Recommended Posts

Hey guys im having a difficult time setting up our new router, we replaced a dead dlink with this and im trying to figure out why port forwarding isnt working. we have time warner cable, i setup the ports via the guide found on portforward.com. I save the settings and test them and they wont work, this is namely utorrent and my domain from my homeserver; both which worked on my previous router. utorrent states no incoming connections and a red circle on utorrrent for mac, my vm also shows this on windows 8 when i use their test it states it isnt forwarded properly; this also happens when i try to access my homeserver from remote or via the domain https://myhomeserver....

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1129064-port-forward-ebr-2310/
Share on other sites

What is the device in front of your new router? You sure its not doing NAT?

I would say like 95 times out of a hundred when people can not get port forwarding to work, is because they are behind a double NAT!

Might of worked before because the IP address of the other routers wan was placed into the dmz? Maybe it was setup static - and this new one you just plugged it in, etc.

As to other reasons port forwarding doesn't work - wrong private IP, IP they are forwarding to is not really listening on that port (wrong port), ISP blocking the port inbound that they are trying to forward. Software firewall on the IP they are wanting to forward too. They setup the forward wrong, ie trigger vs actual forward. They used the wrong protocol, tcp vs udp or vise versa. They setup the forward wrong source port vs dest port.

They are trying to test via loopback which router does not support or behind a double nat that doesn't support it, and forward actually works fine but their test method is flawed, etc. etc.

Verify that your new router actually has a PUBLIC IP on its wan (internet) interface -- something other than 10.x.x.x, 192.168.x.x, 172.16-31.x.x and then give the details of what your doing with screen shots and your host listing on the port.. You being able to connect to said port from other local devices, no firewall setup on the device your trying to forward too, etc.

And we can work out your issue - for now we are working with NOTHING to go on other than you can not setup a port forward ;)

We got your previous one works -- great do into the mech when your car does not work and say. No idea what is wrong, it doesn't work. My last car worked just fine. Got this one and it doesn't work ;)

What is the device in front of your new router? You sure its not doing NAT?

Sorry if i dont understand but out setup is modem->ebr-2310->dell gigabit switch. I have setup the uplink from router to switch but all computers are plugged into the gigabitswitch

Might of worked before because the IP address of the other routers wan was placed into the dmz? Maybe it was setup static - and this new one you just plugged it in, etc. I dont understand the first part about being placed into the dmz? Before it was not setup static as sometimes i would need to relogin to the router and change the ip of the computer that the ports were forwarded for, i think thats what you were asking.

Verify that your new router actually has a PUBLIC IP on its wan (internet) interface -- something other than 10.x.x.x, 192.168.x.x, 172.16-31.x.x and then give the details of what your doing with screen shots and your host listing on the port.. You being able to connect to said port from other local devices, no firewall setup on the device your trying to forward too, etc. Forgive my ignorance how would i go about checking this?

I have attached screenshots of the router pages, hopefully that will help.

https://www.dropbox.....33.13%20AM.png

https://www.dropbox.....36.02%20AM.png

https://www.dropbox.....35.31%20AM.png

https://www.dropbox.....35.11%20AM.png

https://www.dropbox.....34.38%20AM.png

https://www.dropbox.....34.25%20AM.png

OFF TOPIC: budman how did you become so knowledgeable in networking, is it first hand experiences? schooling? books and materials?

I have been playing/working with computers and networking since late 70's -- so yeah lots of first hand. Its what I do for a living the last 20+ years. But yeah I read a LOT!!! I research a LOT, I play a LOT!! Yes I have had some classes over the years, advanced routing, checkpoint firewalls, I remember a IRIX class way back in the day when company I worked for at the time got some SGI boxes in.. etc.. etc.. Would be impossible for me to remember all the classes and certs I have gotten over the last 20+ years ;) I recall a class with management of SSL certs back when PKI was new and fresh ;) Got some kind of cert from verisign, etc.

