Recommended Posts

I'm sure it will be of use to some people but I just don't see the appeal, either for myself or casual users. It just doesn't strike me as a compelling feature, though I reserve judgement until I've seen the final implementation.

Did you try it in 9901?

 

I didn't think it would be all that much, either; still a LOT has been made of Google Now (and Siri, for that matter) - which is why I compared it heads-up TO Google Now.  It's not a major feature - however, it IS one of those "hidden gems" that stomps rather flat the competing features elsewhere (Google Now and Siri).  If anything, I'm expecting to hear a lot of "Why wasn't this done YEARS ago?" - as none of Cortana is exactly new technology.  The issue has been integrating it into the rest of the OS - which is an issue with ANY new (or improved, for that matter) technology.    It's a "stealth gem" that is better than the competition - which is enough.

So I've got it installed on my laptop, natively.

 

It's not bad -ish. And yet it's terrible.

 

Compatibility wise, I have a dual 6630HD/HD3000 GPU that made the computer unusable with Windows 8, as it would blue screen all of the time. Since then, either Microsoft, Dell, Intel, or AMD got their act together, because I don't get blue screens every time I resume from standby.

 

But on the flip side, even with 12gb of RAM, the computer still sits and hangs sometimes. It's on things like opening new tabs in IE, or browsing folders in explorer, too. But it's not the HDD, because it's just sitting there... doing nothing (I have a HDD light LOL).

 

So overall, it's stable, gives me less issues as a beta than Windows 8 did on release, and works for work... but it's not quite there yet.

 

But I like it, I'll use it, and I'll be one of those idiots who updates his production machine on day-1 to it. :D

Did you try it in 9901?

Nope. I used the last public build in the fast release channel, which was a disaster. In the end I rolled back to Windows 8.1. When the next release comes out I'll install it on my backup SSD.

So I've got it installed on my laptop, natively.

 

It's not bad -ish. And yet it's terrible.

 

Compatibility wise, I have a dual 6630HD/HD3000 GPU that made the computer unusable with Windows 8, as it would blue screen all of the time. Since then, either Microsoft, Dell, Intel, or AMD got their act together, because I don't get blue screens every time I resume from standby.

 

But on the flip side, even with 12gb of RAM, the computer still sits and hangs sometimes. It's on things like opening new tabs in IE, or browsing folders in explorer, too. But it's not the HDD, because it's just sitting there... doing nothing (I have a HDD light LOL).

 

So overall, it's stable, gives me less issues as a beta than Windows 8 did on release, and works for work... but it's not quite there yet.

 

But I like it, I'll use it, and I'll be one of those idiots who updates his production machine on day-1 to it. :D

 

Could be the AMD driver that is making it hang once in a while. Not unheared off to have freezes on PXAI machines such as yours with the newest drivers.

 

Other symptoms include slow startup, icons resetting upon start.

Could be the AMD driver that is making it hang once in a while. Not unheared off to have freezes on PXAI machines such as yours with the newest drivers.

 

Other symptoms include slow startup, icons resetting upon start.

 

You've just perfectly described my machine.

I am dual-booting 9901 alongside Windows 8.1, and so far I have not had any major problems. I was actually surprised that my drivers did not encounter any issues, especially considering this is one the builds where they rolled up the kernel to 10; I did not expect my applications to have any trouble because after reading an Ars Technica article I learned that Windows changes the behavior of APIs if an application from an older version of Windows is run, but I did expect there to be driver issues since a lot of drivers operate at a lower level.

 

There is a lot of work that remains, which I would expect since it is still in heavy development, but so far my experience has been good.

You've just perfectly described my machine.

 

I have great news for you ;). Fix:

Enter your registry

Find

EnableULPS

set to 0 and restart.

There is another way to speed up the laptop which in regards to the above fix addresses other issues:

 

 

AMD messed up the "switching" aspect for DWM.exe (Desktop Windows Manager).

 

It is supposed to be constantly using whatever is best (Intel or AMD). However it has some major issues resulting in the slow down of Windows (Metro) or Chrome (even if set to Intel in CCC).

 

As if it is having a fight between Intel and AMD causing some kind of memory leak during prolonged OS use. 

 

Try restarting DWM.exe via CMD: taskkill /f /im dwm.exe to see if it has any effect for you and let me know the outcome.

 

Am trying to collect as much info as possible for the next UnifL release.

