It's pronounced "jif" says GIF creator Steve Wilhite.


Recommended Posts

I think if I told some a file was in a "jif" format with a "jif" file extension, most people would automatically assume .jif and not .gif LOL. Myself and 99% of the people I know have always and will always pronounce it with a hard g. Eff what the creator of the format says. He can go google himself. (pronounced joogle lol!)

I don't know about english but in french gi is pronounced ji. Anyway all words i know starting with gi are this way. Girafe, Gigolo, Gigot, Gingembre, etc ...

No.

http://esl.about.com.../hardsoftcg.htm

http://en.wikipedia....Hard_and_soft_G

"G" is followed by an "I" therefore it deserves a soft "G".

End of.

As you're well aware, for every rule there is an exception. Here are just a few:

Gift

Git

Gig

Gimp

Giddy

Gill

Give

Girl

Girth

Gizmo

Girder

The point is that the Oxford Dictionary accepts both pronunciations, so anyone pronouncing it with a hard G is perfectly correct. It doesn't really matter what the inventor of the word intended, it comes down to how it is used. Language evolves over time and it's perfectly understandable for people to pronounce it with a hard G given how other similar words are pronounced. Most people will see it as "gift" minus the T.

PS - It's worth bringing up another "rule", the famous "I before E except after C". It was widely taught as an easy way to spell words yet the sheer number of exceptions meant that it fell out of usage and is now rarely taught.

I will continue to G-if, J-if just doesn't seen remotely right.

Same here. I don't care if the guy is trying to get more attention by making people have to re-pronounce it or not and as said also above, why would it be call "graphical" image format if it was supposed to be pronounced his way?

Word of the year? How stupid is that?!

Same here. I don't care if the guy is trying to get more attention by making people have to re-pronounce it or not and as said also above, why would it be call "graphical" image format if it was supposed to be pronounced his way?

Indeed. The word "graphics" is pronounced with a hard G, so it figures that the same would apply to an acronym starting with it - that's especially true when you factor in similar words (give, gift, girl, gig, etc). The guy who invented the term is free to offer his opinion of how it should be pronounced but it is just an opinion and the Oxford English Dictionary stated, quite rightly, that the pronunciation of the word is beyond his control. Language evolves and common usage reigns supreme.

Next you'll be telling us that P.N.G is meant to be pronounced "ping"....

hmm......what?... the creator says it already is...? oh.

I pronounce JPG and PNG by simply stating the letters (i.e. J-P-G, P-N-G), as to me it sounds wrong to say jay-peg or ping.

As you're well aware, for every rule there is an exception. Here are just a few:

Gift

Git

Gig

Gimp

Giddy

Gill

Give

Girl

Girth

Gizmo

Girder

The point is that the Oxford Dictionary accepts both pronunciations, so anyone pronouncing it with a hard G is perfectly correct. It doesn't really matter what the inventor of the word intended, it comes down to how it is used. Language evolves over time and it's perfectly understandable for people to pronounce it with a hard G given how other similar words are pronounced. Most people will see it as "gift" minus the T.

PS - It's worth bringing up another "rule", the famous "I before E except after C". It was widely taught as an easy way to spell words yet the sheer number of exceptions meant that it fell out of usage and is now rarely taught.

There are exceptions to most rules in English but there are guidelines to avoid the language being a complete clusterf***. The real question is whether GIF is a word in and of itself. It is, and therefore the guidelines should apply. There are exceptions as in the many words that are being repeated in this thread but those are already written in stone. If we are to debate the correct phonetics to a relatively new word, why would we purposefully ignore how it should be pronounced?

Following basic English would tell you GIF is pronounced with a hard G as in "gift".

Also, I would like point out the seemingly snide attempt to use my exact words to completely contradict me without anything more than "he said, he said" when in fact your comment is not correct at all.

I accept that both pronunciations can be used. It should be well noted however that at least GIF with a soft G is backed up with something other than loose proofs such as "other words are exempt therefore I think this should be too" or "Graphics starts with a hard "g" therefore GIF should as well". The latter completely ignores that "graphics" is a "g" followed by an "r" and GIF is spoken as a full word in and of itself.

There are exceptions to most rules in English but there are guidelines to avoid the language being a complete clusterf***. The real question is whether GIF is a word in and of itself. It is, and therefore the guidelines should apply. There are exceptions as in the many words that are being repeated in this thread but those are already written in stone. If we are to debate the correct phonetics to a relatively new word, why would we purposefully ignore how it should be pronounced?

You're missing the point. As I already pointed out, there are so many exceptions to the "rule" as to make it meaningless - that's why it is not widely taught. More importantly, the OED officially recognises both pronunciations and has stated that it is beyond the GIF inventor's control to determine how it is pronounced. That means people are correct to pronounce it with a hard G, just as they are with a soft G.

Also, I would like point out the seemingly snide attempt to use my exact words to completely contradict me without anything more than "he said, he said" when in fact your comment is not correct at all.

My statement was perfectly legitimate and backed up by the OED. Your statement was also correct. Your entire argument seems to be predicated on a rule that isn't enforced, isn't widely known and isn't accurate.

