Malaysia Airlines 'loses contact with plane' (and search effort updates)


Recommended Posts

^ The phones would have to be within range of a tower,

 

I would carry a device that would scream bloody murder to a satellite, from anywhere.

 

Actually they would not have to be in range of a cell phone tower with GPS Chipsets in them.  That is how some of the mapping models work.  GPS Chips work to the GPS satellite.  Tower only needed for phone/data.

^ The phones would have to be within range of a tower,

 

I would carry a device that would scream bloody murder to a satellite, from anywhere.

Breitling Survival watch, just don't pull the pin if it's not life or death, :p
  • Like 1

Actually they would not have to be in range of a cell phone tower with GPS Chipsets in them.  That is how some of the mapping models work.  GPS Chips work to the GPS satellite.  Tower only needed for phone/data.

Yes. I also tend to suspect the first round of search efforts were intentionally misled by Malaysia because the batteries would be drained in a few days. 

 

That being said, in order to actually LOCATE the smartphone, you WILL need towers. GPS on smartphone is only a RECEIVER. They do not BROADCAST their location.

Breitling Survival watch, just don't pull the pin if it's not life or death, :p

 

That thing is friggin awesome!! Youd think that if they could put something like that in a watch, they could put it in a plane....and i know they have similar systems (which appear to be easily switched off) but i mean something that pings when it senses an impact, or something very unusual, a system that cant be switched off. The idea of the black box is good, but really it should be re-designed to have the ability to send signals to a satellite.

 

Did anyone watch the BBC Horizon program the other day about it? was very interesting how they narrowed the search area

That thing is friggin awesome!! Youd think that if they could put something like that in a watch, they could put it in a plane....and i know they have similar systems (which appear to be easily switched off) but i mean something that pings when it senses an impact, or something very unusual, a system that cant be switched off. The idea of the black box is good, but really it should be re-designed to have the ability to send signals to a satellite.

 

Did anyone watch the BBC Horizon program the other day about it? was very interesting how they narrowed the search area

That's a cool watch. 

 Australian authorities say they're not certain when a new search area for missing Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 will be announced, clarifying earlier statements suggesting it would be made public Wednesday.

Martin Dolan, the commissioner of the Australian Transport Safety Bureau, or ATSB, said Tuesday that the analysis of the relevant data will be completed this week, but that "before we release, we have to talk with the Malaysians who are responsible for the overall investigation."

The ATSB, the agency leading the underwater search for the plane, had said Sunday that the new search area would be announced Wednesday.

"We are waiting for the Malaysians to get back to us on that," Dolan said Tuesday. "I suspect we will know when within the next 24 hours."
 

http://www.cnn.com/2014/06/24/world/asia/malaysia-mh-370-search/index.html?hpt=hp_t4

Actually they would not have to be in range of a cell phone tower with GPS Chipsets in them.  That is how some of the mapping models work.  GPS Chips work to the GPS satellite.  Tower only needed for phone/data.

 

Actually they would, if you wanted someone else to know your location.

 

What you are taking about is finding your location by tracking the location of various satellites. You track the satellites, they don't track you. If you actually wanted your location to be picked up by someone remotely, you would need some way to transmit that location information out. Either via cell towers (with/without data) or by transmitting something strong enough to be picked up via satellite.

After the claims it was flown around land masses to avoid radars I guess they wanted to clarify. (Not that such a path couldn't have been programmed in.)

It wouldn't need to be programmed in, it would be just as easy to use the FCU, or the Boeing equivalent, to manually adjust the autopilot. Commercial aircraft are never flown manually at high altitudes. Too unstable.

  • 2 months later...
  • 5 months later...

I Noticed a couple of things,

 

1, this thread hasn't been updated in a while

 

and

 

2. I recall something on BBC news (but didn't get a change to stop and watch the article) Today, there was some sort of story regarding the flight.

Has it been located?

 

edit nevermind

found an article on the website

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-31777060

While we're on about updates, a report has been published, apparently one of the black box's batteries were dead due to an error in maintenance records.

 

But apparently the cockpit voice recorder's battery was fine and would have been picked up if they were in the right search area.

 

http://www.theverge.com/2015/3/8/8170437/mh370-report-reveals-black-box-battery-expired-a-year-before-flight

While we're on about updates, a report has been published, apparently one of the black box's batteries were dead due to an error in maintenance records.

 

But apparently the cockpit voice recorder's battery was fine and would have been picked up if they were in the right search area.

 

http://www.theverge.com/2015/3/8/8170437/mh370-report-reveals-black-box-battery-expired-a-year-before-flight

may have been dead... it was past its expiration,  but that doesn't mean it was dead..

  • 4 months later...

Some wreckage has been found which "matches" MH370.  Developing story.

A French aviation expert believes he may have found the wreckage of MH370 – the Malaysia Airlines flight which disappeared off the coast of Malaysia in March 2014.

Xavier Tytelman, a former military pilot who now specialises in aviation security, was contacted on Wednesday morning by a man living on the island of Reunion, in the Indian Ocean. The man sent Mr Tytelman a series of photos showing wreckage of a plane, which the Frenchman said could possibly be the missing jet.

"I've been studying hundreds of photos and speaking to colleagues," Mr Tytelman told The Telegraph. "And we all think it is likely that the wing is that of a Boeing 777 – the same plane as MH370.

