Recommended Posts

He *knew* no such thing. He assumed she was unstable, whereas the reports indicate she was being calm, quiet and completely cooperative.  Therefore his actions of throwing her into the cell were totally disproportionate.

You should never assume, you make an ASS of U and ME, the person was arrested for being drunk, the assumption was over, it was an arrest for a crime and if they just "assumed" she was drunk, they should never have arrested her unless they clearly did their job and used a breathalyser or it's equivalent or have video evidence of her driving around drunk as the law demands.

The video clearly also shows the lady had her hands behind her back when she was flung into the cell giving her less of a chance to get her bearings drunk or not, there was two crimes committed that day, her DUI and his battery of a prisoner.

here another situation in 2009..lol

Guess it was her fault in this one too.

here another situation in 2009..lol

Guess it was her fault in this one too.

According to some of the people in this topic it would be her fault for flinging her shoes off at the officer. To these people the second you do anything wrong you forfeit your human rights and deserve everything you get, even when that means an officer shoving a minor across the cell, forcing them to the ground and smashing their face in. It's police brutality, plain and simple.

 

These officers should be in jail, not out "protecting" the community.

This was not a beating it was a shove. I've seen kids shoved harder than that playing in our front yard. That she was falling down drunk probably has more to do with her face plant than anything. A person with half normal faculties could have stayed vertical or landed on the bench.

FYI we have a legal standard called Contributory Negligence for split responsibility incidents, and in this one I'd give her about 70% of the responsibility.

 

I think you lose that case. It would not have been appropriate to shove a completely sober citizen into their cell that way, especially a female. If not for his inappropriate actions, it wouldn't have happened.

 

If she had fallen in a drunken stupor, she would have fallen down, or forward a bit with the force of her own female bodyweight. Not more or less lunging forward with the momentum of a male shove with the inability (due to her physical state which is why she was under arrest) to brace or protect herself from said injury.

 

To assess any responsibility to her in this case, would be opening the door to the notion that anyone arrested is responsible for inappropriate or illegal actions performed upon them by officers who they become the custody of.

 

A bigger question in my mind is, this happens regularly, and funds for such are built into most municipalities budgets. This was not particularly heinous as these things go. Why is "this" one newsworthy?

  • Like 1

Guess it was her fault in this one too.

 

Now this guy needs to lose his badge and be convicted of the assault charges. You have to remember, law enforcement are just people like the rest of us. They have issues, just like the rest of society. Many people with control, power, and self-esteem issues gravitate toward law enforcement. A gun and a badge and power over people is therapeutic for many with issues. Is it the majority, of course not, maybe in certain precincts it is ... There's a reason there is some mandatory psyche eval for this profession. Many skip it.

 

Unfortunately, while not the majority, there are a lot, IME, and they as in all things, overshadow the good. The good are taken for granted.

  • Like 1

What a fitting name. :D

G9HLUpi.png

 

Also, by "shattered" I'd expect 10 times the damage I saw on the video.. Stupid overdramatization of facts is making the money, I know.

If you slow down the video you notice her being sexually assaulted too.  :argh:

Tossed shoes at cop after committing a felony, grand theft auto. Assaulting an officer, which with the felony causes a reasonable presumption she will continue to resist. Was she bitig? Swinging? Trying to kick? We don't know but it would elicit a continued response. 15 years old is old enough to be charged as an adult.

Too little info to judge.

Urgh, not enough evidence to go on really. It does indeed look like a shove, but who's to say how she was acting before this section of footage, she may have been violent, it may have taken them half hour to move her three feet no one but those officers really know.

Urgh, not enough evidence to go on really. It does indeed look like a shove, but who's to say how she was acting before this section of footage, she may have been violent, it may have taken them half hour to move her three feet no one but those officers really know.

I doubt they had a problem moving her 3 feet by the way they put her in the cell, do you?

I doubt they had a problem moving her 3 feet by the way they put her in the cell, do you?

