Restore Start menu but limit it to Pro edition


Recommended Posts

Actually seeing how the "New" Modern UI in Windows 8 is hiding everything from you throwing you into a full screen app without any indication about what to do next. I would personally call that an overly complex UI, at least on the desktop.

For example

Control Panel

Windows 7 : Start / Control panel

Windows 8: Put your mouse in the bottom left to make a hidden square appear, right click it and choose control panel

Windows 8: Put your mouse in the bottom / top right to bring up a hidden charms bar / click select settings / click control panel.

Windows 8: Take your hand off the mouse and put it on the keyboard / press Windows key + C/ put your hand back on the mouse and click settings / then click control panel.

Windows 8: Press the windows key on the keyboard. Take your hand off the mouse and type control panel, then put your hand back on the mouse and click control panel.

Actually:

Windows 7: Put your mouse over the "Orb" and click to make the start menu appear, click control panel

Windows 8: Put your mouse in the bottom left to make menu appear, right click it and click control panel

...

Windows 7 & Windows 8: Press the windows key on the keyboard. Take your hand off the mouse and type control panel, then put your hand back on the mouse and click control panel.

It's not easier to do that in Windows 7 other than there not being an "Orb", the number of steps and clicks are equal. And it only takes you a few minutes to know where the menu is in the lower left hand corner. So there's a slight "learning curve".

Other than that, it sounds about the same to me.

No surprise there, kids aren't smart, have little organizational skill, and their hand-eye coordination hasn't been developed yet (just like a certain poster here). When they grow up and have to do stuff, that story will change. The problem isn't touch as Morgan notes, but its implementation. They aren't replacements. That isn't an opinion, its fact.

If you don't see how it is more complex (and requires more mental effort) for average users to juggle two different and competing UIs (since you guys keep saying you agree that Metro is a competitor with the Desktop and does introduce a radical new UI) then you will never get it since you aren't bound by reality. Which is fine as long as you don't end up in any IT position of merit, or worse, become another brain dead Mac/Google loving developer.

So a child that isn't smart; can understand and use the start menu but an adult with far more inteligence has trouble "juggling two different and competing UIs"? Is that about right?

And that last line you quoted was meant as a joke, we all know 4 year olds can't navigate the start menu; it's too complex for them!

And sorry to burst your bubble; but I am in an IT position of merit. But that doesn't mean that I'm going to force our users to us Windows 8; not yet anyways. I'm waiting for SP1.

  • Like 2

Actually seeing how the "New" Modern UI in Windows 8 is hiding everything from you throwing you into a full screen app without any indication about what to do next. I would personally call that an overly complex UI, at least on the desktop.

For example

Accessing the Control Panel

Windows 7 : Start / Control panel

Windows 8: Put your mouse in the bottom left to make a hidden square appear, right click it and choose control panel

Windows 8: Put your mouse in the bottom / top right to bring up a hidden charms bar / click select settings / click control panel.

Windows 8: On they keyboard with the left hand press press Windows key + C/ then with the mouse click settings on the charms bar / then click control panel.

Windows 8: Press the windows key on the keyboard. Take your hand off the mouse and type control panel, then put your hand back on the mouse and click control panel.

If someone who is looking for it can't find it, then it's a problem. However, your example here really doesn't clarify if that's an issue or not. What you fail to mention is that Windows also feeds people into the control panel menus if they need to get to them without ever "opening" the control panel (see, Windows update / security for an example).

Actually seeing how the "New" Modern UI in Windows 8 is hiding everything from you throwing you into a full screen app without any indication about what to do next. I would personally call that an overly complex UI, at least on the desktop.

For example

Accessing the Control Panel

Windows 7 : Start / Control panel

Windows 8: Put your mouse in the bottom left to make a hidden square appear, right click it and choose control panel

Windows 8: Put your mouse in the bottom / top right to bring up a hidden charms bar / click select settings / click control panel.

Windows 8: On they keyboard with the left hand press press Windows key + C/ then with the mouse click settings on the charms bar / then click control panel.

Windows 8: Press the windows key on the keyboard. Take your hand off the mouse and type control panel, then put your hand back on the mouse and click control panel.

Those are okay but you are slow... but my way is better than that since I am a system admin. I have the quick way to access to it.

Actually seeing how the "New" Modern UI in Windows 8 is hiding everything from you throwing you into a full screen app without any indication about what to do next. I would personally call that an overly complex UI, at least on the desktop.