I have great news for you ;). Fix:

Enter your registry

Find

EnableULPS

set to 0 and restart.

 

That did the trick. Granded IE is giving me problems just typing a reply and I ended up using Firefox to type this... ahh the joys of a TP.

 

But the rest of the computer feels much more responsive. The start menu doesn't pause as it loads, and the facebook (metro) app was like *bam* on my screen. I don't think I'll have a memory issue (12gb for what ammounts to a facebook machine) but I'll keep the trick to kill the DWM in mind, too.

 

Also, the computer's palm rest is noticably warmer, but I guess that's what happens when you keep the dGPU on ;)

Glad to hear!

 

The interesting thing about the dGPU in this is that it is locked at 100MHz core 150MHz memory. Am not sure on why this is but it is normally only seen on desktops. (Naturally it scales fully up during games etc)

 

To me it just seems like an AMD bug resulting from this new post "14.4" approach. It might or might not be resolved. But yes you are right in stating that the device becomes hotter since it does not allow the AMD card to "switch off". It was also noted by several people that the battery life disperses faster. Can't have it all  :cool:

 

One more thing I can mention to improve the performance of web browsers:

 

AMD as you might know locks applications to either Intel or AMD on "dynamic switching". It is quite restrictive and I myself have been having issues on my 6xxxm series.

 

So on IE or Firefox running Flash will make the HD3000 kick in. After fiddling for some time I managed to unlock this so now you can put the "Firefox plugin container" (flash) or the flash container for IE into AMD mode in CCC.

 

Drastically improves performance of the browser but yet again the battery suffers.

I wouldn't say the economy was a major factor but rather people's perception of technology. Operating systems are seen as what ships with the device or a free update that comes later (like iOS and Android). Further, most people don't need any additional features.

 

 

I really don't think that Cortana is going to be a selling feature. As impressive as the technology is I can't see myself using much, if at all. On my phone I only use S Voice to set alarms because it's more convenient than setting them manually - on a PC with keyboard and mouse I don't see that being the case.

 

As a gamer and tech enthusiast I'll be upgrading for Windows 10 at launch, as I have done with every previous release since ME (the only really bad version of Windows). Perhaps we'll see some consumer orientated features that are truly compelling announced on the 21st but so far I haven't seen anything to suggest that will be the case. I haven't seen anything for the average consumer to get excited about.

theyarecomingforyou - by and large, the additional features in Windows 8 forward are features I can't use - because my hardware doesn't support them.  That, in and of itself, means I basically evaluated the OS as a straight upgrade - how well does it run - with the then-current hardware and application mix?  If the OS were to perform worse, it would be passed over - however, if performance goes up, the upgraded OS is a success.

 

Also, a lot of the critics indeed looked for reasons/excuses to not move, with the economy being crap.  However, as a technology enthusiast and support geek, I can't afford to think that way - too great a chance on being outright wrong.

 

And even I'm not saying that Cortana will be a SELLING feature; it will, instead, be a "stealth gem" (much the way that even Google Now and Siri are today).  After all, how many Android users actually USE Google Now today?  (Remember, it will work on Jelly Bean, and all the updates forward from it - it's not unique to Lollipop, or even KitKat.)  Google Now and Siri are first-generation virtual assistants - and both are still basically getting discovered.  Cortana for Windows will be the first wide deployment of such a VA - and it's capable of being used by any PC that is capable of running 7.  Yes - it's a gee-whiz feature; however, it's a lot more USABLE such feature than Hyper-V - or even touch support.

 

THAT is why I'm hoping that Cortana will be at least as unlocked as it was in 9901 - if it has MORE features, it could be a major jaw-dropper in just the gee-whiz sense.  (Remember, unlike touch, Cortana requires exactly NO new hardware - at all.)

theyarecomingforyou - by and large, the additional features in Windows 8 forward are features I can't use - because my hardware doesn't support them.  That, in and of itself, means I basically evaluated the OS as a straight upgrade - how well does it run - with the then-current hardware and application mix?  If the OS were to perform worse, it would be passed over - however, if performance goes up, the upgraded OS is a success.

I'm the same. For me I was happy to upgrade to Windows 8 as even though Metro is a disaster there were plenty of compelling features to warrant the upgrade - multi-monitor improvements, improved Taskbar and Explorer, cloud syncing, etc. However, that's not enough for the average person. They see they already have an operating system that does everything they need it to and don't see any reason to upgrade, especially if it costs money.

