Tech issues solved added in tech forums


Recommended Posts

No one said anything about not having fun. But you joined a month after I did, and you surely see that there's a difference. I would like to see us try some things out and see if they make us better than we are now, rather than blindly shoot them down in the first few hours. We all have a fondness for IT, and therefore we all know that there are almost always day-one problems.

And I'm sorry that you're not going to renew your subscription, but that's your perogative. :(

I was speaking out of anger mostly and will keep it.. But, it just seems that Neowin doesn't care about the feedback and just shrugs it off..

 

But it was a lot worse before and nothing was done about it. It doesn't really seem that bad anymore.. compared to when Windows 8 was released anyway.. Just seems like a violent push.. Thank you for taking the time to actually reply back to me instead of just shoving it down my throat. 

Ok. Since Neowin has "overnight" gotten serious and a attitude for people trying to make light of the situation, I have decided I will NOT be renewing my sub. Why help a community that doesn't care about it's members. 

It's ironic you would say that - the feature is all about fostering a healthier, more supportive community.

I'm certainly willing to give it a go, though I still think it places too much importance on one single aspect of the site (answering questions). I think of Neowin as more than just a tech site where people come to get answers to questions; it's a community and I think its members should be valued as a whole and not just for how many correct answers they've been voted for. I feel that the Likes system that is already in place would have been more fitting perhaps since it isn't just limited to answering questions. Maybe it could be made optional or something; I know it is silly and vain maybe but many of us have been here a long time and it is a bit disheartening to see a big 0 under our names.

Yeah, I'm gonna agree this is a dumb change. Post count is important, regardless of if a few people post just to see their post count increase. Deal with those people in their own way and leave the post count showing. Since the LARGE majority of my participation in this forum is NOT in tech sections because lets be honest, this is NOT a leading tech site and isn't going to be, this change will only be a negative to me. We have a good community and group of members, and there is certainly good help here, but that's not what the majority of posts on this message board are about. Message boards have worked just fine for years the same way, no need to change things just for the sake of changing. I don't have an issue with adding the best answers part, but I don't particularly care for removing the post count just to pretend this is a site focused on tech support.

It's ironic you would say that - the feature is all about fostering a healthier, more supportive community.

It kinda is ironic.. but.. I was referring to listening to the voice of it's members and subs rather than just shrugging them off. 

The point of replacing the post count with the best answers count is to recognize the efforts of those that went out of their way to help their fellow member.

But only the best answers get counted. So efforts to help others don't always get recognized. Also what if multiple posters each give an equal contribution or people built upon each others answers?

  • Like 3

But only the best answers get counted. So efforts to help others don't always get recognized. Also what if multiple posters each give an equal contribution or people built upon each others answers?

unforchantly, they aren't going to budge in this debate.. They are pretty firm on it.. I've fought and I can fight.. 

I don't care about my post count, I find posting interesting and funny things in small amounts more important than having 100,000 trivial posts!

It isn't going to change, and a minority of members whining about it just enforces this decision :)

Whining? Opposing opinions to a change you have implemented means whining? So can we expect that any future decisions you make should automatically mean that we should shut up and deal with it?

 

I mean I understand its your site. Its ultimately your call and I respect that but if you really meant for this change to boister your community up more like your staff members have replied to this thread to elaborate, a response such as yours is more immature than the "whiners" you speak of.

 

Want the change accepted? Start first with reinforcing your reasoning.

 members whining about it just enforces this decision :)

This is what really irritates me. We are not whining, we are speaking our opinion. Really sad.. You would think the head admin of the site wouldn't call subscribers whiners for speak out against a change that affects them.   

This is what really irritates me. We are not whining, we are speaking our opinion. Really sad.. You would think the head admin of the site wouldn't call subscribers whiners for speak out against a change that affects them.   

Yeah, that's a pretty ****ty slap in the face to those of us who have been here since the beginning and supported you by giving you our money multiple times. That's probably about the most disrespectful post I've ever seen from an Admin.

 

How about you give us a reason why removing post counts is useful. It keeps getting asked why they are useful and a number of reasons have been given, but there has yet to be a reason why removing it is better. As a new visitor to this site, I would very likely discount someone who has 0 best answers. This does the opposite of what was the intention. Not to mention those of us who spend many hours helping people in section that don't have a "best answer" feature,or the people who spend hours helping someone debug something just to have someone come in and drop one line and get all the credit. And on top of that, people may be an expert in certain topics compared to someone who just posts a lot of generic Googled solutions to people's problems. A high number of best answers gives a false impression that a new answer may be more correct than someone else's. There are a number of reasons why systems like this don't work well. Calling the people who help pay your bills whiners when they offer valid opposition and concerns is incredibly disrespectful. I know you well enough to know you're better than that, Steven, and I'll just assume and hope it was a slip only out of frustration.

