Sky that are greedy, they like BBC bid for the rights to televise the races.

The fact that Bernie when with the Sky bid doesn't mean that Sky was the highest bid. I'm sure money was a contributing factor, but I'm sure the overall package Sky offered showed they are committed to the sport.

In this case it's not Sky that are greedy, they like BBC bid for the rights to televise the races.

The fact that Bernie when with the Sky bid doesn't mean that Sky was the highest bid. I'm sure money was a contributing factor, but I'm sure the overall package Sky offered showed they are committed to the sport.

Ok fair comment it probably wasn't all sky...but its just annoying...why don't they offer a per channel package. I hate football with a passion and really don't wanna pay ?30 for the sports pack on that basis, I know its not just football on the other sports channels, but its a large part and probaby the reason the price is so high...if I could just get F1 for like ?5 ontop of the basic pack then ?26 is far more reasonable...

so...Bernie is a greedy b*****d  ;)

I'm lucky to have access to Sky Player for nothing from a friend but I agree it's disappointing that F1 has gone behind a paywall. Sky aren't to blame though, it's Bernie that I blame (I can't stand the man, I seriously hope the Germans do him for that fraud so someone takes over that is prepared to put the sport first)

Ok fair comment it probably wasn't all sky...but its just annoying...why don't they offer a per channel package. I hate football with a passion and really don't wanna pay ?30 for the sports pack on that basis, I know its not just football on the other sports channels, but its a large part and probaby the reason the price is so high...if I could just get F1 for like ?5 ontop of the basic pack then ?26 is far more reasonable...

so...Bernie is a greedy b*****d  ;)

Agreed on that, you can have Sky Sports 1 only, or Sky Sports 2 only or have everything... just offer Sky F1 as a seperate package (on Virgin Media also please) and i could deal with that.

I know a guy at work pays for an "HD" pack which means he gets Sky F1 without having to pay for sports but I'm not entirely sure what that is.

Agreed on that, you can have Sky Sports 1 only, or Sky Sports 2 only or have everything... just offer Sky F1 as a seperate package (on Virgin Media also please) and i could deal with that.

I know a guy at work pays for an "HD" pack which means he gets Sky F1 without having to pay for sports but I'm not entirely sure what that is.

