Man of Steel sequel to feature Batman (and others) (2016)


Recommended Posts

http://m.superherohype.com/news/articles/180895-producer-wesley-coller-on-wonder-womans-role-in-batman-vs-superman

With production on Batman vs. Superman scheduled to begin next year in his alma mater's home state, film producer and Eastern Michigan University grad Wesley Coller spoke today with M Live regarding the much-anticipated Man of Steel sequel.

?[My daughter?s] favorite book is this little Wonder Woman flip book,? Coller says of the recent announcement that Gal Gadot will be portraying the Amazon princess. ?It has the lasso, the invisible plane, the bracelets ? every page has an image she?s just in awe with. And something that?s become a reality, being a dad with a new daughter, is that I have a special place in my heart for the idea of a strong, empowered female superhero being out there.?

As for a future spinoff film featuring the character, Coller says fans may have a bit longer to wait.

?We?re super excited to have her in the film," he says. "It will be a ton of fun, but at the same time, we?ve got to stay focused on the film we?re working on now.?

Coller also addressed some of the more negative comments regarding Ben Affleck being cast in the Batman role.

?Anything you do that?s culturally significant," he says. "or any time you deal with an iconic character or story, you?re going to hear responses from every possible perspective? If anything, that gauges the relevance of a property or character, and it?s invigorating to know people care that much. It inspires you to make the coolest version of the movie that you can. Ben is the perfect fit for Zack?s vision for this story.?

Gal Gadot Talks Wonder Woman Casting Reaction, Cup Size, Training And More

Where were you when you heard the news that you?d been cast as Wonder Woman?

 

I was just on my way to shooting at LA. I landed at NY in a connection flight when my agent, Hadass Lichtenstein, called me. She says to me ?Wonder Woman!? and I?m like ?What??? ? ?The role is yours!?and it?s a secret and the news are not yet announced and you can?t tell anyone??. I?m saying to her ?Are you serious???- and we both scream! Now it?s a plane from Israel to NY and I can?t make loud noise, and so I lean on a window, bending down to my legs, and just try to understand. Long story short ? I was totally alone in NY, I got to a hotel at 12 pm, I needed to wake up in the morning for shootings. I remember laying in the darkness by myself, staring at the ceiling, and I was telling myself ?It?s not real!??it shouldn?t be like that, I?m supposed to be like? ?where?s the champagne??.

It?s been said that you?re too skinny for the part. Wonder Woman is large-breasted, is that going to change?

Hmm. I represent the Wonder Women of the new world. Breasts? anyone can buy for 9,000 shekels and everything is fine. By the way, Wonder Woman is amazonian, and historically accurate amazonian women actually had only one breast. So, if I?d really go ?by the book??it?d be problematic.

So you?re not going to gain a little weight and start eating carbs before filming begins?

It?s the physical preparations that I?m starting now. A very serious training regime ? Kung Fu, kickboxing, swords, jujutsu, Brazilian?1,000 and 1 things?I?ll gain body mass.

Is this Man of Steel discussion thread, or DC comics in general?

All the stuff discussed Wonder Woman, Flash etc are all related to the film as they are going to appear

She certainly did do her homework - Amazons had one breast removed so as to clear a bowstring. To this day female (and a few male) archers use a leather shield over one breast to restrain/shield it.

Given the speed of modern compound bows (350-400fps) it's more necessary now than then.

2070333_26.jpg

All the stuff discussed Wonder Woman, Flash etc are all related to the film as they are going to appear

Someone should fix the thread title then. This is all news to me.

I thought only Batman is going to make an appearance, just like the title says.

Someone should fix the thread title then. This is all news to me.

I thought only Batman is going to make an appearance, just like the title says.

That's because at the time we only knew Batman would be involved. The title is still relevant though because it's mainly going to be about Batman an Superman as far as we know now :)

They're going the right way about it and I'm now thinking she's a great fit for the Wonder Woman role.

The extent of her in the movie isn't known yet, or others for that matter, it's still going to be heavily a Superman movie with more Batman than WW or Flash and so on, imo.   I think with more DC heros being in, with smaller cameo type roles that MoS2 or w/e they call it, we'll see a big setup towards the end of the movie for a JL movie after.   

The extent of her in the movie isn't known yet, or others for that matter, it's still going to be heavily a Superman movie with more Batman than WW or Flash and so on, imo.   I think with more DC heros being in, with smaller cameo type roles that MoS2 or w/e they call it, we'll see a big setup towards the end of the movie for a JL movie after.   

Agree. The movie is about superman. HOWEVER i don't think ben affleck will allow for little amount of screen time,I do see the others being just tie in with Justice League.

Just so everyone has a current point of reference, and because Superman's new movie uniform is close to the current comic storyline, here's the New 52 version of Wonder Woman. In New 52 she no longer stands eye-to-eye with Superman but is a few imches shorter..

Wonder_Woman_New_52_Jim_Lee.jpg

Denzel Washington Considered For Green Lantern In "Batman vs Superman"

According to our source, the ?Training Day? actor is being considered for the role of Green Lantern John Stewart instead. If this proves to be true, Green Lantern will join an ever growing list of members from DC?s Justice League of America that also include Superman, Batman and Wonder Woman.

x

Why not just call it a Justice League film at this point? Too many heroes for a Man of Steel film. Not to keen on the fact that they're considering Denzel Washington either. Idris Elba would be a much better fit.

  • Like 1

I have to admit.. I'm starting to wonder (not intentional) if the whole "Superman vs Batman" hype was a red herring all along.

 

Yeah I am wondering the same really

Denzel is too old to play John Stewart.

Shemar Moore of Criminal Minds has the intensity, physique and youth to play John Stewart. His part on CM is also a former Marine, like Stewart, and he has it down.

untitled+large.bmp

 

The problem with this particular choice, and that of those calling Gina Carano for Wonder Woman, is that while both have the physical attributes; neither has the acting skills.

And Denzel is too ######ing old. Idris Alba would have made a better choice. And while we're at, why not just call it "Justice League"?

She certainly did do her homework - Amazons had one breast removed so as to clear a bowstring. To this day female (and a few male) archers use a leather shield over one breast to restrain/shield it.

Given the speed of modern compound bows (350-400fps) it's more necessary now than then.

[snip]

 

I like what I am hearing from her. She seems smart and has done her homework. Now all I want is more meat on her bones.

 

I wouldn't consider a not-so-unknown fact about Amazon women as doing her homework, but I digress.

 

She mentions being by the book, but let's be honest here, she's not representing Amazon warriors from Greek mythology per say, she's representing Wonder Woman from the comics. She's a model first, actress second, so I take her "I'll gain body mass" quote with skepticism.

 

And now Green Lantern? I doubt WW, Flash and GL's involvement will be great, but it keeps looking more like Justice League #1 of the New 52. It also sounds like WB and DC Comics still doesn't know how they want to handle their franchises. Marvel has set a superb example of planning ahead, so what gives DC Comics?

I think that after Sups and Bats butt heads (similar to their meeting in the 1980's Man of Steel #3, 'One Night In Gotham City') there'll be a major threat, Darkseid has been rumored, and heroes will come out of their closets, put aside their differences and meet it in Act III. See the first 2 episodes of the Justice League animated series as your guide, but rougher.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • All these CEOs got the biggest boners thinking about firing employees for AI. Turned out it was just a wet dream.
    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!