Do you perfer manual or automatic transmission?


Manual or automatic transmission?  

170 members have voted

  1. 1. What do you perfer to drive in a car using manual transmission or automatic transmission?



Recommended Posts

Automatic for me.  I've driven manual (enough to learn the basics). .. however for me driving isn't about driving so much as getting for A-B quicker than walking, and for cheaper than paying for public transportation.. and taking stuff from A-B.   I found I got frustrated with driving manual.. couldn't just go on Gas, then on Brake.. there was 5 other steps in the middle.

Never found someone willing to let me learn manual on his car, so I only drive them in racing sims. That said, I drive a CVT and really love the smoothness of acceleration and consistently low RPM. I don't think I could go back to standard automatic. Most of my time behind the wheel is in traffic jams so I doubt driving a manual would bring me much enjoyement. CVTs are the future of eco-friendly cars IMO.

Never found someone willing to let me learn manual on his car, so I only drive them in racing sims. That said, I drive a CVT and really love the smoothness of acceleration and consistently low RPM. I don't think I could go back to standard automatic.

You are the first person I have ever heard say anything positive about CVT's. I hate them with a passion! 

This.  I have to worry enough about the idiots driving around me that I'd rather not have to divert any of my attention towards shifting.

I've found I pay much more attention to driving when I actually get to be involved in the process, and a third pedal does that for me. Automatics leave too much room for focusing on everything else...

 

If you're driving a 'dull car', it's not going to be fun regardless if you have an automatic or manual.

I disagree. For me, a manual can add a little bit of fun to even an otherwise dull car. Sure it won't be as fun as a fun car with a manual...

 

I prefer manual.  Wife prefers automatic.  So yea, our vehicles are automatics.

 

That's how I ended up driving only automatics for a year or so. I decided this was one of the battles I was going to fight... that's how much I dislike automatics. Now we have one of each... if she wants to drive my car, she can learn to.

You are the first person I have ever heard say anything positive about CVT's. I hate them with a passion! 

Really? Perhaps you drove an early bad one? The only bad thing I can say about mine (Nissan Versa 2008 CVT) is that it's a bit slow to respond when I press the accelerator with force and suddenly (half a second of delay), but that's such a rare occurence in my daily driving that it's really offset by all the advantages. I also hear that newer CVTs include a planetary gear for more manual-like reaction at low speeds and have a much improved dynamic range, so perhaps even that concern has been addressed.

Really? Perhaps you drove an early bad one? The only bad thing I can say about mine (Nissan Versa 2008 CVT) is that it's a bit slow to respond when I press the accelerator with force and suddenly (half a second of delay), but that's such a rare occurence in my daily driving that it's really offset by all the advantages. I also hear that newer CVTs include a planetary gear for more manual-like reaction at low speeds and have a much improved dynamic range, so perhaps even that concern has been addressed.

Nope, rented a 2011 Nissan Versa. It was slow, loud, and annoying. It was not efficient - my '05 Civic from back in the day would get 38-42mpg on the highway (summer day w/AC ). I couldn't achieve that with the Versa going the same routes I did with my Civic. I feel bad for Subaru/Nissan owners - they just push CVT's on almost their entire lineup. 

I have yet to drive a manual car but I assume it probably better. Right now I like driving an automatic.

 

I like driving a manual transmission in Gran Turismo :laugh:

I think each has a place - can't beat a nice lazy automatic box on a long cruise. But I do prefer manual.

 

Still never driven a car with DSG though - really want to try that out! 

Really? Perhaps you drove an early bad one? The only bad thing I can say about mine (Nissan Versa 2008 CVT) is that it's a bit slow to respond when I press the accelerator with force and suddenly (half a second of delay), but that's such a rare occurence in my daily driving that it's really offset by all the advantages. I also hear that newer CVTs include a planetary gear for more manual-like reaction at low speeds and have a much improved dynamic range, so perhaps even that concern has been addressed.

I had a 2013 Altima as a rental last year, and the only thing that I didn't like about the CVT was that slight delay.

