Recommended Posts

The continued use Metro UI confuses me also, its has no place on a desktop.

Most of its aspects are giant a waste of realistate, elements of the UI are made so basic its actually harder to find what your looking for

 

lets put it this way.. you can own a car that runs awesomely fast, but if the seats are terribly uncomfortable you are less likely to enjoy the experience.

 

The bing elements are terribly intrusive & have to go, just why do I care what is trending and the image of the day is when I just want to do a search on my computer?

 

I am enjoying task view, and fact when windows are maximized they don't take full focus anymore

 

The unifying of the platform makes sense, but this is the wrong direction.

The continued use Metro UI confuses me also, its has no place on a desktop.

Most of its aspects are giant a waste of realistate, elements of the UI are made so basic its actually harder to find what your looking for

 

lets put it this way.. you can own a car that runs awesomely fast, but if the seats are terribly uncomfortable you are less likely to enjoy the experience.

 

The bing elements are terribly intrusive & have to go, just why do I care what is trending and the image of the day is when I just want to do a search on my computer?

 

I am enjoying task view, and fact when windows are maximized they don't take full focus anymore

 

The unifying of the platform makes sense, but this is the wrong direction.

What bing elements and how is it intrusive?

 

Don't like a app\live tile? Unpin or uninstall the app....

 

Don't like Cortana? Don't use it and disable it....

  • Like 2

Its not being used, to be clear I have already removed it from the taskbar & cortana is off, but the above is the result just clicking on the search box when the start menu is opened

That's because you turn on Cortana, turn it off than you don't see any bing results and it's still work in progress that search bar is a place holder atm(aka bugged).

I will sum it up as it is continuation of steps in the wrong direction. Same ugly UI and metrofication makes it half baked potato. This OS, although MS is giving free, going to tank as its precedator Win 8.

I assume not everybody can love a '' most - bugged '' Technical Preview ever .

Bugged - or complained about?

 

I hear lots of complaints - and very few honest bugs.  Honest bugs are things like the driver issues and other mostly known issues; however, I've been hearing (here at Neowin) more about UI complaints and icon complaints than bugs.

 

Even more telling, the complaints largely revolve around "it's not pointing-device-centric" or "it's not 7".

 

Of course not - it's not SUPPOSED to be 7; Windows 7 is BTDT (Been There, Done That).  Even more telling, where has it gone?

 

Is or isn't Windows 7 still being sold?  Is or isn't Windows 7 still purchasable as a new OS?

 

Consider this - Windows 10 hasn't had a Consumer Preview yet (a genuine beta); instead, it's been Technical Preview after Technical Preview.

 

A lot of the OS is either in flux or outright missing.  Yet it is AT LEAST as usable as 8.1 was, despite that.

 

Worse, I'm hearing a slight hunger for Vista - the second most despised pre-8 Microsoft OS for users (only Windows ME was more despised).

 

Go back and read the complaints ABOUT Vista - right here on Neowin itself.  (I didn't even MAKE any.)  Despite my non-complaints about Vista, I'm not waxing THAT nostalgic that I want Vista Redux - I don't want 7 Redux, either.

 

It is looking more and more like lots of folks are either unwilling to move or are outright nostalgic here on Neowin.

 

If you have application issues (other than the UI), there is even a thread for that - that I created - here in this specific subforum ("Compatibility Failures - What Is Keeping You From Windows 10").  Other than the games Daybreak inherited from Sony (that I kicked off that same thread with) - every application and game that I played in 8 I have been able to play in EVERY build of Windows 10 to date - including the leaked builds.  The number of operating systems that are that clean that they are no worse than the SHIPPING OS - as far as usability goes - previous to 10 number exactly one.  And no - 7 wasn't it, despite it changing less than Vista (which brought the code over from Windows Server).

 

Unlike those complaining, I didn't move the measuring stick (or the goalposts) any compared to even previous versions of Windows - and especially not compared to 7 - after all, why would (or should) I?  My hardware pretty much is unchanged (except for adding the notebook - which predates even 7).  Touch isn't part of the measuring - none of my hardware supports it.  The reason I no longer use an external mouse on my notebook is because the built-in trackpad is now properly supported in the OS - which is Windows 10 9926.  (After I pick up a new power brick, I'm planting 10041 on that same notebook.)  The notebook itself dates back to Vista - which is what originally shipped on it - yet it took three-plus OSes to get the trackpad support right?  Who is to blame, people?  Synaptics (that made the trackpad for HP)?  Microsoft (that supplied the driver said trackpad uses by default)?  Previous users? (After all, the notebook itself had two previous users before I got it - and hundreds of thousands of identical AND similar trackpads - from Synaptics and others - were and are included in notebooks today and years previously - what did those users do?)

