Recommended Posts

That is completely false.

 

Just a simple comparison. A full meal (few sandwiches, chips, drink) that would fill me up from McDonalds would cost me about 250 MKD, which is about 4 EUR. I can get half a kilo of bread, kilo of fresh tomatoes, some freshly harvested cucumbers, nicely and freshly cooked kebabs (the real Eastern European ones, not the ###### that is sold in Western countries), lovely white brined cheese, and chips made from real potatoes (not the frozen crap that is sold in stores). It would cost right about the price I mentioned, and it would be a billion times more healthy than the crap sold by McDonalds.

'Organic', 'Non-GMO', 'real sugar', 'grass fed', ... products are way more expensive and smaller in size.

At least that is my experience.

On top of that, you need to make the food yourself because ready to eat food usually contains way more sodium and fat.

Just look at ready to eat chicken...

:/

 

Because of subsidies. Meat is much more expensive in Europe while fruits/veggies are cheap because Europe subsidizes agricolture more than meat production. It's the government that indirectly promotes that hypercaloric and non-satiating/crave-inducing foods (it's hard to resist cheap+tasty) rather than promoting healthier choices with the right subsidies and regulations. Now that you are starting to have universal health care they'll likely have to start addressing the issue otherwise all taxpayers will end up paying the consequences.

Meat is much more expensive in Europe while fruits/veggies are cheap because Europe subsidizes agricolture more than meat production.

Meat is cheaper in the US because cattle is pumped full of growth hormones and antibiotics to accelerate growth; chicken is chlorinated and mechanically salvaged; pink slime is produced using ammonia gas to recover non-meat animal parts exposed to fecal matter, etc. The 'meat' being served in the US is unfit for human consumption in the EU.

If you're in the US you've got to try the fries at 5 Guys Burgers & Fries! They get them shipped fresh everyday and cut them onsite. There is a chalkboard in the store telling you where "today's" potatoes came from.

http://www.fiveguys.com/menu/nutritional-information.aspx

 

I went to a 5 Guys in the UK a couple of weeks ago.  It was the most underwhelming, and EXPENSIVE, burger bar trip -ever-.

 

I couldn't believe their prices.. Ridiculous! It cost me and the wife just under ?30 for 2 burgers (one a small), ONE regular cup of fries, and 2 regular drinks.  The food wasn't even particularly good either.. I'd have gotten far better from a mobile burger van for a fraction of the price.  Never going there again.

I'm making home made fries today :)

Peeled and cut them, fry them once at low heat for about 4,5 minutes

Tonight I'll refry them at high heat for about 2,5 minutes

Add salt and done

 

Better than any fast food chain

 

 

Cut them thick, like proper British chips.

Par-boil until 3/4 cooked, leave to cool and go fluffy.

Fry at low-heat for 4-5 mins.

Drain and cool

Fry at high-head for 2-3 mins

 

Perfect, top restaurant quality, triple cooked chips! :D

  • Like 2

That's the real issue. The portion sizes are simply excessive and most people aren't good at monitoring their caloric intake. For instance, a Big Tasty with Bacon has 890 calories, large fries are 490 calories and a milkshake is 500 calories - that's 1,880 calories, which is nearly the entire daily allowance for a woman and 75% of that for a man. That's ridiculous for a standard formula meal (i.e. a preset meal, rather than choosing your own meal). Even the standard meal (regular fries, latte) is excessive for the average person.

 

If you are aware of what you eat then there's nothing unhealthy about McDonald's (at least outside of the US) but certainly McDonald's should be criticised for not acting responsibly with portion sizes.

 

Calories are less of a problem than all the fats and sugars, and in the EU at least, McD's are MUCH lower in fats and sugars than the US equivalents.

 

It really does puzzle me why US customers don't demand EU recipes... They're much tastier.

You don't need to buy 'Organic', 'Non-GMO', 'grass fed' etc to make a healthy meal. Also you might think you're spending a lot of money on groceries but the cost per meal may end up being very low. Ingredients can be used in a variety of ways. Don't just focus on one meal.

 

In most cases, "organic" produce is either a complete lie, or is just no better for you at all than regularly produce fruit & vegetables (and sometimes, less).

Calories are less of a problem than all the fats and sugars, and in the EU at least, McD's are MUCH lower in fats and sugars than the US equivalents.

 

It really does puzzle me why US customers don't demand EU recipes... They're much tastier.

True. Also, portion sizes in the US are larger - the Big Mac is 490 calories in the UK and 550 in the US; the Quarter Pounder is 490 in the UK and 520 in the US; large fries are 430 in the UK and 510 in the US; the large Caramel Frappe is 460 in the UK and 670 in the US.

 

The frappe is a great example, as the regular version in the US has more calories than the large version in the UK. In fact the small version in the US is virtually the same as the large version in the UK. The way McDonald's is conducting itself in the US is incredibly irresponsible.

One thing people always miss when looking at nutritional values for McD's is protein. If I'm going through a bulking phase through winter, McD's is the perfect meal which always makes people laugh.