For example

Accessing the Control Panel

Windows 7 : Start / Control panel

Windows 8: Put your mouse in the bottom left to make a hidden square appear, right click it and choose control panel

Windows 8: Put your mouse in the bottom / top right to bring up a hidden charms bar / click select settings / click control panel.

Windows 8: On they keyboard with the left hand press press Windows key + C/ then with the mouse click settings on the charms bar / then click control panel.

Windows 8: Press the windows key on the keyboard. Take your hand off the mouse and type control panel, then put your hand back on the mouse and click control panel.

This:

Actually:

Windows 7: Put your mouse over the "Orb" and click to make the start menu appear, click control panel

Windows 8: Put your mouse in the bottom left to make menu appear, right click it and click control panel

...

Windows 7 & Windows 8: Press the windows key on the keyboard. Take your hand off the mouse and type control panel, then put your hand back on the mouse and click control panel.

While I believe it is a step backwards to require keyboard shortcuts to obtain efficiencies lost when moving from Win 7 to Win 8, anyone spending much time in control panel should be able, almost as a reflex, to Win+R and type control. That's actually faster than clicking your way to it in Win 8 or Win 7. Though for a click solution I'd have to say right click lower left corner of Win 8 and select control panel is faster and requires less precision.

Slam it in the lower left corner and right click.

If someone who is looking for it can't find it, then it's a problem. However, your example here really doesn't clarify if that's an issue or not. What you fail to mention is that Windows also feeds people into the control panel menus if they need to get to them without ever "opening" the control panel (see, Windows update / security for an example).

I actually get to Update through properties on Computer icon on desktop or Computer on Start Menu (Start8 now) and Security through Action Center. Of course those are all a part of the flexibility and accessibility afforded through the desktop environment.

Slam it in the lower left corner and right click.

Of course you can't hold down the mouse button and then release it on the target element as you were able to do with the Start menu. And this is actually something that Start8 fails at, too.

It's a super-fast way to select elements, especially when the motion is already in muscle memory.

The shut down function isn't hidden away on Windows 7, you can just click it. That's one huge plus for me (I'm aware it can be done with keyboard shortcuts but for the average idiot the Windows 7 system is far more simple).

I actually get to Update through properties on Computer icon on desktop or Computer on Start Menu (Start8 now) and Security through Action Center. Of course those are all a part of the flexibility and accessibility afforded through the desktop environment.

The point is all of the important functions of the control panel can be accessed without ever opening the control panel. This is also true if you're only on the W8 / Metro / whatever side of things, add / remove and update are all quite simple.

The shut down function isn't hidden away on Windows 7, you can just click it. That's one huge plus for me (I'm aware it can be done with keyboard shortcuts but for the average idiot the Windows 7 system is far more simple).

It can also be done by the much more accessible button on your computer.

W8 / Metro / whatever side of things, add / remove and update are all quite simple.

W8 Desktop, yes. W8 Metro, not so much. Easy enough, but clumsy and more work. Anything requiring Modern UI search is to be avoided IMO. The epitome of clumsiness, inefficiency, bad design, wasted time, go on, and on.

I'm satisfied with W8. The Desktop Environment is a significant improvement/optimization over Win7 and I've just learned to avoid Modern UI. I don't use it much, there's not really much to use it for. I mostly avoid it though there are some useful apps. Start8 boots me to the desktop and returns an effective, usable search through the Start Menu.

I actually did a refresh when I got a new SSD to activate properly, and had to reinstall programs. Man, it's incredibly shocking to boot to the Start Page after using Win8 booting to the desktop. I was like, wtf, what a waste of time. You can't do anything with this except go to the Desktop. First thing I did was reinstall Start8 and boot to desktop. The Start Page isn't that bad for what it is, but it really was just a nuisance, a huge obstacle to getting work done.

I think it will always be something we just put up with or accept on the Desktop. At least until some major changes and major apps arrive.

So a child that isn't smart; can understand and use the start menu but an adult with far more inteligence has trouble "juggling two different and competing UIs"? Is that about right?

And that last line you quoted was meant as a joke, we all know 4 year olds can't navigate the start menu; it's too complex for them!

And sorry to burst your bubble; but I am in an IT position of merit. But that doesn't mean that I'm going to force our users to us Windows 8; not yet anyways. I'm waiting for SP1.