 

Complaints are not bugs - BUGS are bugs.

 

Complaints are complaints - and I refuse to conflate, OR mix up, the two.

Problem is, there is no one way to define a "desktop" anymore. This is why Metro is there to begin with. That's why Microsoft is unifying all these devices with one UI that scales. There is no more going back Pre-Windows 8 UIs. The mouse is only going to fall away from use as other technologies take over.

Not necessarily fail away, Dot.  However, it will be used, if ONLY due to user-preference.

 

That's the REAL issue - the mouse itself is now an option - not mandatory - for the first time in Windows in almost three decades - regardless of your hardware.

 

If anything, that is why mini-Start was brought in - the StartScreen threatened to whack Microsoft's own hardware group right in the wallet.

 

Of ALL the hardware (other than Surface), what one piece of kit does Microsoft sell more of?  Pointing devices, and specifically mice.

 

Unlike the original Start menu, the StartScreen can be driven ENTIRELY by the keyboard.  If you know the keyboard shortcuts (which are unchanged from the first "Windows keyboard"), you only need mice for applications in Windows 8.x - not to maneuver around the OS.

 

Screw touch - the bigger threat to mice was the keyboard.

 

Touch may be threatening on smaller screens - however, keyboards are FAR more common on most Windows hardware - and are options on the rest of it.  Touch can be avoided - and usually is in terms of BYOPC due to cost/price.  However, how many users are going to even BUILD a PC sans keyboard?

 

A keyboard-driven GUI was supposed to be impossible.  So much for that idea - starting with Windows 8, in fact, it's plausible.  (While Android and iOS are NOT touch-centric, neither is capable of becoming keyboard-centric - Windows 8+ is, however.)

 

It sounds screwball - like a whale sneaking up on an alligator.  However, it's plausible (unlike the reality of a whale in Nike Airs).

Auditor - you have just made sure that Windows 10 won't fail.

 

You have just accused the majority of Windows users of suffering from SHS - Shallow Hal Syndrome.

 

By painting that picture of the Windows user base, you have painted as unflattering a picture of those users as was possible to paint - you just accused them of being unable to get past the differences in terms of UI altogether.  That, sir, is the IT equivalent of pre-judgmental.  I have greater faith in the Windows userbase than that - and I have a lot more hard data to back it up than you do - simply based on previous versions OF Windows.

Anarkii, what is stopping Win32 applications? I run them every day in 10041 (and every other build of 10, and 8.x before that). I even have a thread devoted specifically to software that (supposedly) doesn't work in the Windows 10 preview builds. Other than three games, the list of such compatibility failures is zero. (As in none - bupkis - the dodo egg.)

If you must have (or use) a Win32 (or Win64, for that matter) application or game, in ninety-nine out of one hundred cases, you won't have an issue. (The only OTHER versions of Windows - even in beta form - to rack up such utter cleanliness in terms of backward compatibility since the death of Windows ME - which didn't do it - are Windows 8 and 8.x. XP didn't do it, Vista didn't do it - even the much-preferred Windows 7 - before OR after Service Pack 1 - didn't do it.) Win32/64 is still available - even in Windows 10; on devices running BayTrail-T (such as tablets and even some phones and phablets) Win32/64 is an option even there! The ONLY reason I develop on Windows Server 2012R2 is because of Hyper-V (which I have made perfectly clear in the Windows Server and Virtualization threads). Win32/64 is still available - it has NOT been taken away.

You totally misread what I said.

What I want is METRO apps to have the exact same functionality as win32/64 apps on desktops/laptops and notebooks. At the moment, Metro apps on my desktop have the same functionality as a patato on a phone. Which is nothing. 

Think of it this way mate:

You goto Windows Store. You want Outlook. So you pay for it, and download it. 

Then on the desktop, you get the Metro version running (and looking) pretty much exactly like the current Office 2016 preview. Nothing taken out, everythings there. Then you get on a train, take a tablet, and Outlook is there again, but - it looks like that Outlook preview currently on the store since its for touch. Then you get to work, and in a meeting and you pull out your phone, and you get Outlook, for your phone device. BUT - its all the same one program. Not 3 different ones. The same, scaled for the device its using. 