 

Big Tasty: 51g of Protein

Big Mac: 28g of Protein

Bacon Swiss Melt (UK promotion atm): 41g of Protein

 

For example, with the big tasty, that's more protein than one of my large supplement shakes. It's a known fact that McD's in the UK is way better quality due to food standards and such, I'd happily eat a McD's rather than some of the burgers you get from UK supermarkets.

 

What people forget is that burgers are generally unhealthy anyway as the meat is usually taken from fatty cuts to give it flavour.

I went to a 5 Guys in the UK a couple of weeks ago.  It was the most underwhelming, and EXPENSIVE, burger bar trip -ever-.

 

I couldn't believe their prices.. Ridiculous! It cost me and the wife just under ?30 for 2 burgers (one a small), ONE regular cup of fries, and 2 regular drinks.  The food wasn't even particularly good either.. I'd have gotten far better from a mobile burger van for a fraction of the price.  Never going there again.

Wow, My wife and I go from time to time and it cost us $25 That's 2 cheeseburgers and 2 regular fries and 2 drinks. They put the 2 cups of fries in a paper sack and then fill that sack half with fries. It's always top notch at both stores here in Panama City , FL. Sorry you had a bad experience.

Wow, My wife and I go from time to time and it cost us $25 That's 2 cheeseburgers and 2 regular fries and 2 drinks. They put the 2 cups of fries in a paper sack and then fill that sack half with fries. It's always top notch at both stores here in Panama City , FL. Sorry you had a bad experience.

 

As I was sitting there, eating it, I was looking across the mall at a Nando's (Portugese chain restaurant) and thinking, why didn't I go in there instead?  Would have been cheaper, and far tastier...

Wow, My wife and I go from time to time and it cost us $25 That's 2 cheeseburgers and 2 regular fries and 2 drinks. They put the 2 cups of fries in a paper sack and then fill that sack half with fries. It's always top notch at both stores here in Panama City , FL. Sorry you had a bad experience.

Still seems kinda expensive for a fast food burger. For that price, I think I'd go with Smashburger or something.

http://content.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2055444,00.html

Want Fries with that Ring? McDonald's Offers Weddings

>

In January, McDonald's added wedding packages to its Hong Kong menu. This is the only city in the world where the American restaurant chain offers the service, prompted by frequent inquiries about fast-food weddings from customers in recent years. Now, three McDonald's locations are equipped to stage marital festivities in the style of any 6-year-old's model birthday. That the corporation should move to fill ? or perhaps create ? this niche is not so unusual. Despite being surpassed by Subway as the world's largest fast-food chain, McDonald's still serves 400,000 Hong Kongers every day. Countless couples will have met, or at least dated, there. Business executives take clients there for lunch; high school students gather there over homework.

>

Article never says the chemicals that McDonald's uses for their French Fries at least the ones in USA use this so that they do not Rot. Yup ever seen old french fries left under a car for a year un noticed under seat even in hot climate and you find it a year later and it  has not rotten and looks same as day one! If you do that to a regular french fry it rots.

Thus they dont break down in your body well leaving you with a bigger waist line.

 

 

 

Cut them thick, like proper British chips.

Par-boil until 3/4 cooked, leave to cool and go fluffy.

Fry at low-heat for 4-5 mins.

Drain and cool

Fry at high-head for 2-3 mins

 

Perfect, top restaurant quality, triple cooked chips! :D

 

 

damn, man, i am salivating...  i have to try this.     triple cooked.  never thought of that.  i always just deep fry my thin sliced potato.

 

 

max i did was to shallow fry boiled potato!  it was great!  but this is next level :woot: :rofl:

damn, man, i am salivating...  i have to try this.     triple cooked.  never thought of that.  i always just deep fry my thin sliced potato.

 

 

max i did was to shallow fry boiled potato!  it was great!  but this is next level :woot: :rofl:

 

I can't take credit for it... It's how Heston Blumenthal cooks his chips! :p

 

To expand a little bit, as you're going to try it.

 

After par-boiling, don't forget to drain (I forgot to mention that!), then give them a little shake in the collander or whatever you drain them in, to roughen up the exterior a bit (which gives you scrummy crispy bits on the outside!)

 

First fry at 120c for 4-5 mins, until pale golden colour is achieved.  Remove from oil and allow to cool somewhere they can drain.

 

Second fry at 180c, fo 3-4 mins, until deep golden colour is achieved. Remove, drain, and serve with a little sea salt for best results!

 

Make sure the oil is at the right temp before putting chips in, or they WILL go soggy!

 

First few times might be trial an error, it very much depends on the oil used to fry (best is sunflower), the potato type (go for a nice fluffy type), and your timings.  

 

You should end up with a nice deep golden crisp exterior, and a fluffy interior, the perfect chip!

 

Enjoy!

 

Make sure the oil is at the right temp before putting chips in, or they WILL go soggy!

 

 

 

You can always tell if someone put the potatoes into cold oil because they are oillogged. (Like waterlogged, but with oil)

I can't take credit for it... It's how Heston Blumenthal cooks his chips! :p

 

To expand a little bit, as you're going to try it.

 

You should end up with a nice deep golden crisp exterior, and a fluffy interior, the perfect chip!

 

Enjoy!

You need to make a YouTube video. ;)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      576
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      78
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!