Do you perfer manual or automatic transmission?


Manual or automatic transmission?  

170 members have voted

  1. 1. What do you perfer to drive in a car using manual transmission or automatic transmission?



Recommended Posts

Automatic for me.  I've driven manual (enough to learn the basics). .. however for me driving isn't about driving so much as getting for A-B quicker than walking, and for cheaper than paying for public transportation.. and taking stuff from A-B.   I found I got frustrated with driving manual.. couldn't just go on Gas, then on Brake.. there was 5 other steps in the middle.

Never found someone willing to let me learn manual on his car, so I only drive them in racing sims. That said, I drive a CVT and really love the smoothness of acceleration and consistently low RPM. I don't think I could go back to standard automatic. Most of my time behind the wheel is in traffic jams so I doubt driving a manual would bring me much enjoyement. CVTs are the future of eco-friendly cars IMO.

Never found someone willing to let me learn manual on his car, so I only drive them in racing sims. That said, I drive a CVT and really love the smoothness of acceleration and consistently low RPM. I don't think I could go back to standard automatic.

You are the first person I have ever heard say anything positive about CVT's. I hate them with a passion! 

This.  I have to worry enough about the idiots driving around me that I'd rather not have to divert any of my attention towards shifting.

I've found I pay much more attention to driving when I actually get to be involved in the process, and a third pedal does that for me. Automatics leave too much room for focusing on everything else...

 

If you're driving a 'dull car', it's not going to be fun regardless if you have an automatic or manual.

I disagree. For me, a manual can add a little bit of fun to even an otherwise dull car. Sure it won't be as fun as a fun car with a manual...

 

I prefer manual.  Wife prefers automatic.  So yea, our vehicles are automatics.

 

That's how I ended up driving only automatics for a year or so. I decided this was one of the battles I was going to fight... that's how much I dislike automatics. Now we have one of each... if she wants to drive my car, she can learn to.

You are the first person I have ever heard say anything positive about CVT's. I hate them with a passion! 

Really? Perhaps you drove an early bad one? The only bad thing I can say about mine (Nissan Versa 2008 CVT) is that it's a bit slow to respond when I press the accelerator with force and suddenly (half a second of delay), but that's such a rare occurence in my daily driving that it's really offset by all the advantages. I also hear that newer CVTs include a planetary gear for more manual-like reaction at low speeds and have a much improved dynamic range, so perhaps even that concern has been addressed.

Really? Perhaps you drove an early bad one? The only bad thing I can say about mine (Nissan Versa 2008 CVT) is that it's a bit slow to respond when I press the accelerator with force and suddenly (half a second of delay), but that's such a rare occurence in my daily driving that it's really offset by all the advantages. I also hear that newer CVTs include a planetary gear for more manual-like reaction at low speeds and have a much improved dynamic range, so perhaps even that concern has been addressed.

Nope, rented a 2011 Nissan Versa. It was slow, loud, and annoying. It was not efficient - my '05 Civic from back in the day would get 38-42mpg on the highway (summer day w/AC ). I couldn't achieve that with the Versa going the same routes I did with my Civic. I feel bad for Subaru/Nissan owners - they just push CVT's on almost their entire lineup. 

I have yet to drive a manual car but I assume it probably better. Right now I like driving an automatic.

 

I like driving a manual transmission in Gran Turismo :laugh:

I think each has a place - can't beat a nice lazy automatic box on a long cruise. But I do prefer manual.

 

Still never driven a car with DSG though - really want to try that out! 

Really? Perhaps you drove an early bad one? The only bad thing I can say about mine (Nissan Versa 2008 CVT) is that it's a bit slow to respond when I press the accelerator with force and suddenly (half a second of delay), but that's such a rare occurence in my daily driving that it's really offset by all the advantages. I also hear that newer CVTs include a planetary gear for more manual-like reaction at low speeds and have a much improved dynamic range, so perhaps even that concern has been addressed.

I had a 2013 Altima as a rental last year, and the only thing that I didn't like about the CVT was that slight delay.

Overall, it was strange not having gear shifts, but it got really good gas mileage which I would think far outweighed the minor nuisances.

Nope, rented a 2011 Nissan Versa. It was slow, loud, and annoying. It was not efficient - my '05 Civic from back in the day would get 38-42mpg on the highway (summer day w/AC ). I couldn't achieve that with the Versa going the same routes I did with my Civic. I feel bad for Subaru/Nissan owners - they just push CVT's on almost their entire lineup. 

I take good note of your experience, but in official ratings, CVTs consistently achieve better fuel economy than regular automatics and manuals. They're lighter, smaller, the absence of gaps in gear ratios translates in smoother accelerations, less strain on most moving parts, and allows the engine to work at its peak efficiency more often. This does mean the engine will rev up more if you accelerate hard, but it also means the engine revs down more with a light foot - I love my low RPMs when driving around the city. CVTs are also kickass in mountainous terrain - they seamlessly adapt to the varying inclination of terrain whereas fixed-ratio transmissions struggle to find the ideal gear.