THATS what I want to see happen. And so far, theres no Metro app that does it. You get ones for Phones and Tablets, but nothing for anything that can display apps in HD on a desktop in Metro style. So like I said, until that happens then Metro apps wont really take off, and its developers to blame for not doing it. 

You totally misread what I said.

What I want is METRO apps to have the exact same functionality as win32/64 apps on desktops/laptops and notebooks. At the moment, Metro apps on my desktop have the same functionality as a patato on a phone. Which is nothing. 

Think of it this way mate:

You goto Windows Store. You want Outlook. So you pay for it, and download it. 

Then on the desktop, you get the Metro version running (and looking) pretty much exactly like the current Office 2016 preview. Nothing taken out, everythings there. Then you get on a train, take a tablet, and Outlook is there again, but - it looks like that Outlook preview currently on the store since its for touch. Then you get to work, and in a meeting and you pull out your phone, and you get Outlook, for your phone device. BUT - its all the same one program. Not 3 different ones. The same, scaled for the device its using. 

THATS what I want to see happen. And so far, theres no Metro app that does it. You get ones for Phones and Tablets, but nothing for anything that can display apps in HD on a desktop in Metro style. So like I said, until that happens then Metro apps wont really take off, and its developers to blame for not doing it. 

You're never going to get full parity. In the transition to Modern applications, features are going to be deprecated and removed or in the case of scalability, features that are just not feasible in Modern applications.

Also, what you just described, is what Microsoft is working towards, and has achieved with Windows 10. Right now, when you download a modern application from the Store, it's the same application on the desktop, tablet, and phone. Not 3 different ones. Office, for example, has achieved universal status.  

You're never going to get full parity. In the transition to Modern applications, features are going to be deprecated and removed or in the case of scalability, features that are just not feasible in Modern applications.

Also, what you just described, is what Microsoft is working towards, and has achieved with Windows 10. Right now, when you download a modern application from the Store, it's the same application on the desktop, tablet, and phone. Not 3 different ones. Office, for example, has achieved universal status.  

Yes Windows 10 has achieved it, but there is zero reason why thoe modern apps cannot be scaled so more features show on PCs with keyboard or mouse. If they can do it with Spartan, why not everything else? Why not with Outlook as I suggested? As it seems for me, its like they are intentionally dumbing down applications that run on the desktop just to make those people who run Tablets and Phones happy.

Outlook are 3 totally different apps. 

547f8dd0798b9.preview-620.jpg

3 versions, same app. But the desktop version has the same features as the tablet one, just more screen space. 

Then on top of that, you got this - another version of Outlook altogether:

outlook_ui_900x530-100564288-orig.png

Then on top of that, you got the 2016 preview.

outlook-2016-575x339.png

What im saying Dot is have 1 program (in this case, Outlook) - and have the UI that of Metro for PCs (anything with a keyboard and mouse), then the same program, but scaled features on the tablet for touch, then scaled even more for phones? 

Hope that clears it up. 1 program, literally. 3 devices. 3 different UIs. If scalability is such a big thing for Microsoft, then they REALLY need to implement it for its apps. 

 

Spotify is still not working for me on Windows 10 TP, but the rest is looking OK. A bit worried about the pace of development.
Pretty excited to try out the refreshed core system apps that have yet to be released.
I hope they do a complete UI refresh of the entire OS, and not just the upper layers. I hate half-assed work.

 

Untitled-4.png?dl=0

 

Need I say more

Dude, the very first thing many of us do upon installing 10, is to install "Classic Shell", to fix the start menu.

 

IMHO win10 is UNUSABLE without classic shell. (and it's free)

 

http://www.classicshell.net/

Dude, the very first thing many of us do upon installing 10, is to install "Classic Shell", to fix the start menu.

 

IMHO win10 is UNUSABLE without classic shell. (and it's free)

 

http://www.classicshell.net/

I can't properly reason with people who install Classic Shell, even more so in a technical preview which is aimed at users who are willing to test drive a work in progress.

Not to replace it with other tools.

 

I can't properly reason with people who install Classic Shell, even more so in a technical preview which is aimed at users who are willing to test drive a work in progress.

Not to replace it with other tools.

 

It's not really all that hard to figure out, but I'll try to help.

 

Preview or not, most people who have been into these things for a while, pretty much know what they want. And I can assure you, in no uncertain terms that the current start menu, for oh so many of us, is certainly not it.