 

Who are we to make that judgement though? We're not privy to the evidence needed to ascertain that for a fact. Can't make rash decisions based on a few seconds of video.

 

Just for the record, i'm not saying he didn't push her above and beyond what was necessary. Just that we don;t have the evidence to hand.

Tossed shoes at cop after committing a felony, grand theft auto. Assaulting an officer, which with the felony causes a reasonable presumption she will continue to resist. Doing that is dumb. Was she bitig? We don't know but it would elicit a continued response. 15 years old is old enough to be charged as an adult.

NOTHING she did could have warranted that attack upon her. Further, to class her flicking her shoe at him like that as "assaulting an officer" is clearly an exaggeration (especially when there is no evidence the shoe actually hit him, which would be required to class as battery); then again, that's not surprising when we see people who fart in the presence of an officer charged with battery. All too often we see 'assaulting an officer' and 'resisting arrest' tacked on to charges because they require little to no evidence.

 

It's shocking?but not at all surprising?that you would defend the actions of the officer in that case. What's worse is that he was never convicted on any crime, despite the clear and overwhelming evidence, though thankfully he at least lost his job over the incident.

 

Urgh, not enough evidence to go on really. It does indeed look like a shove, but who's to say how she was acting before this section of footage, she may have been violent, it may have taken them half hour to move her three feet no one but those officers really know.

I posted a link to the extended footage earlier in the topic. She was only out of the cell for six seconds and there was no evidence of any violence or resistance, with the earlier footage showing that she was compliant with the officers.

So a woman who it seems was pushing back to not get into the cell got shoved in, tripped and hit her face.  What do you want me to say to that?  She should have either (1) been more careful or (2) just gone in.

  • Like 1

So a woman who it seems was pushing back to not get into the cell got shoved in, tripped and hit her face. What do you want me to say to that? She should have either (1) been more careful or (2) just gone in.

Exactly. Plus 3) not been in a state where her equilibrium was compromised. A little sobriety goes a long ways towards not face planting

 

 

I posted a link to the extended footage earlier in the topic. She was only out of the cell for six seconds and there was no evidence of any violence or resistance, with the earlier footage showing that she was compliant with the officers.

 

The damn vid wont play. I'll reserve further judgement until i can watch it.

So a woman who it seems was pushing back to not get into the cell got shoved in, tripped and hit her face.  What do you want me to say to that?  She should have either (1) been more careful or (2) just gone in.

You must have watched a different video, as that's CLEARLY not what this video showed. Her being "more careful" would not have prevented the police officer from using his full force to shove her across the room. It's disgusting that you would defend the actions of this officer and seek to blame the victim. Police officers have a duty to protect those in their care, which obviously wasn't what happened here.

You must have watched a different video, as that's CLEARLY not what this video showed. Her being "more careful" would not have prevented the police officer from using his full force to shove her across the room. It's disgusting that you would defend the actions of this officer and seek to blame the victim. Police officers have a duty to protect those in their care, which obviously wasn't what happened here

 

Save your nonsense.  We both watched the same cleverly cropped video that shows her coming into the room against her will.  Yes he pushed a bit too hard, but it's his job to get her in there, and if she was grabbing the door frame and pushing back, it would take force.

 

But hey, if my words have disgusted you, then you really have a weak constitution!

I think you're confused.

 

Nope. You are.

 

Here's your post again, as you seem to have memory issues:

 

Partakes in drugs.
Then decides to break the law and drive.
Gets caught.
Gets shoved into a cell and smashes her face in.
 
a la Trayvon fans..."SHE DIN DO NUFFIN"
 
It's almost as if people are born these days with no concept of common sense, self respect and doing the right thing.
 
Lucky for us this model citizen didn't plow into someone else or innocent bystanders while doing nuffin. Far from slagging off the police for perceived rough treatment...in cases such as these it should be par for the course. Dole out a kicking. Go right ahead.
 
