EA's response to being named the Worst Company in America


Recommended Posts

EA are by no means a great company but this wins a bit of my respect

  • In the past year, we have received thousands of emails and postcards protesting against EA for allowing players to create LGBT characters in our games. This week, we?re seeing posts on conservative web sites urging people to protest our LGBT policy by voting EA the Worst Company in America

That last one is particularly telling. If that?s what makes us the worst company, bring it on. Because we're not caving on that.

  • Like 1

Granted, I'll gladly give them kudos for that. They still treat their staff like crap though.

They have taken some flak for it in the past but I have no reason to believe they're currently any worse than any other gaming company. (I'm not even sure they were any worse than most others before, though it wasn't a good deal either way.)

Its simple, nerds end up as your boss. Don't mess with them. They messed with the nerds, again, and the nerds bite them back where it hurts. Consumer Preception.

Onto the letters content, yes there are worse companies than EA, those events of the other companies are singularly terrible events vs EA's overall disregard for the consumer. But hey, the sheep will continue on, both companies that make huge oil spills and terrible games will still be around. They know just as everyone else does, everyone won't stop buying their games. Becuase there are far more people that Don't Know, than those that Do.

Look at BP, its like nothing ever happened, to the avg person these days.

I think the first handful of replies on their real response summed it up pretty well. From monopolizing on sports game franchises (which is as much the league's faults as theirs), using those monopolies to make half assed games, to finding ways to nickel and dime people with crap like online passes, and all their ridiculous DRM gaffes, it's not a one year thing, EA has been an awful company for a long time. Of course people still buy their products, that's why they call it a monopoly. Some of us sports game fans want to play our favorite sport's game every year and have it up to date. Even if we hate EA, no one else can make something worth playing because EA owns licenses to everything. And we can't stop buying their games each year, because they stop updating rosters and such as soon as a new version is released, then completely shut down the servers shortly after.

They have set it up quite well to be able to deny any wrong doing, but overall their company's tactics are crap. The only reason they have customers is because we don't have a choice.

My take on their real response: "We can do better... but we won't because you will still give us money."

Entirely depends on their new CEO.

Seems like all they need to do to make people less incensed is put stuff back on Steam (properly, not like before where some games didn't get keys or work with DLC or whatnot.) I'm not impressed with Valve in general for the last several years and would rather avoid them, but they do have the better client.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • The Trump administration doesn't want you to use OpenAI's GPT-5.6 without its approval by David Uzondu Image via @realDonalTrump (X) As OpenAI prepares the release of its next model, GPT 5.6, the White House has instructed the company to limit the distribution of the software to a small group of government-approved partners instead of the general public, as it has done with previous releases. According to The Information, OpenAI Chief Executive Officer Sam Altman sent an internal memo to staff on Thursday explaining that the federal government will approve access "customer by customer" during an initial preview phase. Altman noted in the communication that this restrictive rollout is "not [their] long-term model" for software deployment, and the company plans to work toward a "more sustainable" distribution method later. CNN said that both OpenAI and the Trump administration view the capabilities of GPT 5.6 on the same level as Anthropic's Mythos and that government officials intend to "collaborate with frontier AI labs to develop shared approaches for addressing the challenges of scaling this technology." The latest restriction comes just weeks after the US Commerce Department decided to restrict Fable, a version of Mythos with extra safety "guardrails" to prevent users from exploiting software vulnerabilities. Not long after the release, though, researchers at Amazon found a way to bypass these restrictions, prompting an aggressive response from federal authorities. The government ordered Anthropic to cut off access for non-US citizens located outside the US, non-US citizens living inside the US, and incredibly, even Anthropic's own foreign-born employees. Anthropic now appears to be building a workaround to resolve this compliance block with an update to its Privacy Policy that introduces a category called "Verification Data" to handle KYC and Digital IDs. This setup could mandate digital identity checks to filter users by nationality, requiring a government-issued ID and facial biometric data. Who knows? Maybe in the future, you would have to scan your US Passport or State ID to prove your citizenship before you are allowed to chat with Fable 5 (or any other model).
    • When Windows 7 was released I created an AutoHotkey script that uses Alt+` as a keyboard shortcut to move a window across monitors. I have been using that script for over 15 years and this is the first time I have come across another app that uses the same shortcut!
    • I called it last year that they wouldn't end support when they said there would. There are too many people still on Windows 10 waiting for something better to upgrade to and 11 ain't it! The recent promises of fixing Windows 11's many problems is nice, but unless they deliver on those promises in a big way then I expect customers will still want to stick with 10.
    • Full ACK. I went too far adressing your post specifically. And as you said, it up to us customers as participant of the market dynamic as it happens to decide whether we spend our money on a product or not. The responsibility is to the company. In case of this price hike one could assume that MS is expecting or even starting to see a new interest in XBox hardware so they want to avoid losses per unit sold. I find it fair enough that they granted a period in which everyone interested could grab a unit for the current price (Amazon.de has a reliable stock of XBox Series X digital, which I bought last December after having sold my day one Series X a year ago). It is not that they cash up their customers starting on Monday. Cheers and let's cling to our perfectly fine hardware as long as we deem it worthy in relation to purchasing something new!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      xvvxcvv earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      xvvxcvv earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Enthusiast
      Xonos went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      414
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      129
    4. 4
      neufuse
      69
    5. 5
      Xenon
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!