Its great when what you do is also your hobby ;) I enjoy tech and keeping up with all things computer related be it hardware, OS or networking.. Current position is more networking based so I have lost some of my AD and Server Skills.

the forward is clearly working for the first one - since you post your actual IP, I connected to you on 80 and got this

budman@ubuntu:~$ wget --save-headers 76.167.xx.xx

--2013-01-04 14:18:14-- http://76.167.xx.xx/

Connecting to 76.167.xx.xx:80... connected.

HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK

Length: 602 [text/html]

Saving to: `index.html.5'

100%[======================================>] 602 --.-K/s in 0s

2013-01-04 14:18:14 (65.4 MB/s) - `index.html.5' saved [602/602]

ubuntu:~$ cat index.html.5

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Length: 602
Content-Type: text/html
Content-Location: http://76.167.xx.xx/Default.htm
Last-Modified: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 20:45:28 GMT
Accept-Ranges: bytes
ETag: "0648c3760e4c81:1389"
Server: Microsoft-IIS/6.0
X-Powered-By: ASP.NET
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 20:17:02 GMT

<html>

<head>
<meta HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" Content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<script language="javascript">
		document.location = 'home/default.aspx?gotodefault=true';
</script>

<title ID="titletext">Navigate to public landing page...</title>
</head>

<body>
<noscript>
   <p id="JSWarningTitle"><b>JavaScript is Required.</b><br/></p>
   <p id="JSWarningText">
	   JavaScript is required to use the Windows Home Server Remote Access Web site.<br />
	   Please enable JavaScript in your Web browser and refresh this page to proceed.
   </p>
</noscript>
</body>
</html>

Again how are you testing that it was not working?

Also not a good idea to forward to IP that fall inside your dhcp scope - do you have a reservation set for the .11 box?? If not if you turn him off he might be .12 next time.

Also normally if your going to setup manual port forwards you don't leave UPnP enable.

quick scan shows

Starting Nmap 6.01 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2013-01-04 14:07 Central Standard Time

Nmap scan report for cpe-76-167-xx-xx.socal.res.rr.com (76.167.xx.xx)

Host is up (0.090s latency).

Not shown: 98 filtered ports

PORT STATE SERVICE

80/tcp open http

443/tcp open https

Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 3.23 seconds

I can verify those other ports for you if you want.. But sure looks like your forwards are working to me, which is a close 2nd to users just think their forwards are not working because they try testing it via loopback forwarding, nat reflection when their router does not support it. Many routers do not allow you to hit your public IP from an inside IP just to get forwarded back in. You would have to RTFM on your router to see if they do - maybe changing your nat restrictions might allow it, maybe endpoint independent

Also I highly doubt you need UDP 80 and 443 forwarded. As to 4125, not sure what your wanting to do with that so not sure if that is tcp or udp, I would guess from what I got back from port 80 your using it for RWW, I would have to lookup the details but some sort of proxy port used for remote desktop use. But that is the older version I do believe - thought the newer versions of SBS used 443 for this?

Not sure that has to be open on your router or not - since not clear on what your trying to get working? But its rare that a port is both, off the top of my head dns needs to be because it will switch from udp to tcp depending.. But mostly its udp. torrents might use both tcp/udp depending on what your doing.

I snipped out your public IP from what I posted - you might want to remove screen shots showing your public IP.

"Again how are you testing that it was not working?"

For utorrent I go into preferences and it says no incoming connections on the port i set it to, giving me a red light. This does the same when I test on my win 8 VM it just gives me an x stating its not forwarded.

For my home server I have it setup on the custom domain https://kevinbostwick.homeserver.com and its no longer opening.

"Also not a good idea to forward to IP that fall inside your dhcp scope - do you have a reservation set for the .11 box?? If not if you turn him off he might be .12 next time."

I dont have a reservation setup, i will look into doing that

"Also normally if your going to setup manual port forwards you don't leave UPnP enable."

in case others on the network have devices that use upnp, i dont want them to have problems, so i just assumed id leave it on.

