Recommended Posts

I personally like it. From the moment I first installed it (somewhere in the 9000-series of builds) I have deemed it Worthy. Nothing gets the Worthy vote from me without either being awesome or having the potential to be awesome.

 

My only complaints are a few minor UI gripes (mostly about consistency across the title bar between Modern and Win32 apps), but there have been several indications of work being forthcoming in that department.

I've installed it on a Centrino based Lenevo X201 (circa 2010) core i7 ulv 2.26Ghz (2 cores 4 threads) with 8Gb ddr2 and a sata 2 ssd and it flies to be honest. its a joy to use.

 

I've also installed it on my games desktop, performance is on a par with W7 atm, on my 660ti 8gb and 2600k clocked. nice and slick but just doesn't feel as smooth as the Centrino tbvh.

I like what we have so far and can't wait for release, but there is a lot of work to do. Some features, I feel will be lost on the chopping block to meet the deadline, mostly with Edge.

 

Really can't wait to use Cortana though. The new Start is a decent compromise. I don't see many downsides of the platform in beta state so far.

Installed it on my Lenovo X1 (which was hosed up anyways). Works well and all software I installed worked without a problem. But ultimately removed it the following morning. I can't stand the UI - in my opinion it is hideous and way too big. I know it's preview and unfinished and all that but it's not like it's scheduled for release in a year from now either so not sure. If they radically revamp the UI then I will be a lot more satisfied. I like just about everything but the UI...

I think that we're all going to like things and not like things about Windows 10 depending on where your coming from. In the end, if we want to follow the Windows path that is where it leads. The Windows 7 users can stay on Win 7 but miss the free upgrade if they stay too long. Same goes for Windows 8. If you want to take advantage of Universal Apps though you have to go to Windows 10. 

 

I'm not so sure how big of bite it's going to be to Microsoft.  

I'm not, either - what I AM sure of, though, is that the bite WILL happen; too many folks either bought Windows 8 and 8.1 on new hardware OR upgraded existing hardware - and found out that it DID support touch - to dismiss it entirely.

(I'm talking just about family and friends that I support - I'd done three upgrades from 7->8.x at user request onto AIOs; two of them had touch support unmasked by the upgrade.  It's why I was not AS shocked when Baby Pavilion's Hyper-V support got uncovered by the Windows 10 Technical Preview - it wasn't the first time that upgrading an OS uncovered a feature that the user couldn't use because the original OS didn't support it - Baby Pavilion's original OS was Windows 7.)

 

It's why I ask those users that have decided to wait things out "How well do you REALLY know your system's hardware?"  (So far, I've uncovered touch support, Hyper-V, and poor trackpad support - all on hardware that dates back to 7 or earlier, and all of which got uncovered either by 8.x or 10 - the last two affect me DIRECTLY, as it's on my own hardware.  For your own sake, avoid the assumption trap - at the very least, try the Insider Preview yourself.)

Only 1 thing to say-Improve Cortana.

I have only one nitpick with Cortana; for some reason, the voice output is still broke across all my hardware - however, typing in requests works a treat, and across all that same hardware.

It's a nitpick because I don't rely on voice output - too many places where I could compute on the move (both notebooks) are where vocal output is either frowned upon or utterly verboten, let alone vocal INPUT.

 

What is your specific issue (or issues) with Cortana?

Its odd but for some reason, when I ask her a Question, I can't hear her answer it with her voice.

In other words, it's a variant on my own issue.  Still, it doesn't make Cortana any LESS usable.

 

As I pointed out above, the reality that neither Google Now or Siri accept typed input makes both a non-starter - too many places make the voice-only requirement a no-no.

Given that, why WOULDN'T you want Cortana at your beck in your cube? (Type-in/response out - without either you OR Cortana uttering a peep.)

