Did we land on the Moon?  

289 members have voted

  1. 1. Did we land on the Moon?

    • No Way, and we aint gonna!
      71
    • You Bet! We did for sure...
      173
    • The Chinese will be first on the Moon
      45


Recommended Posts

Its a hoax, they are trying to make you beleive. now the space shuttle is not made to land on the moon. i mean if you landed on the moon wouldnt you go back as often you could, i know i would. its like being allowed in the gorls locer room during shower time, if you allowed in there why would you not go.

if we rally didnt go

dont you think the russians would be haveing a field day with this?

the guy that made the video stating it was a hoax

got paid for it (motive to lie)

we went 6 times 12 men stepped on the moon

this is just like during the 70's with the bermuda triangle

some guy made a movie to make money thats all

peace

...probably after as a stray asteroid caught in the Earth's gravitational field...

the moon is too big for the earth to 'catch' with it's graviational field. scientist speculate a more reasonable explaination is that the earth was grazed by a large body such as another planet that no longer exists and tore away from the earth an object that formed to be our moon. the object could have been one of two things. the rings much like saturn has, or a moon like we have today that we will eventually lose due to the distance it is away from the earth and the earth slowly losing it's grip on it.

We DID land on the moon. On every Apollo trip Russians satellites follows them. After Moon Landing in 1969 not even one Russian authority appeared saying that was a hoax, and do you know why? Because US DID land on the moon.

As someone said before, if this is fake every single employee in the Mc. Donnald Observatory, TX should be in jail, because they invested over this years millon of dollars calculating the distance between the earth and our natural satellite shooting a laser on mirrors on the ALSEPs (Apollo Lunar Surface Experiment) left them there by the astronauts...

hahaha made me laugh

the moon landing was all part of the cold war, apollo 13 was to make it seem that nothing's perfect (as if 13 is really unlucky)

the Chinese will be there before the americans

the thing that convinces me that it's fake is how would the get out of the van-allen belt???? (the radiation surrounding the earth that would kill you unless you were surrounded by 8ft of solid lead)

Oh god...people still think we didn't go to the moon?

Anyone who honestly believes such a pile of crap is insane, stupid, or both.

Do some reading:

http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html

http://users.commkey.net/Braeunig/space/hoax.htm

http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2001/ast23feb_2.htm

I won't bother posting more links because I'm just googling for them anyway. Any of you braindead fools can do the same.

Conspiracy theories like this aren't 'fun'...they're ignorance at it's best...or worst I should say.

Apparently the landing sites can be seen from the earth with a proper telescope...at least that is what I've heard. Surely, the Hubble could photograph foot prints at landing sites. Besides, could any of you think that something that big and expensive, as well as extensive could have been faked? This wasn't a couple people with a lawnmower making patterns in a wheat field. :whistle: Morons...find something useful to talk about.

the thing that convinces me that it's fake is how would the get out of the van-allen belt???? (the radiation surrounding the earth that would kill you unless you were surrounded by 8ft of solid lead)

to be simple, you go through it quickly as they did, sustained exposude whould kill you, calculations predicted thet each astronaut got about 2 rem, 4 times the recomended exposude for a nuke plant worker, but not enough to make you feel anything.

It may kill them though since cancer risk will go up

It sure is  :rolleyes:

And click here to discover that the above is all bull

The site is at least...

I hope that's what you were getting at.

http://www.moontruth.com/clips/moontruth.mpg

I was shocked by this little clip, but it looks so real, now i totally confused~!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Now 8GB of ram looks even worse in the Neo. I'm so happy I purchased 128GB of DDR 4 when I did.... paid $174. Upgraded my parents laptop to 32GB around the same time for $48. Luckily I have a TON of spare laptops. So i'm good on laptops for a while. I also have a lot of desktops too that I could use if i had to. Lets just hope nothing happens to my main 4 monitor couch workstation.
    • I will keep my current devices for several years... no planning in upgrading until these devices stop working. Too pricey.
    • Apple raises MacBook and iPad prices as memory costs surge by Karthik Mudaliar Apple has raised the U.S. prices of several MacBook and iPad models, including the MacBook Neo, which it launched for $599 less than four months ago. The company’s cheapest laptop now starts at $699, while some MacBook Pro configurations have increased by $300. The changes affect the MacBook Neo, MacBook Air, MacBook Pro, iPad Air, and iPad Pro. Apple has not changed the hardware or storage included with these models, so customers are simply paying more for the same configurations. Here is how the new US pricing compares with the previous starting prices: Product Previous price New price Increase MacBook Neo $599 $699 $100 13-inch MacBook Air, 512GB $1,099 $1,299 $200 14-inch MacBook Pro, 1TB $1,699 $1,999 $300 16-inch MacBook Pro $2,699 $2,999 $300 11-inch iPad Air, 128GB $599 $749 $150 13-inch iPad Air, 128GB $799 $949 $150 11-inch iPad Pro, 256GB $999 $1,199 $200 13-inch iPad Pro, 256GB $1,299 $1,499 $200 The updated prices are already appearing on Apple’s U.S. online store. The MacBook Neo increase will probably attract the most attention. Apple introduced the laptop in March for $599, pitching it as a more affordable Mac for students and buyers considering Windows laptops or Chromebooks. It uses an A18 Pro processor and originally undercut Dell’s new $699 XPS 13 by $100. Following the increase, the two laptops now have the same starting price. The M5 MacBook Air has also lost the price Apple promoted when it launched in March. The 13-inch model arrived with 512GB of storage for $1,099, while Apple’s store now lists the MacBook Air range as starting at $1,299. The 14-inch MacBook Pro with an M5 chip and 1TB of storage has gone from $1,699 to $1,999. Apple has made similar changes to its iPads. The recently released M4 iPad Air, which launched at the same $599 starting price as its predecessor, now starts at $749 for the 11-inch version. The 13-inch version has risen from $799 to $949. The iPad Pro increases are larger in dollar terms. Apple’s 11-inch M5 iPad Pro now starts at $1,199, up from $999, while the 13-inch version has moved from $1,299 to $1,499. Both base models still include 256GB of storage. Apple blamed the increases on the rapidly rising cost of DRAM and NAND flash, which provide system memory and device storage. The company told Reuters that it had tried to shield customers from the increases but could no longer absorb them. “We have never seen a component price increase this much, this quickly,” Apple said. Tim Cook had already warned that price increases were coming. Cook said Apple’s existing component inventory had softened the immediate impact, but that higher memory costs would increasingly affect the company after the June quarter. Much of the pressure comes from the construction of AI data centers. Memory manufacturers are directing more production toward high-margin server products, leaving PC, tablet, and smartphone makers competing for the remaining supply. Apple has not said whether the new prices are temporary or whether further increases are planned. For now, the changes show that even Apple’s purchasing power has not been enough to keep the AI-driven memory shortage away from consumer devices.
    • Ventoy 1.1.16 is out.
    • This is a none story - these low volume Chinese models will always get new experimental features first because Apple and Samsung can't produce them in huge volume to meet demand.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      135
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      77
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!