Recommended Posts

How would I get a Windows 8 license for a virtual machine? Do I really need to spend $300 - $500 to get it (Windows 7 THEN Windows 8 Pro)?

NOTE: I do not want to do any hacks, tweaks, or anything like that. What is the appropriate way to get a brand new Windows 8 license? I have to buy Windows 7 first?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1146908-windows-8-for-a-virtual-machine/
Share on other sites

You can't do it legally anymore..

I'd just suggest you have a license for the install and install it..

Here is a pretty good overview of the new licensing.

http://www.picacommu...hanges1208.html

**** me Microsoft are becoming evil..

EDIT::

After further thought I'd interpret this as meaning you cannot move the VM. You can install it onto a machine in a VM, but not move it to another device :\

Either way, epicly scumbaggy..

use an OEM disk, the licensing has been changed with windows 8 so this works similarly to the way the old Retail version worked

http://www.amazon.com/Windows-System-Builder-OEM-64-Bit/dp/B0094NY3R0/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1365865834&sr=8-1&keywords=windows+8

Buy it online (http://windows.micro...ShopHP_FPP_Null) or buy it at retail. The same way you would buy a Windows 7 license.

I thought those were only upgrades? I did buy it online for my main OS. It needed Windows 7 or something else installed or it would not work.

So the only way to get a fresh copy for a virtual machine is to buy an OEM license? What happens if I need to reinstall the Virtual Machine or use a different VM software? How does that work with the Windows Activation with OEM licensing (since it is no transferrable)?

I thought those were only upgrades? I did buy it online for my main OS. It needed Windows 7 or something else installed or it would not work.

So the only way to get a fresh copy for a virtual machine is to buy an OEM license? I thought OEM licenses were ONLY for system builders?

that's how they were in the past, but with 8 the license for them has changed to basically take the place of the normal retail copy

System builder as defined by Microsoft is literally anyone who uses a machine.

You take on all requirements for support of the operating system in using it (no ringing MS for help).

You need an existing NTFS partition on the drive to install it. After that you can.

System builder as defined by Microsoft is literally anyone who uses a machine.

You take on all requirements for support of the operating system in using it (no ringing MS for help).

You need an existing NTFS partition on the drive to install it. After that you can.

How would it work with a virtual machine if I need to reinstall it, or change the VM software to something else? Since OEM licenses are non-transferrable, how would that work during windows activation?

How would it work with a virtual machine if I need to reinstall it, or change the VM software to something else? Since OEM licenses are non-transferrable, how would that work during windows activation?

that's the main thing that changed in the license for 8, the OEM system builder license actually is transferable now

Legally it doesn't..

All you can do is try your best to keep to the spirit of the terms of use. Just install to a VM. When you need to reinstall, just reinstall into the VM. It should work?

I know a couple of people have been using 8 in a VM. I suspect they are just ignoring the legality of it all (which I think you should do also >.<)

Well, if you consider you can't move the VM, I don't think you breach the license..

All I can suggest is ringing Microsoft on that note.

OEM 8 copy is still the best answer if 7 isn't a good answer >.<

I do not know much about VMs. I need to use it for testing purposes. What if (just for example) I use VMWare and decide to switch to Parallels or something? Will it consider that a different hardware setup with the way they operate?

Or if I want to move it to my mac laptop vs my windows desktop. How will that work?

I'd just do it. Microsoft won't give a damn whatsoever.

The internal policy (when I worked for them) was that so long as you bought a license, we don't care. That having been said, I can't speak for Microsoft even if they still employed me.

Just do it >.< (Sorry for bringing up the licensing (feeling like a dick for making this overly complex))

You're allowed to transfer the System Builder software if you buy it with the "Personal Use License". I'm not sure if you'd have to contact Microsoft to explain what you're doing, but the right is granted just as with a full Windows 7 license.

http://www.microsoft.com/OEM/en/licensing/sblicensing/Pages/personal-use-license.aspx#fbid=FawIJ6YfbQM

http://personaluselicense.windows.com/en-US/default.aspx

If you're purpose in installing Windows 8 is to test it, you might want to use the free 90-day evaluation copy.

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/evalcenter/hh699156.aspx

You can't do it legally anymore..

I'd just suggest you have a license for the install and install it..

Here is a pretty good overview of the new licensing.

http://www.picacommu...hanges1208.html

**** me Microsoft are becoming evil..

EDIT::

After further thought I'd interpret this as meaning you cannot move the VM. You can install it onto a machine in a VM, but not move it to another device :\

Either way, epicly scumbaggy..

Actually, once you license a VM, you can move it; however, you cannot have two copies of the same VM running at once. In that sense, it is no different from a license for a physical PC.

You have two choices - you can start with a legally-licensed Windows 7 VM and upgrade it (same process as upgrading a physical PC) or buy Windows 8 OEM and license the VM that way.

This is, in fact, per the most recent Microsoft post on the Unified Licensing Schema.

Actually, once you license a VM, you can move it; however, you cannot have two copies of the same VM running at once. In that sense, it is no different from a license for a physical PC.

You have two choices - you can start with a legally-licensed Windows 7 VM and upgrade it (same process as upgrading a physical PC) or buy Windows 8 OEM and license the VM that way.

This is, in fact, per the most recent Microsoft post on the Unified Licensing Schema.

And the same goes for when I get my Macbook pro? I can use the OEM version and it will be legal?

