Do you perfer manual or automatic transmission?


Manual or automatic transmission?  

170 members have voted

  1. 1. What do you perfer to drive in a car using manual transmission or automatic transmission?



Recommended Posts

I only live 4 kilometres to work so a manual is the only way to go

Having no rush hour traffic to deal with is a plus

I had to search hard on the web to find my vehicle with a manual

It would be boring with a automatic and not worth the driving experience which i enjoy.

A manual in gear also would try to go forward without a foot on the pedal--except it stalls unless you give it gas.

 

Like a manual, you can put the auto in neutral as well.  Don't get me wrong, I like manuals better too, but not for a reason like this.

 

The difference being natural and fluid motion to put the vehicle in N. I don't believe anyone puts an automatic car in N almost ever.

But when in a manual vehicle your already shifting down or already riding N and its as simple (and natural) as moving your hand over. This should be with out saying to my original statement if your custom to both standard and automatic transmission.

The difference being natural and fluid motion to put the vehicle in N. I don't believe anyone puts an automatic car in N almost ever.

But when in a manual vehicle your already shifting down or already riding N and its as simple (and natural) as moving your hand over. This should be with out saying to my original statement if your custom to both standard and automatic transmission.

Hard to get less fluid than bumping it forward. Neutral isn't locked on automatics(doesn't require you to be stopped or foot on the brake).

 

You just find it more natural  with a manual because you are used to it.

Hard to get less fluid than bumping it forward. Neutral isn't locked on automatics(doesn't require you to be stopped or foot on the brake).

 

You just find it more natural  with a manual because you are used to it.

 

Your trying to make an argument that is unique to you. This is NOT common. In manual your constantly shifting and shifting in N is a no brainer. with automatic there is no reason to be shifting unless your changing directions, parking or changing into 1, 2 or 3rd. I know perfectly how both transmissions function and how they are meant to be used (but thanks for explaining it to me like I had no idea). Shifting into neutral on an auto on a daily basis just causes unnecessary wear and recommend against. Shifting to N in Manuel is safe and normal. 

Automatics are a much easier transmission to use and are better for traffic driving over a standard.

I have always owned standard transmissions. I will not buy an automatic for the fact that they are expensive to rebuild when they break down. Standard transmissions are stronger and cheaper to repair because it is usually the clutch that wears out.

Manual all the way. Fun to drive, becomes second nature a d you can deal with stop and go traffic if you know what you are doing.

 

of cause you can deal with it.   however, after 1 year of 1 hour in traffic, i certainly prefer to drive automatic.

 

i love manual, for anything else other then the daily commute..   there is no fun engaging with the car if you stop all the time

Your trying to make an argument that is unique to you. This is NOT common. In manual your constantly shifting and shifting in N is a no brainer. with automatic there is no reason to be shifting unless your changing directions, parking or changing into 1, 2 or 3rd. I know perfectly how both transmissions function and how they are meant to be used (but thanks for explaining it to me like I had no idea). Shifting into neutral on an auto on a daily basis just causes unnecessary wear and recommend against. Shifting to N in Manuel is safe and normal. 

Unique to me eh? 

 

 

I guess auto makers make their transmissions designed to shift into neutral at any time just like a manual, just for me. 

 

 

I feel honored. :p

I prefer manual because I've mostly driven cars with manual transmission. Automatic is more comfortable but I need time until I get used to it.

 

I have a feeling that manual is better for urban areas and automatic for long trips.

Hello,

I prefer manual because I've mostly driven cars with manual transmission. Automatic is more comfortable but I need time until I get used to it.

 

I have a feeling that manual is better for urban areas and automatic for long trips.

There really is no getting used to it :) No clutch and no gearshifting! :)

BTW, I think you got it reversed :) Manual is better for long trips and automatic is better for urban (city, go and stop traffic) areas.

Hello,

There really is no getting used to it :) No clutch and no gearshifting! :)

BTW, I think you got it reversed :) Manual is better for long trips and automatic is better for urban (city, go and stop traffic) areas.

There's getting used to the pedals because autos got 2 and manuals - 3. So when I enter into an automatic transmission vehicle I place my left foot onto the stop pedal (unintentionally) and that could create troubles. It's just odd using only one leg.

 

As for the urban driving - you could be right here, but don't the automatics act weird when you drive somewhere in between the first and second gear?

Pies. Anyone who has tried eating a pie (or a really hot burger) while driving will KNOW that automatic is the only way. Seriously, turning a corner, while shifting gears, just not possible with a hot mince and cheese pie in one hand. Won't somebody think of the pies!

Hello,

There's getting used to the pedals because autos got 2 and manuals - 3. So when I enter into an automatic transmission vehicle I place my left foot onto the stop pedal (unintentionally) and that could create troubles. It's just odd using only one leg.

Explain please :)

On a manual there are 4 positions (right to left): Accelerator, brake, clutch, and rest

In a automatic, you would simply put your foot where the clutch is. I dont see it that hard to get use to :)

As for the urban driving - you could be right here, but don't the automatics act weird when you drive somewhere in between the first and second gear?

Nope. They act better than manual cars, as you rarely have to shift to first gear while driving for anything...

 

 

Pies. Anyone who has tried eating a pie (or a really hot burger) while driving will KNOW that automatic is the only way. Seriously, turning a corner, while shifting gears, just not possible with a hot mince and cheese pie in one hand. Won't somebody think of the pies!

As dangerous as it is, yes, having only to be able to drive with one hand is a advantage to me (Some say two to keep on the steering wheel, debateable :) )

Hello,

Explain please :)

On a manual there are 4 positions (right to left): Accelerator, brake, clutch, and rest

In a automatic, you would simply put your foot where the clutch is. I dont see it that hard to get use to :)

 

Not really. Manual cars are driven by using your left foot for the clutch and the right for brake and acceleration. So in an automatic car I'd place my left foot on the brake by habit and that could be very dangerous. When my reflex strikes I'd automatically floor the brake pedal and the acceleration pedal which will turn my engine off. People have told me one way to deal with this is by sitting onto you left foot and thus ensuring I'll use only right.

People have told me one way to deal with this is by sitting onto you left foot and thus ensuring I'll use only right.

 

What a twist!!!! Thank God, My first car is autmatic and voila.I don't have this problem even if I use manual....

Stick is fun but with stuff like the 7 sp autos coming out, manual is being phased out as it's lost it's usefulness. I just bought my first stick too. It's worth noting that driving stick forces you to be more attentive.

An automatic gearbox is for people who just want to get from A to B. A manual gearbox is for people who want to drive!

 

Seriously though I have no issues with changing gear, just comes so naturally that I don't even think about it. Driving an automatic I'm conscious about what my left foot is doing! 

Stick is fun but with stuff like the 7 sp autos coming out, manual is being phased out as it's lost it's usefulness. I just bought my first stick too. It's worth noting that driving stick forces you to be more attentive.

They have been saying that for years and yet manual is still here, and only a few vehicles do not offer it.

 

7 speeds have been coming out for the last 4 years.  There are now 8 speed automagics out.

7 speeds have been coming out for the last 4 years.  There are now 8 speed automagics out.

I spent the last few weeks in and out of dealerships looking to replace my car and they all told me that less than 30% of cars are manually equipped

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Pretty nice tool, thanks
    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      455
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      83
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!