Windows 8.1 Did Microsoft miss their last chance?


Recommended Posts

Is Microsoft loosing it?

 

I don't think so. I think they're trying to find their voice in this generation because they realized that they couldn't continue to do the same things that made them successful in the 90s.

 

 

Having used both 8 and 8.1 are great, just because some so called nerds can't handle some change doesn't change that, Metro apps are fairly useful and practical also, again people are hating change for the sake of hating on it, NO ONE has brought up a legitimate issue with the changes, they are all personal gripes because again so called nerds are scared of change 

 

Please.

 

There are two years worth of posts from people who have brought up legitimate issues with Windows 8 that have nothing to do with being scared of change. You just choose to ignore it because it would mean that you would have to admit that there are flaws to something that you think is great. I mean, I hope you're not suggesting that Windows 8 is perfect. It also appears that you're trying to pass your opinion off as fact.Nice try.  

I definitely see 8.1 bringing some needed tweaks to 8.  In general, I feel that Microsoft should've gave people who are installing Windows 8 an option to have Modern UI on or off.  For example, ask the user if they have a touchscreen computer.  If they say yes, you get Modern UI along with the desktop.  If you say no, you get the desktop and Modern UI gone/turned off/disabled.    I don't think that would've been that hard for Microsoft to do.  I feel that would've pretty much silenced the Windows 8 critics.  For my personal Windows 8 experience, I use Start8 and ModernMix by Stardock and I'm comfortable with using Windows 8.  I don't care for the Modern UI in the desktop environment. 

Have a better multi tasking that has been familiar to me since time immemorial.

 

 

I'm just shocked people are asking for better multi tasking on a desktop OS... it should be at the forefront of any OS, massive fail.

 

Slightly off topic, but as i read this post i also read this on Facebook.. it may seem a little ignorance but it shows you general frustrations when doing simple tasks for the non tech people who are using W8. (excuse the bad Geordie language)

 

gk9VihI0lo.png

  • Like 2

There are two years worth of posts from people who have brought up legitimate issues with Windows 8.

 

For every legitimate issue that's been raised there are at least a dozen illegitimate complaints most of which are entirely petty. The Win8 hatred is so overblown that it's become comical and makes it harder for anyone (especially MS) to focus on resolving the real issues. 

But why bother when the GUI still exists? You can still create system images, the link is now within file history (lower left):

 

sq5s7k.png

When did Microsoft add that back? I'm using the Windows 8.1 Preview and that option is definitely NOT there.

MS isnt going to make things more non touch friendly.  They think that touch is going to be the only thing in the near future and that keyboards are going away.  Not surprising they are ignore users who request more desktop friendly features.

 

If anyone hasnt already realized this over the years, its Microsoft's way or no way at all.

Plenty of improvements for desktop users :)

its Microsoft's way or no way at all.

If that were true you wouldn't be able to change it to, well, your way. It's just an out of the box setup that can still be overridden, just like every version of Windows that came before, and pretty much just like every other desktop OS out there. I'm not a big fan of the Modern stuff myself, but 10 seconds and a couple of clicks, presto, I get it the way I want it. "No way at all" is a bit of a stretch.

If that were true you wouldn't be able to change it to, well, your way. It's just an out of the box setup that can still be overridden, just like every version of Windows that came before, and pretty much just like every other desktop OS out there. I'm not a big fan of the Modern stuff myself, but 10 seconds and a couple of clicks, presto, I get it the way I want it. "No way at all" is a bit of a stretch.

True but there are more users who don't know how to do that then users who do.

True but there are more users who don't know how to do that then users who do.

Pretty sure even the most clueless of user knows how to bring up a search engine, if they can't then they have bigger issues. "Remove start screen" or "disable metro" for example brings up tons of answers, most of which are extremely simple to perform, literally completed in seconds. Download, click click done. Probably the only OS that lets you make a major change in to how to interact with the desktop in so few steps.

People need to show just a hint of initiative before complaining about not having something delivered exactly the way they want out of the box. It just doesn't work that way... different people are going to want different things, it's impossible to make everybody happy at the same time.

I have Windows 8.1 installed on 3 office PCs and whoever uses it says "That's it? They worked one whole year to just add that start button and eyesore of a wallpaper?" That has been the reaction so far.

The only good thing they said was that they could shut down PC in 2 clicks and avoid those mouse gymnastics as they did previously with Windows 8.

Pretty sure even the most clueless of user knows how to bring up a search engine, if they can't then they have bigger issues. "Remove start screen" or "disable metro" for example brings up tons of answers, most of which are extremely simple to perform, literally completed in seconds. Download, click click done. Probably the only OS that lets you make a major change in to how to interact with the desktop in so few steps.

People need to show just a hint of initiative before complaining about not having something delivered exactly the way they want out of the box. It just doesn't work that way... different people are going to want different things, it's impossible to make everybody happy at the same time.

 

You are giving a lot of users to much credit.  Most just use it as is and deal with the problems and learn to use what is new.

I have Windows 8.1 installed on 3 office PCs and whoever uses it says "That's it? They worked one whole year to just add that start button and eyesore of a wallpaper?" That has been the reaction so far.

The only good thing they said was that they could shut down PC in 2 clicks and avoid those mouse gymnastics as they did previously with Windows 8.

 

That's my other beef with Windows 8 is the "Shut down" that isn't really a shutdown, but more of a hibernation hybrid" .. People who "Shut down their computers" every night often run into the problems, and they wonder why, because to them their computer hasn't been running for days on end, they did what they think is the equivalent of a restart everyday, when they actually haven't.

You are giving a lot of users to much credit.  Most just use it as is and deal with the problems and learn to use what is new.