Don't be obtuse by equating their use. I don't follow your second line though. Per the last, is there some show stopping bug that is preventing your adoption? Why are you waiting for SP1? Why not force them and then report on your top help desk items?

You, as an IT Pro, are going to say in all honesty that there is zero user weight to adding a completely new UI on top of the familiar that is more than just the Start Menu, both in scope and integration? Now we can quibble over how heavy you think it is, but to say its weightless?

W8 Desktop, yes. W8 Metro, not so much. Easy enough, but clumsy and more work. Anything requiring Modern UI search is to be avoided IMO. The epitome of clumsiness, inefficiency, bad design, wasted time, go on, and on.

I'm satisfied with W8. The Desktop Environment is a significant improvement/optimization over Win7 and I've just learned to avoid Modern UI. I don't use it much, there's not really much to use it for. I mostly avoid it though there are some useful apps. Start8 boots me to the desktop and returns an effective, usable search through the Start Menu.

I actually did a refresh when I got a new SSD to activate properly, and had to reinstall programs. Man, it's incredibly shocking to boot to the Start Page after using Win8 booting to the desktop. I was like, wtf, what a waste of time. You can't do anything with this except go to the Desktop. First thing I did was reinstall Start8 and boot to desktop. The Start Page isn't that bad for what it is, but it really was just a nuisance, a huge obstacle to getting work done.

I think it will always be something we just put up with or accept on the Desktop. At least until some major changes and major apps arrive.

It's only an "obstacle" if you make it out to be one. It's no more of an "obstacle" than the Start Menu was. Give it a few years, and it will transform the way we work.

Start is the new desktop. ;)

that is the most idiotic thing you ever said

It's certainly not as streamlined as it can/should be.

haha!!! your complaining about something not being streamlined and then you praised windows 8 and metro?

are you for real! or are you trying out for comedian of decade.

that is the most idiotic thing you ever said

Denying reality. Nice. Doesn't change the fact that what I said is the truth. The changes coming in "Blue" only solidify that statement.

It's only an "obstacle" if you make it out to be one. It's no more of an "obstacle" than the Start Menu was. Give it a few years, and it will transform the way we work.

It is an obstacle if you have work to do and you have to stop there first, for not good reason and you can't do much there. The Start Menu was a part of an environment, the Explorer UI environment from which you could do much tasks efficiently.

It will itself, transform. Hopefully it won't transform the way I work, it will augment it. Based on the Modern UI's limitations, if it transforms the way I work, I will have to seek alternative platforms. I doubt the desktop environment goes away ever. Meaning the Modern UI will become more Explorer UI-like, because it must for desktop computing, or the DE must remain as it is today.

It can also be done by the much more accessible button on your computer.

sometimes yes

not if

1) PC is under a desk

2) PC is mounted on back of monitor

3) PC is hidden in cabinet (like my HTPC

and before you say, duh, you will have same trouble turning it on

perhaps, but when I pull into garage I press a button on my phone and it wakes the pc on lan, so I don't have to reach and get to a button.

start - shutdown, was much simpler.

It will itself, transform. Hopefully it won't transform the way I work, it will augment it. Based on the Modern UI's limitations, if it transforms the way I work, I will have to seek alternative platforms. I doubt the desktop environment goes away ever. Meaning the Modern UI will become more Explorer UI-like, because it must for desktop computing, or the DE must remain as it is today.

Not sure what you mean by this. The way we work is always constantly changing, no matter what OS we use. It changed from 95 to XP, and it's changed since XP.

Windows 8 Metro will transform the way we work, make no mistake, it just needs time. Slowly users will work their way into using Metro, as common desktop tasks make the transition.

companies don't want to adapt windows 8

average consumer tries to avoid windows 8

companies will stick with 7 like they did with xp (and keep using xp as well), until (if) MS releases more viable option

if in few years down the road companies install windows 8, I guarantee metro interface/store will be blocked as companies will not want their employees installing bunch of stupid useless apps and waste time

all metro apps lack function compared to desktop apps

full screen metro apps are idiotic, stardock to rescue again with their new program

windows 8 (especially metro) is full of blunders.

companies don't want to adapt windows 8 - not true. the only proven reason most companies aren't gonna upgrade to 8 is because most companies have just recently upgraded to 7

average consumer tries to avoid windows 8 - i don't see this. if they already have a good computer the average user doesn't see a reason to upgrade. but those that have bought new computers with windows 8 on it have either liked it or they are indifferent.