IMO if people strive for higher Best Answer numbers rather than higher spammer numbers the overall quality of the forum should go up, as people are going to spend more time in the help forums, as well as helping each other out.

 

And as with other changes upsetting people, if a change like this is going to make people want to leave, they didnt need to be here to begin with.

  • Like 3

All very valid points, and I do apologise. I was annoyed at the time, and I was surprised at the fact that in the short space of time it has been announced there were so many posts that didn't want to even see how things went.

However, I stand by the change for the moment for that exact reason. Why are so many people not willing to give this a go and see what happens? Do we want to stagnate?

No worries and I hope it didn't come off as an attack.

 

I agree that there is need for change on occasion; I question the reasoning behind this change. I'm willing to give this a shot and am not above compromising so long as some things are adjusted. Namely the ability to best answer your own posts.

Stardock wants them to, it makes Neowin look more professional, along with answered questions driving more traffic from google.

 

You're wrong that was me actually, if we act more professional and friendly, were hoping it will encourage the membership to do the same 

There's only one person you could be referring to and you should call Him by His name.

I don't even know who you're referring to, so this a non issue. I was generalizing.

It isn't going to change, and a minority of members whining about it just enforces this decision :)

 

 

Members voicing their concern about a site they like/love and we're "whining"?   Unbelievable and unacceptable.  So is this an indication of the direction Neowin is heading to, only reward a minority or try to entice others by manipulating them with a reward that is nothing but a number?

 

Bravo!   /s

Sorry if it came off disrespectful, name some decisions that have proven to be unpopular in the long run? I had dinner, watched a movie and came back to see a lot of posts saying the same things from pages ago by the same people, arguing against the people who support it, because they believe it will eventually lead to higher quality posts on this forum. If that isn't a change we can get behind then I don't know what is lol.

 

Post counts were considered to be removed altogether, but I wasn't a fan of that.

Sorry if it came off disrespectful, name some decisions that have proven to be unpopular in the long run? I had dinner, watched a movie and came back to see a lot of posts saying the same things from pages ago by the same people, arguing against the people who support it, because they believe it will eventually lead to higher quality posts on this forum. If that isn't a change we can get behind then I don't know what is lol.

 

Post counts were considered to be removed altogether, but I wasn't a fan of that.

Can you please at least provide an option to remove the best answer feature from the User CP? Pretty please with a cherry on top!

 

E3moWR9.png

But the problem is that it's only post quality in certain parts of the forum. The issue we're having is that we don't all post in those areas specifically.

 

Ironically I came to neowin many years ago seeking tech help but I didn't keep posting here because I got the help I needed. I stayed because I found other parts of the forum that I enjoyed.

 

I'm really not sure how I should take it now that I'm being told that my contributions (however small) to this forum aren't worth anything if I'm not posting in reply to some one elses tech troubles.

 

Also I consider what phone or OS a person is using, or their location, considering it can be anything from nothing to the moon, to be less useful pieces of information than their post count.

  • Like 2

And its only a few certain members that are complaining and backing each other up....you dont see the other 299,999+ members moaning, infact other than the little click, most others are saying they welcome the change of focus and are tired of post count ###### and bullies.

 

...People said Neowin was going down hill, not as godd as it used to be yada, yada, yada...

 

...This is the start of us pulling the content upto a level where we want it to be and refocus on what makes Neowin great not just pandering to the vocal few...

Sorry guys, absolutely ridiculous, I see what you're trying to achieve, but this isn't a good way to do it IMO. (N)

 

Why bother having post-count stars if we don't have post counts?

 

Should people that have extremely high amounts of post counts now be demoted to standard members considering they were promoted mainly due to the fact of their sheer amount of posts?

 

The entire basis of a forum revolves around post counts for the most part. How will competitions work if we don't know their post counts now?

(Yes I realise it's in their profile. So was their warning level and that decision got reversed quickly.)

 

Silly, silly move. Please reconsider this decision.

 

 

Can you please at least provide an option to remove the best answer feature from the User CP? Pretty please with a cherry on top!

Agreed, this is a good idea.

Edited by Raa

No worries and I hope it didn't come off as an attack.

I agree that there is need for change on occasion; I question the reasoning behind this change. I'm willing to give this a shot and am not above compromising so long as some things are adjusted. Namely the ability to best answer your own posts.

Completely agree with you.

It's great you guys are trying to encourage members to help one another, but please remove to option to best answer your own threads.

