Xbox One 500GB hard drives can't be replaced


Recommended Posts

So, they haven't sold any official HDD kits. and that proves what. these technologically inept people don't update their HDD officially or unofficially most of them aren't even aware they can. they start up their PS3, and play games or watch BD's that's it.

You're seriously out of touch with the average consumer.

If that is the case what is your point? That select audience wouldn't replace on the 360 either. If someone doesn't need to update then they don't do it. Being able to user replace the drive is pro-consumer, easy for those that find out how, and in absolutely no way an unachievable task.

How a drive can be replaced is only ever going to be appliable to a consumer that needs to do it. If your mother doesn't need to/care for/or can't replace a 360 hard drive she wasn't replacing a PS3 one no matter how the process is carried out.

My point in regards to Sony not selling official hard drives is that those people that need to or want more space have clearly not had a "99.9%" percentile issue with the PS3 as it's now sold what, nearly 80 million units and Sony have not needed to release any official hard drive addons. That speaks volumes.

So, they haven't sold any official HDD kits. and that proves what. these technologically inept people don't update their HDD officially or unofficially most of them aren't even aware they can. they start up their PS3, and play games or watch BD's that's it.

You're seriously out of touch with the average consumer.

and when the warranty runs out they either send them in or hand them in to be fixed by people who know what they do, and you know what, they PAY for this service. I should know, I'm one of the people who gets paid.

and yes, let's ignore the fact it was SPECIFICALLY STATED on the presentation you can plug in any USB3 HDD and use it for downloads, installs and storage.

Or they just unscrew the one screw holding the HDD tray in instead of spending silly money getting it "repaired".

They said in the presentation you could use USB3 HDDs but not what size. Current Xbox is limited to 32GB for NO reason whatsoever.

Or they just unscrew the one screw holding the HDD tray in instead of spending silly money getting it "repaired".

They said in the presentation you could use USB3 HDDs but not what size. Current Xbox is limited to 32GB for NO reason whatsoever.

I think it's mostly limited by the file system used by the Xbox but I might be wrong.

Or they just unscrew the one screw holding the HDD tray in instead of spending silly money getting it "repaired".

They said in the presentation you could use USB3 HDDs but not what size. Current Xbox is limited to 32GB for NO reason whatsoever.

It's a bit naive to think NO reason, it's simply to encourage you to buy the official hard drive addons. If you could plug in any external drive and use all the space word of mouth would spread and MS profits would dip.

Kind of like why a mobile hardware maker will offer an 8GB and a 16GB option, the 8GB phone very cheap, the 16GB unrealistically more expensive, and guess what, neither have an sd cart slot (yes looking at you Google). Why? An SD cart slot would make most people buy the cheap 8GB phone and add their own space MUCH MUCH more cheaper than the charge in difference between the 8GB and 16GB phone.

If that is the case what is your point? That select audience wouldn't replace on the 360 either. If someone doesn't need to update then they don't do it. Being able to user replace the drive is pro-consumer, easy for those that find out how, and in absolutely no way an unachievable task.

How a drive can be replaced is only ever going to be appliable to a consumer that needs to do it. If your mother doesn't need to/care for/or can't replace a 360 hard drive she wasn't replacing a PS3 one no matter how the process is carried out.

My point in regards to Sony not selling official hard drives is that those people that need to or want more space have clearly not had a "99.9%" percentile issue with the PS3 as it's now sold what, nearly 80 million units and Sony have not needed to release any official hard drive addons. That speaks volumes.

Your original point was that a built in non replaceable HDD was a terrible sin to humanity, but now it was suddenly something else.

If HDD crash, people turn it in for service inside or outside warranty, and hardly anyone, at leas with a 500GB drive won't replace the drive. So this affects less than a fraction of a percentile of the users. Ad due to the external HDD support, they're not effected either.

Or they just unscrew the one screw holding the HDD tray in instead of spending silly money getting it "repaired".

They said in the presentation you could use USB3 HDDs but not what size. Current Xbox is limited to 32GB for NO reason whatsoever.

Really, you know so much about the internal workings of the 360 you can flat out state it is for no reason...

Your original point was that a built in non replaceable HDD was a terrible sin to humanity, but now it was suddenly something else.