While Windows 8 and 8.1 was absolutely horrible as a OS, Windows 10 has so far redeemed itself to a point where Windows is once again usable. I dont have a tablet, a Windows phone nor a xbox so how Windows runs on those devices is of no importance to me what so ever. All I care about is the desktop, and on that at least, It does exactly what I want it to do, and so far, very stable. 
The only thing that bugs me is the inconstancy of Metro apps which are all over the place and look - well, stupid. Skype is just crap, The store is still full of bloatware apps that do absolutely nothing. The only good Metro apps are Netflix, Mail, Calendar and the video and photo previews. And even then there is no consistency between those apps. I'm still hoping that one day once the code for the new apps are complete, they hire a good UI designer to put it all in place with a similar look and feel to them. 
Seeing build 10108 it looks like Windows 10 for desktops is coming along nicely though, and how it would get regular updates can only be a good thing. 
I just hope sometime soon, they purge everything in the Windows Store, and have some kind of proper screening for the apps and games that are allowed to go in there. 

  • 1 month later...

Downloaded 10147 this morning and installed it. So far, I am really liking it. Every issue I had with 10130 is fixed and the OS is rock solid stable so far. Looks like they are very close to RTM. I'd just like to see an option to enable Aero transparency in window titlebars instead of just the startmenu and taskbar.

Downloaded 10147 this morning and installed it. So far, I am really liking it. Every issue I had with 10130 is fixed and the OS is rock solid stable so far. Looks like they are very close to RTM. I'd just like to see an option to enable Aero transparency in window titlebars instead of just the startmenu and taskbar.

 

Send feedback if you want that happen in titlebars. 

Not impressed so far.  Problems and issues are numerous.  So much so I cannot see putting it in a production environment.  Bottom line impossible to do real work with it as is as pertains to running a business.  If  Microsoft would put the same effort into fixing the bugs reported as they do in marketing the OS ir would work better. As it stands all that is being accomplished is your companies complete loss off any credibility.  Frankly maybe th problem was not Mr. Balmer

I have only one nitpick with Cortana; for some reason, the voice output is still broke across all my hardware - however, typing in requests works a treat, and across all that same hardware.

It's a nitpick because I don't rely on voice output - too many places where I could compute on the move (both notebooks) are where vocal output is either frowned upon or utterly verboten, let alone vocal INPUT.

 

What is your specific issue (or issues) with Cortana?

 

Voice output won't work... 

I wish to like all of it but, damn, those modern apps fonts are ridiculously ugly. When will it be anti-aliased as the win32 apps? I know the problem existed ever since Windows 8 and up to this day it's still half-assed. It is one of the reported problems, but it seems it will never be resolved or I am losing hope (days before RTM). I guess if it will never be checked then Windows 10 has no use for me.

I wish to like all of it but, damn, those modern apps fonts are ridiculously ugly. When will it be anti-aliased as the win32 apps? I know the problem existed ever since Windows 8 and up to this day it's still half-assed. It is one of the reported problems, but it seems it will never be resolved or I am losing hope (days before RTM). I guess if it will never be checked then Windows 10 has no use for me.

 

Unfortunately it likely won't be resolved, as it's 'working as intended'. The reason it looks so poor is it doesn't use RGB-subpixel positioning, which was basically the innovation of cleartype in the first place. The reason MS states they're not using it is primarily due to rgb-sub pixel not working correctly when the screen is rotated, so this is basically (yet another) compromise to support tablets/phones. The current rendering method just uses grayscale anti-aliasing, which is why it looks so jagged. You can see the difference especially when you switch from IE/Edge to Firefox/Chrome which still use RGB Clearype, and it's a significant reason why I doubt I'll ever go to edge until I get a 4k display.

 

I agree though they do look pretty bad. If you're going to make text the primary element of your GUI, you at least should consider the rendering quality. 

Unfortunately it likely won't be resolved, as it's 'working as intended'. The reason it looks so poor is it doesn't use RGB-subpixel positioning, which was basically the innovation of cleartype in the first place. The reason MS states they're not using it is primarily due to rgb-sub pixel not working correctly when the screen is rotated, so this is basically (yet another) compromise to support tablets/phones. The current rendering method just uses grayscale anti-aliasing, which is why it looks so jagged. You can see the difference especially when you switch from IE/Edge to Firefox/Chrome which still use RGB Clearype, and it's a significant reason why I doubt I'll ever go to edge until I get a 4k display.