It could lead to distorting the number of people who are genuinely helping others.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A coalition of publishers sued OpenAI and Microsoft over scraping content without consent by Hamid Ganji Image via Depositphotos.com AI companies often rely on readily available internet content to train their chatbots and provide users with instant answers. This method of AI training is fast and relatively inexpensive, but using a website’s content without permission or compensation is not something publishers like to see, and this is exactly why Microsoft and OpenAI are now being sued. As reported by Bloomberg, a group of publishers that collectively own nearly 400 newspapers has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft. The coalition argues that the two companies scraped their content to build AI chatbots like ChatGPT and Copilot without paying any compensation. The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, argues that while AI products have generated billions of dollars in market value using publishers’ work, none of that value has been shared with the publishers. The plaintiffs are seeking statutory damages and injunctive relief for alleged copyright infringement and violations of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. “Defendants systematically and secretly crawled the Publishers’ websites—including content behind paywalls and other access restrictions—and copied the Publishers’ articles, stories, and other original works onto their own servers without authorization,” the complaint states. The publishers also described the AI boom as a “death knell for local journalism” if AI companies that scrape content for free are not held accountable. Former New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin and his law firm, Platkin LLP, are representing the publishers. “Our models empower innovation, are trained on publicly available data, and are grounded in fair use,” OpenAI spokesperson Drew Pusateri told Bloomberg. This is not the first lawsuit involving the unauthorized use of publishers’ content by AI firms, but it is one of the largest coalitions ever formed against the free use of content by AI chatbots. In 2024, OpenAI and Microsoft also faced a similar lawsuit from eight newspapers that claimed AI products were benefiting from their content without permission.
    • Rufus alternative Ventoy now supports Windows 11's mandatory update, fixes major boot bug by Sayan Sen While Microsoft has its own official Media Creation Tool used for making bootable USB media, there are some popular third-party utilities as well which offer additional options like bypassing system requirements, Microsoft Account creation, and more. One of these is Ventoy, and the software has received its latest update today. In fact, the app actually got a slew of updates over the last couple of days, three version releases in total, to be specific. The first release, version 1.1.13, was pulled as there was some unspecified error in the update, and as such, the corrected version 1.1.14 was pushed out. Following that on very short notice, 1.1.15 was published as well. For those unfamiliar, Ventoy is an open-source utility that lets users create a bootable USB drive once and then simply copy ISO, WIM, IMG, VHD, or EFI files onto it without repeatedly formatting the drive. It supports both legacy BIOS and UEFI boot modes, Secure Boot, and a wide range of operating systems, making it one of the most versatile tools in the category. The biggest change in version 1.1.14 is an updated Secure Boot shim file aimed at resolving the UEFI CA 2023 issue, which is basically a compatibility problem that has affected Secure Boot environments on some systems. If you recall, we reported about severe boot issues on HP devices following the release of updated Secure Boot 2023 keys. For anyone who may not be aware, back in early 2024, Microsoft announced that it was updating Secure Boot keys as they were going to become 15 years old in 2026, which is also when they are set to expire. As such, the new 2023 certificates have been rolling out with the newest Windows 11 updates. Updated boot manager and Secure Boot certificates are crucial for protection against malware like bootkits. These are mandatory updates. Alongside that, the VentoyPlugson graphical plugin configurator was updated in sync with the release. The update also introduces a new VTOY_SECURE_BOOT_POLICY option within the Global Control plugin, giving users more flexibility in managing Secure Boot behavior. Ventoy has also received a fix for a startup issue when Secure Boot was disabled. Microsoft does officially allow users to boot systems without Secure Boot as long as the PC is Secure Boot capable. The full changelog is given below: Update secure boot shim file to solve the UEFI CA 2023 issue. The new release use a new CA, so you need to enroll the new key for the first boot time. VentoyPlugson update synchronously. Global control plugin add a VTOY_SECURE_BOOT_POLICY option. Fix the boot issue when Secure Boot is disabled in the UEFI firmware. You can download the latest version of the app here on Ventoy's official GitHub repo or from Neowin software stories.
    • Windows 11 is fine, no issues on any of the machines I've run it on since release. The stricter security requirements are a good thing, sometimes the baseline needs to change and people will winge, but it is what it is. Happened with the move from 9x to NT - broke compatability Happened with XP SP2 when security started to become a serious consideration Certainly happend with Vista that brought in UAC, the concept of not running as admin (something that has been the norm in Linux/Unix from pretty much the start) and a completely new driver stack. Windows 11 will probably get looked back at as the point where even consumer and SMB IT was dragged kicking and screaming into a somewhat secure by default configuration.
    • Bluestacks has been emulating Android on Windows for fifteen years. It's janky and riddled with ads though, so WSA looked like it was going to be a huge improvement over the emulator experience. Too bad Microsoft dropped the ball on that.
    • Classic. China would be nothing without Western, Japanese, and South Korean technology.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      441
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      134
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!