Yeah I remember seeing that when Sky Sports F1 1st came out, but it doesn't seem to be mentioned anymore...To be honest I wish they'd do that with everything, a completely customisable, per channel package, add and remove channels on a per month basis etc... get with the times Sky ;)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I'm not happy with myself for it, but I've gone and got hold of it. Just another 45 minutes and I'll be Bond, James Bond. In my defence, IO's Hitman series is awesome, and I'm a sucker for 007. So while it might seem a bit simplified compared to Hitman, I'm sure I'll be right at home.
    • Or just check the script yourself ^^. I hate having a Microsoft account tied to my windows install.
    • 007 First Light review: Satisfying spy adventure that James Bond needed by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe I have fond memories of classic James Bond games from the Electronic Arts era. Using high-tech gadgets, sneaking into parties, and dispatching bad guys were wildly exciting activities for my younger self. In recent years, Bond games have entirely disappeared, alongside the super spy genre. Fast forward to 2020, imagine my surprise when IO Interactive announced it had secured the Bond IP to make a game. Considering the studio’s Hitman history, this project is one I keenly kept an eye on. Six years later, 007 First Light is finally here, and after spending time inside this globe-trotting adventure, I can safely say that my excitement for this developer’s take on this universe was not unfounded. IO has taken lessons it has learned from Hitman and combined them with what I would expect from a directed cinematic experience like James Bond. I have refrained from mentioning major plot points to save you from story spoilers in this review. This is an original story that doesn’t tie into any movies, so there isn’t an expectation of knowing the backstory or the decades of movies either. Bond, James Bond When 007 First Light begins, Bond is just Bond. There isn’t a spy angle, fancy gadgets, or even a secret mission. The introductory mission is framed to show how James Bond handled himself and how he does not care about the odds when it comes to saving lives. It’s a gorgeous level as well, showing off an island scattered with cliffs in the middle of a storm. Looking back, this is probably the best-looking level in the game, with IO showing off all its abilities with its custom engine, Glacier. But my favorite ended up being the follow-up to this level. Once the United Kingdom's foreign intelligence agency, MI6, recruits our daring youngster into its super-spy “00” program, training begins. However, instead of treading through the same tutorial missions where the game teaches you to run and jump and drive, IO opted for a montage, and it’s amazing. The scenes cut between Bond practicing and improving his marksmanship, parkour, hand-to-hand combat, and driving as weeks go by in his training. What impressed me here was the lack of any loading screens or stutters as scenes instantly switched to different locations entirely, as if I was watching a movie. This creativity is a trend I noticed in most levels, where there is some sort of gameplay or choreography mechanic being introduced to keep things interesting. Soon, the rest of the cast is introduced, bringing other agents that our favorite secret agent will be working with, the scientists and engineers that build MI6’s spy gadgets, as well as higher-ranking officers that either appreciate or (at best) tolerate Bond’s rebellious attitude. It’s a tight cast, all with incredibly good voice acting and personalities that quickly grew on me. The casting for Bond himself is also an excellent one. From showing his iconic soft spot for women to the condescending smiles that get a rise out of enemies, I had no issues getting immersed into this universe as this new face of James Bond. The missions take place in a wide range of locations as MI6 sends Bond to tackle dangers that are growing everywhere from the UK to Africa. These aren’t unrelated adventures where MI6 is sending secret agents, which is an angle I would love to see in another game, but a part of a bigger conspiracy affecting the entire world. Some of the twists and turns were all too predictable, and the character that Lenny Kravitz played made me cringe a little too much. But all in all, I enjoyed the campaign’s storyline that sets the stage for this new agent joining the illustrious “00” program. Plenty of Possibilities The third-person style of IO Interactive fits this role quite well. Bond is presented as a master at hand-to-hand combat as well as firearms, while also having a knack for being stealthy when required. Most sections of missions have a lot of freedom. This means I could beat up every goon and security guard on the way to an objective, slip past them without sounding a single alarm, or do a mix of both. My sessions usually end up with the third option because I tend to be impatient about waiting for a patrol to move. Drawing from its Hitman genes, the developer almost always gives multiple routes for going through missions. Levels can be massive, sometimes sporting hundreds of NPCs going their own ways and having conversations. If my objective is to break into a security room on the third floor, I could look around for roof access, eavesdrop on conversations to find out where someone lost a key, create a distraction and pickpocket a guard for a keycard, sneak in through the vents, or simply kick down the offending door. I enjoyed the variety on offer, especially because the same solutions didn’t usually show up in different missions. Before heading out into a secret MI6 escapade, the gadget specialist of the branch walks Bond