Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (2016)


Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, DocM said:

The idea of him having an Earth "mom" with the same name maybe. Humanizing.

 

That said, several of those scenes people are yammering about have parallels in the comics so the complainers are dancing on quicksand. 

You're close, people don't get the whole mom bit, it's like it's something overly deep when it's simple, and in typical human nature when someone doesn't get something they hate it and ridicule it.

 

There mom's having the same name works for two reasons, but it's also not just because the names are the same.  Throughout the fight itself and the movie, superman is treated as anything but a human, batman keeps saying you're not a "man" as they fight.  The mom part makes him realize he's as human as the rest, not some perfect god. The names matching also serves to snap batman out of his deep rage mode, where he is ready to kill, he flashes back to that night and remembers what he's doing and why he started being batman.

 

We see this change more at the end with batmans final seen with Lex.

 

Spoiler

The fact batman doesn't brand Lex at the end means he's gone back to what me know him as, not this "cruel"version that we start with.   

 

People moan about the fight as if it's pointless but not only does it setup things for the next movie, it develops both batman and supermans characters more, the first part for batman, and the later doomsday fight for superman.

  • Like 3

Great insight George, makes a lot of sense.

 

Any speculation on how Superman will return? I wasn't sure if he even would until the rising dirt at the Kant second of the movie. The sun can't reach him in a coffin to heal him right?

3 hours ago, patseguin said:

Great insight George, makes a lot of sense.

 

Any speculation on how Superman will return? I wasn't sure if he even would until the rising dirt at the Kant second of the movie. The sun can't reach him in a coffin to heal him right?

I'm not quite sure how the next movie will do it, and if it'll be in JL1 or if we have to wait all the way till JL2 (I'm guessing superman will show up in the 3rd act of JL1 though).

 

The comics show different ways they can do it, so there's things they can pull from, like using tech to supercharge his cells with solar radiation etc, the movie hinted that he can come back if he's hit with enough sunlight.  The only question is who is going to figure it out, obvious choice would be batman but we'll have to wait and see.

2 hours ago, Mirumir said:

Is this movie set in an alternative universe from Batman Begins?

Yes, Man of Steel, and now BvS are all in a new DC movie universe, the past Nolan batman movies are they're own thing.    I don't expect another batman begins type solo movie though, everyone knows the origin story, we don't need a whole movie about it.   I actually expect the next solo batman movie will cover events before BvS and show what happened to Robin, like the suit teases us, and why Batman in BvS is so cruel/angry etc.   I actually think they could use the killing joke as the bases for the next solo batman, it would explain so much as to why he acts the way he does in BvS.

51 minutes ago, George P said:

Yes, Man of Steel, and now BvS are all in a new DC movie universe, the past Nolan batman movies are they're own thing.    I don't expect another batman begins type solo movie though, everyone knows the origin story, we don't need a whole movie about it.   I actually expect the next solo batman movie will cover events before BvS and show what happened to Robin, like the suit teases us, and why Batman in BvS is so cruel/angry etc.   I actually think they could use the killing joke as the bases for the next solo batman, it would explain so much as to why he acts the way he does in BvS.

I just wish they were more consistent. For the first five minutes I was watching BvS, I kept on repeating to myself "this is all wrong". 

 

Spoiler

He didn't fall into the cave on his parents' funeral and his experience there was dramatically different. 

 

 

4 hours ago, Mirumir said:

I just wish they were more consistent. For the first five minutes I was watching BvS, I kept on repeating to myself "this is all wrong". 

 

  Hide contents

He didn't fall into the cave on his parents' funeral and his experience there was dramatically different. 

 

 

Those minor changes are ok imo, plus it was also a dream sequence.

 

That aside, as this is technically a Man of Steel sequel, it just passed that movies world wide box office total. It should end it's run around $900m - $1b world wide, it's at $683million right now.

20 hours ago, patseguin said:

Great insight George, makes a lot of sense.

 

Any speculation on how Superman will return? I wasn't sure if he even would until the rising dirt at the Kant second of the movie. The sun can't reach him in a coffin to heal him right?

 

20 hours ago, patseguin said:

 

 

Perhaps the "coffin" was hacked with birthing matrix tech, or see the "Death of Superman" arc where The Eradicator in disguise spirited him to the Fortress and placed him in a matrix to regenerate.

On 3.4.2016. at 7:23 AM, DocM said:

The idea of him having an Earth "mom" with the same name maybe. Humanizing.

 

That said, several of those scenes people are yammering about have parallels in the comics so the complainers are dancing on quicksand. 

Man, I was certain you'd pull the "he killed before" card, but this is close enough :) Image from two weeks ago

 

4M8YXmR.png

DocM for the win.

 

Saw it again this weekend, enjoyed it even more the 2nd time.  I still can't believe people are taking the opening bat cave scene literally, call the Mythbusters.  Clearly the force needed to lift a human child would take 5 million bats which couldn't possibly fit in the shaft.

  • Like 1

Haha, people actually took the end of the well scene literally? For all the movie's problems (and there are a million to pick from), that one was obviously meant as being symbolic.

  • Like 3

The whole movie is full of symbolizim and lots of easter eggs, you have to watch it at least twice to catch them all.  And this whole batman killing people is becoming a tired argument, the characters have all evolved and developed differently over the decades and constant reboots we get.  And bad guys have been dropping left and right in the comics but also in every movie to date.

  • Like 1
1 hour ago, George P said:

The whole movie is full of symbolizim and lots of easter eggs, you have to watch it at least twice to catch them all.  

 

That's exactly why I will be seeing it again (3rd time) sometime in the next week.  

3 minutes ago, Syanide said:

He's not the sharpest tool in the shed. One would think the world's greatest detective would look into Superman's background first before trying to murder the guy.

My point exactly, as i'm used to previous batman incarnations where he is 5 steps ahead of everyone (though please note, my references are movie only so...)

We'll have to wait for the solo batman movie to get even more detective work for batman.  BvS is more of a superman sequel, it just takes the time to introduce batman more, as a central figure of the JL along with WW and all the setup for future movies.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
    • Compared to the 7735HS it is around 25-30% slower in multi-threaded tasks (according to Google search) I did a review of the 7735HS Beelink SER6 Max in 2023, but thinking about it, it's not comparable to the 7730U. For the example you gave about how it will be used, the 7730U is actually an excellent choice for its power and battery efficiency.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      194
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!