Recommended Posts

Hmm you couldn't be more wrong. There's ton of proof of evolution. Use google...

Or just read the link I gave lol

Evolution is a faith, you have to believe in it, it can not be proved. There is no evidence at all of evolution, most of what we are made to believe is based on elaborate assumption. I chose to believe in a loving God and Creator, you chose otherwise...

Projection much ? Considering your hero's stamen about biblical glasses and ignoring all evidence.

The Evolutionist basically believe in something that only to a very small extent can explained by science but has giant holes in the theory and can never be proved either.

There's probably billions of examples of evolution, but just for the sake of choosing the easiest one, Google "evolution of birds in Hawaii" or "evolution of animals in Galapagos"....

Evolution is a faith, you have to believe in it, it can not be proved. There is no evidence at all of evolution, most of what we are made to believe is based on elaborate assumption. I chose to believe in a loving God and Creator, you chose otherwise...

What the actual eff?! You're kidding, right? We have *plenty* of evidence to support evolution. It in fact, can and has been proven. Much of out modern day medicine would not exist without it. How do you explain strains of bacteria becoming resistant to medication?

 

Worse, the theory of evolution is tied to other scientific theories! How do you explain *million years old* fossils? How do you explain earthquakes? How do you explain evidence to support that Earth's continents have moved position since being created billions of years ago? How do you explain evidence to support climate change? How do you explain that when we gaze up into the sky, we don't see a "god" creating new stars, new planets, and eventually new life, but gravity, accretion, fusion, etc.... All these things tie into and support evolution. Nothing stays the same, ever. Nothing.

There's probably billions of examples of evolution, but just for the sake of choosing the easiest one, Google "evolution of birds in Hawaii" or "evolution of animals in Galapagos"....

I have seen those before.  Not sure why your showing that.  You must be getting something from that I am not.  Like I said theres no doubt that things evolve.  But nothing about evolution can explain "how we got here" with any kind of proof.  I am just saying you cant call one side an idiot for believing in something that your side cant prove either.

I have seen those before.  Not sure why your showing that.  You must be getting something from that I am not.  Like I said theres no doubt that things evolve.  But nothing about evolution can explain "how we got here" with any kind of proof.  I am just saying you cant call one side an idiot for believing in something that your side cant prove either.

Nothing can *prove* how we got here, no. But we can look elsewhere for clues on how it may have happened. Astronomy is a very big player in that. When we look to the skies with Hubble, we can see other solar systems being created... not by a god, but by gravity bounding material together, those materials eventually accrete into a star, planets, and eventually other matter - for example, comets, which deliver water and other organic compounds to these newly formed planets, which then can plant the seeds of life. Search for "panspermia".  

I have seen those before. Not sure why your showing that. You must be getting something from that I am not. Like I said theres no doubt that things evolve. But nothing about evolution can explain "how we got here" with any kind of proof. I am just saying you cant call one side an idiot for believing in something that your side cant prove either.

While the scientists don't 100% agree on how life started on earth, they all agree that we evolved from monkeys and that the earth is much more than 6 thousand years old. Those two should be enough to prove any religious goer wrong. The rest is just bonus.

I have seen those before.  Not sure why your showing that.  You must be getting something from that I am not.  Like I said theres no doubt that things evolve.  But nothing about evolution can explain "how we got here" with any kind of proof.

That's because it doesn't address that question and never attempts to.

I am just saying you cant call one side an idiot for believing in something that your side cant prove either.

For deliberately ignoring evidence we can. They proudly proclaim their rejection of any evidence that contradicts the creation modal.

While the scientists don't 100% agree on how life started on earth, they all agree that we evolved from monkeys and that the earth is much more than 6 thousand years old. Those two should be enough to prove any religious goer wrong. The rest is just bonus.

 

Correction. .No scientists claim we evolved from monkeys, and never have.  Evidence shows that humans AND monkeys (and apes) all evolved from the same common ancestor, which was pre-primate.  It was not a monkey.

