Recommended Posts

screen_shot_2014-10-01_at_2.03.51_pm.jpg

 

Inspired by the Windows 8.1 experience thread, we have put together a Windows 10 satisfactory poll.

Vote!

Leave your comments below.

Some facts:

Disclaimer: I only installed it in a virtual machine. Not on actual hardware yet.

 

Installation was fast. No problems here.

Compatibility: The software I've thrown at it thus far all worked. As for hardware compatibility - I'll report when I get to install it on a dedicated machine.

Features: 3/5 at this stage. I'm eagerly awaiting whatever features MS are going to add to Windows 10.

 

All in all it is a huge step in the right direction.

I tried it on a junk computer that is nothing fantastic. Gave it a 3 on all matters as it's just an OS that does do what it's supposed to do, so far. :)

 

Still not even beginning to think of dumping my Windows 7 though, even if this was a final release.

 

Wasn't impressed with Windows 8 and this version doesn't blow my hair back any more than that did.

  • Like 3

i give it a 2 out of 5 on everything. had big compatibility problems with a game, the first time i boot the startmenu looked weird and small, i don't like nor understand the keylogger they have implemented.

on the plus side i like the themes.

Installation was excellent in Virtualbox. Very quick, and I love the fact that it let me import settings from another system - I had the Start Screen on first boot!

 

Compatibility - good so far, but I haven't tried pushing the envelope. My monitor is stuck at old-school screen ratio rather than widescreen, but so is my virtual Win7 setup. I think that's a problem with my Virtualbox setup rather than the OS.

 

Features - decent for the desktop-oriented. If I didn't love 8 and Metro I'd probably be much happier; as it is I think its decent, if a little retro.

 

Opinion to be revised once I see how the Modern side looks. Hopefully "everything runs in little boxes" will just be one option rather than the only option. Lots of windows are useful sometimes, but I don't need that capability all the time. Sometimes a clean, full-screen UI - Modern - is more efficient. and I want the option for both.

  • Like 2

Used an old test system to toy with it. Installation was quick and painless, no complaints or surprises. 5 for me.

Compatibility -- only tried a few things with it so far, everything worked. Couple applications, couple games. Didn't test too much but what I did test worked, so *shrug* 4.

Features -- this build isn't really isn't showing off a lot of new features yet besides the obvious, that comes later. What I did see was pretty decent but a little rough yet, sure it'll be vastly improved down the road. 3/5 for now. More curious about the CP next year.

Still got a long way to go, but definitely liking where it's going. Performance was surprisingly good considering the POS I got it running on, running smoother than my previous 7 and KDE installs on it. The start menu may be the first one I keep since the 2K days, I've replaced each and every one since XP. No interest in virtual desktops but nice to see it baked in versus third party. Visually *shrug* I've yet to find any OS that I was happy with out of the box, always replace the look anyway so don't care. But all in all, if the current trend continues, Microsoft is going to have a killer release this time around.

Install - Upgraded from 8.1, took forever but that seems to be a constant. I was expecting it to.

Compatibility - Zero issues except Dragon's Lair. The UI doesn't redraw properly when changing screen modes.

Features - Getting there, but awkward. I expect there will be many fixes and improvements over the next few months.

 

Seems snappy!

  • Installation (5/5): I experienced absolutely no issues during the upgrade from Windows 8.1 to the Windows Technical Preview. Applications, drivers, and et cetera worked flawlessly on real hardware?a Dell Inspiron 1525 circa 2008.

     

  • Compatibility (5/5): As mentioned above I experienced no issues with application compatibility. Applications that I use on a daily basis, such as Pale Moon, work flawlessly; my bookmarks and settings were retained after the upgrade.

     

  • Features: (3/5): I had originally wanted to give this a 2/5, but seeing the features in the Technical Preview gives me hope that they will improve and that Microsoft is listening. I was honestly quite surprised that the Previous Versions tab was reinstated, and the Empty Recycle Bin option on the context menu of the Recycle Bin shows that Microsoft is paying attention to detail. Perhaps more importantly, the option to use either the Start menu or the Start screen shows consideration for users of the software.

    With that said, I do hope for other features, including Interactive Live Tiles, additional improvements to the Start screen, and additional improvements to notifications.

Install (3/5): Upgraded from 8.1. Took a while for it to initially start but after the compatibility(?) check it worked flawlessly

 

Compatibility (5/5): Games I've tried work fine (Mordor, Injustice, Dota), Crossfire works and so does the usual Office suite

 

Features (3/5): I enjoy the multitasking improvements as I use a 34" LG monitor and having apps snapable to corners now is a good change. Start menu is also a welcome improvement.

 

 

I have found that using Windows 10 I've changed my desktop habits. Gone are application grouping on the taskbar, the size has been reduced to small and I'm starting to treat Win10 with an old school flair. I have encountered one issue however, I'm unable to enter text into the start menu (WinKey -> Type) and when i do, it closes the start menu and inputs the key onto the desktop or currently running app. Apart from that, Windows 10 is quite the upgrade to 8.1. I'm using it on my main machine as I don't have any sensitive data or anything I care about losing and for the things that I do, it's all backed up. And as a main system, it seems quite readily stable.