through the organization's latest and greatest achievements. This can be cool little devices like a laser built into the watch, a phone that fires poison darts, or a camera that emits a powerful shockwave. The choice of what can be taken into the mission is up to the player. I could usually find fresh routes or get out of tough situations with a punch or two, so I never had the feeling of missing out by not choosing the right equipment. It’s still a fun practice. Choosing the armaments before a mission enhanced the super spy feeling quite a bit. As I mentioned, stealth comes in as a very viable option for most of the missions, letting Bond sneak past foes or knock them out silently. While it is satisfying to clear entire areas of goons and walk away without any alarms, the way of accomplishing this could have been done better. Bond can lure enemies, sneak up and knock them out, or use a gadget to disorient them before dealing a nasty blow. Bodies cannot be moved or hidden afterward either. It’s a very simple system, which I wish were more exciting to pull off. Perhaps more stealth-orientated gadgets, distraction options, or multi-takedowns could have helped here, I think. Getting caught while attempting to be in stealth does not mean a game over. Other than getting into a fist fight, an interesting twist of 007 First Light is the bluffing option. While an enemy is confused as to what you are doing in a restricted location, Bond has the option to improvise and persuade them that you are exactly where you’re supposed to be. These are fun little dynamic interactions with unique dialog depending on the mission and location, giving a few extra moments for Bond to go past suspicious guards smoothly. It’s the first time I’ve witnessed this system in a game, and I hope to see more. License to Kill Bond isn’t just dealing with security guards or civilians. From time to time, entire gangs of gun-toting mercenaries show up in levels looking to take down our protagonist. It is then that License to Kill mode is activated for Bond, letting him use firearms with no restrictions. I was surprised by just how tight gunplay is in 007 First Light. The weapons feel powerful and satisfying to fire, with single bullets capable of taking down an enemy with a headshot. Ammo is scarce, and enemies don’t drop weapons with full magazines most of the time. This forces a hectic kind of gameplay where I am always advancing towards enemies to take their weapons after they are downed. Things like shooting legs to immobilize, aiming at the hands to make their weapon go flying, blowing up nearby fire extinguishers for cover, and using gadgets to halt a goon in their tracks while I reload, make up enjoyable levels. I had to hold back my disappointment when the enemy count in these action sequences dropped to zero and I had to go non-lethal again. Speaking of action sequences, First Light isn’t just offering sandbox levels to complete at the player’s own leisure either. Each level comes with specific linear and directed scenes to move the story forward and put Bond in tight situations. These usually end up with high-octane chases or driving sections, offering the chance to witness chaining explosions, hails of gunfire, and scripted parkour scenes that remind me of Mission Impossible movies more than Bond. Elements like seeing James Bond jump out of a plane without a parachute or drive through buildings in London inside a trash truck were fantastic and always left me at a high point when finishing a mission. The classic James Bond theme is sprinkled in here too, which only happens a handful of times in the game, but at just the right moments. Visuals and Performance Compared to Unreal Engine 5 games we are seeing nowadays, 007 First Light isn’t flexing a huge amount of realism when it comes to graphics. The models, textures, and effects all feel a little dated, with the starting mission that I mentioned being the most visually striking. However, the complete lack of stutters, the hundreds of NPCs that can be on screen without a single hitch, massive sandbox levels, and smooth transitions between them all play a part in making this an immensely immersive and complex experience. The in-engine cutscenes are gorgeous as well, offering an upgraded visual style and model detail over the gameplay sections. Animations are one aspect that jumps out at me about any new game, and First Light has nailed what a third-person action game should feel like. Walking, sneaking, and running all have a heaviness to them that I appreciate. Whenever Bond moves past a wall or a ledge, his arms reach out to lightly hold those structures until he moves away. NPCs actually react to my character and move out of the way. Even during melee combat or takedown animations, the fists impacting a body or a head hitting a wall all have that same weight. Even the more frivolous animations, like catching a gun in midair or chucking an empty one at a goon (yes, you can do that), are satisfying to pull off. Of course, the in-engine cutscene animations are remarkably well done too, with facial animations and the upgraded model details improving my engagement with the characters. I have an AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT 16GB paired with an eight-core Ryzen 7 3700X and 32GB of RAM, with the game running at 1440p resolution. Deciding to completely max out all the graphics options gave me a range of frame rates between 60 and 100 depending on the scene and level. While I did try to enable AMD FSR, which bumped up the frame rates by a good 20% at Quality mode, IO Interactive’s implementation of the technology wasn’t that great. Every corner and edge in levels began shimmering, and I was also seeing smearing issues in fast-moving