companies will stick with 7 like they did with xp (and keep using xp as well), until (if) MS releases more viable option - once again, not the reason companies are staying with 7. no company upgrades that frequently

if in few years down the road companies install windows 8, I guarantee metro interface/store will be blocked as companies will not want their employees installing bunch of stupid useless apps and waste time - of course they'd block the normal store, but they'd probably have a section of the store with only approved apps or company specific apps

all metro apps lack function compared to desktop apps - so? it's still a new and evolving system. nothing is amazing right off the bat. give it time

full screen metro apps are idiotic, stardock to rescue again with their new program - opinion and nothing more

windows 8 (especially metro) is full of blunders. - still opinion

  • Like 2

companies don't want to adapt windows 8

average consumer tries to avoid windows 8

companies will stick with 7 like they did with xp (and keep using xp as well), until (if) MS releases more viable option

if in few years down the road companies install windows 8, I guarantee metro interface/store will be blocked as companies will not want their employees installing bunch of stupid useless apps and waste time

all metro apps lack function compared to desktop apps

full screen metro apps are idiotic, stardock to rescue again with their new program

windows 8 (especially metro) is full of blunders.

What a completely ignorant statement to make. There is nothing in the rulebooks stating businesses can't adapt to "Smart", dynamic UIs in the workplace, and must remain with "dumb", static UIs for productivity. Not to mention, the Store is available for internal use for companies to launch and deploy vertical apps.

Also, NO one should still be using XP for front end operations. Only idiots would use an unsupported OS.

Not sure what you mean by this. The way we work is always constantly changing, no matter what OS we use. It changed from 95 to XP, and it's changed since XP.

Not really. Applications have changed the way we work. The Explorer UI, whole more efficient and optimized performance, hasn't really changed much. Not the basic functionality, though I can't remember when copy/paste entered the file system which was critical.

Windows 8 Metro will transform the way we work, make no mistake, it just needs time. Slowly users will work their way into using Metro, as common desktop tasks make the transition.

If Metro is all we're left with it will change the way we work, and not for the better. It has it's niche. Modern UI will have to change or the applications that change the way we work will never become full Modern UI apps. It will be the home of "elements." Meaning, no Photoshop, but a crippled Photoshop "elements" i.e. Fresh Paint.

Some things like drag and drop, MDI, and copy/paste file system cannot currently be duplicated in the Modern UI. The Modern UI will change dramatically if it hopes to do what you suggest.

Windows Server 2012 will change the way we work, along with the Enterprise Applications. Server 2012 will also change how we architect solutions and save TONS of money. Unfortunately the best Windows Server ever is flying under the hype radar of Windows 8.

Also, NO one should still be using XP for front end operations. Only idiots would use an unsupported OS.

XP is unsupported? That's strange, I thought it was supported til April 18th 2014.

sometimes yes

not if

1) PC is under a desk

2) PC is mounted on back of monitor

3) PC is hidden in cabinet (like my HTPC

and before you say, duh, you will have same trouble turning it on

perhaps, but when I pull into garage I press a button on my phone and it wakes the pc on lan, so I don't have to reach and get to a button.

start - shutdown, was much simpler.

I have to agree, using the Power Button is no longer a common practice for all the reasons you mentioned and because it's just not done much anymore, which is a good thing. At least not in the Windows 7+ age.

The Start Screen can do everything the old Start menu could, and then some. I still fail to see the problem why some people don't like it. I use a desktop PC and am using Desktop mode 99% of the time, and the Start Screen works perfectly fine. ^_^

Oh, I don't know, you could go set your file association preferences like we've always done and save yourself the gnashing of teeth. You seriously think I used the built-in Metro app for my music? Heck no; I installed Foobar and told it to take over every format it supports...just like I've always done. The only real change is the default Windows programs changed (and I think that should have been an option to have during install, but I digress), but it takes all of a minute to get working the way you want it to. I don't flip between Metro and the Desktop unless I *want* to.

Its like people have forgotten about customizing their install to fit their preferences... This all happened when XP and Vista came out too; people complained before taking the time to see its not really all that different from before, and often is actually better.