 

I'll be upgrading to Windows 10 for launch, just as I did with ME, XP, Vista, 7, 8 and 8.1.

 

And even I'm not saying that Cortana will be a SELLING feature; it will, instead, be a "stealth gem" (much the way that even Google Now and Siri are today).  After all, how many Android users actually USE Google Now today?  (Remember, it will work on Jelly Bean, and all the updates forward from it - it's not unique to Lollipop, or even KitKat.)  Google Now and Siri are first-generation virtual assistants - and both are still basically getting discovered.  Cortana for Windows will be the first wide deployment of such a VA - and it's capable of being used by any PC that is capable of running 7.  Yes - it's a gee-whiz feature; however, it's a lot more USABLE such feature than Hyper-V - or even touch support.

 

THAT is why I'm hoping that Cortana will be at least as unlocked as it was in 9901 - if it has MORE features, it could be a major jaw-dropper in just the gee-whiz sense.  (Remember, unlike touch, Cortana requires exactly NO new hardware - at all.)

Don't get me wrong, it's a sensible feature that makes for a good selling point given its prevalence on mobile platforms. When combined with other features it may help swing those on the fence. My point is just that I don't see it is as a compelling feature for everyday users. If I wasn't already planning to upgrade it wouldn't be the feature to change my mind.

I'm the same. For me I was happy to upgrade to Windows 8 as even though Metro is a disaster there were plenty of compelling features to warrant the upgrade - multi-monitor improvements, improved Taskbar and Explorer, cloud syncing, etc. However, that's not enough for the average person. They see they already have an operating system that does everything they need it to and don't see any reason to upgrade, especially if it costs money.

 

I'll be upgrading to Windows 10 for launch, just as I did with ME, XP, Vista, 7, 8 and 8.1.

 

 

Don't get me wrong, it's a sensible feature that makes for a good selling point given its prevalence on mobile platforms. When combined with other features it may help swing those on the fence. My point is just that I don't see it is as a compelling feature for everyday users. If I wasn't already planning to upgrade it wouldn't be the feature to change my mind.

True - after all, the greatest use for Siri (or Google Now) is as an augmented search engine - and that is today.

 

However, why do YOU see ModernUI as a disaster?  Aesthetic reasons?  (That seems to be the biggest complaint.)  If aesthetics were so important, that would be a major indication of VANITY on my part - I'm not from the "Shallow Hal School of IT".  Aesthetics CAN be changed, even in Windows 8.x - therefore, why are they so critical?  Because they CAN be changed, I could care less about aesthetics.

QuoteHowever, why do YOU see ModernUI as a disaster?  Aesthetic reasons?  (That seems to be the biggest complaint.)  If aesthetics were so important, that would be a major indication of VANITY on my part - I'm not from the "Shallow Hal School of IT".  Aesthetics CAN be changed, even in Windows 8.x - therefore, why are they so critical?  Because they CAN be changed, I could care less about aesthetics.

 

I'm not saying you can't use Windows 8.x without ever interacting with Metro. You can (although you'll definitely want to hit start + search). The thing is, when the default applications for playing music files or reading pdfs (both basic actions in desktop computing) are full screen "apps" that take forever to load and have no apparent way of closing , it's definitely an issue...

I'm not saying you can't use Windows 8.x without ever interacting with Metro. You can (although you'll definitely want to hit start + search). The thing is, when the default applications for playing music files or reading pdfs (both basic actions in desktop computing) are full screen "apps" that take forever to load and have no apparent way of closing , it's definitely an issue...

 

Considering the default for PDFs was nonexistent prior to 8, I'd say that's an improvement. There was no default in 7 or lower - you had to install Adobe Reader manually. And you can still install any other reader you choose. I don't have any issues with the built-in reader, but prefer full Acrobat on my tower and Adobe reader Modern version on the SP2.

 

I also can't see how XBox Music is any worse a default for music than Media Player was. If anything, Media Player was slower to load IMO.

DConnell, on 19 Jan 2015 - 20:33, said:DConnell, on 19 Jan 2015 - 20:33, said:DConnell, on 19 Jan 2015 - 20:33, said:

Considering the default for PDFs was nonexistent prior to 8, I'd say that's an improvement. There was no default in 7 or lower - you had to install Adobe Reader manually. And you can still install any other reader you choose. I don't have any issues with the built-in reader, but prefer full Acrobat on my tower and Adobe reader Modern version on the SP2.

