Windows 10: New leaked screenshots reveal brand new UI for Settings; death of Control Panel?


Recommended Posts

Being able to have them on your tablet or phone and still having access to it on your desktop too, that whole unified platform idea.  Choice is a funny thing.

 

WP8 is a failure with less than 3% marketshare (actually down from 3.9%).

 

So lets force the 90% of OS marketshare to conform to the failed 3% phone platform for the sake of unification, what a BRILLIANT idea!

 

/s

WP8 is a failure with less than 3% marketshare (actually down from 3.9%).

 

So lets force the 90% of OS marketshare to conform to the failed 3% phone platform for the sake of unification, what a BRILLIANT idea!

 

/s

Mmmmm tablets? Maybe you should watch MS Build 2014 keynote. MS isn't forcing anything on you. You can still use old win32/64 apps. The incentive of  metro apps is the easy port of said app to xbox\wp\tablets. What makes Windows great is options, unlike mac osx.

  • Like 3

This thread has gone way off topic. Time to block Order_66 and be done. You'll be much happier in the long run.

Mmmmm tablets? Maybe you should watch MS Build 2014 keynote. MS isn't forcing anything on you. You can still use old win32/64 apps. The incentive of  metro apps is the easy port of said app to xbox\wp\tablets. What makes Windows great is options, unlike mac osx.

 

Actually microsoft is indeed forcing metro by removing the modern windows 7 style control panel in favor of a metro version.

This thread has gone way off topic. Time to block Order_66 and be done. You'll be much happier in the long run.

 

This discussion is about the "death of Control Panel" which I have been routinely addressing in this discussion.

 

And why would you advise people to block me when you've not done it yourself?

Why can't they just have a single unified GUI? Why do they have to have regular apps and modern apps? Can't they just make them all have the same graphics?

Actually microsoft is indeed forcing metro by removing the modern windows 7 style control panel in favor of a metro version.

How so? Windowed?  All you can see so far is windowed?  Check.  Sorted by categories out of the box like previous versions?  Check.  Functionality currently appears more or less identical?  Check.  Of course it's not visually the same, it's a WIP.  Bitching over nothing?  Check.  And as mentioned before, you can still run the traditional stuff, same as before.  All of this "removal" is pure speculation and fearmongering.  Even in 8.1 the classic setup is still there.  Get off it already.

Being able to have them on your tablet or phone and still having access to it on your desktop too, that whole unified platform idea.  Choice is a funny thing.

 

Not to mention all the benefits that comes with the WinRT framework which benefit the end user in terms of better power management, memory usage, ability to suspend and free up memory etc. Honestly, I swear people here have spent no time learning the benefits of the WinRT framework and instead whinge because of change. The complaints regarding Windows 8.x had some legitimacy but with Windows 10 the complaints are more about 'they're changing things! I don't like change!' than actually something legitimate.

This thread has gone way off topic. Time to block Order_66 and be done. You'll be much happier in the long run.

 

Wow, really.  Imagine if everyone blocked everyone else who they didnt agree with or because the topic went off course.  No one would post anything anymore.

Server IE11 is so ridiculously locked down that I think it fails in its function as a web browser. I would rather use IE6 over the horror that is PEP IE11 :p. At least I don't have to click through several dialogue boxes just to browse the internet...

And that sort of lockdown for a SERVER makes a ton of sense - and there are options if you aren't going to use the server AS a server (I stated one of them - that actually costs me nothing).

You are twisting my words, I never said I "want it now, not later" for anything.

 

And you are simply making excuses for microsoft and their weak and backwards metro junk, making a decent metro mail app isn't going to cut into their bank account, their windows live email client didn't undercut their office sales did it?

Order_66: I use the same default view YOU do.  However, I have done testing of operating systems (Microsoft's, and those from other companies), and I am quite aware that it takes time to migrate from one paradigm to another.  You, by comparison, want the migration to be immediate and instantaneous.  I'm not the one complaining that the migration is taking too long (that means that, despite my preferences, I'm in not that big a hurry)  - you, however, are.

