Restore Start menu but limit it to Pro edition

By Yuhong Bao
in Microsoft (Windows)

 Share

Recommended Posts

Mentor

c.grz

Posted
Posted

So that is the attitude now? Again, why do people protest? Should you go tell those people to just "accept" that they get 50% less money (or whatever they are protesting) and more work? Why do we have product reviews?

We have our right to be annoyed with MS and we can fight the decision if we want to. If enough people feel this way, MS better put things back.

Protesting that you're not getting paid what you're worth and protesting that a company has removed a function in one of their products is not the same thing.

We understand that you're annoyed with MS and that you want to fight the decision; but why? Because your workflow has changed? Instead of saying; give me back my start menu why not say; "here are the changes I would like to see in the start screen."

I'm honestly baffled by this constant need to cling to the start menu. But if you want to continue to protest the change and ask that Microsoft bring back the start menu; go ahead.

For the record; I'm not "for" or "against" the start screen in Windows 8. I'm the kind of person that uses what's given to them and makes due. My wife on the other hand would be here fighting the same fight you are. She likes the way things are and she doesn't like to change.

Grand Master

bandit_liberty_rumble

Posted
Posted

In the end, (I can't believe I'm saying this) Dot Matrix and PGHammer are right. if you like Metro and ever intend to use the apps and Start screen environment, then you'll have to use 8 or one of its successors, but if you don't, then Windows 7 is a perfectly fine enough OS for running Win32 "legacy" apps. And since nothing much seems to be changing anymore on that front, you could probably use it for another decade, unless you ever have a need for Metro apps. Obviously Windows 8 can be made to work for Win32 apps, but even if that wasn't the case, it wouldn't really be an issue.

Veteran

xWhiplash

Posted
Posted

Protesting that you're not getting paid what you're worth and protesting that a company has removed a function in one of their products is not the same thing.

We understand that you're annoyed with MS and that you want to fight the decision; but why? Because your workflow has changed? Instead of saying; give me back my start menu why not say; "here are the changes I would like to see in the start screen."

I'm honestly baffled by this constant need to cling to the start menu. But if you want to continue to protest the change and ask that Microsoft bring back the start menu; go ahead.

For the record; I'm not "for" or "against" the start screen in Windows 8. I'm the kind of person that uses what's given to them and makes due. My wife on the other hand would be here fighting the same fight you are. She likes the way things are and she doesn't like to change.

I feel the same way you do about the start screen. What I want to happen is a built in option to boot directly to the desktop and avoid the hot corners. I do not care about the start screen / start menu. But a lot of people do. That affects articles and word of mouth which is what Vista's main problem was.

Grand Master

Stoffel

Posted
Posted

Haven't they? They have seen what happened to Vista: bad press / word of mouth. I got Vista when it was released and did not have an issue, even on 3 going on 4 year old hardware. When I ask people why they hate Vista, they say they heard it sucks, The same thing is happening here. They ignored the risks so they could force their new interface on us. Now it seems the Windows community is a mess with these two sides.

Windows 8 should have been an OS between Windows 7 and what we have now. They need to at least provide options for those strictly on the desktop.

I do agree with your first point. Win 8 just as Vista has bad press, because a few people didn't like it/ have issues with drivers. And now we get people again saying Win8 sucks without trying it, just because they heard from somebody who knows somebody who said.....

Second point just shows that people can't handle change very well.

Grand Master

MorganX

Posted
Posted

No, they modified UAC. Same thing they'll do with the Start Screen.

You guys are both saying essentially the same thing. I agree with you both.

Grand Master

MorganX

Posted
Posted

I do agree with your first point. Win 8 just as Vista has bad press, because a few people didn't like it/ have issues with drivers. And now we get people again saying Win8 sucks without trying it, just because they heard from somebody who knows somebody who said.....

Second point just shows that people can't handle change very well.

I think it's more than a few, and I don't think there are that many driver issues. I think WOM is only spreading on the desktop. With regards to Surface RT, it just can't beat or outperform the competition in any area meaningful to that demographic at the moment. Pro is doing well in its segment.

The problem isn't that people don't like change or don't try it on the desktop. Unlike 7, when people who don't like it try it, that doesn't seem to change very often. Not that they don't like change, per se. They don't like what has changed and have no option to change it back, or change it for the better as determined by them. In that case, they don't have to buy it. If enough don't buy it, Microsoft will address their issues. That is the gamble.