Wait a minute. When I install a fresh Windows 7, I do not get thrown into a full screen application. Again, all of this is FORCED on us. We have to perform A LOT of stuff to make it work JUST LIKE Windows 7. It is not as easy as you guys make it out to be.

So yes, this new interface is forced on us. There is no denying that. We cannot just click Desktop and forget about it as you guys suggest. Because, on a stock install, clicking an image will open up a full screen image viewer.

To get it to work as Windows 7 you need to do more than just click desktop. As you said, you also need to change all of these file associations. Which we never had to do in Windows 7 since nothing was using crappy full screen only mode. I mean really, full screen to see ANY size image? Click an image that is 50x50 and it brings this full screen app.

But that still does not help 100%. What about when you see available network connections? Modern UI like display that fills the entire height. So there is really no way to avoid the Metro/Modern UI like you guys say.

  • Like 2
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Exactly, this is just the beginning. I hope that by that time, our inept politicians devise something like a Universal Basic Income, because unemployment and poverty rates will skyrocket otherwise. And believe me, robots that perform physical work aren't a matter of IF, but WHEN. No career is truly safe from AI/robots, it's just a matter of time.
    • Subtitle Edit 5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Subtitle Edit is a powerful, free, and user-friendly subtitle editing tool designed for creating, editing, and converting subtitles for videos. It supports a wide range of subtitle formats, including SRT, ****, and SUB, allowing users to easily modify and adjust subtitles for accurate timing and formatting. With its intuitive interface, Subtitle Edit provides a variety of features such as waveform audio display, spell-check, subtitle synchronization, and real-time video preview, making it an ideal choice for both beginners and professionals. The software also includes powerful tools for batch processing, translating subtitles, and converting between different subtitle formats. Subtitle Edit features: Create/adjust/sync/translate subtitle lines Convert between SubRib, MicroDVD, Advanced Sub Station Alpha, Sub Station Alpha, D-Cinema, SAMI, youtube sbv, and many more (300+ different formats!) Cool audio visualizer control - can display wave form and/or spectrogram Video player uses mpv, DirectShow, or VLC media player Visually sync/adjust a subtitle (start/end position and speed) Audio to text (speech recognition) via Whisper or Vosk/Kaldi Auto Translation via Google translate Rip subtitles from a (decrypted) dvd Import and OCR VobSub sub/idx binary subtitles Import and OCR Blu-ray .sup files - bd sup reading is based on Java code from BDSup2Sub Can open subtitles embedded inside Matroska files Can open subtitles (text, closed captions, VobSub) embedded inside mp4/mv4 files Can open/OCR XSub subtitles embedded inside divx/avi files Can open/OCR DVB and teletext subtitles embedded inside .ts/.m2ts (Transport Stream) files Can open/OCR Blu-ray subtitles embedded inside .m2ts (Transport Stream) files Merge/split subtitles Adjust display time Fix common errors wizard....and more. Subtitle Edit 5.0.0 changelog: Subtitle Edit 5 is a major new release and a big step for the project. For the first time, Subtitle Edit runs natively on Windows, macOS, and Linux from a single, modern, cross-platform codebase. The builds are self-contained, so no separate .NET installation is required, and on macOS and Linux the needed media components (mpv/ffmpeg) are bundled in. Please read before upgrading: Subtitle Edit 5 is a new application, not just an update of Subtitle Edit 4. It has been rebuilt from the ground up to be cross-platform, so: It is not 100% the same app. The look, layout, and some workflows have changed. Some things are in different places, and a few behave differently than in SE4. Not every SE4 feature exists in SE5 yet. SE5 covers all the core editing, conversion, sync, video playback, OCR, and online services, but some of the more specialized SE4 tools are not available yet. Features will continue to be added. If you rely on a specific SE4 feature that is missing, please keep SE4 installed alongside SE5. The easiest way to run both side by side is to use the Portable versions of SE4 and SE5, which keep their settings separate and do not interfere with each other. Which version should I use? Subtitle Edit 5: recommended for most users on Windows 10 (22H2) or newer, macOS 12+, and Linux. Subtitle Edit 4: please continue to use SE4 if you are on an older Windows version (Windows 7/8), or on older / slower computers where SE5 may not run well. SE4 remains available and is the right choice in those cases. To run SE4 and SE5 at the same time, use the Portable versions - you can try SE5 while keeping SE4 as a fallback. Download: Subtitle Edit 5.0.0 | ARM64 | ~60.