 

Therefore, to properly test 10's usefulness we need to ensure that available fixes can still fix the mess that microsoft is pushing out. I am happy to state that at least for me, most of the annoyances are fixable. And make no mistake, the inability to fix their disastrous start menu, would be an absolute deal breaker.

 

Hope that helps..... :)

Yes, you are wrong, and merely adding long winded rebuttals does not change that.

 

When you remove options, when you remove choice, when you limit flexibility, when you limit configurability, all of these things have a net result of dumbing down the entire operation. All of which may well be fine, on a phone, but it has not place on a desktop computer.

 

I agree. Windows 10, at the moment is dumbed down compared to 8.1. The lack of a proper Start Screen is removing choice, since in 8 we could add a menu if we wanted, or use the Screen. Since there's no 3rd party Screen tool, we basically have a choice between built-in menu or a 3rd party one. Which is no choice at all if you don't want a menu.

 

And before you bring out the canned "it can stay on tablets" response - I'm talking about my tower system on which I have 10 in a VM - which does not have a touchscreen. I want the Screen for use with a mouse and keyboard.

 

IMO, being dragged back to the same basic design as was forced on us in 1995 is the worst kind of dumbing down.

  • Like 2

 

You totally misread what I said.

What I want is METRO apps to have the exact same functionality as win32/64 apps on desktops/laptops and notebooks. At the moment, Metro apps on my desktop have the same functionality as a patato on a phone. Which is nothing. 

Think of it this way mate:

You goto Windows Store. You want Outlook. So you pay for it, and download it. 

Then on the desktop, you get the Metro version running (and looking) pretty much exactly like the current Office 2016 preview. Nothing taken out, everythings there. Then you get on a train, take a tablet, and Outlook is there again, but - it looks like that Outlook preview currently on the store since its for touch. Then you get to work, and in a meeting and you pull out your phone, and you get Outlook, for your phone device. BUT - its all the same one program. Not 3 different ones. The same, scaled for the device its using. 

THATS what I want to see happen. And so far, theres no Metro app that does it. You get ones for Phones and Tablets, but nothing for anything that can display apps in HD on a desktop in Metro style. So like I said, until that happens then Metro apps wont really take off, and its developers to blame for not doing it. 

 

You want better hardware detection - so do I. However, not all users DEPEND on hardware detection; even more telling, not all users want to be constrained by what the OS thinks the hardware is - the OS has been known to get it wrong. (Trackpads and touchpads, for example, are NOTORIOUS for being misdetected in even Windows 8.1.)

That is where (and why) user-based adjustability comes in. It is nothing more (or less) than manual-override capability for UI/UX features.

The problem (as you framed it) has four components - what the developer knows about what hardware is out there (which is, typically, unsurprisingly little), what the OS knows about the hardware that is running (believe it or not, barely more than what the developer does), what Microsoft knows (non-disclosure agreements between Microsoft and their ODMs often work both ways - not just from Microsoft to the ODM, but from the ODM to Microsoft as well - how much of the functionality of a GPU, for example, is deliberately unexposed) and what hardware partners are willing to expose.

Even before Multiplatform Windows became a vision, all has been FAR from "sweetness and light" as far as even Windows hardware compatibility has gone - you and I both know that.

Now, Multiplatform Windows is coming into the home stretch - and those that are used to single-platform Windows are finding that their comfort zone is going away. What the hardware is no longer decides what can and will run on it. That isn't going to make the developer's job any easier. Result - developers are writing "bare minimum" apps. I can't exactly blame the developer - the hardware base was already wildly variable merely in the Win32 "salad days" of XP. Just at Windows 7 (remember, 8 hadn't even delivered a Developer Preview at that point) launched, things had started to get wilder and woolier - and that was just in terms of desktops and portables. Still, "bare minimum" is the watchword for Modern/RT development - what they can count on (in terms of features available to the app) varies way too wildly; that is why you see more MOBILE developers in the Modern/RT space, as opposed to desktop developers; desktop developers are not used to being constrained by the bare minimum. Modern/RT is constrained by exposed levers - it's not identical to desktop development. Do you have VS 2013 Community? If not, grab it right now - it costs nothing, and is as complete a multiplatform IDE for the masses as exists at any price. (Better yet, it costs exactly nothing.)

  MS is looking for feed back and testing bugs on features they introduce such as the new start menu. If you're installing classic shell, you should just  stick to windows 7 or 8 for now.