I personally wouldn't think (or at least hope) that "thinking for yourself" would be giving too much credit, but maybe I'm just a bit pickier about who I associate with, even my daughter who's only 6 tries to at least figure things out for herself. (Who by the way mastered the "intricacies" of the modern UI in about 3 minutes.) Those in that "just deal with it" category would do just that then regardless, that's their choice then, still not a "Microsoft's way or no way" situation though, not doing anything was their choice. I'm not a big fan of the Modern UI myself, but I have zero sympathy for somebody who's so apathetic that they can't be bothered to at least put a tiny bit of effort into something that they think should be different, especially when it's so easy to do.

When did Microsoft add that back? I'm using the Windows 8.1 Preview and that option is definitely NOT there.

 

I never liked it anyway. I use Macrium Reflect Free. I move lots of personal folders around, some things that are seen as startup I install on other drives and Microsoft's system backup will force you to image these drives as well with no option to uncheck. Hate it. Plus Reflect uses Win PE 4.0 for boot disk with full GUI and drag and drop UI. Love it.

I never liked it anyway. I use Macrium Reflect Free. I move lots of personal folders around, some things that are seen as startup I install on other drives and Microsoft's system backup will force you to image these drives as well with no option to uncheck. Hate it. Plus Reflect uses Win PE 4.0 for boot disk with full GUI and drag and drop UI. Love it.

I used to use Norton Ghost but found the system imager built into Windows 7 and onwards to be perfectly adequate for my needs. It's been a huge time saver on numerous occasions.

Keep in mind that Win8.1 is still part of the Ballmer era. Whoever the next CEO is, hopefully he has a developer or software UX background that actually understands the direction in which Windows 9 needs to take in order to undo some of the drastic changes brought by Win8. Modern UI is here to stay, especially after seeing Android going Holo and iOS7 going flat no-gradient icons. OSX will most likely get a similar design makeover next year to mimic the iOS7 changes. The lack of excessive eye candy that we had with aero transparency and shadows makes it quite pleasant to use and easier on my eyes. 

 

But I still believe opening a program is needlessly complicated without the old style vertical list start menu, making this my #1 complaint about Windows right now. The start screen that shows the apps are now less intrusive since you can disable it from opening on boot and I still sort of hate the gesture delays, but the apps are indeed nice to grab quick bits of info like the weather, sports, etc. Rest of the OS, especially performance, feels a lot snappier and refined than Win7.

 

Disclosure: I use OSX as my main and Win7 rarely on a VM for the past year. So I haven't really touched Win8 or 8.1 until now.

I've actually made the move to ModernUI Mail. There's enough functionality now for me to use it for personal and remote use. Anticipating 8.1. Now, I need to be able to autostart ModernUI apps - oversight? Granted, I rarely need to restart so it's not "that" big of a deal, but it is.

 

Looks like when I give up Start8 I'll be looking for a utility to start ModernUI apps. :/

 

Edit: The mail move may not last long. While you can search just fine, you can't perform any actions other than reply/forward on results. Can't select them all, move, or delete search results. That's just boneheaded.

I find it funny that people think a new CEO is going to somehow drastically change the direction Windows is going.  Whoever the new boss is modern ui and modern apps are here to stay.

I personally wouldn't think (or at least hope) that "thinking for yourself" would be giving too much credit, but maybe I'm just a bit pickier about who I associate with, even my daughter who's only 6 tries to at least figure things out for herself. (Who by the way mastered the "intricacies" of the modern UI in about 3 minutes.) Those in that "just deal with it" category would do just that then regardless, that's their choice then, still not a "Microsoft's way or no way" situation though, not doing anything was their choice. I'm not a big fan of the Modern UI myself, but I have zero sympathy for somebody who's so apathetic that they can't be bothered to at least put a tiny bit of effort into something that they think should be different, especially when it's so easy to do.

 

So you dont associate with people who dont think like you do?  Odd.

 

Anyway, you think a certain way and therefor you bring your kids up the same way.  Lots just use the system as is and don't know about the extra tools/programs you can download.  You do, and many others do but doesnt mean everyone does or should know.  People have different interests and may know a lot in one area/field but not so much in others.  At work, almost weekly I hear someone complaining about Win8 and how they dont like it. I tell them you can download replacement start menus and they are like "Really?"

So you dont associate with people who dont think like you do?  Odd.

No, I generally try not to associate with people who don't think, period. Are you saying you generally can't even be bothered to even check if something is possible or not before ruling it out? Not even a teeny tiny bit curious? I don't know about you, but I generally point people to a search engine if they got a question.

 

You do, and many others do but doesnt mean everyone does or should know.

And as you mentioned, they either 1) look it up to see if something exists, or 2) they're ok with it and plod on. But that's still neither here nor there, the option exists, contrary to "Microsoft's way or no way." If somebody can't take the time to actually look, well, that's on them. I absolutely positively hate the new versions of Nautilus on many of the latest Linux desktops with a passion. I could either learn to deal with it and move on, or I can hit up a search engine and find out how to replace it, which I did. As much as I detest the thing, I don't sit there and try and tell people that it's Gnome's way or no way, cry about how they should give me the option to use the older menus or file manager, it's the Gnome people shoving bad decisions down my throat or how they're eventually going to ditch the desktop for a tablet oriented UI. That's just silly, sucks yes, but you change it or you don't. But since it's Microsoft...

 

I tell them you can download replacement start menus and they are like "Really?"

And for your next amazing trick, show them how to spell Google, or Bing if that's too long for them. You'd be amazed what you can learn if you take a few seconds to actually check, or even how you can change/replace all sorts of things Windows.. even *gasp* Win 8.
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. They are seeking a better life too. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!