 

I agree though they do look pretty bad. If you're going to make text the primary element of your GUI, you at least should consider the rendering quality. 

 

I don't get it. How does rgb-subpixel AA doesn't work when the screen is rotated? That sounds like working around a problem instead of solving it.

  • 2 years later...
On 5/7/2015 at 4:17 PM, Mando said:

I've installed it on a Centrino based Lenevo X201 (circa 2010) core i7 ulv 2.26Ghz (2 cores 4 threads) with 8Gb ddr2 and a sata 2 ssd and it flies to be honest. its a joy to use.

 

I've also installed it on my games desktop, performance is on a par with W7 atm, on my 660ti 8gb and 2600k clocked. nice and slick but just doesn't feel as smooth as the Centrino tbvh.

Two of my notebooks are done (Baby Pavilion and the ASUS X54C I mentioned  earlier I was adding) - both date back to 7 originally and both have 4GB of RAM.  I'm posting from the ASUS - as expected, the i3 with HT is smoking, despite the memory deficit.  The one weakness is the HD3000 graphics; can't fix that.

On 7/4/2015 at 1:58 AM, MiloVosmus said:

I wish to like all of it but, damn, those modern apps fonts are ridiculously ugly. When will it be anti-aliased as the win32 apps? I know the problem existed ever since Windows 8 and up to this day it's still half-assed. It is one of the reported problems, but it seems it will never be resolved or I am losing hope (days before RTM). I guess if it will never be checked then Windows 10 has no use for me.

It's NOT unique to phones or Windows - it happens in Android as well (same situation - device rotation) even in Chrome or Firefox. I would wager it happens with a rotatable desktop display in Windows, too (portrait mode, for example); basically, any non-default display mode.

  • Brandon H locked this topic
  • Daniel F. unpinned this topic
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
    • For me, the fundamental problems with these "smartglasses" is that they really don't work well for people with significant prescriptions and massively up the price if you use attached lenses if they have displays, and if they don't, then they're not actually "smart" anything, rather just connecting to your phone and relaying voice to an AI. In a few cases like this, they throw in small cameras to feed video to the AI. All around, these feel like both a solution looking for a problem, and the problems it tries to solve seem more easily solved by different approaches and designs. Oddly, if the rumours are true, Apple may actually have invented something for once and it kind of does this right: put cameras in ear buds and manage the interface to AI exactly as most of us do: tapping on an ear bud and saying "Hey Google" or "Hey Siri." That makes them compatible with almost everyone, can double up as a hearing assist device, an impaired vision assist device, a "smart" device... and answer your phone and play music. That just seems like a better solution all around.
    • Usually the bigger ones with many fixes/changes take a few, theyre an exception to the rule most likely
    • If you don’t get lucky with Valve’s Steam Machine reservation system, you can make your own Steam Machine instead. Valve says that “starting with the SteamOS 3.8 release, you can put together your own Steam Machine using whatever PC parts you want.” SteamOS 3.8.10 launched last week with a slew of updates, including “improved compatibility with recent Intel and AMD platforms.” Alongside that improved compatibility, Valve is giving gamers the green light to install SteamOS on their own desktops. In an interview with The Verge, Valve’s Pierre-Loup Griffais said Valve has been “rolling out improvements to [SteamOS] so it’s more compatible with desktop hardware,” including eventual support for Nvidia graphics. Griffais says Valve has “a growing team” working on Nvidia driver support for SteamOS, adding, “We’re collaborating with Nvidia very closely.” While he mentioned that Nvidia support might not come this year, Griffais emphasized that “it’s certainly something that we’re working on in the background.”     Subscription not needed: https://archive.fo/Tssfc Subscription needed: https://www.theverge.com/games/953411/valve-steamos-desktop-nvidia
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      452
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!