Emphasis mine.  She's not on drugs or arrested for drugs. She's drunk. Alcohol is not classed as a drug. 

Save your nonsense.  We both watched the same cleverly cropped video that shows her coming into the room against her will.  Yes he pushed a bit too hard, but it's his job to get her in there, and if she was grabbing the door frame and pushing back, it would take force.

 

But hey, if my words have disgusted you, then you really have a weak constitution!

 

I see no indication in the video that she was resisting entering the cell in any way.  She steps in, he shoves, she goes flying.

 

Why are you defending the cop? He's clearly in the wrong here.

  • Like 1

I see no indication in the video that she was resisting entering the cell in any way.  She steps in, he shoves, she goes flying.

 

Why are you defending the cop? He's clearly in the wrong here.

 

Her stance before entering, she is leaning backwards.  Why are you defending someone who has been arrested, she's clearly in the wrong here.

Save your nonsense.  We both watched the same cleverly cropped video that shows her coming into the room against her will.  Yes he pushed a bit too hard, but it's his job to get her in there, and if she was grabbing the door frame and pushing back, it would take force.

The video wasn't "cleverly cropped", as the extended video I posted earlier shows the context to be exactly as portrayed. And saying he "pushed a bit too hard" is like saying Hitler's foreign policy was a bit too aggressive - it's disingenuous. His job is to protect her, which he certainly didn't do using his full force to shove her across the room and shatter her face.

 

You have gone out of your way to defend the actions of a cop who was completely out of line.

The video wasn't "cleverly cropped", as the extended video I posted earlier shows the context to be exactly as portrayed. And saying he "pushed a bit too hard" is like saying Hitler's foreign policy was a bit too aggressive - it's disingenuous. His job is to protect her, which he certainly didn't do using his full force to shove her across the room and shatter her face.

 

You have gone out of your way to defend the actions of a cop who was completely out of line.

 

I did say to save the nonsense, but oh well.

 

I have seen the uncropped video, her weight is on her back foot, she is leaning back and attempting to not be put into the cell.  Argue it any way you want, you're wrong.  Her face shattered because she fell, she fell because he pushed her, he pushed her because she was attempting to not be put into the cell, she was being put into the cell because she was arrested, she was arrested because she had committed a criminal act.  And you paint the cop as the problem... LOL

some people are simply too obtuse and can't seem to be able to be objective to certain things.   they are soooo close minded that arguing with them is futile and simple angers people who are capable of seeing things properly.

 

Just like i said before, I usually side on the side of the cops, but this one case, i cant seem to condone his actions...not sure how anyone can?!  WDC woman on car? Deserved to get killed....Woman who escapes police and resists arrest gets stunned gun and falls flat on her face and dies? Yeah, cop was right on that one, she was asking for it!  But this? really? are we watching the same video?

 