Grand Master

Noir Angel

Posted
Posted

I do agree with your first point. Win 8 just as Vista has bad press, because a few people didn't like it/ have issues with drivers. And now we get people again saying Win8 sucks without trying it, just because they heard from somebody who knows somebody who said.....

Second point just shows that people can't handle change very well.

I've used it, and using it just reinforced my opinion that it sucks. The hybrid boot feature is very nice but the fact that my devices didn't work correctly (even though I had the correct drivers) coupled with the start screen and the fugly theme has just turned me back to Windows 7. The performance enhancements are pretty nice, it's just a shame the UI is so horrible.

Grand Master

MorganX

Posted
Posted

I've used it, and using it just reinforced my opinion that it sucks. The hybrid boot feature is very nice but the fact that my devices didn't work correctly (even though I had the correct drivers) coupled with the start screen and the fugly theme has just turned me back to Windows 7. The performance enhancements are pretty nice, it's just a shame the UI is so horrible.

I liked your comment, not because I fully agree with it. But I agree with your experience and right to express yourself. The notion that people are out to get Windows 8 by bad mouthing it without trying it, or just in general being resistant to change is zealotry at best. Everyone including those who like it know that a lot of it is Kludgy and inefficient on a desktop. To the degree it affects you depends on how you work and what you work on, and how often you do a thing.

I like Windows 8 a lot more than you but find Modern UI Search juvenile, amateurish, and imbecilic. So much so I paid $5 for a third party app to return the efficient search present in Windows 7. There are many other issues with the Modern UI UX as well as bugginess with legacy apps (which are the only real apps available) and within the Modern UI itself. The Store is dog slow, updating is buggy and unreliable (and multiply this on Surface RT). The Core apps are crap and the updates just make them bearable.

I don't think it is productive to be in denial of these things and to say "It doesn't affect me, therefore it doesn't exist." Anyone wrestling with Windows 8 obviously supports the Windows platform. Constructive criticism will only make it better. Does anyone actually believe that the complaints and lackluster sales didn't help drive the Core App updates? Seriously now ...

There's a whole lot to like in Windows 8, and a whole lot not to like taken on an individual basis, per user. The Modern UI isn't the problem, forcing it on the desktop is. And I understand why they did it. Doing it in such a hurry is inexcusable, as is the shoddiness of the apps and some of the usability. Microsoft got itself in the Tablet/Phone hole and users shouldn't pay the price to dig them out.

/rant

Grand Master

Noir Angel

Posted
Posted

I can respect that. As I have said all along, I'm in no way advocating the removal of the new bits, just the option to be able to use Windows the way I am used to. I adapt to change when it fits my needs and provides an improvement. Like the superbar in Windows 7, which was a great new feature. I have no issue at all with those that like it, I just wish they would stop trashing those of us that do not. I applaud your fairness, it's a rarity here.

Unfortunately, however it looks like the opinions of folks like us (On the "Modern" UI) will fall on deaf ears. Microsoft's new policy seems to be "We are doing this and if you don't like it you can f*** off".

Grand Master

MorganX

Posted
Posted

Well the most recent Ad I saw for a Windows 8 tablet had MS pointing out "here's" the desktop you know and love and then went on to show Snap to Desktop and Modern UI. So, the message is getting home people liked what worked and Modern UI can compliment that.

Of course I think that's OK for straight tablet PCs. For Surface RT I think that dual identity hurts it. They should have dropped Desktop Environment, sped it up quite a bit, and gone straight consumer tablet running applets from the Windows Store. They might be able to significantly speed it up but I doubt it will ever perform like iOS and Android on Tegra 3.

I can respect that. As I have said all along, I'm in no way advocating the removal of the new bits, just the option to be able to use Windows the way I am used to. I adapt to change when it fits my needs and provides an improvement. Like the superbar in Windows 7, which was a great new feature. I have no issue at all with those that like it, I just wish they would stop trashing those of us that do not. I applaud your fairness, it's a rarity here.

Unfortunately, however it looks like the opinions of folks like us (On the "Modern" UI) will fall on deaf ears. Microsoft's new policy seems to be "We are doing this and if you don't like it you can f*** off".

Grand Master

PGHammer

Posted
Posted

Change is a great thing, but trying to force everyone to buy a touch screen monitor is a money racket.