"Police in Reunion examining the wreckage say that it looks like it's been in the water for around a year, which again would fit with MH370. We can't say for certainty, but we do think there is a chance that this is it."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/malaysia/11771229/MH370-wreckage-found-on-Reunion-matches-Malaysia-Airlines-flight.html 

http://www.wsoctv.com/news/news/national/apparent-airplane-debris-found-island-could-be-mis/nm8Ym/

 

http://news.yahoo.com/us-official-debris-photo-belongs-boeing-777-214432419--politics.html.

 

WASHINGTON (AP) — Air safety investigators have a "high degree of confidence" that a photo of aircraft debris found in the Indian Ocean is of a wing component unique to the Boeing 777, the same model as the Malaysia Airlines plane that disappeared last year, according to a U.S. official said Wednesday.

Air safety investigators — one of them a Boeing investigator — have identified the component as a "flaperon" from the trailing edge of a 777 wing, the U.S. official said.

A French official close to an investigation of the debris confirmed Wednesday that French law enforcement is on site to examine a piece of airplane wing found on the French island of Reunion, in the western Indian Ocean. A French television network was airing video from its Reunion affiliate of the debris.

The U.S. and French officials spoke on condition that they not be named because they aren't authorized to speak publicly.

At the United Nations, Malaysian Transport Minister Liow Tiong Lai told reporters that he has sent a team to verify the identity of the plane wreckage.

"Whatever wreckage found needs to be further verified before we can ever confirm that it is belonged to MH370," he said.

If the debris turns out to be from Malaysia Airlines flight 370, it will be the first major break in the effort to discover what happened to the plane after it vanished on March 8, 2014, with 239 people on board while traveling from Kuala Lumpur in Malaysia to Beijing. A massive multinational search effort of the South Indian Ocean, the China Sea and the Gulf of Thailand came up dry.

They don't appear to have matched the serial number yet, but it's definitely a 777 flaperon, and as no other 777s were lost in the area it's almost certain it came from MH370

It's a sort of closure, at least they know the plane crashed at sea now, though I hope they do find it and work out what really happened.

  • 11 months later...
Quote

Exclusive: MH370 Pilot Flew a Suicide Route on His Home Simulator Closely Matching Final Flight

 

New York has obtained a confidential document from the Malaysian police investigation into the disappearance of Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 that shows that the plane’s captain, Zaharie Ahmad Shah, conducted a simulated flight deep into the remote southern Indian Ocean less than a month before the plane vanished under uncannily similar circumstances. The revelation, which Malaysia withheld from a lengthy public report on the investigation, is the strongest evidence yet that Zaharie made off with the plane in a premeditated act of mass murder-suicide.

 

The document presents the findings of the Malaysian police’s investigation into Zaharie. It reveals that after the plane disappeared in March of 2014, Malaysia turned over to the FBI hard drives that Zaharie used to record sessions on an elaborate home-built flight simulator. The FBI was able to recover six deleted data points that had been stored by the Microsoft Flight Simulator X program in the weeks before MH370 disappeared, according to the document. Each point records the airplane’s altitude, speed, direction of flight, and other key parameters at a given moment. The document reads, in part:

 

Based on the Forensics Analysis conducted on the 5 HDDs obtained from the Flight Simulator from MH370 Pilot’s house, we found a flight path, that lead to the Southern Indian Ocean, among the numerous other flight paths charted on the Flight Simulator, that could be of interest, as contained in Table 2.

 

More at NYMag

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I'm not unblocking my camera for this crapola. Sorry, Google.
    • Ummmm that is what is it supposed to do. Just turn if off in settings if you do not want it analyzing your open tabs. Chrome does the same thing with Gemini. Sarfari will do the samething after Apple's AI and even more so with the release of their 27 versions that is now powered by Googles LLM/ML models. Understanding why it is doing it and how it can help you vs jumping to some conspiracy theroy is a much better approach. As long as it can be turned off, all is good. Yes the default should be off but the a lot of people would never discover these features.
    • Just another reason (aside from many others) not to use Edge. Firefox 153.0b5 DEx64 has a similar feature added recently in prior builds that I will turn off at some point when I get around to it. It's the new "Something looks suspicious" page that pops up here and there. It cleverly hides itself between web pages that I've actually visited; as a result, you know, of selecting a web page and telling the browser where to go. The interesting thing is that it does not produce these warnings from pages that I, as the only intelligent user of the browser in my system, have ever directed the browser to open! What seems to be happening is that the browser looks at all the goofy ad links on a web page I do actually open and selects one that "looks suspicious" and then creates the "something looks suspicious" web page, which is neatly inserted, as mentioned, between web pages my RB ("real brain") has directed the browser to load in a session. The thing is, I usually look at links I am considering to follow before I ask the browser to load them, and in cases I have noticed where the link does indeed look suspicious, most of the time I will choose to not follow the link at all. Doesn't everyone do this or something similar? I am picky about what I voluntarily load... (I don't like links that start off fine, with a site designaiton that seems normal enough but then is followed by indecipherable alphanumeric strings many, many lines long, etc. I tend to reject those because they look suspicious. They may not be, but I don't care... I'll stay with Firefox, of course, if for no other reason than they usually let you turn off the junk you don't like. And because it isn't Edge... But at some point Microsoft will come to realize that putting your bookmarks on the left side is a Good Thing for a lot of people, just as Microsoft discovered when it had the bright idea of nailing the Windows taskbar to the bottom of the screen, when for decades Microsoft browsers had left that placement up to the user. They have finally reversed the obscenity of that decision. Finally.
    • Google was using the old CATPCHAs data to train their LLMs. What is the say they won't use this camera data of users to train their LLM? these companies need some strict regulations!
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      carols23 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      Tom Willson earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      259
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      94
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!