bah...i am just going to stop looking at this.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • So size is the ONLY selling point????? People have been plugging in PC's to TV's in living rooms for 20+ years. I would take a bigger box for more peformance. Also lot and lots of SFF/Mini ITX build guides out there.
    • My point is, if you buying this instead of a console for TV purposes, that you need to understand that you will not be able to play the most popular MP games with Steam OS. Now if you are not into those games, and into some of the perputual alpha/beta games on Steam then this is an option. I would argue a gaming PC would be the better route, more expensive but take the 1k -1.4k you are about to spend on this thing and build a better one. Because it is running Linux you can overide its 1080p settings. However The Verge complained about its 1080p cap and how you would have to get around it at the CLI, so someone buying this instead of a PS5 or Xbox might have a challege on their hands.
    • A review of Synology's BeeCamera software for the BeeStation Plus by Christopher White Synology is leaning into the BeeStation and the BeeStation Plus, and it's easy to understand why. While power users will want something more customizable, the BeeStation and its more powerful sibling, the BeeStation Plus, are great for those who want a device they can simply plug in, click a few buttons, and have it work as their own personal cloud. Until recently, the device was mostly used for the storage of files, photos, and videos, and with the Plus model, you could install and stream media through Plex. Synology recently released a new free application for the BeeStation Plus called BeeCamera, which is basically a stripped-down version of Surveillance Station. First, let's get the confusing naming out of the way. While you might initially think that BeeCamera is a physical device, perhaps a camera that Synology created specifically for the BeeStation Plus, that would be incorrect. BeeCamera is simply the name for the application that runs on the NAS and on your mobile device. I think the marketing team missed the mark here, but it does fit the other naming on the device, like BeePhotos and BeeFiles, I guess. Camera Support As of right now, only Synology-branded cameras are supported, which many will see as a callback to the drive locking the company implemented and then backtracked on. That said, while I 100% disagree on drive locking, I agree that camera locking for a device made to simply plug and play is the right decision. The whole point of the BeeStation line is simplicity. There are currently three camera model lines available, a wireless device for indoor use, and two PoE models for external use. CC400W (Wi-Fi): Plug it into power using the included power adapter, and connect it to your wireless network. This camera is rated only for indoor use and is the one I was provided to review the BeeCamera. $198.36, in line with the Unifi G6 Compact. BC510 (PoE): A bullet-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. TC510 (PoE): A dome-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. Although this isn't a review of the actual Synology camera, I did want to note that a positive for the Synology CC400W is that it uses a magnetic base. This means you can mount it on any magnetic surface, which is pretty handy. However, a downside to the camera is that it's powered by a built-in USB cable that's about six and a half feet (two meters) long. This means that the cable will probably be either too long or too short, but more importantly, if the cable is damaged at all, you'll likely need to buy an entirely new camera because there doesn't appear to be a way to replace it, unlike many competitors, like the Unifi G6 Instant. Hopefully, this is something Synology addresses in a future revision of the hardware. The BeeStation Plus supports up to four cameras. Setup The setup of BeeCamera is, like everything in the BeeStation family, very straightforward. Simply make sure you're on at least version 1.5 of the BeeStation OS, and BeeCamera is automatically installed on the device. BeeCamera Setup Screenshots Setting up the CC400W was just as easy. Plug it in, open up the BeeCamera app, and follow the on-screen steps to add the camera. During this process, you'll configure the camera name and how many days of retention you want to keep. The system will also automatically update the firmware for you. The whole thing took only a couple of minutes, excluding the time it took for the camera to update the firmware. Once the camera is connected to the BeeStation Plus, you can manage the various camera settings within the app, although there aren't many to choose from. You're able to configure whether the microphone will record audio (some privacy laws may preclude you from recording it), select what codec to use (H.264 or H.265), configure the color and exposure of the camera, and determine what data you want to overlay onto the video. Finally, you can set up AI detections so that BeeCamera will alert you if it sees certain things. These are all of the common detections you would expect in a camera system, such as people, pets, and vehicles. Under people and vehicles, you can also add extra monitoring for lingering and congestion detection, although pets are currently in "Lab" and therefore have no extra features yet. Recording in 4K using H.265 for 30 days will take roughly 300 GB of storage, which is very reasonable for most regular households, as the BeeStation Plus has 8TB of native storage. If you want to set up detection zones, you can. These are areas that BeeCamera will look at for the various detections, and are helpful if, for example, there's a tree in your frame and you don't want to be notified each time the wind makes the branches move around in the frame. Finally, you can also schedule when the camera should and should not be recording, which is a very useful feature. For