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Subtitle Edit Portable | 103.0 MB View: Subtitle Edit Homepage | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Google Pixel 11 series: Here's what to expect by Hamid Ganji Google Pixel 10 series In recent years, Google has successfully turned its Pixel devices into worthy contenders in the smartphone market. The search giant is now preparing to launch the Pixel 11 series in just a few months, and many Pixel fans are likely wondering what Google has in store for them this year. The next lineup of Google smartphones includes four devices: the Pixel 11, Pixel 11 Pro, Pixel 11 Pro XL, and Pixel 11 Pro Fold. This year, we don’t expect Google to bring revolutionary upgrades to its handsets, and the Pixel 11 series is likely to receive modest hardware improvements alongside a slew of AI-powered features. Here are the rumored specifications of the Google Pixel 11 series ahead of its official debut: When will the new Pixel phones be unveiled? The last two generations of Google Pixel phones (Pixel 9 series and Pixel 10 series) were launched in August, unlike the previous three generations that debuted in October. With that in mind, we expect Google to unveil the Pixel 11 series sometime in August 2026. The exact launch date has yet to be confirmed. Google Pixel 11 CAD renders - Image via AndroidHeadlines How much will the Pixel 11 series cost? Predicting the final price of upcoming smartphones has become increasingly difficult. As you may know, RAM and memory prices are rising sharply, leading to significant increases in the cost of consumer electronics. Recently, Apple CEO Tim Cook said that price increases for some future Apple products are unavoidable, suggesting that the iPhone 18 series could become more expensive. Google has remained tight-lipped about any potential price increases for the Pixel 11 series. If the company manages to maintain last year’s pricing structure, here’s what the lineup could cost: Pixel 11: $799 Pixel 11 Pro: $999 Pixel 11 Pro XL: $1,199 Pixel 11 Pro Fold: $1,799 Given current market conditions, it may be difficult for Google to avoid raising prices unless it adopts cost-saving measures, such as equipping the base model with 8GB of RAM. Google Pixel 11 series anticipated specs: We expect the Google Pixel 11 series to debut with a new Tensor G6 processor as well as an upgraded camera system. The overall design, however, is expected to remain largely unchanged across the lineup. Specifications Pixel 11 Pixel 11 Pro Pixel 11 Pro XL Pixel 11 Pro Fold Display 6.3-inch LTPO AMOLED / 120Hz refresh rate / up to 3100 nits of brightness 6.3-inch Super Actua LTPO OLED, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness 6.8-inch Super Actua LTPO OLED, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness 8-inch inner screen and 6.4-inch outer display, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness RAM & Processor Tensor G6 / 8-12GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 12-16GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 12-16GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 16GB of RAM Storage options 128GB or 256GB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB Camera 50MP main sensor, 13MP ultra-wide, 10.8MP 5x telephoto, 10.5MP front camera 50MP main camera, 48MP ultra-wide, 48MP telephoto with 5x optical zoom, 42MP selfie camera 50MP main camera, 48MP ultra-wide, 48MP telephoto with 5x optical zoom, 42MP selfie camera 50MP main camera, 10.5MP ultra-wide camera, 10.8MP telephoto camera, 10MP front camera, 10MP inner camera Battery 4,840 mAh 4,707 mAh 5,000 mAh 4,658 mAh Software Android 17 Android 17 Android 17 Android 17 The Pixel 11 series won’t be a major departure from its predecessor, with Google instead focusing on subtle improvements and AI additions such as Gemini Intelligence. However, a patent filed by Google suggests the company is working on a removable battery for its smartphones, and we could see this feature make its way to the Pixel 11 Pro Fold. Given that nearly all smartphones today lack removable batteries, such a feature would be a welcome addition to future Pixel devices. That said, it may not arrive with this year’s lineup after all, and the final decision is yet to be made by Google. The Pixel 11 series could also face an uphill battle in the market. In the Android segment, Samsung is performing well with the Galaxy S26 series, while the Galaxy Z Fold 8 lineup is also expected to launch next month. On the other hand, Apple is preparing to unveil the iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max in September alongside its first foldable iPhone.
    • At least AMD is still taking Windows 10 seriously (after the oops) before it consumer extended support ends. @WaltC - Memories, 2x Voodoo in SLI with a Riva TNT with an Aureal A3D soundcard.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      475
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      105
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      88
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!