 

I also can't see how XBox Music is any worse a default for music than Media Player was. If anything, Media Player was slower to load IMO.

 

 

Dot Matrix, on 20 Jan 2015 - 02:13, said:

I do, and I disagree.

how about this, 99.99% of pepole don't normally turn on their computer just to listen to music. please give me one advantage a full-screen music player has over a windowed one (especially since the latter can essentially take up the whole screen if you want).

how about this, 99.99% of pepole don't normally turn on their computer just to listen to music. please give me one advantage a full-screen music player has over a windowed one (especially since the latter can essentially take up the whole screen if you want).

WMP in fullscreen mode = visualizations! :woot:

  • Like 2

If you're talking about the Modern UI media player, it doesn't really matter, since you can control the music through the volume display, the actual app is just a media manager.

 

pADlY.jpg

 

Of course the app is still tuned to full screen use, I hope they can make some of the apps have compact modes specifically for Desktop use. The Zune desktop app had a button you could click which would bring the player into compact mode.

I tried it in VirtualBox first and then loaded it on a Mac via BootCamp. Pretty good so far. I won't be installing it on my main machines quite yet, but so far so good on the Mac.

 

As this matures I may try it on my tablet, but not yet.

 

I do like what they've done with the Start Menu though, pretty decent job of bringing them together but retaining the information at a glance the Start Screen had.

upgraded my up to date 8.1 machine to the new preview build.   Seems my amd display driver is causing issues, will look into it.  the overall use is acceptable, although a little lag. chrome is a little unstable.  but i am enjoying testing and seeing what works and doesn't.

Upgraded from 9879 to 9926 today.

The part involving "Preview builds" under "Update and recovery was just plain terrible. Here's a screenshot which I skillfully annotated with the Snipping Tool (and which I had to save with Gimp because the Save function of the Snipping tool is broken):

 

pDwIKvfI.jpg

 

Besides the fact that they can't even make the button match the text, the download experience was just plain awful:

There's no info whatsoever on what exactly it's downloading (Iso? Individual files for updates?) or which build. There's no indication of download progress whatsoever, or if the download is still running at all and the updater is crashed, leaving only the stupid spinning circle.

After about half an hour of this disgrace, it finally changed to "Install now". (What took it so long? Downloading the iso took only 10 minutes for me.)

However, upon pressing "Install now", I just got more of the same crap: no information whatsover it was doing exactly, no progress indicator whstoever... after yet another half an hour of this pathetic crap, it finally wanted to reboot.

After reboot, most of the texts were as indescriptive as possible ("Setting up some more stuff for you", oh really? :rofl: ), but at least the was a percentual progress indicator. After yet another half an hour and a few reboots later, it was finally done.

 

Overall, no problems occurred, but taking 1 1/2 hours was awfully slow. Making a clean install (~15 min) and reinstalling everything (another ~15 min.) would've been quite a lot faster, and without potential upgrade-related problems. Plus, the first two thirds of the update experience were just plain terrible, with no progress indicator whatoever and no indication of whatever it is doing, or if it crashed or not in the meantime. Until this is significantly improved, I probably won't do it again.

 

The start menu in 9926 is a clear regression over 9879 (or perhaps it's just broken by design, who knows). It has has taken big steps backwards. There's still no simple way of removing all of the tiles from the start menu, you still have to remove them one by one. If you've removed them all, you're in for a nasty surprise in 9926. In 9879, the start menu shrunk down to ordinary size, once all the tiles were removed. This doesn't happen anymore in 9926, the start menu stays at the humongous size it had when it still showed the tiles. Now whenever you open the start menu, three quarters of it are empty space. It can't be resized anymore either to get it down to a decent size.
The icing on the turd cake is that they now also removed the search bar from the start menu. So you now have a start menu that always has a humongous size, lots of empty space, is not resizable to a decent size and now even lacks a search function. Whee!