Apparently the company is only looking for feedback which is in accord with what it already plans to do. Requests for the Windows 8.1 Start screen, for example, are seemingly ignored altogether.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • So size is the ONLY selling point????? People have been plugging in PC's to TV's in living rooms for 20+ years. I would take a bigger box for more peformance. Also lot and lots of SFF/Mini ITX build guides out there.
    • My point is, if you buying this instead of a console for TV purposes, that you need to understand that you will not be able to play the most popular MP games with Steam OS. Now if you are not into those games, and into some of the perputual alpha/beta games on Steam then this is an option. I would argue a gaming PC would be the better route, more expensive but take the 1k -1.4k you are about to spend on this thing and build a better one. Because it is running Linux you can overide its 1080p settings. However The Verge complained about its 1080p cap and how you would have to get around it at the CLI, so someone buying this instead of a PS5 or Xbox might have a challege on their hands.
    • A review of Synology's BeeCamera software for the BeeStation Plus by Christopher White Synology is leaning into the BeeStation and the BeeStation Plus, and it's easy to understand why. While power users will want something more customizable, the BeeStation and its more powerful sibling, the BeeStation Plus, are great for those who want a device they can simply plug in, click a few buttons, and have it work as their own personal cloud. Until recently, the device was mostly used for the storage of files, photos, and videos, and with the Plus model, you could install and stream media through Plex. Synology recently released a new free application for the BeeStation Plus called BeeCamera, which is basically a stripped-down version of Surveillance Station. First, let's get the confusing naming out of the way. While you might initially think that BeeCamera is a physical device, perhaps a camera that Synology created specifically for the BeeStation Plus, that would be incorrect. BeeCamera is simply the name for the application that runs on the NAS and on your mobile device. I think the marketing team missed the mark here, but it does fit the other naming on the device, like BeePhotos and BeeFiles, I guess. Camera Support As of right now, only Synology-branded cameras are supported, which many will see as a callback to the drive locking the company implemented and then backtracked on. That said, while I 100% disagree on drive locking, I agree that camera locking for a device made to simply plug and play is the right decision. The whole point of the BeeStation line is simplicity. There are currently three camera model lines available, a wireless device for indoor use, and two PoE models for external use. CC400W (Wi-Fi): Plug it into power using the included power adapter, and connect it to your wireless network. This camera is rated only for indoor use and is the one I was provided to review the BeeCamera. $198.36, in line with the Unifi G6 Compact. BC510 (PoE): A bullet-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. TC510 (PoE): A dome-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. Although this isn't a review of the actual Synology camera, I did want to note that a positive for the Synology CC400W is that it uses a magnetic base. This means you can mount it on any magnetic surface, which is pretty handy. However, a downside to the camera is that it's powered by a built-in USB cable that's about six and a half feet (two meters) long. This means that the cable will probably be either too long or too short, but more importantly, if the cable is damaged at all, you'll likely need to buy an entirely new camera because there doesn't appear to be a way to replace it, unlike many competitors, like the Unifi G6 Instant. Hopefully, this is something Synology addresses in a future revision of the hardware. The BeeStation Plus supports up to four cameras. Setup The setup of BeeCamera is, like everything in the BeeStation family, very straightforward. Simply make sure you're on at least version 1.5 of the BeeStation OS, and BeeCamera is automatically installed on the device. BeeCamera Setup Screenshots Setting up the CC400W was just as easy. Plug it in, open up the BeeCamera app, and follow the on-screen steps to add the camera. During this process, you'll configure the camera name and how many days of retention you want to keep. The system will also automatically update the firmware for you. The whole thing took only a couple of minutes, excluding the time it took for the camera to update the firmware. Once the camera is connected to the BeeStation Plus, you can manage the various camera settings within the app, although there aren't many to choose from. You're able to configure whether the microphone will record audio (some privacy laws may preclude you from recording it), select what codec to use (H.264 or H.265), configure the color and exposure of the camera, and determine what data you want to overlay onto the video. Finally, you can set up AI detections so that BeeCamera will alert you if it sees certain things. These are all of the common detections you would expect in a camera system, such as people, pets, and vehicles. Under people and vehicles, you can also add extra monitoring for lingering and congestion detection, although pets are currently in "Lab" and therefore have no extra features yet. Recording in 4K using H.265 for 30 days will take roughly 300 GB of storage, which is very reasonable for most regular households, as the BeeStation Plus has 8TB of native storage. If you want to set up detection zones, you can. These are areas that BeeCamera will look at for the various detections, and are helpful if, for example, there's a tree in your frame and you don't want to be notified each time the wind makes the branches move around in the frame. Finally, you can also schedule when the camera should and