Did we land on the Moon?  

289 members have voted

  1. 1. Did we land on the Moon?

    • No Way, and we aint gonna!
      71
    • You Bet! We did for sure...
      173
    • The Chinese will be first on the Moon
      45


Recommended Posts

Its a hoax, they are trying to make you beleive. now the space shuttle is not made to land on the moon. i mean if you landed on the moon wouldnt you go back as often you could, i know i would. its like being allowed in the gorls locer room during shower time, if you allowed in there why would you not go.

if we rally didnt go

dont you think the russians would be haveing a field day with this?

the guy that made the video stating it was a hoax

got paid for it (motive to lie)

we went 6 times 12 men stepped on the moon

this is just like during the 70's with the bermuda triangle

some guy made a movie to make money thats all

peace

...probably after as a stray asteroid caught in the Earth's gravitational field...

the moon is too big for the earth to 'catch' with it's graviational field. scientist speculate a more reasonable explaination is that the earth was grazed by a large body such as another planet that no longer exists and tore away from the earth an object that formed to be our moon. the object could have been one of two things. the rings much like saturn has, or a moon like we have today that we will eventually lose due to the distance it is away from the earth and the earth slowly losing it's grip on it.

We DID land on the moon. On every Apollo trip Russians satellites follows them. After Moon Landing in 1969 not even one Russian authority appeared saying that was a hoax, and do you know why? Because US DID land on the moon.

As someone said before, if this is fake every single employee in the Mc. Donnald Observatory, TX should be in jail, because they invested over this years millon of dollars calculating the distance between the earth and our natural satellite shooting a laser on mirrors on the ALSEPs (Apollo Lunar Surface Experiment) left them there by the astronauts...

hahaha made me laugh

the moon landing was all part of the cold war, apollo 13 was to make it seem that nothing's perfect (as if 13 is really unlucky)

the Chinese will be there before the americans

the thing that convinces me that it's fake is how would the get out of the van-allen belt???? (the radiation surrounding the earth that would kill you unless you were surrounded by 8ft of solid lead)

Oh god...people still think we didn't go to the moon?

Anyone who honestly believes such a pile of crap is insane, stupid, or both.

Do some reading:

http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html

http://users.commkey.net/Braeunig/space/hoax.htm

http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2001/ast23feb_2.htm

I won't bother posting more links because I'm just googling for them anyway. Any of you braindead fools can do the same.

Conspiracy theories like this aren't 'fun'...they're ignorance at it's best...or worst I should say.

Apparently the landing sites can be seen from the earth with a proper telescope...at least that is what I've heard. Surely, the Hubble could photograph foot prints at landing sites. Besides, could any of you think that something that big and expensive, as well as extensive could have been faked? This wasn't a couple people with a lawnmower making patterns in a wheat field. :whistle: Morons...find something useful to talk about.

the thing that convinces me that it's fake is how would the get out of the van-allen belt???? (the radiation surrounding the earth that would kill you unless you were surrounded by 8ft of solid lead)

to be simple, you go through it quickly as they did, sustained exposude whould kill you, calculations predicted thet each astronaut got about 2 rem, 4 times the recomended exposude for a nuke plant worker, but not enough to make you feel anything.

It may kill them though since cancer risk will go up

It sure is  :rolleyes:

And click here to discover that the above is all bull

The site is at least...

I hope that's what you were getting at.

http://www.moontruth.com/clips/moontruth.mpg

I was shocked by this little clip, but it looks so real, now i totally confused~!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • UK funds £60M AI labs to challenge US tech dominance with open-source models by Paul Hill The UK government has awarded £60 million to Oxford University and University College London to help keep the country in the AI race by focusing on open-source, low-hardware alternatives. This is in stark contrast to the expensive, closed-source, and high-hardware-requirement models being created in the United States and elsewhere. The money will be shared among two new academic research labs over six years to help them redesign the fundamental mathematics and architectures of AI to help the UK reduce its reliance on a handful of US tech firms. Commenting on the development, AI Minister Kanishka Narayan said: Initially, the government planned to fund just one lab with a £40 million investment, but with this update, two labs will now get access to a larger pool of funds. The labs are expected to invest in the top AI researchers at every career stage, with £2 million per lab being set aside for hiring at least ten doctoral students. The government hopes that this will grow the UK’s talent in the field of AI. The labs are also expected to work closely with the leaders in British AI research, such as the Alan Turing Institute and UKRI’s AI research hubs. This will allow the various teams to collaborate and create new solutions faster than they could alone. This development is pretty interesting for a number of reasons, chiefly that it could create a long-term challenge for US tech firms if these labs successfully scale these open-source architectures that bypass the proprietary ecosystems. It could also give British businesses and public sector organizations access to AI features without paying high licensing fees to foreign providers or needing to invest in specialized server infrastructure.
    • If I were them, I'm gonna hold out until the prices of these semiconductor parts normalize. $1,049 for a ~5 year old hardware is DoA, more so for gamers. On a deeper note, if Steam Machine is priced like this, we are soo effed up for the next gen Xbox console and PS6. With great AAA titles releasing at the end of the year, this just creates more demand...and more tears for me. Lol.
    • I suspect one reason its hard to justify subsidising is that it's not a locked down device like a traditional console is. In this climate sadly if it was a "good deal" you'd get people hoarding them for anything but gaming. The Lenovo Legion Go 2 with the Ryzen Z2 Extreme is £1300 here ($1720) for some context on how other SteamOS like devices are now priced. I got the older Z1 Extreme model for £300 with a dock, just shows how insane prices have got recently.
    • If you have an account with any of Meta's services, you technically have an account with all of their services. You may not use it, but it exists.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      449
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      180
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      93
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      87
    5. 5
      neufuse
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!