"Also I highly doubt you need UDP 80 and 443 forwarded. As to 4125, not sure what your wanting to do with that so not sure if that is tcp or udp, I would guess from what I got back from port 80 your using it for RWW, I would have to lookup the details but some sort of proxy port used for remote desktop use. Not sure that has to be open on your router or not? But its rare that a port is both, off the top of my head dns needs to be because it will switch from udp to tcp depending.. But mostly its udp. torrents might use both tcp/udp depending on what your doing."

I followed the portforward.com guide for my router and setting up windows home server for outside access via a windowslive custom domain.

Well that resolves to the IP you posted in your screenshots - I would remove anything that resolves or gives you public IP out on a public forum.

;; QUESTION SECTION:

;snipped.homeserver.com. IN A

;; ANSWER SECTION:

snipped.homeserver.com. 271 IN A 76.167.xx.xx

But how are you trying to test that?? You trying to access it from one of the machines on your local network? That is not going to work unless your router supports nat reflection, etc.

As to utorrent not working - you sure its using that 10622 port?? Do you have utorrent set to use UPnP? You have that enabled, but also trying to do manual forwards. I did a scan of that port and show it filtered -- I would check that box is actually listening on that port.

Starting Nmap 6.00 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2013-01-04 15:17 CST

Nmap scan report for cpe-76-167-xx-xx.socal.res.rr.com (76.167.xx.xx)

Host is up (0.091s latency).

PORT STATE SERVICE

10622/udp open|filtered unknown

UDP scans can be misleading for sure.. But I would have to guess that your not forwarding to the right IP, or its not listening on that port if your saying its not working. You sure you don't have a firewall on that host that is blocking your utorrent traffic?

simple netstat -an | findstr portnumber

would tell real quick, so for example I use 42312 as my torrent port.. And you can see from this output

C:\>netstat -an | findstr 42312
  TCP	0.0.0.0:42312		  0.0.0.0:0			  LISTENING
  TCP	192.168.1.8:42312	  xx:1526	   TIME_WAIT
  TCP	192.168.1.8:42312	  xx:13288	 TIME_WAIT
  TCP	192.168.1.8:42312	  xx:57388   TIME_WAIT
  TCP	192.168.1.8:42312	  xx:57759   TIME_WAIT
<snipped out all the other listed time_waits>
  TCP	[::]:42312			 [::]:0				 LISTENING
  UDP	0.0.0.0:42312		  *:*
  UDP	[::]:42312			 *:*

So maybe your utorrent client is not using that 10622 port? Maybe Its no longer on that .20 IP I believe you were forwarding it too? But clearly your forwards are working since I hit your server on port 80 from the outside.

If you change the command to say -ano you will get the PID of the process listening, so you can verify that its utorrent listening on that port

C:\>netstat -ano | findstr 42312

TCP 0.0.0.0:42312 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING 4712

C:\>tasklist | findstr 4712

uTorrent.exe 4712 Console 1 19,344 K

Maybe having the manual forward is messing up the UPnP? If you going to do manual forwards, normally you disable UPnP - I personally not a fan of UPnP and normally do not have it enabled ever!! But when my son got his PS3 it was the easiest way to allow his games to work. But my router firewall allows me to lock down UPnP so only his PS3 IP can request and only to his PS3 IP, etc.