 

Windows Live Mail lacked features compared to Outlook - it's why I didn't migrate to it FROM Outlook.  It had ONE feature that Outlook lacked - support for USENET newsgroups; had USENET remained relevant, I might have kept it.  (As it was, I migrated from the old Outlook Express to Outlook BECAUSE USENET became irrelevant, due largely to the BT protocol and the adoption - by me - of broadband.  (Look at how - and why - Thunderbird is still seen as relevant today.)

 

On Category View - the very reason I actually understand what is taking so long is that I actually AM comparing Category View (in the Technical Preview, where it is the default once again) to Category View in 8 and 8.1 - where it isn't the default - there are more options just in Category View alone - options that Category View in 8.x lacked; they weren't there in 7 or earlier, either.  In other words, there are MORE options - not fewer.  Greater adjustability - not lesser adjustability.  More options - not fewer.  In other words, because I'm actually engaging in checking out individual trees, I'm actually finding more adjustability - something that we have both criticized Windows 8.x for lacking.

 

Lastly, what is Mail actually lacking that it needs - in YOUR opinion?  And why must it compete - feature for feature - with Outlook, as opposed to Windows Live Mail (which still exists)?  Outlook is a PAID application - comparing any free application to it is silly in the extreme; it actually does FREE applications a dis-service.

 

A final point on Category View - I went to Small Icon view starting with XP because everything I needed as far as adjustability went actually FIT on a single page in Small Icon view.; now, the adjustability has gotten so fine-grained that it no longer does.  THAT is what I meant by adjustability up the wazoo - it has, literally, gotten THAT detailed.  Is that, in fact, your REAL complaint?  That Windows has gotten too complicated/complex?

  • Like 2

Wow, really. Imagine if everyone blocked everyone else who they didnt agree with or because the topic went off course. No one would post anything anymore.

Order's posts are designed to get under people's skin. Nothing more.

  • Like 3

Order's posts are designed to get under people's skin. Nothing more.

If he is being a deliberate contrarian, that, in and of itself, is not a sin - however, if that IS the case, I wish he would simply admit it and be done with it, as opposed to acting childish (which is how he comes across).

  • Like 3

Lastly, what is Mail actually lacking that it needs - in YOUR opinion?  And why must it compete - feature for feature - with Outlook, as opposed to Windows Live Mail (which still exists)?  Outlook is a PAID application - comparing any free application to it is silly in the extreme

 

 

This again, you twisting my words and inventing an attack, I never said Mail had to "compete - feature for feature - with outlook"  and to think you are the one insinuating that I am somehow "acting childish".

 

 

How many metro apps have equivalent number of features and functionality compared to their modern win32 counterparts?

Why should anything from the metro design language become a replacement for a truly modern win32 program when metro is obviously gimped and half-baked?

 

This is the big problem with metro and the replacement of the control panel (or anything else for that matter), the metro CP is already showing signs of being weaker and lacking in features compared to the modern windows 7 CP.

 

You want change? fine, but for gods sakes don't cripple or 'dumb down' windows 10 with useless, half-baked metro junk that's already been a proven "across the board" failure.

 

Metro marketshare failures:

 

WP8 - less than 3%

Surface 3 - still in the hole. (or did it break even yet?)

Windows 8 - less than 15%

 

Come up with a better plan microsoft, you shouldn't even touch the desktop until you do.

"Metro marketshare failures:"

 

What about xbox it's design is also "METRO"....

 

Surface was profitable in 2014 Q1...

 

By your logic mac osx has failed hard. 12+ years at only 7 percent marketshare.

  • Like 2

Order's posts are designed to get under people's skin. Nothing more.

 

In which case I'm sure it breaks one of the forums rules in relation to trolling and flame bait. It is one thing to have a disagreement and layout reasons why but to continuously harp on about the same crap over and over and over again as Order_66 does I have to ask what value his 'contribution' (a word I use loosely) does for the forum other than derail conversations into a flame war.

Surface was profitable in 2014 Q1...