example, you may want to record only at night when you're sleeping, but not during the day when you're up and about the house, so you can easily shut the camera off between 8 am and 10 pm. Each hour of each day can be configured to record continuously, only upon a detection event, or disabled completely. You can't fine-tune to record at a specific time, though, only hourly blocks on the hour. Daily Use The best part of BeeCamera is that it's easy and just works. If you only care about being notified when things happen, the mobile app sends those notifications and lets you click the button to bring up the video and see what's going on. For example, when I went out of town and had the camera pointed at the cat tower in our hallway, it was nice to be able to drop in and check that my furry friends were doing okay without me. Initiating the remote connection to the BeeStation Plus through the app is very responsive, but this will heavily depend on your ISP. In my case, using Xfinity, I'm able to go from starting the app to seeing live video in roughly three seconds, which is about the same amount of time it takes to connect to my Unifi UNVR system that costs much more. If you want to see footage from a specific day and time, you can do so using the calendar icon. You can also scroll through the timeline, looking for detections that are labeled in blue (vs. the normal gray when there's nothing of interest). There are buttons that let you go to the last/next detection on the timeline, which is helpful if you missed the notification on your mobile device. That's where the ease of use stops, though. While you can download clips that are flagged by detection, there's apparently no way to select generic time frames you're interested in, and the only place to download is to your phone. In addition, sharing a video shares the actual video, not just a link back to your BeeStation Plus. While that's good from a security and privacy perspective, it's a little awkward for sharing large videos. Limitations While the ease of implementation is great, there are some things that are lacking from BeeCamera. The most obvious is that there is no way to view the footage on the desktop. You can log in to the BeeStation Plus to see how much storage BeeCamera is using, but unlike BeePhotos and BeeFiles, there is no BeeCamera on the web console to manage or view footage. This means you'll be viewing all of your security footage on your mobile device, which is pretty limiting. In addition, there's no way to download the video to your PC without first using your phone as the intermediary. The one exception to this is that you can use BeeFiles to see the raw MP4 files. They're saved in 5-minute increments, and it's just raw data with no detection information or any other way to identify what any of them are. The lack of a way to interact with BeeCamera on the desktop also makes configuration of the cameras more difficult. For example, trying to set up detection zones using a tiny screen and your finger to draw boxes is more cumbersome than it needs to be. This reinforces the idea that BeeCamera is not made for power users. It's also missing some of the more advanced functionality of Surveillance Station. For example, I couldn't find a way to say, "Alert me if the thing in this zone is no longer there." Another major deficiency with BeeCamera, and a feature I suspect may come out in the future, is that while it can detect generic people, there is no specific facial recognition yet. This is an interesting omission, given the fact that other Synology tools can detect specific individuals, and competitors such as Unifi Protect also do it. This is probably a software limitation, so we will have to wait and see if this feature is added in the future. Conclusion If you need a security guard to monitor surveillance cameras to make sure your property is secure, then BeeCamera is not the solution for you. That said, you probably wouldn't be using a BeeStation Plus as the brains behind the system either. BeeCamera (and BeeStation in general) is clearly aimed at households that want to avoid sending personal data to Google and Amazon, and now want to add some cameras to keep an eye on their home and their pets while they're away. BeeCamera excels at doing this. The target market isn't interested in creating cases, tying multiple views together in a single pane of glass, or the like, and for the intended use case, the system works great. Where it starts to fall apart a bit is with more advanced features. Not being able to use a desktop app is a major compromise in my opinion, and having to do all of the configuration on a mobile device is annoying, but not impossible. If you don't want to have a full-fledged NAS device in your home, but still want control over your data (or maybe want an easy way to backup your data for World Backup Day), and want to add a couple of cameras to keep an eye on your house and your pets, this is a great, cheap, and easy way to go, and I suspect more functionality will come over time. If Synology releases a desktop app or at least a way to configure cameras and view footage on a desktop browser, this would be a near-perfect solution for a general home user. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • I forgot to add on my comment that when robots will take physical jobs, it's when they become more cheaper to manufacture and sell. That will be the starting point of the end to lanscaping, trash pickup, factory jobs, etc.
    • How many people can actually use a 2.5gig ethernet port? Most people do not have more than a 1gig internet connection, heck most have less than that. Most people at home do not have a switch that has multiple 2.5gig ports either.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      476
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      104
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      88
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!