Overall, it was strange not having gear shifts, but it got really good gas mileage which I would think far outweighed the minor nuisances.

Nope, rented a 2011 Nissan Versa. It was slow, loud, and annoying. It was not efficient - my '05 Civic from back in the day would get 38-42mpg on the highway (summer day w/AC ). I couldn't achieve that with the Versa going the same routes I did with my Civic. I feel bad for Subaru/Nissan owners - they just push CVT's on almost their entire lineup. 

I take good note of your experience, but in official ratings, CVTs consistently achieve better fuel economy than regular automatics and manuals. They're lighter, smaller, the absence of gaps in gear ratios translates in smoother accelerations, less strain on most moving parts, and allows the engine to work at its peak efficiency more often. This does mean the engine will rev up more if you accelerate hard, but it also means the engine revs down more with a light foot - I love my low RPMs when driving around the city. CVTs are also kickass in mountainous terrain - they seamlessly adapt to the varying inclination of terrain whereas fixed-ratio transmissions struggle to find the ideal gear.

I take good note of your experience, but in official ratings, CVTs consistently achieve better fuel economy than regular automatics and manuals. They're lighter, smaller, the absence of gaps in gear ratios translates in smoother accelerations, less strain on most moving parts, and allows the engine to work at its peak efficiency more often. This does mean the engine will rev up more if you accelerate hard, but it also means the engine revs down more with a light foot - I love my low RPMs when driving around the city. CVTs are also kickass in mountainous terrain - they seamlessly adapt to the varying inclination of terrain whereas fixed-ratio transmissions struggle to find the ideal gear.

LOL @ MPG. :D

I think every one voted for mannual was because they are familiar with it and just are Used to shifting.

 

For me, I think Automatic is pretty awesome...I can focus on something else, others' dangers and faults, talking with my little daughter....and so.

 

My first car is Mitsubushi 1994 Lacer automatic.I insisted on buying automatic and never learnt mannual in the first place.I will always drive automatic in such heavy traffic

 

I don't know how to drive an automatic. :(

yaayy...I don't know how to drive mannual

Auto can be a bit of a pain in some cases, when you want to put your foot down and the car takes a few seconds to realise what's going on.

This may not be as apparent in bigger cars but is definitely apparent in the smaller vehicles I have driven.

Manual all the way. Automatic is convenient, but there's nothing quite like the feeling of dumping my S2000 into third or fourth at 60MPH for an epic overtaking maneuver and a wonderful accompanying soundtrack :D