The real issue is that there has been virtually NO advertising showing how keyboard and mouse users can (and have continued to) use Windows 8 (wilt little to no differences compared to 7) - again, that is because Windows 8 ads are geared towards those buying new hardware - NOT upgrading existing hardware. Therefore, the only way word on THAT gets out is via word-of-mouth (folks like myself, that upgraded). We have to get past the wall of FUD from the pro-Start-menu crowd AND face off against Microsoft's own ads to get our opinions in; it's like paddling or swimming against the tide (a lot like pro-Vista opinions were, actually). Throw in that it's far easier during a poor economy to justify NOT spending, and it has only gotten worse.

The OEMs are driving Microsoft's Windows 8 ad campaign (as per what is USUALLY the case for new versions of Windows); however, for economic reasons, there may need to be a wave of ads targeting those looking to upgrade the OS they already have (a pro-8 case for upgraders, as opposed to those buying new hardware) - when was the last time that Microsoft did anything like that?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • AI is indeed eliminating jobs, and Oracle just proved it

      By leonsk29 · Posted

      Exactly, this is just the beginning. I hope that by that time, our inept politicians devise something like a Universal Basic Income, because unemployment and poverty rates will skyrocket otherwise. And believe me, robots that perform physical work aren't a matter of IF, but WHEN. No career is truly safe from AI/androids, it's just a matter of time.
    • Politically funny images of the World

      By +primortal · Posted

    • Subtitle Edit 5.0.0

      By Copernic · Posted

      Subtitle Edit 5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Subtitle Edit is a powerful, free, and user-friendly subtitle editing tool designed for creating, editing, and converting subtitles for videos. It supports a wide range of subtitle formats, including SRT, ****, and SUB, allowing users to easily modify and adjust subtitles for accurate timing and formatting. With its intuitive interface, Subtitle Edit provides a variety of features such as waveform audio display, spell-check, subtitle synchronization, and real-time video preview, making it an ideal choice for both beginners and professionals. The software also includes powerful tools for batch processing, translating subtitles, and converting between different subtitle formats. Subtitle Edit features: Create/adjust/sync/translate subtitle lines Convert between SubRib, MicroDVD, Advanced Sub Station Alpha, Sub Station Alpha, D-Cinema, SAMI, youtube sbv, and many more (300+ different formats!) Cool audio visualizer control - can display wave form and/or spectrogram Video player uses mpv, DirectShow, or VLC media player Visually sync/adjust a subtitle (start/end position and speed) Audio to text (speech recognition) via Whisper or Vosk/Kaldi Auto Translation via Google translate Rip subtitles from a (decrypted) dvd Import and OCR VobSub sub/idx binary subtitles Import and OCR Blu-ray .sup files - bd sup reading is based on Java code from BDSup2Sub Can open subtitles embedded inside Matroska files Can open subtitles (text, closed captions, VobSub) embedded inside mp4/mv4 files Can open/OCR XSub subtitles embedded inside divx/avi files Can open/OCR DVB and teletext subtitles embedded inside .ts/.m2ts (Transport Stream) files Can open/OCR Blu-ray subtitles embedded inside .m2ts (Transport Stream) files Merge/split subtitles Adjust display time Fix common errors wizard....and more. Subtitle Edit 5.0.0 changelog: Subtitle Edit 5 is a major new release and a big step for the project. For the first time, Subtitle Edit runs natively on Windows, macOS, and Linux from a single, modern, cross-platform codebase. The builds are self-contained, so no separate .NET installation is required, and on macOS and Linux the needed media components (mpv/ffmpeg) are bundled in. Please read before upgrading: Subtitle Edit 5 is a new application, not just an update of Subtitle Edit 4. It has been rebuilt from the ground up to be cross-platform, so: It is not 100% the same app. The look, layout, and some workflows have changed. Some things are in different places, and a few behave differently than in SE4. Not every SE4 feature exists in SE5 yet. SE5 covers all the core editing, conversion, sync, video playback, OCR, and online services, but some of the more specialized SE4 tools are not available yet. Features will continue to be added. If you rely on a specific SE4 feature that is missing, please keep SE4 installed alongside SE5. The easiest way to run both side by side is to use the Portable versions of SE4 and SE5, which keep their settings separate and do not interfere with each other. Which version should I use? Subtitle Edit 5: recommended for most users on Windows 10 (22H2) or newer, macOS 12+, and Linux. Subtitle Edit 4: please continue to use SE4 if you are on an older Windows version (Windows 7/8), or on older / slower computers where SE5 may not run well. SE4 remains available and is the right choice in those cases. To run SE4 and SE5 at the same time, use the Portable versions - you can try SE5 while keeping SE4 as a fallback. Download: Subtitle Edit 5.0.0 | ARM64 | ~60.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Subtitle Edit Portable | 103.0 MB View: Subtitle Edit Homepage | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Google Pixel 11 series: Here's what to expect

