Recommended Posts

Hey guys im having a difficult time setting up our new router, we replaced a dead dlink with this and im trying to figure out why port forwarding isnt working. we have time warner cable, i setup the ports via the guide found on portforward.com. I save the settings and test them and they wont work, this is namely utorrent and my domain from my homeserver; both which worked on my previous router. utorrent states no incoming connections and a red circle on utorrrent for mac, my vm also shows this on windows 8 when i use their test it states it isnt forwarded properly; this also happens when i try to access my homeserver from remote or via the domain https://myhomeserver....

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1129064-port-forward-ebr-2310/
Share on other sites

What is the device in front of your new router? You sure its not doing NAT?

I would say like 95 times out of a hundred when people can not get port forwarding to work, is because they are behind a double NAT!

Might of worked before because the IP address of the other routers wan was placed into the dmz? Maybe it was setup static - and this new one you just plugged it in, etc.

As to other reasons port forwarding doesn't work - wrong private IP, IP they are forwarding to is not really listening on that port (wrong port), ISP blocking the port inbound that they are trying to forward. Software firewall on the IP they are wanting to forward too. They setup the forward wrong, ie trigger vs actual forward. They used the wrong protocol, tcp vs udp or vise versa. They setup the forward wrong source port vs dest port.

They are trying to test via loopback which router does not support or behind a double nat that doesn't support it, and forward actually works fine but their test method is flawed, etc. etc.

Verify that your new router actually has a PUBLIC IP on its wan (internet) interface -- something other than 10.x.x.x, 192.168.x.x, 172.16-31.x.x and then give the details of what your doing with screen shots and your host listing on the port.. You being able to connect to said port from other local devices, no firewall setup on the device your trying to forward too, etc.

And we can work out your issue - for now we are working with NOTHING to go on other than you can not setup a port forward ;)

We got your previous one works -- great do into the mech when your car does not work and say. No idea what is wrong, it doesn't work. My last car worked just fine. Got this one and it doesn't work ;)

What is the device in front of your new router? You sure its not doing NAT?

Sorry if i dont understand but out setup is modem->ebr-2310->dell gigabit switch. I have setup the uplink from router to switch but all computers are plugged into the gigabitswitch

Might of worked before because the IP address of the other routers wan was placed into the dmz? Maybe it was setup static - and this new one you just plugged it in, etc. I dont understand the first part about being placed into the dmz? Before it was not setup static as sometimes i would need to relogin to the router and change the ip of the computer that the ports were forwarded for, i think thats what you were asking.

Verify that your new router actually has a PUBLIC IP on its wan (internet) interface -- something other than 10.x.x.x, 192.168.x.x, 172.16-31.x.x and then give the details of what your doing with screen shots and your host listing on the port.. You being able to connect to said port from other local devices, no firewall setup on the device your trying to forward too, etc. Forgive my ignorance how would i go about checking this?

I have attached screenshots of the router pages, hopefully that will help.

https://www.dropbox.....33.13%20AM.png

https://www.dropbox.....36.02%20AM.png

https://www.dropbox.....35.31%20AM.png

https://www.dropbox.....35.11%20AM.png

https://www.dropbox.....34.38%20AM.png

https://www.dropbox.....34.25%20AM.png

OFF TOPIC: budman how did you become so knowledgeable in networking, is it first hand experiences? schooling? books and materials?

I have been playing/working with computers and networking since late 70's -- so yeah lots of first hand. Its what I do for a living the last 20+ years. But yeah I read a LOT!!! I research a LOT, I play a LOT!! Yes I have had some classes over the years, advanced routing, checkpoint firewalls, I remember a IRIX class way back in the day when company I worked for at the time got some SGI boxes in.. etc.. etc.. Would be impossible for me to remember all the classes and certs I have gotten over the last 20+ years ;) I recall a class with management of SSL certs back when PKI was new and fresh ;) Got some kind of cert from verisign, etc.

Its great when what you do is also your hobby ;) I enjoy tech and keeping up with all things computer related be it hardware, OS or networking.. Current position is more networking based so I have lost some of my AD and Server Skills.

the forward is clearly working for the first one - since you post your actual IP, I connected to you on 80 and got this

budman@ubuntu:~$ wget --save-headers 76.167.xx.xx

--2013-01-04 14:18:14-- http://76.167.xx.xx/

Connecting to 76.167.xx.xx:80... connected.

HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK

Length: 602 [text/html]

Saving to: `index.html.5'

100%[======================================>] 602 --.-K/s in 0s

2013-01-04 14:18:14 (65.4 MB/s) - `index.html.5' saved [602/602]

ubuntu:~$ cat index.html.5

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Length: 602
Content-Type: text/html
Content-Location: http://76.167.xx.xx/Default.htm
Last-Modified: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 20:45:28 GMT
Accept-Ranges: bytes
ETag: "0648c3760e4c81:1389"
Server: Microsoft-IIS/6.0
X-Powered-By: ASP.NET
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 20:17:02 GMT

<html>

<head>
<meta HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" Content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<script language="javascript">
		document.location = 'home/default.aspx?gotodefault=true';
</script>

<title ID="titletext">Navigate to public landing page...</title>
</head>

<body>
<noscript>
   <p id="JSWarningTitle"><b>JavaScript is Required.</b><br/></p>
   <p id="JSWarningText">
	   JavaScript is required to use the Windows Home Server Remote Access Web site.<br />
	   Please enable JavaScript in your Web browser and refresh this page to proceed.
   </p>
</noscript>
</body>
</html>

Again how are you testing that it was not working?

Also not a good idea to forward to IP that fall inside your dhcp scope - do you have a reservation set for the .11 box?? If not if you turn him off he might be .12 next time.

Also normally if your going to setup manual port forwards you don't leave UPnP enable.

quick scan shows

Starting Nmap 6.01 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2013-01-04 14:07 Central Standard Time

Nmap scan report for cpe-76-167-xx-xx.socal.res.rr.com (76.167.xx.xx)

Host is up (0.090s latency).

Not shown: 98 filtered ports

PORT STATE SERVICE

80/tcp open http

443/tcp open https

Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 3.23 seconds

I can verify those other ports for you if you want.. But sure looks like your forwards are working to me, which is a close 2nd to users just think their forwards are not working because they try testing it via loopback forwarding, nat reflection when their router does not support it. Many routers do not allow you to hit your public IP from an inside IP just to get forwarded back in. You would have to RTFM on your router to see if they do - maybe changing your nat restrictions might allow it, maybe endpoint independent

Also I highly doubt you need UDP 80 and 443 forwarded. As to 4125, not sure what your wanting to do with that so not sure if that is tcp or udp, I would guess from what I got back from port 80 your using it for RWW, I would have to lookup the details but some sort of proxy port used for remote desktop use. But that is the older version I do believe - thought the newer versions of SBS used 443 for this?

Not sure that has to be open on your router or not - since not clear on what your trying to get working? But its rare that a port is both, off the top of my head dns needs to be because it will switch from udp to tcp depending.. But mostly its udp. torrents might use both tcp/udp depending on what your doing.

I snipped out your public IP from what I posted - you might want to remove screen shots showing your public IP.

"Again how are you testing that it was not working?"

For utorrent I go into preferences and it says no incoming connections on the port i set it to, giving me a red light. This does the same when I test on my win 8 VM it just gives me an x stating its not forwarded.

For my home server I have it setup on the custom domain https://kevinbostwick.homeserver.com and its no longer opening.

"Also not a good idea to forward to IP that fall inside your dhcp scope - do you have a reservation set for the .11 box?? If not if you turn him off he might be .12 next time."

I dont have a reservation setup, i will look into doing that

"Also normally if your going to setup manual port forwards you don't leave UPnP enable."

in case others on the network have devices that use upnp, i dont want them to have problems, so i just assumed id leave it on.

"Also I highly doubt you need UDP 80 and 443 forwarded. As to 4125, not sure what your wanting to do with that so not sure if that is tcp or udp, I would guess from what I got back from port 80 your using it for RWW, I would have to lookup the details but some sort of proxy port used for remote desktop use. Not sure that has to be open on your router or not? But its rare that a port is both, off the top of my head dns needs to be because it will switch from udp to tcp depending.. But mostly its udp. torrents might use both tcp/udp depending on what your doing."

I followed the portforward.com guide for my router and setting up windows home server for outside access via a windowslive custom domain.

Well that resolves to the IP you posted in your screenshots - I would remove anything that resolves or gives you public IP out on a public forum.

;; QUESTION SECTION:

;snipped.homeserver.com. IN A

;; ANSWER SECTION:

snipped.homeserver.com. 271 IN A 76.167.xx.xx

But how are you trying to test that?? You trying to access it from one of the machines on your local network? That is not going to work unless your router supports nat reflection, etc.

As to utorrent not working - you sure its using that 10622 port?? Do you have utorrent set to use UPnP? You have that enabled, but also trying to do manual forwards. I did a scan of that port and show it filtered -- I would check that box is actually listening on that port.

Starting Nmap 6.00 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2013-01-04 15:17 CST

Nmap scan report for cpe-76-167-xx-xx.socal.res.rr.com (76.167.xx.xx)

Host is up (0.091s latency).