If HDD crash, people turn it in for service inside or outside warranty, and hardly anyone, at leas with a 500GB drive won't replace the drive. So this affects less than a fraction of a percentile of the users. Ad due to the external HDD support, they're not effected either.

Considering I'm an athiest and think the word "sin" is stupid, certainly not :p

It's an annoying anti-consumer decision most of us thought MS would learn from after Sony allowed it on the PS3, that is all. There is a slight concern about what happens if your internal drive kicks the bucket (replacing a PS3 hard drive is "hard"? Try opening and dismantling a console...), and the even smaller annoyance of yeah you can plug an external drive in, but that's yet ANOTHER piece of hardware along with the kinect that needs hang around your TV. With an internal upgrade you bump up from 500GB to 1TB and the box/your TV setup doesn't change or have anything else cluttering it up. Simple.

Well you're seriously out of touch with this generation considering Sony have sold absolutely no official hard drive addons and have had absolutely no issues at all. When people run out or low on space they'll consult friends or family or Sony or the staff at Best Buy/Game/Gamestop/Walmart etc.

Playing the "society are all helpless dumb people who cannot use the internet or phone the manufacturer or ask in retail" card in a world of smart phones and tablets and interactive TVs gets seriously flawed.

Dude you posted the same sort of fud during the 360's lifecycle and yet it was extremely successful. I think you're the one out of touch and yet again blowing things out of proportion.

The fact they have a specific USB3 port on the side so you can easily connect a external drive and also the internal is not swappable says to me that they're not going to have any size limits on externals. They're not going to be selling their own drives for this like they did on the 360, thus they have no need to limit what you can do through USB.

Regardless, a year after when prices come down I bet you'll see a newer model with a 1TB internal but for now if 500GB isn't doing it for you then any USB3 external hdd you can buy will help.

Really, you know so much about the internal workings of the 360 you can flat out state it is for no reason...

As Audioboxer said, purely monetary reasons. You can pick up USB flash drive or USB HDD for so cheap and no one would buy the overpriced HDD only Microsoft makes.

Flash drives use FATX filesystem just like HDDs and you can get a branded Microsoft 320GB HDD, why can't you use a 64, 128 or 256 GB flash drive or external HDD?

Legendofmart and audioboxer keeps flooding the Xbox threads and those guys are serious die hard playstation fans.

First they started with how "ugly" the box look, then they down played the cloud computing (completely sidestepping no other console has incorporated this before, not even PCs) then now they're going on about the hard drive completely ignoring that you can just install games movies audios and the like on an external hard drive which virtually means endless hdd space all without having to switch hdd. Man I'm sure you can even plug it in ur NAS.

I'm a die hard Playstation fan because I don't like the Xbox One?

Nice logic. I had an Xbox from launch until 2011, if that's a die hard Playstation fan then I'd hate to hear how you describe someone who buys and uses nothing but Sony/Playstation.

I just enjoy discussing topics of things I am interested in, I was fully prepared to get an Xbox One until the reveal.

Legendofmart and audioboxer keeps flooding the Xbox threads and those guys are serious die hard playstation fans.

First they started with how "ugly" the box look, then they down played the cloud computing (completely sidestepping no other console has incorporated this before, not even PCs) then now they're going on about the hard drive completely ignoring that you can just install games movies audios and the like on an external hard drive which virtually means endless hdd space all without having to switch hdd. Man I'm sure you can even plug it in ur NAS.

I think you'll find PCs have lead cloud computing (Steam/Gaikai/Onlive), PS3/360 came next (save game files) and then Sony mentioned it prior to MS for the PS4 at the February event. Just saying.

Mixed, w/ external drive options, hitting space limit.

But.... will the Xbox One continue to operate after HD failure?

The OS could be stored on separate (smaller) memory chips.

Example - Early PS3 has enough storage space for the OS indepedent of the Hard drive. However Latter model's has to save part of it to the hard drive.

On the flip side, I've just installed a 1TB HD into my PS3.

  • Like 1

I think it's serious time we start ignoring these guys. I don't see why we should be defensive about their insecurities. They'll always be ps fans and will always try to down play the Xbox.