Install went great, everything is working fine, only thing that bothers me is that I can't resize the start menu after I resize modern apps to medium or small, it just leaves a bunch of empty space after that other than that I'm liking the progress, and am sure the problem with the start menu will get worked on.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • So size is the ONLY selling point????? People have been plugging in PC's to TV's in living rooms for 20+ years. I would take a bigger box for more peformance. Also lot and lots of SFF/Mini ITX build guides out there.
    • My point is, if you buying this instead of a console for TV purposes, that you need to understand that you will not be able to play the most popular MP games with Steam OS. Now if you are not into those games, and into some of the perputual alpha/beta games on Steam then this is an option. I would argue a gaming PC would be the better route, more expensive but take the 1k -1.4k you are about to spend on this thing and build a better one. Because it is running Linux you can overide its 1080p settings. However The Verge complained about its 1080p cap and how you would have to get around it at the CLI, so someone buying this instead of a PS5 or Xbox might have a challege on their hands.
    • A review of Synology's BeeCamera software for the BeeStation Plus by Christopher White Synology is leaning into the BeeStation and the BeeStation Plus, and it's easy to understand why. While power users will want something more customizable, the BeeStation and its more powerful sibling, the BeeStation Plus, are great for those who want a device they can simply plug in, click a few buttons, and have it work as their own personal cloud. Until recently, the device was mostly used for the storage of files, photos, and videos, and with the Plus model, you could install and stream media through Plex. Synology recently released a new free application for the BeeStation Plus called BeeCamera, which is basically a stripped-down version of Surveillance Station. First, let's get the confusing naming out of the way. While you might initially think that BeeCamera is a physical device, perhaps a camera that Synology created specifically for the BeeStation Plus, that would be incorrect. BeeCamera is simply the name for the application that runs on the NAS and on your mobile device. I think the marketing team missed the mark here, but it does fit the other naming on the device, like BeePhotos and BeeFiles, I guess. Camera Support As of right now, only Synology-branded cameras are supported, which many will see as a callback to the drive locking the company implemented and then backtracked on. That said, while I 100% disagree on drive locking, I agree that camera locking for a device made to simply plug and play is the right decision. The whole point of the BeeStation line is simplicity. There are currently three camera model lines available, a wireless device for indoor use, and two PoE models for external use. CC400W (Wi-Fi): Plug it into power using the included power adapter, and connect it to your wireless network. This camera is rated only for indoor use and is the one I was provided to review the BeeCamera. $198.36, in line with the Unifi G6 Compact. BC510 (PoE): A bullet-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. TC510 (PoE): A dome-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. Although this isn't a review of the actual Synology camera, I did want to note that a positive for the Synology CC400W is that it uses a magnetic base. This means you can mount it on any magnetic surface, which is pretty handy. However, a downside to the camera is that it's powered by a built-in USB cable that's about six and a half feet (two meters) long. This means that the cable will probably be either too long or too short, but more importantly, if the cable is damaged at all, you'll likely need to buy an entirely new camera because there doesn't appear to be a way to replace it, unlike many competitors, like the Unifi G6 Instant. Hopefully, this is something Synology addresses in a future revision of the hardware. The BeeStation Plus supports up to four cameras. Setup The setup of BeeCamera is, like everything in the BeeStation family, very straightforward. Simply make sure you're on at least version 1.5 of the BeeStation OS, and BeeCamera is automatically installed on the device. BeeCamera Setup Screenshots Setting up the CC400W was just as easy. Plug it in, open up the BeeCamera app, and follow the on-screen steps to add the camera. During this process, you'll configure the camera name and how many days of retention you want to keep. The system will also automatically update the firmware for you. The whole thing took only a couple of minutes, excluding the time it took for the camera to update the firmware. Once the camera is connected to the BeeStation Plus, you can manage the various camera settings within the app, although there aren't many to choose from. You're able to configure whether the microphone will record audio (some privacy laws may preclude you from recording it), select what codec to use (H.264 or H.265), configure the color and exposure of the camera, and determine what data you want to overlay onto the video. Finally, you can set up AI detections so that BeeCamera will alert you if it sees certain things. These are all of the common detections you would expect in a camera system, such as people, pets, and vehicles. Under people and vehicles, you can also add extra monitoring for lingering and congestion detection, although pets are currently in "Lab" and therefore have no extra features yet. Recording in 4K using H.265 for 30 days will take roughly 300 GB of storage, which is very reasonable for most regular households, as the BeeStation Plus has 8TB of native storage. If you want to set up detection zones, you can. These are areas that BeeCamera will look at for the various detections, and are helpful if, for example, there's a tree in your frame and you don't want to be notified each time the wind makes the branches move around in the