I really wouldn't call those numbers "profitable", but at least they didn't have a huge write-down as they did in mid-2013:

 

Unsold inventory for Microsoft's Surface RT tablet recently led to a write-down totaling $900 million.

That number turned out to be greater than the amount of revenue earned on the entire Surface product line.

According to GeekWire, total Surface revenue reached $853 million on June 30, 2013.

 

Their shipment of Surface tablets broke in again in Q2 2014. After 3.2m in Q1, it broke in to 2.7m in Q2 2014. Also in Q2, 36,8m of Android tablets were shipped and 13.3m of Apple tablets (Source: Statista 2014). Market share of Microsoft Surface tablets is only at tiny 1.6% (Source: Chitika).

 

Windows Phones aren't doing much better, even though they had much more time than Surface already: (Source: Neowin)

 

post-534520-0-70669100-1419285128.jpg

 

By your logic mac osx has failed hard.

Let's take a look at the current Statista stats for Septemper 2014:

 

Windows 7: 49.64%

Windows XP: 12.81%

Mac OS X: 8.27%

Windows 8.1%: 7.88%

 

Mac OS X still has more market share than Windows 8.1. Even the 13 year old Windows XP, which has reached End of Life over half a year ago, is still a lot more popular than Windows 8.1. That clearly makes Windows 8.1 the one who fails hard.

 

As such, putting a Windows 8-style control panel into Windows 10 would be a very bad idea.

Stop skewing numbers towards your argument...Windows 8.1 and Windows 8 has double the market share of  all version osx combined which was release 13 years.

 

Market Share of Windows 8.1 Windows 8.1    12.10%
Market Share of Windows 8 Windows 8    6.55%
Market Share of Mac OS X 10.9 Mac OS X 10.9    2.79%
Market Share of Mac OS X 10.10 Mac OS X 10.10    2.66%
Market Share of Mac OS X 10.6 Mac OS X 10.6    0.68%
Market Share of Mac OS X 10.8 Mac OS X 10.8    0.50%
Market Share of Mac OS X 10.7 Mac OS X 10.7    0.49%
Market Share of Mac OS X 10.5 Mac OS X 10.5    0.12%

 

As of NOV 2014

Source

http://www.netmarketshare.com/operating-system-market-share.aspx?qprid=10&qpcustomd=0

 

Need another source?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_operating_systems

I really wouldn't call those numbers "profitable", but at least they didn't have a huge write-down as they did in mid-2013:
 

 
Their shipment of Surface tablets broke in again in Q2 2014. After 3.2m in Q1, it broke in to 2.7m in Q2 2014. Also in Q2, 36,8m of Android tablets were shipped and 13.3m of Apple tablets (Source: Statista 2014). Market share of Microsoft Surface tablets is only at tiny 1.6% (Source: Chitika).
 
Windows Phones aren't doing much better, even though they had much more time than Surface already: (Source: Neowin)
 
attachicon.gifkantar-smartphones-usa-2014-10.jpg
 


Let's take a look at the current Statista stats for Septemper 2014:
 
Windows 7: 49.64%

Windows XP: 12.81%

Mac OS X: 8.27%

Windows 8.1%: 7.88%

 

Mac OS X still has more market share than Windows 8.1. Even the 13 year old Windows XP, which has reached End of Life over half a year ago, is still a lot more popular than Windows 8.1. That clearly makes Windows 8.1 the one who fails hard.

 

As such, putting a Windows 8-style control panel into Windows 10 would be a very bad idea.

  • Like 3

I really wouldn't call those numbers "profitable", but at least they didn't have a huge write-down as they did in mid-2013:

 

 

Their shipment of Surface tablets broke in again in Q2 2014. After 3.2m in Q1, it broke in to 2.7m in Q2 2014. Also in Q2, 36,8m of Android tablets were shipped and 13.3m of Apple tablets (Source: Statista 2014). Market share of Microsoft Surface tablets is only at tiny 1.6% (Source: Chitika).

Of course their sales went down in 2014Q2. That happens to every product right before a new generation is launched. That "tiny" 1.6% is, however, just 0.1% less then Google. Microsoft is set to take over Google this year (and they already did).