As Steve also said, humans are generally more in tune with their intentions than an automatic gearbox is, so manuals are mostly more responsive (at least in my experience). When I put my foot down, I'm generally wanting to go faster at that moment, not when the gearbox finally decides the correct gear. I've driven an automatic Aston Martin Vantage on a track, and it was probably one of the most frustrating experiences of my life.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • AI is the beginning, wait until real robots replace more jobs, specifically jobs that require physical work.
    • AI is indeed eliminating jobs, and Oracle just proved it by Hamid Ganji There’s no question that AI has become the hottest trend in workplaces, and every company is trying to adopt AI-driven solutions across its operations. While some industry leaders repeatedly say AI won’t lead to massive layoffs, recent data suggest that AI is actually one of the main reasons some companies are reducing their workforce. According to Oracle’s annual regulatory filing, the company has laid off about 21,000 employees, or 13% of its workforce, amid increasing AI adoption. “The adoption and deployment of AI technologies across our operations have resulted, and may continue to result, in reductions to our workforce,” Oracle said in the filing. The software giant now has approximately 141,000 full-time employees, a notable decrease from 162,000 during the same period last year. Restructuring expenses, including severance payments, cost Oracle $1.84 billion in fiscal 2026. Additionally, around 49,000 Oracle employees were based in the U.S., while approximately 92,000 were employed internationally. Like many other companies, Oracle has fully embraced AI and concentrated much of its efforts on the technology. The company is also a key participant in the United States’ $500 billion Stargate Project, which aims to build multiple AI data centers across the country. When it comes to AI adoption and its impact on the workforce, opinions remain divided. NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang, whose company has been one of the biggest beneficiaries of the AI boom, recently said in an interview that attributing job cuts to AI is a “lazy” narrative. “The narrative that connects AI to job loss, for many of the CEOs that are doing it – it is just too lazy. AI has just arrived, how is it possible they're already losing jobs?” Huang said. However, statistics and recent reports tell a different story. According to Layoffs.fyi, 196 tech companies have laid off about 119,800 employees so far this year. Reducing staff and replacing roles with AI agents could become one of the most significant trends in the job market in the years ahead.
    • Zoom Workplace 7.1.0.41345 by Razvan Serea Zoom Workplace for Windows is a reliable video conferencing tool that makes it easy to connect and collaborate. With features like messaging, file sharing, and app integrations, it’s designed to streamline teamwork. You’ll get high-quality audio and video, strong security with end-to-end encryption, and an intuitive interface—all of which help remote teams and businesses stay productive and connected. Zoom Workplace key features: High-Definition Video & Audio: Provides clear, reliable communication for virtual meetings. End-to-End Encryption: Ensures secure communication with strong data protection. Multi-Factor Authentication: Adds an extra layer of security for user accounts. Integration with Productivity Apps: Supports seamless integration with Microsoft Office, Google Workspace, and more. File Sharing: Easily share files during meetings for efficient collaboration. Real-Time Messaging: Enables team chat for ongoing communication. Collaborative Whiteboarding: Allows teams to brainstorm and collaborate visually. Webinar Support: Host large webinars with interactive features. Administrative Controls: Manage user permissions, meeting settings, and security features. Cloud Storage: Automatically stores meetings and files in the cloud for easy access. Cross-Platform Support: Available on Windows, macOS, and mobile devices. Meeting features: Virtual Backgrounds: Customize your background for meetings to maintain privacy or enhance professionalism. Touch Up My Appearance: Automatically smoothens skin tone for a more polished video appearance. Breakout Rooms: Divide meetings into smaller sessions for group discussions or workshops. Live Transcription: Automatically generate real-time captions during meetings for accessibility. Zoom Apps: Integrate third-party applications directly into Zoom for enhanced functionality. Meeting Reactions: Participants can use emojis for quick, non-verbal feedback during meetings. Polling: Conduct live polls during meetings to gather instant feedback from participants. Attention Tracking: Monitors participant attention during meetings to ensure engagement. Closed Captioning: Enable manual or automatic captions for a more inclusive experience. Webinar Replay: Record and share webinars with analytics for audience engagement. Download: Zoom 64-bit | 145.0 MB (Free, paid upgrade available) Links: Zoom Website | Zoom ARM64 | Zoom Installers | Release Notes Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • UK funds £60M AI labs to challenge US tech dominance with open-source models by Paul Hill The UK government has awarded £60 million to Oxford University and University College London to help keep the country in the AI race by focusing on open-source, low-hardware alternatives. This is in stark contrast to the expensive, closed-source, and high-hardware-requirement models being created in the United States and elsewhere. The money will be shared among two new academic research labs over six years to help them redesign the fundamental mathematics and architectures of AI to help the UK reduce its reliance on a handful of US tech firms. Commenting on the development, AI Minister Kanishka Narayan said: Initially, the government planned to fund just one lab with a £40 million investment, but with this update, two labs will now get access to a larger pool of funds. The labs are expected to invest in the top AI researchers at every career stage, with £2 million per lab being set aside for hiring at least ten doctoral students. The government hopes that this will grow the UK’s talent in the field of AI. The labs are also expected to work closely with the leaders in British AI research, such as the Alan Turing Institute and UKRI’s AI research hubs. This will allow the various teams to collaborate and create new solutions faster than they could alone. This development is pretty interesting for a number of reasons, chiefly that it could create a long-term challenge for US tech firms if these labs successfully scale these open-source architectures that bypass the proprietary ecosystems. It could also give British businesses and public sector organizations access to AI features without paying high licensing fees to foreign providers or needing to invest in specialized server infrastructure.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      97
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      89
    5. 5
      neufuse
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!