It doesn't matter if the ps4's GPU is 50% faster. The ps3 had way more processing power than the 360 but look how that turned out.

I've watched both the Sony and Xbox reveal and yeah my house is going Xbox.

I'm not a freaking fanboy, I owned 360 since launch till 2011, I've owned more Xboxes (thanks RROD) and played on them longer than I have PS3.

It does matter that the PS4 GPU is 50% faster, like this generation the PS3 dragged down the graphical quality for the sake of parity between platforms, next generation is going to be held back by the weak GPU in the Xbox One for multiplat games.

  • Like 1

I think it's serious time we start ignoring these guys. I don't see why we should be defensive about their insecurities. They'll always be ps fans and will always try to down play the Xbox.

It doesn't matter if the ps4's GPU is 50% faster. The ps3 had way more processing power than the 360 but look how that turned out.

I've watched both the Sony and Xbox reveal and yeah my house is going Xbox.

Funny, you claim they have insecurities, yet you make comments like the one I bolded above. How exactly did it turn out? With great games on both systems? And almost identical numbers of units sold worldwide even with a year head start? Oh yeah, that turned out so awful. :rolleyes:

Do not blame these two guys for being the only ones to defend their brands. The SAME exact sort of things are said from the other side from those who prefer MS.

I think it's serious time we start ignoring these guys. I don't see why we should be defensive about their insecurities. They'll always be ps fans and will always try to down play the Xbox.

Just FYI I didn't post this topic to start a fanboy war.

One thing my girl and I hated was having to find the other remote to switch input to the tv. So it's welcomed that this was addressed in the new Xbox, I'm hoping it has DVR functionality too. 500gb is a decent amount of space. I have a 3tb drive here...think I'll get another one daisy chain them in the new Xbox. So in Essence I'll have a 6.5TB Xbox One, just because I can.

Funny, you claim they have insecurities, yet you make comments like the one I bolded above. How exactly did it turn out? With great games on both systems? And almost identical numbers of units sold worldwide even with a year head start? Oh yeah, that turned out so awful. :rolleyes:

Do not blame these two guys for being the only ones to defend their brands. The SAME exact sort of things are said from the other side from those who prefer MS.

When I said look how that turned out I was actually trying to say there really was no difference. That people still bought the box they wanted wether it was ps or Xbox. The processing power of any one console didn't have such a great impact on sales.

So really I dot see what's so wrong with my comment.

As Audioboxer said, purely monetary reasons. You can pick up USB flash drive or USB HDD for so cheap and no one would buy the overpriced HDD only Microsoft makes.

Flash drives use FATX filesystem just like HDDs and you can get a branded Microsoft 320GB HDD, why can't you use a 64, 128 or 256 GB flash drive or external HDD?

Even though this is off topic I would like to point out some things to do with FATX and external storage. One reason for it being capped at 32GB was to prevent users from formatting a 1TB HDD and rendering it pretty much useless by gifting it with an inferior and one purposed file system. Another very interesting fact is that the modding community (me included :D ) already tried removing the (at that time) 16GB restriction by editing a few headers (I'm not going to explain it all) and upon going over about 20-22GB crashed the OS. Now when Microsoft released the update that allowed for 32GB drives (essentially just lets you use 2 16GB drives) it required that drive to be Fat32 and wouldn't accept NTFS nor Fat16, when trying to push boundaries on this update the same effect occurred. The Microsoft HDDs were already COMPLETELY FATX formatted and posses many signatures, headers and sectors which no one really knows anything about- to protect game fraud is the suspicion.