I take good note of your experience, but in official ratings, CVTs consistently achieve better fuel economy than regular automatics and manuals. They're lighter, smaller, the absence of gaps in gear ratios translates in smoother accelerations, less strain on most moving parts, and allows the engine to work at its peak efficiency more often. This does mean the engine will rev up more if you accelerate hard, but it also means the engine revs down more with a light foot - I love my low RPMs when driving around the city. CVTs are also kickass in mountainous terrain - they seamlessly adapt to the varying inclination of terrain whereas fixed-ratio transmissions struggle to find the ideal gear.

LOL @ MPG. :D

I think every one voted for mannual was because they are familiar with it and just are Used to shifting.

 

For me, I think Automatic is pretty awesome...I can focus on something else, others' dangers and faults, talking with my little daughter....and so.

 

My first car is Mitsubushi 1994 Lacer automatic.I insisted on buying automatic and never learnt mannual in the first place.I will always drive automatic in such heavy traffic

 

I don't know how to drive an automatic. :(

yaayy...I don't know how to drive mannual

Auto can be a bit of a pain in some cases, when you want to put your foot down and the car takes a few seconds to realise what's going on.

This may not be as apparent in bigger cars but is definitely apparent in the smaller vehicles I have driven.

Manual all the way. Automatic is convenient, but there's nothing quite like the feeling of dumping my S2000 into third or fourth at 60MPH for an epic overtaking maneuver and a wonderful accompanying soundtrack :D

As Steve also said, humans are generally more in tune with their intentions than an automatic gearbox is, so manuals are mostly more responsive (at least in my experience). When I put my foot down, I'm generally wanting to go faster at that moment, not when the gearbox finally decides the correct gear. I've driven an automatic Aston Martin Vantage on a track, and it was probably one of the most frustrating experiences of my life.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Fresh CachyOS install with Niri - I guess it's a little orange, but I'm working on it
    • FastStone Image Viewer 8.5 by Razvan Serea FastStone Image Viewer is a fast, stable, user-friendly image browser, converter and editor. It has a nice array of features that include image viewing, management, comparison, red-eye removal, emailing, resizing, cropping, retouching and color adjustments. Its innovative but intuitive full-screen mode provides quick access to EXIF information, thumbnail browser and major functionalities via hidden toolbars that pop up when your mouse touches the four edges of the screen. Other features include a high quality magnifier and a musical slideshow with 150+ transitional effects, as well as lossless JPEG transitions, drop shadow effects, image annotation, scanner support, histogram and much more. It supports all major graphic formats (BMP, JPEG, JPEG 2000, animated GIF, PNG, PCX, PSD, EPS, TIFF, WMF, ICO and TGA) and popular digital camera RAW formats (CRW, CR2, NEF, PEF, RAF, MRW, ORF, SRF, ARW, SR2, RW2 and DNG). FastStone Image Viewer features: Image browser and viewer with a familiar Windows Explorer-like user interface Support for many popular image formats and PDF viewing True Full Screen viewer with convenient image zoom support and unique fly-out menu panels Crystal-clear and customizable one-click image magnifier Powerful image editing tools: Resize/resample, rotate/flip, crop, sharpen/blur, adjust lighting/colors/curves/levels etc. Eleven re-sampling algorithms to choose from when resizing images Image color effects: gray scale, sepia, negative, Red/Green/Blue adjustment Image special effects: drop shadow, framing, bump map, sketch, oil painting, lens Draw texts, lines, highlights, rectangles, ovals and callout objects on images Clone Stamp and Healing Brush Superior red-eye effect removal/reduction with completely natural looking end result Multi-level Undo/Redo capability Single click to switch between best fit and actual size mode Image management, including file tagging, rating and drag-and-drop to copy/move/re-arrange files Histogram display with color counter feature Compare images side-by-side (up to 4 at a time) to easily cull those forgettable shots Image EXIF metadata support (plus comment editing for JPEGs) Configurable batch processing to convert/rename large or small collections of images Slideshow with 150+ transition effects and music support (MP3, WMA, WAV...) Create efficient image attachments for emailing to family and friends Print images with full page-layout control Create fully configurable contact sheets Create memorable artistic image montages from your family photos for personalized desktop wallpapers (Wallpaper Anywhere) Acquire images from scanners. Support batch scanning to PDF, TIFF, JPEG and PNG Versatile screen capture capability Powerful Save As interface to compare image quality and control generated file size Run favorite external editors with one keystroke from within Image Viewer Offer portable version of the program which can be run from a removable storage device Configurable mouse wheel support Support themes (bright, gray and dark) Support dual-monitor configurations Support touch interface (tap, swipe, pinch) Support dual instances Play video and audio files (Third party codecs may be required for old versions of Windows) And much more... FastStone Image Viewer 8.5 changelog: Added support for SVG format Added Start importing automatically and Handle duplicate file names automatically options to the Import Photos and Videos tool WebP files can now be rotated and saved with a single click Enhanced dark theme support in the PDF viewer Fixed a bug where some links in PDF files were not clickable Other improvements and bug fixes Download: FastStone Image Viewer 8.5 | Portable | ~15.0 MB (Freeware) View: FastStone Image Viewer Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Yup, broke my comp… again. its times like this when I regret AMD. This just never happens on NV.
    • Huh? You're delusional calling the Steam Deck dead. It is so successful that it has sold out multiple times. Even after the price hike this year it sold out again with 24 hours of being back in stock. The demand is real and has not died down even after four years.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      DaviKar went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      460
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      160
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      110
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      85
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!