I have seen those before.  Not sure why your showing that.  You must be getting something from that I am not.  Like I said theres no doubt that things evolve.  But nothing about evolution can explain "how we got here" with any kind of proof.  I am just saying you cant call one side an idiot for believing in something that your side cant prove either.

 

As is typical of theists who don't know what they're talking about, you're confusing evolution with abiogenesis.  Evolution is nothing more than the mechanism by which organisms change over time, usually into more complex organisms.  Abiogenesis is the field of study that tries to understand how life itself actually started.

 

If you're going to try to refute something, it generally helps to educate yourself on the topic. Why do you think atheists as so good at argument against their counterparts?

 

<snipped>

What the actual eff?! You're kidding, right? We have *plenty* of evidence to support evolution. It in fact, can and has been proven. Much of out modern day medicine would not exist without it. How do you explain strains of bacteria becoming resistant to medication?

 

Worse, the theory of evolution is tied to other scientific theories! How do you explain *million years old* fossils? How do you explain earthquakes? How do you explain evidence to support that Earth's continents have moved position since being created billions of years ago? How do you explain evidence to support climate change? How do you explain that when we gaze up into the sky, we don't see a "god" creating new stars, new planets, and eventually new life, but gravity, accretion, fusion, etc.... All these things tie into and support evolution. Nothing stays the same, ever. Nothing.

 

Well really that is stretching it a tad there Dot.  Plate tectonics has nothing to do with the Theories of Evolution and Survival of the Fittest.  They were two different theories. 1 explained the mechanism  evolution, and the second in how those traits passed on.

 

If you want to tie everything together without using String Theory,  Thermodynamic is a much better discipline to use than Evolution.

** Citation needed.

 

I class Dark Matter / Energy / Force, and the big bang theory under the iffy science category. It's basically all theoretical. Some might argue that DM is a mathematical fudge to account for the mysterious force called gravity (we don't even know what creates / causes it). The problem is that people treat it as real science, when it's really not. Our current models of gravitation and the universe don't work, so physicists are adopting the climate science technique of changing the data, and inventing imaginary forces.  

Well really that is stretching it a tad there Dot.  Plate tectonics has nothing to do with the Theories of Evolution and Survival of the Fittest.  They were two different theories. 1 explained the mechanism  evolution, and the second in how those traits passed on.

 

If you want to tie everything together without using String Theory,  Thermodynamic is a much better discipline to use than Evolution.

Not so much, I don't think. With plate tectonics, comes climate change. For example, Antarctica wasn't always under ice, and Manhattan wasn't always temperate. It used to be a desert, at one point in time, etc...  

Not so much, I don't think. With plate tectonics, comes climate change. For example, Antarctica wasn't always under ice, and Manhattan wasn't always temperate. It used to be a desert, at one point in time, etc...  

 

But thermodynamics can account for all of the energy exchanges that had to happen during each of those events, and the overarching conversion/conservation of Energy.

Evolution is a faith, you have to believe in it, it can not be proved. There is no evidence at all of evolution, most of what we are made to believe is based on elaborate assumption. I chose to believe in a loving God and Creator, you chose otherwise...

 

While Evolution (the theory of) certainly doesn't explain the actual start of life, it does make a lot of sense when you take a look around at all the variety. Not only that, but on microscopic level, we can actually see the changes in generations of bacteria and viruses. That's pretty compelling evidence for the theory.

 

I don't see any evidence provided by religion or Ham, only a book written and revised by men over hundreds of years. It doesn't explain anything. It only alludes to a supernatural being who decided to create everything on a whim. Hardly compelling is it?

 

And if there is such a loving God and Creator, why would he create deadly viruses, bacteria, parasites, natural disasters, or even man himself? After all, man is the biggest killer of life and habitat that has ever existed. Animals never sinned as Ham frequently likes to say man did, yet they're still punished by all those things.