PORT STATE SERVICE

10622/udp open|filtered unknown

UDP scans can be misleading for sure.. But I would have to guess that your not forwarding to the right IP, or its not listening on that port if your saying its not working. You sure you don't have a firewall on that host that is blocking your utorrent traffic?

simple netstat -an | findstr portnumber

would tell real quick, so for example I use 42312 as my torrent port.. And you can see from this output

C:\>netstat -an | findstr 42312
  TCP	0.0.0.0:42312		  0.0.0.0:0			  LISTENING
  TCP	192.168.1.8:42312	  xx:1526	   TIME_WAIT
  TCP	192.168.1.8:42312	  xx:13288	 TIME_WAIT
  TCP	192.168.1.8:42312	  xx:57388   TIME_WAIT
  TCP	192.168.1.8:42312	  xx:57759   TIME_WAIT
<snipped out all the other listed time_waits>
  TCP	[::]:42312			 [::]:0				 LISTENING
  UDP	0.0.0.0:42312		  *:*
  UDP	[::]:42312			 *:*

So maybe your utorrent client is not using that 10622 port? Maybe Its no longer on that .20 IP I believe you were forwarding it too? But clearly your forwards are working since I hit your server on port 80 from the outside.

If you change the command to say -ano you will get the PID of the process listening, so you can verify that its utorrent listening on that port

C:\>netstat -ano | findstr 42312

TCP 0.0.0.0:42312 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING 4712

C:\>tasklist | findstr 4712

uTorrent.exe 4712 Console 1 19,344 K

Maybe having the manual forward is messing up the UPnP? If you going to do manual forwards, normally you disable UPnP - I personally not a fan of UPnP and normally do not have it enabled ever!! But when my son got his PS3 it was the easiest way to allow his games to work. But my router firewall allows me to lock down UPnP so only his PS3 IP can request and only to his PS3 IP, etc.

allow 1024-65535 192.168.1.209/32 1024-65535

I would turn of UPnP if your going to use manual port forwarding.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Everyone else has said it. I'm gonna say it - you don't know what you're talking about. I do. I have two laptops. One work, one personal. I have access to two more laptops - both personal. At home I manually update my personal laptop when I see on Neowin that there is an update - I carry on and only apply the updates when I am ready. My work one only updates when my workplace decides to send it - I carry on and only apply the updates (when they actually arrive, which is usually days after the release) when I switch off the laptop at the end of the day as usual. The two other personal laptops only get updated when I get to it which is rarely - the people who own them carry on using them until I get to it and update them. All of the browsers on all laptops are configured to restore the tabs when launched. Google and Microsoft have changed from 6 weeks to 4, and it looks like it's going to move to 2. None of these changes affect how any of these browsers on the laptops are used. Not one jot. My advice to you is stop panicking whenever you see an update. Just carry on with what you're doing. This even benefits you in a way - from your comment you sound like you don't like the changes or the frivolous new features - great - then carry on as before!
    • AMAZON needs to take total accountability for this.
    • Server Summit had a heap of announcements, ADCS changes are baller.
    • Nice, hope they *finally* fixed the issue with the NTFS driver where the system would completely brick during large file copies using the built in driver. It's been broken for years requiring me to use the older, slower, NTFS-3G FUSE driver.
    • Windows 11 KB5094126 BSODing, freezing, forcing BitLocker lockout, breaks OneDrive, and more by Sayan Sen Microsoft released Windows 11 KB5094126 and KB5093998 last week as the latest Patch Tuesday updates. Following that the company also published the accompanying dynamic updates under KB5094149, KB5095971, and KB5094156. While Microsoft has so far not acknowledged any major problems with the release, some users online are running into problems. These range from OneDrive and Dropbox access issues, BitLocker recovery lockouts, to blue screens and BSODs. The most common one seems to be happening with HP systems wherein affected users say they hit 0xc0430001 BSOD (blue screen of death) error code after the KB5094126 update. We wonder if this could be related to the recent bug we covered on HP devices wherein the ongoing Secure Boot certificate updates are leading to similar issues. While we are not certain, users affected by this issue likely need to ensure that the boot.stl file is included on the installation media (such as a USB installer or ISO), if the above-mentioned dynamic updates are deployed. If this file is missing, computers may fail to boot from the installation media and could display the error 0xc0430001. This STL file is used by Secure Boot to verify that the boot files are trusted, so it must match the same Windows version and system architecture. To ensure the file is included, Microsoft recommends using the Update WinPE script, which automatically updates the image and handles the required files. Alternatively, you can manually copy the boot.stl file from the Windows\Boot\EFI folder on a Windows device and place it in the matching folder on your installation media before deploying the updated image. Aside from blue screening some users also note their systems have been freezing following the update. This could be happening to Lenovo PCs specifically. In the case of the OneDrive and Dropbox access issues, a user figured out that there could be a conflict with UAC. He explained: "Okay, so I did some digging, and in our environment KB5094126 breaks OneDrive and Dropbox in Explorer. I went through all our GPOs and found out that the combination of disabling UAC and having my user being a local admin breaks OneDrive in Explorer. ... If I enable UAC again, then it works, even with KB5094126 still installed." Hopefully, Microsoft will look into these issues. Source: Microsoft forum (link1, link2, link3, link4), Reddit (link1, link2, link3, link4)
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jeroen Wilms earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      197
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      138
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      90
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      80
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!