allow 1024-65535 192.168.1.209/32 1024-65535

I would turn of UPnP if your going to use manual port forwarding.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8, Flip 8, Z Fold Wide: Everything you need to know The ONLY thing I need to know is the price, which I know will be way higher than I (and most people) are willing to pay for a phone... so basically nothing here I need to know. PS: Nice job getting that Apple reference to a non-existent and unrevealed product as "competition" in there. Cheque is in the mail.
    • Well I really think the repasting helped if your higher clocks have returned, maybe the next thing to look at is if there is a problem with your case airflow? I guess this because your 3080 has returned to optimal state, but is still staying too warm, which might suggest it was thermal throttling before you repasted, of which the only logical conclusion could be outside factors.
    • Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8, Flip 8, Z Fold Wide: Everything you need to know by Hamid Ganji Galaxy Z Fold 7 - Image via Samsung The next generation of Samsung foldables is set to be unveiled next month at the second Unpacked event of the year. Samsung’s 2026 foldables are not expected to offer significant upgrades over their predecessors, with the Korean firm instead focusing on design refinements and conventional upgrades such as faster processors and better cameras. However, Samsung is reportedly planning to unveil an all-new passport-style foldable this year to rival Apple’s first foldable iPhone, which is expected to debut this September. Here’s a roundup of everything we know about Samsung’s upcoming foldable devices ahead of their official debut. When can we expect Samsung’s new foldables? The Galaxy Z Fold 7 and Z Flip 7 series were unveiled in July, and Samsung is expected to maintain this timeframe in 2026. Based on previous reports from Korean sources, Samsung will hold its Unpacked event on July 22 in London, UK, to pull back the curtain on the Galaxy Z Fold 8 series. The devices are also expected to hit the shelves a few weeks after launch. However, Samsung has yet to announce an official date. A new naming scheme? One of the most interesting changes we might see this year is a new naming scheme for Samsung’s latest foldables. SamMobile reported that since Samsung is expected to unveil three foldables this year, it has adopted a new naming strategy to simplify product identification for customers. Accordingly, the standard Galaxy Z Fold 8 will reportedly be called the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and will serve as the direct successor to last year’s Galaxy Z Fold 7. The “Ultra” suffix suggests the phone could feature higher-end specifications, such as additional rear camera modules. Samsung’s new passport-style foldable is expected to carry the Galaxy Z Fold 8 name without any suffix. This model is reportedly equipped with two rear cameras. No major changes are expected for the Flip model. Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and Z Flip 8 anticipated specs Rumors over the past few months suggest Samsung is preparing several upgrades for its upcoming foldables, although the devices may continue to rely on larger batteries and faster charging speeds rather than dramatic design changes. The primary focus this year is expected to be the Galaxy Z Fold 8 and its wide-screen design. Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra official CAD renders - Image via AndroidHeadlines Here are the anticipated specifications for the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra based on previous leaks: 6.5-inch outer display and 8-inch inner display, 120Hz refresh rate, and 2,600 nits peak brightness Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor, paired with 12GB or 16GB of RAM and 256GB, 512GB, or 1TB of storage 4.1mm thickness when unfolded and a weight of 210g 200MP main camera, 50MP ultrawide camera, 10MP or 12MP telephoto camera, 10MP cover camera, and 10MP selfie camera 5,000mAh battery with 45W wired charging Android 17 and One UI 9 As for the Galaxy Z Flip 8, the device is not expected to be a major departure from its predecessor, although it could become slightly slimmer. Expected specifications include: Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 or Exynos 2600 processor 12GB of RAM with 256GB and 512GB storage options 6.9-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X inner dispaly and 4.1-inch Super AMOLED outer dispaly 50MP main camera, 12MP ultrawide camera, and 10MP selfie camera 4,300mAh battery with 25W wired charging Android 17 and One UI 9 Samsung’s foldables are also expected to launch with Gemini Intelligence, Google’s AI suite for automating tasks in Android ecosystem. Moreover, given current memory and component costs, some Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and Z Flip 8 variants could see a price hike. Galaxy Z Fold 8 adopts a wide-screen design The centerpiece of the upcoming Unpacked event could be the Galaxy Z Fold 8, previously rumored as the Galaxy Z Fold Wide. This model adopts a passport-style form factor and is expected to compete directly with Apple’s iPhone Fold. Galaxy Z Fold 8 official CAD renders - Image via AndroidHeadlines Here’s what to expect: 7.6-inch primary OLED display and 5.4-inch cover display, 120Hz refresh rate, 2,600 nits peak brightness, and 4:3 aspect ratio Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor, 12GB or 16GB of RAM, and 256GB, 512GB, or 1TB storage options 4,800mAh battery with 45W wired charging 50MP main camera, 50MP ultrawide camera, and 10MP selfie camera Android 17 and One UI 9 The three new foldable phones are unlikely to be the only devices unveiled at Samsung’s Unpacked event. The company is also expected to introduce the Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 and the Galaxy Watch 9 series.
    • Thanks
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      505
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      141
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      89
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!