sections. The title seemingly uses the older generation FSR 3.1 and not the machine learning-assisted FSR 4, leading to these artifacts. Unfortunately, there isn't a way to manually upgrade this right now either. I opted to turn off the upscaling and play the game in native 1440p to avoid problems. I would say the FPS range I was getting was an acceptable one for a single-player action game for my setup. I do wish there were an FOV slider option in the settings. While the camera is far enough back for my tastes in most situations in this third-person adventure, at times the perspective is far too close. When trying to look around quickly and spot targets, I realized I was getting a slight headache at times due to the use of an almost over-the-shoulder close-up camera. Conclusion Being James Bond in 007 First Light is a treat. Traveling around the world chasing conspiracies, using high-tech gadgets disguised as everyday accessories, and improvising on the spot to fool foes all give a fantastic feeling of being a super spy. For an origin story, IO Interactive has done a great job at introducing the character and his motives for doing what he does. The satisfying combat animation and fantastic voice acting are definitely high points, with the License to Kill moments being my favorite. Not being able to move bodies and the simplistic stealth of mechanics does hurt its presentation a little. The NPC logic and intelligence is easy to manipulate and trick, repeating the same actions over and over again if I keep making distractions. The lack of an FOV slider was also a pain (quite literally) at times, and the FSR implementation is quite poor. These are things I hope the studio will improve upon with updates. Even with its faults, IO Interactive and James Bond are a match made in heaven. The studio knows how to make a main character that oozes charm and competency while also leaning heavily into its Hitman experience to make gigantic levels with what looks like hundreds of NPCs roaming around. Being an origin story, IO’s Bond has a way to go before he becomes the highly effective agent we see in the movie world. I am hoping the studio will continue this series alongside its Hitman ventures going forward, just so we get to experience the journey for longer. 007 First Light is available on PC (Steam, Epic Games Store, and Xbox PC), Xbox Series X|S, and PlayStation 5 for $69.99. This review was conducted on the PC version of the game provided by IO Interactive.
    • [Price Drop] PDF Expert for Mac v3 is still half off by Steven Parker Today's highlighted deal comes via our Apps + Software section of the Neowin Deals store, where for only a limited time you can save 42% on PDF Expert One-Time Purchase. PDFs remain the best way to transmit documents, but editing them isn't possible with standard Mac software. PDF Expert changes that, allowing you to edit PDF text, images, links, and outlines quickly and easily. Typo in a contract? Easy fix. Need to rework a complete section of a document? No problem. PDF Expert provides a series of essential functions that will transform the way you work with documents on your Mac. It recognizes text and OCR, makes edits, and fills out forms. And with the “Enhance” feature powered by AI, it will fix distortions, remove shadows and improve contrast so that even difficult-to-read documents look great. EDIT Change the text. Easily fix typos, update numbers, or add entire paragraphs Insert images. Update logos in a contract or add a new graph to a report Add links. Enrich your PDFs by linking to other pages or external websites ANNOTATE Highlight the important. Make the most valuable content stand out at a glance Comment on PDFs. Add text to PDFs, insert pop-up notes & write your thoughts in the margins Add stamps. Review documents with our set of stamps or create custom stamps for any workflow ORGANIZE Merge PDFs. Combine multiple files into one PDF document Manage pages. Add, delete, rearrange, or rotate PDF pages with ease Split PDFs. Extract pages from PDFs & save them as separate files CONVERT Convert to PDF. Turn JPG, PNG, Word, PPT, and Excel to PDF PDF to Word. Convert PDFs into editable Word documents PDF to image. Turn PDFs into JPG or PNG images PDF to Excel. Convert PDFs into Excel spreadsheets PDF to PPT. Save PDFs as PowerPoint presentations PDF to text. Convert PDFs into editable TXT files FILL OUT Fill out PDF forms. Easily fill out PDF forms by just clicking on them Sign documents. Add your signature to a PDF in a few clicks. Let customers sign documents with handy one-time signatures Redact PDFs. Blackout or erase confidential information from your documents RECOGNIZE TEXT OCR text in PDF. Recognize the text, so you can search, highlight & copy it Enhance scans. Fix distortions, remove shadows & improve contrast Crop & split pages. Split double-page scans into separate pages & remove undesired margins Good to know: Length of access: Lifetime Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Access options: Mac Max number of device(s): Unlimited usage on personal macOS devices Version: PDF Expert 3 for Mac (macOS) Updates: Get continuous support and bug fixes. Additional new features may come at an extra cost. PDF Expert One-Time Purchase normally costs $139.99, but you can pick it up for just $69.97 for a limited time, that represents a saving of $70 (50% off). For a full description, specs, and license info, click the link below. Deal Price One time cost now only $69.97 (was $139.99) Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rising Star
      olavinto went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      271
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      75
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!