 

Windows Phones aren't doing much better, even though they had much more time than Surface already: (Source: Neowin)

 

attachicon.gifkantar-smartphones-usa-2014-10.jpg

The USA is not the world. In Europe, they have a double-digit market share. They beat out iOS in 24 markets.

 

Let's take a look at the current Statista stats for Septemper 2014:

 

Windows 7: 49.64%

Windows XP: 12.81%

Mac OS X: 8.27%

Windows 8.1%: 7.88%

 

Mac OS X still has more market share than Windows 8.1. Even the 13 year old Windows XP, which has reached End of Life over half a year ago, is still a lot more popular than Windows 8.1. That clearly makes Windows 8.1 the one who fails hard.

 

As such, putting a Windows 8-style control panel into Windows 10 would be a very bad idea.

Yeah, let's not include Windows 8 because then, my claim wouldn't work anymore. Also. "OS X still has more market share than Windows 8.1"? That's nothing to be proud of. Windows 8.1 managed to get 12% (these are the real numbers) market share in 1 year, while OS X needed 12 year to get to 7%.

Mac OS X still has more market share than Windows 8.1. Even the 13 year old Windows XP, which has reached End of Life over half a year ago, is still a lot more popular than Windows 8.1. That clearly makes Windows 8.1 the one who fails hard.

You're saying that one version has less marketshare than another OS with ALL versions combined? Does that really make any sense? (Hint: It doesn't!)

  • Like 2

Of course their sales went down in 2014Q2. That happens to every product right before a new generation is launched. That "tiny" 1.6% is, however, just 0.1% less then Google. Microsoft is set to take over Google this year (and they already did).

 

The USA is not the world. In Europe, they have a double-digit market share. They beat out iOS in 24 markets.

 

Yeah, let's not include Windows 8 because then, my claim wouldn't work anymore. Also. "OS X still has more market share than Windows 8.1"? That's nothing to be proud of. Windows 8.1 managed to get 12% (these are the real numbers) market share in 1 year, while OS X needed 12 year to get to 7%.

 

The comparison of windows 8.x to OSX is indeed a very funny one, especially when you factor in that you must purchase hardware that is typically many times more expensive just to get OSX.

 

With windows 8.x any $300 junk laptop will do.

 

If windows 8 was such a smashing success and people love metro tiles then why is it that even with its much cheaper price it is still having trouble keeping up with or surpassing OSX in marketshare?

Stop skewing numbers towards your argument...

 

Stop with these ridiculous insults, just because you can't face the facts. The numbers are accurate, you can look them up here on Statista, just as i said.

 

Those were global numbers, numbers for the US (also Sep. 2014) are still a bit different:

 

Windows 7: 40.92%

Mac OS X: 14.8%

Windows XP: 9.71%

Windows 8.1%: 8.45%

 

Even if you still were to add the share for Windows 8 (5.61%), you'd get a total of 14,06%, which is still less than the 14.8% of OS X.

 

(Besides, that netmarket junk is hardly a reliable source, and Wikipedia stats... eww. Let's better not talk about that.)

 What insults? Even your source states win8/8.1 which is 2 years old and  has almost double the global market share of all version of osx which is 12 years old.

 

Like i said from the start your logic is off. 

 

 

 
Stop with these ridiculous insults, just because you can't face the facts. The numbers are accurate, you can look them up here on Statista, just as i said.

 

Those were global numbers, numbers for the US (also Sep. 2014) are still a bit different:

 

Windows 7: 40.92%
Mac OS X: 14.8%
Windows XP: 9.71%
Windows 8.1%: 8.45%

 

Even if you still were to add the share for Windows 8 (5.61%), you'd get a total of 14,06%, which is still less than the 14.8% of OS X.

 

(Besides, that netmarket junk is hardly a reliable source, and Wikipedia stats... eww. Let's better not talk about that.)