Installation: 5/5

Compatibility: 5/5

Features: 5/5

 

 

One question that wasn't asked: Stability, and here's where I would vote 2/5. I know it's just an alpha, but I've found it less than stable to use day to day.

Installation (every which way) has been flawless - two bare-metal installs (dual-boot with 8.1 on my mini-tower, and replacing 8.1 on my refurb notebook) and two VMs (Oracle VB and Hyper-V).  Except for two MMOs, everything works as good as - or better than - 8.1 update 1 - which says a great deal as THAT OS's underpinnings, the Windows 8 Developer Preview, was the previous alpha/beta backward-compatibility champ as far as Windows went.  Origin (EA's download service) and Steam (Valve's similar service) both work swimmingly - so much for Microsoft sniping at the competition.  If it weren't for the MMOs, the Technical Preview would have run the table.

Running it on my main machine, upgraded my 8.1 installation, yeah yeah, I know it's not recommended, but hey I made a full image of my system in case I don't like it or if I want to go back at anytime, I'm just a few clicks away, but so far I'm liking it, very fast and responsive, love the new features and animations, the new Start is growing on me, I was already getting very used to the Start Screen.

I installed on my main work PC, because im fine with rebuilding if need. Im expecting a lot of our clients to want it shortly after it is released.

 

So far everything is going fine except the below.

When I snap an rdp window to the top of the screen it doesnt maximize properly, it has scroll bars on the side and bottom but if you select the maximize button it works fine, This is a small thing but is infuriating since i do it without thinking.

The default settings for text size in command prompt needs to be changed, too hard to read.

AV not working, but not an OS issue.

 

But apart from the above grips which are small things, im liking it, but on the UI side its not like its massively different, just small things here and there.

Kids Windows install died, so installed fresh on it

Install was fast

 

Steam works, Chrome works, kid's happy, running steam in compatibility mode because a few Team Fortress serves gave VAC errors, not sure if Windows or Steam

 

 

And yes all he does is play TF2 and browse the net, nothing fancy so it's fine, not concerned over MSs so called "keylogger" he understands the implications and does all his important stuff on his phone 

 

One small issue was getting the Nvidia drivers to install, but a reboot fixed that 

 

Interesting thing I noticed, it's installed an a HP form a couple of years ago, somehow it self installed the Beats sound manager, we didn't manually install it, heck I forgot about that thing completely 

My main pet hate is that we can't change the taskbar-pinned File Explorer to start directly in "My Computer" ("This PC").

 

The old change target to %windir%\explorer.exe ::{20D04FE0-3AEA-1069-A2D8-08002B30309D} no longer works because the "Target" is greyed out.

 

Something so simple, how on earth can they not have an option for this?

Installation:

Tried using the upgrade feature twice but each time it rolled backed to my previous Windows 8.1 installation. In the end I had to delete the partition and do a clean install.

4/5

 

Compatibility:

Haven't had any problems so far. Everything I've tried works as normal.

5/5

 

Features:

What features? The Mini Start is nice but nothing anyone would upgrade for; the new Alt-Tab is nice but not important, while the multiple desktops are only really useful for production systems; running Metro apps in a window is an improvement but it should have been that way to start with; the new 'Home' view in Explorer is unnecessary when I'd rather boot straight into 'This PC'. As it stands Windows 10 is easily the best version of Windows but there is no reason to upgrade to it from Windows 7 or 8.1.

2/5

As it stands Windows 10 is easily the best version of Windows but there is no reason to upgrade to it from Windows 7 or 8.1.

I get it that there is no reason to upgrading from Windows 8.1 to 10 as there are only arround 5 new features at this moment, but that will change in the future. But no reason to upgrade from Windows 7 to 10? There are a ton of new features, major improvements, etc between those 2. USB3 support, better performance, major security improvements, new Task Manager, major update to Windows Update, new Explorer, etc.

I get it that there is no reason to upgrading from Windows 8.1 to 10 as there are only arround 5 new features at this moment, but that will change in the future. But no reason to upgrade from Windows 7 to 10? There are a ton of new features, major improvements, etc between those 2. USB3 support, better performance, major security improvements, new Task Manager, major update to Windows Update, new Explorer, etc.

Don't get me wrong, I thought Windows 8 was enough of an upgrade from Windows 7 to put up with the annoyances but right now Windows 10 is basically Windows 8 with the Mini Start. If people didn't upgrade to Windows 8 then I don't see why they'd upgrade to Windows 10, unless the upgrade is extremely cheap or free.

 

That said, I'm assuming that Microsoft is keeping the biggest features under wraps as right now it's basically Windows 8.2.

That said, I'm assuming that Microsoft is keeping the biggest features under wraps as right now it's basically Windows 8.2.

This isn't a secret. Right now, Windows 10 only has 10% of its planned feature set implemented, according to Tom Warren. You'll get most of that when Microsoft reveals the consumer features later next year.

This isn't a secret. Right now, Windows 10 only has 10% of its planned feature set implemented, according to Tom Warren. You'll get most of that when Microsoft reveals the consumer features later next year.

Exactly. It will be really interesting to see how Windows 10 shapes up when we get a better idea of the feature set.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Pretty nice tool, thanks
    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      83
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!