Windows 10: New leaked screenshots reveal brand new UI for Settings; death of Control Panel?


Recommended Posts

 

As such, putting a Windows 8-style control panel into Windows 10 would be a very bad idea.

 

The Windows 8 Control Panel is the same as the Windows 7 one, and similar to the Vista and XP ones. So yes, continuing to use that design when everything else is being modified/updated/refreshed/outright remade would be out of place and a huge mistake.

Sorry, but the legacy CP needs removed. Windows 10 is a universal OS, and as such, needs universal components.

  • Like 3

Sorry, but the legacy CP needs removed. Windows 10 is a universal OS, and as such, needs universal components.

How do you know if they are just gona improve the old stuff? 

Sorry, but the legacy CP needs removed. Windows 10 is a universal OS, and as such, needs universal components.

Pretty much the same category view from previous versions of Windows. Really nothing that new about it.

Pretty much the same category view from previous versions of Windows. Really nothing that new about it.

However, some of the categories (let alone the contents OF those categories) are new and different.  Settings is a lot finer-grained than Control Panel - that much is obvious even to me.

 

Also, this is a multiplatform OS - not a single-platform OS;  Control Panel shows up ONLY in PC-derived devices (those that weren't phones, or XBOX ONE, etc.) - why bias the categories toward any device? (While I'm a PC user, even I get the trap about "biasing".)  There is no "Control Panel" in Windows Phone - even more telling, there is no Control Panel in Android, either.  What do both OSes use instead?  "Settings".  The only reason for "Control Panel" is to bias the OS in favor of PCs - which is utterly silly for a multiplatform OS.

I want a modern services.msc, regedit, and event viewer.

It's possible - what it requires is rethinking the container, which is the approach taken by Settings (and even mini-Start).  The Event Viewer is, in fact, more granular merely in Windows 8.x than in 7 (thanks to the redone Task Manager - which is, in fact, the container for Event Viewer; I haven't taken a look at EV in 9879 yet).  Services.msc is a snap-in - and specifically, one for Microsoft Management Console (the management platform for all non-mobile versions of Windows since the desktop/serve code-merge - it's also used by third-party management software for businesses of every size).  That third-party reliance on MMC is, in fact, part of the problem going forward (and for the same reason that the Start menu became a problem) a lot of tradition and cruft due to patch application instead of rewriting the container.  But can you rethink the container without breaking the plug-ins (especially third-party plug-ins from the likes Kace, Intel, H-P, etc.)?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • They already threw the Ultra 1st gen under the bus?
    • Right, Google... because that's who this is going to. Google, the company who's entire business model is geared around ad revenue and your personal data.
    • That is the natural course for regulations. First to protect the consumer. Then to protect the business/industry from upstart competition. There are countless examples across history.
    • I have never been a huge fan of libre, it feels really good but exactly when you need an advance feature for data wrangling it falls short every time or has bugs. I am all for euro office if they can deliver a good and usable alternative to MS office with backing of govt function.
    • Go on, I'll bite. How does windows (nice comment on an 'article' which doesn't actually involve it ) lock users out of their data then? Been using it since 3.1 back in 92 and not once have I been locked out of my data? Perhaps you mean Bitlocker? In which case the average user (who doesn't mess about) will have been forced to use a MSA, and in which case the recovery key would have been saved to said account..... If the user did happen to bodge around and not use an MSA then Bitlocker wouldn't have become live (as it cannot without a safe place to store the key) I want to point out Bitlocker and MSA are not connected and you can of course force it on without a safe place to store the key, but you do that with your eyes open. So your standard consumer who knows no better sets up an MSA, gets bitlocker and a recovery key stored off box, with a route to reset their password. All of this notwithstanding the fact, if your data is important, you back it up, no ifs, no buts, no-ones responsibility other than your own. Important data lives in at least two locations, one of which is offline and recovery is tested, otherwise that data wasn't really that important. Disks, fail, laptops get lost, phones end up down the toilet, tablets get stolen, if your only copy of data is on a single device you're doing it wrong.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      Captain_Eric earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • One Month Later
      amusc earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      509
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      229
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      86
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      78
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!