Now this is the limitation part, the engineering team at MS knew that any avenue for piracy had to be stamped out. If you read an Xbox HDD on Linux or otherwise so you can see the full partition mapping you will notice that 512MB of that is completely untouchable and locked down with all sort of Microsoft crap. This is the same on USB drives. This 512 MB upon close inspection stores information on the last device to write to the disk (among many many other things). If the protected area of the disk is written over or tried to be modified by a device that is not the last Xbox ID stored in that cache then it corrupts via rando partitioning- (it is reversible only by partitioning and formatting) the drives file system . Now you ask where the hell does the 16Gb have anything to do with this. Well your drive essentially is split up into 16GB blocks of which only 4GB (technically 4Gb minus a byte) can be written at a time (think kind of similar to Fat32). The signatures on the PREMANUFACTURED drives actually link these 16GB blocks/sectors together, something that the Xbox formatting tool can't do (even hacked Linux tools don't link properly) and I suspect is something that can only be done to actually physical disks- i'm still stumped on what actually goes on... Now if Microsoft released info on how this linking could be done it would be essentially another avenue into modifying game contents ( I know that kind of jumped quickly- there is a hell of a lot of underground info on this stuff). There would literally be nothing stopping you from ripping the contents of a disc to the HDD and putting in a DVD that contained the games signature that matched up with the one stored in the PROTECTED cache which occurs at the beginning of each 16GB sector. Within each sector that are offsets that can only be read by the Xbox's kernel.

This is where it all comes together, technically speaking MS could open up to 500GB storage formatting for drives by providing support of writing these 16GB sectors and supporting more offsets via an update or whatever, HOWEVER it would require every disk to receive an individual and official Microsoft signature which would at the very least require an internet connection. Now (hypothesising now- no one actually knows a lot about FATX, a very well kept secret indeed) IF the signatures were written to the disk by MS and someone were to analyse what the actual offsets were you would be able to run games off the HDD WITHOUT A DVD by mimicking arcade games. This is one approach softmodders have tried but because we don't know what the actual offsets are on the disks (because as I said before they are protected on the ones by MS which are bigger than 16GB) the OS just crashes.

Anyway that is just the surface and of course I'm sure there is more to the story but the fact that its purely monetary is nieve. There is always more than whats meets the eye with this kind of stuff- not going to bore you anymore, if you want to talk more about the wonderful hacks going on I'm more than happy to talk on PM :)

Funny, you claim they have insecurities, yet you make comments like the one I bolded above. How exactly did it turn out? With great games on both systems? And almost identical numbers of units sold worldwide even with a year head start? Oh yeah, that turned out so awful. :rolleyes:

Um dude I'm pretty sure thats what he is getting at... It doesn't matter that the PS3 had "better" graphics hardware (we could argue for days on the hardware to software efficiency) they both roughly sold the same.

I think you'll find PCs have lead cloud computing (Steam/Gaikai/Onlive), PS3/360 came next (save game files) and then Sony mentioned it prior to MS for the PS4 at the February event. Just saying.

Sony is doing Gaikai which is same as Onlive (AFAIK) where pretty much everything is done in the "cloud" (god I hate saying it in this manner).

Steam has no cloud computing at all - just online distribution. If by PCs you meant PC games, I am not aware of any PC games doing anything similar to Sony or Microsoft.

Microsoft on the other hand is taking a hybrid approach where some part of the game engine CAN BE offloaded to the cloud. I think we will know more about this in last week of June.

Sony is doing Gaikai which is same as Onlive (AFAIK) where pretty much everything is done in the "cloud" (god I hate saying it in this manner).

Steam has no cloud computing at all - just online distribution. If by PCs you meant PC games, I am not aware of any PC games doing anything similar to Sony or Microsoft.

Microsoft on the other hand is taking a hybrid approach where some part of the game engine CAN BE offloaded to the cloud. I think we will know more about this in last week of June.

:huh:

Save games? I can play Portal 2 on my PS3 and then transfer my progress to Portal 2 on the PC.

Steam Cloud

5752067148_3abccdf9c1.jpg

How do I use the Steam Cloud features for Portal 2 on my PS3?

Steam Cloud is automatically enabled once you've linked your PSN and Steam accounts.

Portal 2 for PS3 is the only console version that supports Steam Cloud, which allows your settings, and saves to be transferable from one PS3 to another, or any computer to another computer. This allows you transfer your game saves to other PS3s without ever having to backup your save on a USB stick or having to use the PlayStation Plus psn+.png Cloud service.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yup, that's a doozy right there 😄
    • It's a bundle of tools created by a variety of people, so things can go wrong sometimes. It's a great addition to Windows, and I use a lot of the tools on a daily basis. Also, it's still a 0.**** release so quick updates are to be expected 😉
    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!