I accept that both pronunciations can be used. It should be well noted however that at least GIF with a soft G is backed up with something other than loose proofs such as "other words are exempt therefore I think this should be too" or "Graphics starts with a hard "g" therefore GIF should as well". The latter completely ignores that "graphics" is a "g" followed by an "r" and GIF is spoken as a full word in and of itself.

I pointed out countless examples of worked beginning with G-I to support my point and shall repeat them, as you clearly seem to have ignored them. There's: give, gift, gill, gig, git, girl, girth, etc. The word "gift" is strikingly similar to "gif" and is pronounced with a hard G.

The English language isn't based on rigid rules and absolutes - it evolves over time and is based on common usage. Frankly, I couldn't care less how you pronounce it, nor that you choose to cling to meaningless rules. I pronounce it with a hard G, as does everybody else I know.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • By the sounds of that wall of Fox News propaganda gibberish attacking the Democratic Party you've already had plenty of "juices" flowing this morning. You've ruined what could have been a productive comment thread with your bias post.
    • (Topic to get the juices flowing this Sunday morning!...) Actually, the situation has almost nothing to do with "lack of skills", especially since assembly-line skills can be taught to anyone, including Americans, certainly. Rather, the inadequacy-to-impossibility of large-scale tech manufacturing in America today, and the reasons why America finds tech manufacturing completely onerous in the 21st century, has to do with politically driven laws amid a plethora of non-scientific, utterly politicized "science-fact" that is patently false, punitive business taxation at every turn, an array of judicial fines of unimaginable scope and complexity, and, last but not least, American unionization strictures that serve to actually slay job creation and hobble all such manufacturing endeavors in America before they can get off the ground. Globalism emerged, they tell us, as the needed answer to American hubris and an unholy American drive to excel. Unless one is buried under mounds of political propaganda, it's easy to see the absurdity of labeling the employees of SpaceX, for instance, as "unskilled labor"... Etc. ad infinitum. At one time in the recent past, American manufacturing prowess was the envy of the world in a wide variety of technical fields! The current federal and state government roadblocks against America becoming competitive globally in tech manufacturing are considerable, it's true, as anyone with a working brain knows. But remarkably, that is only half the story! The other half of the story is, of course, the corporations themselves... Chinese tech manufacturing is simply unassailable in terms of profits, because the Chinese government wants to see its tech manufacturing second-to-none globally so that no companies/nations can compete in terms of ROI, and China has completely succeeded in that goal. Let's tic-off a few things: *Chinese tariff policies are set according to what is considered best for Chinese business, Chinese employees, and the Chinese people. Huge difference with how things are done with tariffs in the US--as the US government (SCOTUS in this case, Congress in others) plainly feels that tariffs are "unfair" for the limited number of citizens who may pay them, whereas nothing is "unfair" when Congress considers the Personal Income Tax rates to be infinitely hike-able, along with infinitely enlarging annual budget deficits. *The Chinese government boldly subsidizes Chinese companies to artificially amplify their profits. *The Chinese government deliberately refuses to avidly demonize Chinese businesses and does not consider Chinese businesses "the enemy", so very unlike American (D)s these days. *Chinese labor laws and businesses are allowed to set their own labor policies according to what Chinese companies consider is best for companies and their employees... Simply put, American workers in tech manufacturing are not allowed to set their own labor policies! It is the height of hypocrisy for Americans to decry working conditions in China while simultaneously ensuring that American products are manufactured in China, not in the US, simply to maximize profits. There is nothing wrong with making a profit, of course, absolutely nothing. But there is plenty wrong with attempts to normalize hypocrisy of this kind! But rank hypocrisy and the (D) party in the US are longtime bedfellows... The current government in Washington is working overtime to see if it can toss out the horribly poor, failed economic policies of the past, while the (D)s still in Washington work very hard to bring back the stupidity whenever possible. With the right policies in place, America can be an infinitely competitive manufacturer.
    • eSound Music 3.0.0 by Razvan Serea eSound Music is a free music streaming app that gives you access to over 150 million tracks from all genres. It allows you to search and listen to your favorite songs, create personalized playlists, and explore trending music. With an intuitive interface and smart search, discovering new artists and hits is fast and easy. You can even stream music in the background while using other apps. One of eSound’s standout features is its offline mode, letting you download and listen without internet access. eSound is widely compatible, working seamlessly across Windows, macOS, Linux, iPhone, iPad, Android, HarmonyOS, Amazon Fire devices, CarPlay, Android Auto, and more. eSound Music key features: Over 150 million tracks available Smart search for songs, artists, albums, and playlists Personalized song recommendations Continuous playback with auto-generated playlists Offline mode with song and playlist downloads Daily-updated trending charts and top songs Sleep timer to auto-stop playback High-quality audio support Customizable playlists and favorites Support for Apple CarPlay and Android Auto Works on Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android, HarmonyOS, Amazon Fire, and more Cross-device sync via account login Background playback while using other apps Download: eSound Music 64-bit | Portable | ~160.0 MB (Free, paid upgrade available) Download: ARM64 | 116.0 MB Links: eSound Music Website | Screenshot | Web Player | Other OSes Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      152
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!