  • 4 weeks later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Google is opening the world's first AI museum in Los Angeles by Ivan Jenic Image via: Google Ever since AI image generators went mainstream, the debate over whether AI-generated art is real art hasn't let up. Those who don’t consider AI to be art say that if a machine does the creating and anyone can prompt it, there’s no skill involved, and therefore no art is produced. The counter-argument is equally persistent, as defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool, and that every major technological breakthrough, like the camera or the computer, was met with the same skepticism before eventually being accepted as a legitimate creative medium. Google’s position in this debate is clear. Which is no surprise, as the company is investing billions in AI infrastructure. And now, in efforts to encourage people to use its AI even more, Google is opening Dataland on June 20, which it's calling the world's first AI arts museum. Located inside The Grand LA, a Frank Gehry-designed building in Los Angeles, the museum spans 25,000 square feet. The museum is built around a collaboration with media artist Refik Anadol, who has worked with Google since 2016. The inaugural exhibition is called Machine Dreams: Rainforest, and is powered by an AI model trained on “an extensive dataset of the natural world.” It generates 1.2 billion pixels of visuals in real time and reacts to visitors dynamically. The space also generates soundscapes, real-time emotion sensing, and algorithmically produced scents. Image via: Refik Anadol Studio / Google Google says that the museum is powered by its Gemini models, which run on Google Cloud. So, everything is generated inside one of Google’s AI data centers and is streamed to the museum. Alongside the museum opening, Google Arts & Culture is funding an AI Artist Residency, giving four artists $25,000 grants each, along with mentorship from Refik Anadol Studio and access to Google's machine learning tools. Their work will be shown at Dataland and on the Google Arts & Culture website later this year. Google’s AI museum will undoubtedly initiate a fired-up debate on social media, and we can’t wait to see the first reactions. Via: Smithsonian Magazine
    • Calling GTA 6 overhyped crap doesn’t make you edgy, it just makes you sound like someone who hasn’t enjoyed anything since the PS2 era.
    • I’m not arguing whether Rockstar likes money. Obviously, they do, they’re a business. I’m saying this isn’t new. They’ve always launched console first. This is just how Rockstar operates.
    • I'm not sure how old the school is, but they've been doing this since GTA 3. Back in those days we'd be lucky for game companies to release on the PC at all. And with the current state of Sony (or Microsoft) their gaming wing won't be getting a penny from me.
    • We now know when and how the Universe may truly end by Sayan Sen Image by Marek Pavlík via Pexels| Not representative A study by physicist Henry Tye of Cornell University suggests that the universe may not expand forever. Instead, it could eventually stop expanding, begin contracting and end in a "Big Crunch" roughly 20 billion years from now. The research, published in the Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, was conducted by Tye, Horace White Professor of Physics Emeritus at Cornell University. Using recent observations from major dark-energy surveys, Tye and his collaborators developed a cosmological model that predicts the universe could have a total lifespan of about 33 billion years. Since the universe is currently estimated to be 13.8 billion years old, the model places it near the midpoint of its existence. According to Cornell University's summary of the research, the study centers on the cosmological constant, a term introduced by Albert Einstein in his theory of general relativity. In modern cosmology, the cosmological constant is commonly used to describe the simplest form of dark energy, the unknown phenomenon believed to be driving the accelerating expansion of the universe. "For the last 20 years, people believed that the cosmological constant is positive, and the universe will expand forever," Tye said in a Cornell University news release. "The new data seem to indicate that the cosmological constant is negative, and that the universe will end in a big crunch." The study draws on data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), two major projects designed to investigate the nature of dark energy. According to Tye, recent observations suggest that dark energy may not behave exactly like a simple cosmological constant. To account for those observations, Tye and his collaborators proposed a model involving an extremely light hypothetical particle that evolves over time. In their calculations, this produces a negative cosmological constant and leads to a future collapse of the universe. The model predicts that cosmic expansion would continue for approximately another 11 billion years before reaching a maximum size, after which the universe would begin contracting and eventually collapse. Scientists have long debated how the universe might end. As explained in an article published in The Conversation by Stephen DiKerby of Michigan State University, several possibilities have been proposed. If dark energy remains constant and positive, the universe could continue expanding indefinitely, gradually becoming colder, darker and more diffuse in a scenario often called the "heat death" of the universe. Other theoretical possibilities include a Big Rip, in which cosmic expansion accelerates so dramatically that galaxies, stars and even atoms are torn apart, or a Big Crunch, in which expansion reverses and the universe collapses back into an extremely dense state. DiKerby notes that the Big Crunch idea itself is not new. What distinguishes Tye's work is that it attempts to use current observational data to estimate when such a collapse might occur and how it could unfold. Much of the universe's long-term evolution remains uncertain. According to current astrophysical understanding, stars will continue to form and die for billions of years. The Sun, for example, is about halfway through its expected lifespan. Galaxies are also expected to continue merging; the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies are projected to collide several billion years from now. At the same time, the nature of dark energy remains one of the biggest unanswered questions in cosmology. While observations indicate that the universe's expansion is accelerating, scientists still do not know what is causing that acceleration. Future observations may therefore alter current predictions about the cosmos's ultimate fate. Tye emphasized that additional evidence will be needed before firm conclusions can be drawn. DESI continues to collect data, while upcoming observations from missions and observatories including Euclid, SPHEREx and the Vera C. Rubin Observatory are expected to provide more precise measurements of dark energy. "People have said before that if the cosmological constant is negative, then the universe will collapse eventually. That's not new," Tye said. "However, here the model tells you when the universe collapses and how it collapses." For now, the study presents one possible future for the cosmos rather than a settled prediction. Whether the universe ultimately ends in a Big Crunch, expands forever, or follows another path entirely remains an open question that future observations will help answer. Source: Cornell University, The Conversation This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      570
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      175
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      73
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!