Evolution is a faith, you have to believe in it, it can not be proved. There is no evidence at all of evolution, most of what we are made to believe is based on elaborate assumption. I chose to believe in a loving God and Creator, you chose otherwise...

 

 

 

There is plenty of evidence for evolution, choosing not to believe in it does not make the evidence just disappear. But if you want to claim that evidence doesn't exists, by all means disprove the evidence you claim doesn't exist.  FYI creation and evolution are two entirely different topics. 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I and many others did not vote to get out of the E.u because of Putin or Farage, we did so for our own reasons. You don't have to tel me what my own did or did not do when it comes to the E.U. The EEC is or was the European Economic Community, a different beast to what the E.U is now.The EEC was a mainly about trading, the E.U have gone far beyond that and as I have said before, is now more of a United States of Europe. The U.K did not vote to join a United States of Europe. Anyway, they did not want us in there in the first place, Charles de Gaulle stopped us joining as he claimed we didn’t agree with the core ideas of integration. He was not wrong and that is why we voted out of the E.U when the time came. I was not old enough to vote the first time. My only regret is that we did not have the referendum years ago and got out years ago. If we rejoined, we would have to agree to join the Euro and no doubt Schengen, agree with freedom of movement, we have enough problem with people coming over here as it is. i have no problem with people coming over here if they work and don't try to push their way of life onto us. The E.U has a currency, freedom of movement, an anthem a flag, a parliament, well they are there, not sure if they do anything. Don't sound like something that is just for trading. Oh yeah, also wanted a euro Army. How many stupid rules have the E.U made that we had to follow? I doubt I will see the Uk rejoin the E.U, which suits me. Oh yeah, my partner is Polish, she came over here before Poland joined the E.U and she got fed up of people just coming over here with ease, while she had to struggle. She is now a British citizen and have been for a fair few years
    • Saluton, Paŭlo. Dankon pro la ĉefartikolo. Ĝi estis interesa. Mi esploros pli pri la aplikaĵo kaj ĝia koncepto. Kompreneble, se vi konas min entute, vi scias, ke mi dirus, ke viaj artikoloj bezonas iom da redaktado! Mi ĉiam faras tion, ĉu ne? Ekzemple, la artikolo foje mencias koncepton antaŭ ol difini ĝin, ekzemple, relajsoj.
    • Screamer is 50% off on Steam, making it £24.99 here in the UK: https://store.steampowered.com/app/2814990/Screamer/ You might remember the series from the mid 90s / early 2000s, this new game is also by Milestone who created the older games.
    • U.S. partially reverses Anthropic AI ban for Mythos but keeps Fable 5 off the market by Karthik Mudaliar Anthropic says that the U.S. government has finally allowed it to restore Claude Mythos 5. But of course, there's a catch. The rollout is again for a limited set of U.S. organizations that operate and defend critical infrastructure. The company announced this in a post on X (formerly Twitter). This does not mean that Anthropic's latest frontier models are back to normal availability. Fable 5, which was a tuned version of Mythos 5 for public release, remains unavailable. Anthropic said that it is still working with the government to expand Mythos 5 access and make Fable 5 available again, but there's no timeline. Reports from Bloomberg and Reuters say that this decision actually came through a letter from the U.S. Commerce Department. According to Reuters, this would allow more than 100 companies and institutions access to Mythos 5. Reuters also reported that Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick’s letter removes the need for export licenses for approved companies’ non-US citizen employees, as well as Anthropic’s own non-US citizen employees, while restrictions remain for organizations outside the approved list. Anthropic isn't alone with this kind of controlled rollout. OpenAI's newest model family, GPT 5.6, was announced just yesterday, but isn't available for everyone yet. In its announcement, OpenAI also said that access to these models is initially limited to a select group of trusted partners and organizations, with broader access planned later this year. Both of these cases show that frontier AI launches are no longer just ordinary product releases and more like slow and vetted deployments shaped heavily by the U.S. government.
    • Sol, Terra, Luna - aren't those the names of failed crypto coins? 🤣🤣🤣
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      499
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!