  • Like 2
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft making much needed change to Windows 11, 10 Patch Tuesday security updates by Sayan Sen Recently, Microsoft delivered its latest Defender patches for Windows 11 ISOs. These definitions are released from time to time alongside the general security updates available during Patch Tuesday. Speaking of Defender, the company has now announced another important change that affects how security updates are delivered to enterprise devices running Windows. According to a recent announcement, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint's endpoint detection and response (EDR) updates will no longer be bundled with the monthly Windows security updates or Patch Tuesdays. Instead the company is shifting delivery of these updates to Microsoft Update, bringing EDR servicing in line with several other Microsoft Defender components. If you recall, Microsoft last year moved PowerShell updates to Microsoft Update (MU) as well since it provides automatic updates for Microsoft products and services. Thus the move is intended to allow Microsoft to deliver EDR improvements and security enhancements independently of the OS's regular monthly update cycle; this should enable faster deployment of protection updates without requiring organizations to wait for the next Patch release. For those unfamiliar, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint's EDR capabilities are designed to help organizations detect, investigate, and respond to advanced threats across managed devices. Keeping these components updated is critical for maintaining protection against evolving attack techniques. The rollout has already began for Windows 10 devices in late May 2026 (last month) and Microsoft says it will gradually expand support to Windows 11 and the remaining supported Windows versions over the coming months. The company expects deployment across Windows 10 and Windows 11 to be completed by fall 2026 or around Q3 of this year. Once the transition is complete, EDR updates will be delivered through Microsoft Update using KB5005292, provided the required prerequisite updates have already been installed. Microsoft is also introducing a new Defender Update Service as part of the change. Following installation of the first update, devices will automatically create a new directory located at %ProgramData%\Microsoft\Microsoft Defender\Defender Update. Microsoft notes that restarts may occasionally be necessary in case of "rare" failure scenarios. For most organizations, the tech giant says no action will be required as long as Microsoft Update is already permitted within their update management strategy. Admins who rely on manually deployed update packages, however, will need to adjust their processes to ensure the new Defender update package is included. Microsoft also recommends reviewing internal documentation and notifying helpdesk and security operations teams about the updated delivery mechanism to avoid confusion during the transition. As a prerequisite, the tech giant notes that systems must be running Sense version 10.8798.25857.1000 or later and have one of the following Windows updates (or later) installed: Win11 24H2 KB5062660 (2025-07 Cumulative Update Preview) Win11 23H2 KB5062663 (2025-07 Cumulative Update Preview) Win11 22H2 KB5062663 (2025-07 Cumulative Update Preview) Win10 22H2 KB5062649 (2025-07 Cumulative Update Preview) Win10 1809 KB5063877 (2025-08 Cumulative Update) Server 2019 KB5063877 (2025-08 Cumulative Update) Server 2022 KB5063880 (2025-08 Cumulative Update) Server 2025 KB5063878 (2025-08 Cumulative Update) As always, organizations should verify that their update policies align with the new servicing approach before the broader rollout reaches all supported Windows platforms later this year. In case of major problems, the EDR update can be rolled back to the inbox version stored in %ProgramFiles%\\Windows Defender Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) using: MpCmdRun.exe -RevertMde -Product Edr -ToVersion Inbox For those who have access to the Microsoft 365 Admin Center portal, you can view the message here under ID MC1381119.
    • My problem with these smart scopes is that IMO they're not really an entrance into astronomy, they're an entrance to looking at pretty(ish) pictures that you take by essentially pressing a button and letting the scope do the work. I still maintain that getting some binoculars or a solid dedicated telescope (which doesn't have to mean expensive) and actually spending time learning the night sky and using a telescope is a much better way to actually learn. But, granted, the learning curve is a bit steeper (as it tends to be).
    • I never played Crazy Taxi before, but this looks like a fun game!
    • The perception of Microsoft Edge is unfortunate as it's a world class browser. I'm not exaggerating when I say it's the best browser I've ever used with its feature set, speed, reliability and advanced security. Running the extension Ublock Origin is a must though to deal with advertising and trackers.
    • You can check out our latest 9070 GRE review with scores for the XT too, but these are on Windows: Gaming performance Productivity performance
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      248
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      73
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!