should not be recording, which is a very useful feature. For example, you may want to record only at night when you're sleeping, but not during the day when you're up and about the house, so you can easily shut the camera off between 8 am and 10 pm. Each hour of each day can be configured to record continuously, only upon a detection event, or disabled completely. You can't fine-tune to record at a specific time, though, only hourly blocks on the hour. Daily Use The best part of BeeCamera is that it's easy and just works. If you only care about being notified when things happen, the mobile app sends those notifications and lets you click the button to bring up the video and see what's going on. For example, when I went out of town and had the camera pointed at the cat tower in our hallway, it was nice to be able to drop in and check that my furry friends were doing okay without me. Initiating the remote connection to the BeeStation Plus through the app is very responsive, but this will heavily depend on your ISP. In my case, using Xfinity, I'm able to go from starting the app to seeing live video in roughly three seconds, which is about the same amount of time it takes to connect to my Unifi UNVR system that costs much more. If you want to see footage from a specific day and time, you can do so using the calendar icon. You can also scroll through the timeline, looking for detections that are labeled in blue (vs. the normal gray when there's nothing of interest). There are buttons that let you go to the last/next detection on the timeline, which is helpful if you missed the notification on your mobile device. That's where the ease of use stops, though. While you can download clips that are flagged by detection, there's apparently no way to select generic time frames you're interested in, and the only place to download is to your phone. In addition, sharing a video shares the actual video, not just a link back to your BeeStation Plus. While that's good from a security and privacy perspective, it's a little awkward for sharing large videos. Limitations While the ease of implementation is great, there are some things that are lacking from BeeCamera. The most obvious is that there is no way to view the footage on the desktop. You can log in to the BeeStation Plus to see how much storage BeeCamera is using, but unlike BeePhotos and BeeFiles, there is no BeeCamera on the web console to manage or view footage. This means you'll be viewing all of your security footage on your mobile device, which is pretty limiting. In addition, there's no way to download the video to your PC without first using your phone as the intermediary. The one exception to this is that you can use BeeFiles to see the raw MP4 files. They're saved in 5-minute increments, and it's just raw data with no detection information or any other way to identify what any of them are. The lack of a way to interact with BeeCamera on the desktop also makes configuration of the cameras more difficult. For example, trying to set up detection zones using a tiny screen and your finger to draw boxes is more cumbersome than it needs to be. This reinforces the idea that BeeCamera is not made for power users. It's also missing some of the more advanced functionality of Surveillance Station. For example, I couldn't find a way to say, "Alert me if the thing in this zone is no longer there." Another major deficiency with BeeCamera, and a feature I suspect may come out in the future, is that while it can detect generic people, there is no specific facial recognition yet. This is an interesting omission, given the fact that other Synology tools can detect specific individuals, and competitors such as Unifi Protect also do it. This is probably a software limitation, so we will have to wait and see if this feature is added in the future. Conclusion If you need a security guard to monitor surveillance cameras to make sure your property is secure, then BeeCamera is not the solution for you. That said, you probably wouldn't be using a BeeStation Plus as the brains behind the system either. BeeCamera (and BeeStation in general) is clearly aimed at households that want to avoid sending personal data to Google and Amazon, and now want to add some cameras to keep an eye on their home and their pets while they're away. BeeCamera excels at doing this. The target market isn't interested in creating cases, tying multiple views together in a single pane of glass, or the like, and for the intended use case, the system works great. Where it starts to fall apart a bit is with more advanced features. Not being able to use a desktop app is a major compromise in my opinion, and having to do all of the configuration on a mobile device is annoying, but not impossible. If you don't want to have a full-fledged NAS device in your home, but still want control over your data (or maybe want an easy way to backup your data for World Backup Day), and want to add a couple of cameras to keep an eye on your house and your pets, this is a great, cheap, and easy way to go, and I suspect more functionality will come over time. If Synology releases a desktop app or at least a way to configure cameras and view footage on a desktop browser, this would be a near-perfect solution for a general home user. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • I forgot to add on my comment that when robots will take physical jobs, it's when they become more cheaper to manufacture and sell. That will be the starting point of the end to lanscaping, trash pickup, factory jobs, etc.
    • How many people can actually use a 2.5gig ethernet port? Most people do not have more than a 1gig internet connection, heck most have less than that. Most people at home do not have a switch that has multiple 2.5gig ports either.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      477
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      104
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      88
    5. 5
      neufuse
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!