      By Hamid Ganji · Posted

      Google Pixel 11 series: Here's what to expect by Hamid Ganji Google Pixel 10 series In recent years, Google has successfully turned its Pixel devices into worthy contenders in the smartphone market. The search giant is now preparing to launch the Pixel 11 series in just a few months, and many Pixel fans are likely wondering what Google has in store for them this year. The next lineup of Google smartphones includes four devices: the Pixel 11, Pixel 11 Pro, Pixel 11 Pro XL, and Pixel 11 Pro Fold. This year, we don’t expect Google to bring revolutionary upgrades to its handsets, and the Pixel 11 series is likely to receive modest hardware improvements alongside a slew of AI-powered features. Here are the rumored specifications of the Google Pixel 11 series ahead of its official debut: When will the new Pixel phones be unveiled? The last two generations of Google Pixel phones (Pixel 9 series and Pixel 10 series) were launched in August, unlike the previous three generations that debuted in October. With that in mind, we expect Google to unveil the Pixel 11 series sometime in August 2026. The exact launch date has yet to be confirmed. Google Pixel 11 CAD renders - Image via AndroidHeadlines How much will the Pixel 11 series cost? Predicting the final price of upcoming smartphones has become increasingly difficult. As you may know, RAM and memory prices are rising sharply, leading to significant increases in the cost of consumer electronics. Recently, Apple CEO Tim Cook said that price increases for some future Apple products are unavoidable, suggesting that the iPhone 18 series could become more expensive. Google has remained tight-lipped about any potential price increases for the Pixel 11 series. If the company manages to maintain last year’s pricing structure, here’s what the lineup could cost: Pixel 11: $799 Pixel 11 Pro: $999 Pixel 11 Pro XL: $1,199 Pixel 11 Pro Fold: $1,799 Given current market conditions, it may be difficult for Google to avoid raising prices unless it adopts cost-saving measures, such as equipping the base model with 8GB of RAM. Google Pixel 11 series anticipated specs: We expect the Google Pixel 11 series to debut with a new Tensor G6 processor as well as an upgraded camera system. The overall design, however, is expected to remain largely unchanged across the lineup. Specifications Pixel 11 Pixel 11 Pro Pixel 11 Pro XL Pixel 11 Pro Fold Display 6.3-inch LTPO AMOLED / 120Hz refresh rate / up to 3100 nits of brightness 6.3-inch Super Actua LTPO OLED, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness 6.8-inch Super Actua LTPO OLED, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness 8-inch inner screen and 6.4-inch outer display, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness RAM & Processor Tensor G6 / 8-12GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 12-16GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 12-16GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 16GB of RAM Storage options 128GB or 256GB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB Camera 50MP main sensor, 13MP ultra-wide, 10.8MP 5x telephoto, 10.5MP front camera 50MP main camera, 48MP ultra-wide, 48MP telephoto with 5x optical zoom, 42MP selfie camera 50MP main camera, 48MP ultra-wide, 48MP telephoto with 5x optical zoom, 42MP selfie camera 50MP main camera, 10.5MP ultra-wide camera, 10.8MP telephoto camera, 10MP front camera, 10MP inner camera Battery 4,840 mAh 4,707 mAh 5,000 mAh 4,658 mAh Software Android 17 Android 17 Android 17 Android 17 The Pixel 11 series won’t be a major departure from its predecessor, with Google instead focusing on subtle improvements and AI additions such as Gemini Intelligence. However, a patent filed by Google suggests the company is working on a removable battery for its smartphones, and we could see this feature make its way to the Pixel 11 Pro Fold. Given that nearly all smartphones today lack removable batteries, such a feature would be a welcome addition to future Pixel devices. That said, it may not arrive with this year’s lineup after all, and the final decision is yet to be made by Google. The Pixel 11 series could also face an uphill battle in the market. In the Android segment, Samsung is performing well with the Galaxy S26 series, while the Galaxy Z Fold 8 lineup is also expected to launch next month. On the other hand, Apple is preparing to unveil the iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max in September alongside its first foldable iPhone.
    • AMD confirms 26.6.2 FSR driver breaks on many Windows PCs

      By +Eternal Tempest · Posted

      At least AMD is still taking Windows 10 seriously (after the oops) before it consumer extended support ends. @WaltC - Memories, 2x Voodoo in SLI with a Riva TNT with an Aureal A3D soundcard.

  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      475
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      105
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      88
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!