frame. Finally, you can also schedule when the camera should and should not be recording, which is a very useful feature. For example, you may want to record only at night when you're sleeping, but not during the day when you're up and about the house, so you can easily shut the camera off between 8 am and 10 pm. Each hour of each day can be configured to record continuously, only upon a detection event, or disabled completely. You can't fine-tune to record at a specific time, though, only hourly blocks on the hour. Daily Use The best part of BeeCamera is that it's easy and just works. If you only care about being notified when things happen, the mobile app sends those notifications and lets you click the button to bring up the video and see what's going on. For example, when I went out of town and had the camera pointed at the cat tower in our hallway, it was nice to be able to drop in and check that my furry friends were doing okay without me. Initiating the remote connection to the BeeStation Plus through the app is very responsive, but this will heavily depend on your ISP. In my case, using Xfinity, I'm able to go from starting the app to seeing live video in roughly three seconds, which is about the same amount of time it takes to connect to my Unifi UNVR system that costs much more. If you want to see footage from a specific day and time, you can do so using the calendar icon. You can also scroll through the timeline, looking for detections that are labeled in blue (vs. the normal gray when there's nothing of interest). There are buttons that let you go to the last/next detection on the timeline, which is helpful if you missed the notification on your mobile device. That's where the ease of use stops, though. While you can download clips that are flagged by detection, there's apparently no way to select generic time frames you're interested in, and the only place to download is to your phone. In addition, sharing a video shares the actual video, not just a link back to your BeeStation Plus. While that's good from a security and privacy perspective, it's a little awkward for sharing large videos. Limitations While the ease of implementation is great, there are some things that are lacking from BeeCamera. The most obvious is that there is no way to view the footage on the desktop. You can log in to the BeeStation Plus to see how much storage BeeCamera is using, but unlike BeePhotos and BeeFiles, there is no BeeCamera on the web console to manage or view footage. This means you'll be viewing all of your security footage on your mobile device, which is pretty limiting. In addition, there's no way to download the video to your PC without first using your phone as the intermediary. The one exception to this is that you can use BeeFiles to see the raw MP4 files. They're saved in 5-minute increments, and it's just raw data with no detection information or any other way to identify what any of them are. The lack of a way to interact with BeeCamera on the desktop also makes configuration of the cameras more difficult. For example, trying to set up detection zones using a tiny screen and your finger to draw boxes is more cumbersome than it needs to be. This reinforces the idea that BeeCamera is not made for power users. It's also missing some of the more advanced functionality of Surveillance Station. For example, I couldn't find a way to say, "Alert me if the thing in this zone is no longer there." Another major deficiency with BeeCamera, and a feature I suspect may come out in the future, is that while it can detect generic people, there is no specific facial recognition yet. This is an interesting omission, given the fact that other Synology tools can detect specific individuals, and competitors such as Unifi Protect also do it. This is probably a software limitation, so we will have to wait and see if this feature is added in the future. Conclusion If you need a security guard to monitor surveillance cameras to make sure your property is secure, then BeeCamera is not the solution for you. That said, you probably wouldn't be using a BeeStation Plus as the brains behind the system either. BeeCamera (and BeeStation in general) is clearly aimed at households that want to avoid sending personal data to Google and Amazon, and now want to add some cameras to keep an eye on their home and their pets while they're away. BeeCamera excels at doing this. The target market isn't interested in creating cases, tying multiple views together in a single pane of glass, or the like, and for the intended use case, the system works great. Where it starts to fall apart a bit is with more advanced features. Not being able to use a desktop app is a major compromise in my opinion, and having to do all of the configuration on a mobile device is annoying, but not impossible. If you don't want to have a full-fledged NAS device in your home, but still want control over your data (or maybe want an easy way to backup your data for World Backup Day), and want to add a couple of cameras to keep an eye on your house and your pets, this is a great, cheap, and easy way to go, and I suspect more functionality will come over time. If Synology releases a desktop app or at least a way to configure cameras and view footage on a desktop browser, this would be a near-perfect solution for a general home user. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • I forgot to add on my comment that when robots will take physical jobs, it's when they become more cheaper to manufacture and sell. That will be the starting point of the end to lanscaping, trash pickup, factory jobs, etc.
    • How many people can actually use a 2.5gig ethernet port? Most people do not have more than a 1gig internet connection, heck most have less than that. Most people at home do not have a switch that has multiple 2.5gig ports either.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      477
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      104
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      88
    5. 5
      neufuse
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!