Recommended Posts

+Audioboxer

Actually the PS4 can barely do 1080p 60fps. Hence why you don't find 1080p 60fps locked games on it. The PS4 is grossly under powered. These black bars helped resolve that.

 

 

i think its pretty obvious that the bars were more than likely for performance.  Just cause it runs other games at 1080p 60fps does not mean it can run this one.  All the effects and such are way more taxing and this game has a lot.  Even with the bars its still the best looking game IMO on the ps4.  They probably decided at some point that adding some bars and enhancing all the effects outweighed setting it to a full 1080p for the directors vision.  Also I believe them when they say its to make it feel like a movie.  Anyone who has played this game can tell you it feels more like watching a long decent movie than playing a good game.

 

Not sure why this is the focal point of this game though.  Almost everyone that has played it will tell you its the best looking game on ps4 but its short and the story is not that good. 

 

The game runs at 30FPS....

 

Nearly every PS4 game that is 30FPS is 1080p (If not all of them, I can't think of one example myself. BF4 is 60FPS at 900p. edit: AC Unity is one, but we all know the effort Ubi put into that game).

 

To be clear, x800 with 4xMSAA needs more bandwidth than x1080 would, so 1080 no MS would be cheaper.

 

 

The aspect ratio is a core artistic choice (frame, FOV, etc), added performance is a bonus but nowhere near crucial

 

 

 

http://www.dualshockers.com/2014/02/06/the-order-1886-will-have-4x-aa-undecided-between-1920x800-and-1920x1080-lack-of-multiplayer-expained/

Link to post
Share on other sites
Hedon

What else would the developers say? Everyone knows the black bars are for performance reasons. The news consoles were released under powered. Complete bottlenecks. But that have been proven game after game, which is why we don't have the 1080p 60fps games.

Link to post
Share on other sites
gohpep

Even a Ready at Dawn developer said that The Order 1886 was really close to squeezing the maximum power out of the Playstation 4.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Polonium

What else would the developers say? Everyone knows the black bars are for performance reasons. The news consoles were released under powered. Complete bottlenecks. But that have been proven game after game, which is why we don't have the 1080p 60fps games.

Does it matter? Really?
Link to post
Share on other sites
+Audioboxer

What else would the developers say? Everyone knows the black bars are for performance reasons. The news consoles were released under powered. Complete bottlenecks. But that have been proven game after game, which is why we don't have the 1080p 60fps games.

As I've said before what does 60FPS have to do with anything? The game is 30FPS. Putting that into a statistical comparison with other PS4 games, 95% of those at 30FPS run at 1080p.

I see you post developer quotes around the forums fairly often, recently it was Driveclub, not long ago Halo. You don't seem to have much of an issue posting quotes by them to explain things, but for RAD, they're clearly lying and deceiving?

Maybe if the game ran without AA you could infer they were struggling to hit 1080p in 16:9. However to go and apply 4xMSAA, something rarely seen, does that really suggest the game was struggling to run? If something is struggling you reduce resolution or fidelity to get it to run okay. You don't reduce one thing and then maximise something else as equally if not more power hungry.

It simply seems certain people are desperate to put performance issues and PS4 in the one sentence. That might be fair in many discussions, but to try and cobble that statement together against what is clearly a graphical masterpiece just makes you seem silly.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Hedon

As I've said before what does 60FPS have to do with anything? The game is 30FPS. Putting that into a statistical comparison with other PS4 games, 95% of those at 30FPS run at 1080p.

I see you post developer quotes around the forums fairly often, recently it was Driveclub, not long ago Halo. You don't seem to have much of an issue posting quotes by them to explain things, but for RAD, they're clearly lying and deceiving?

Maybe if the game ran without AA you could infer they were struggling to hit 1080p in 16:9. However to go and apply 4xMSAA, something rarely seen, does that really suggest the game was struggling to run? If something is struggling you reduce resolution or fidelity to get it to run okay. You don't reduce one thing and then maximise something else as equally if not more power hungry.

It simply seems certain people are desperate to put performance issues and PS4 in the one sentence. That might be fair in many discussions, but to try and cobble that statement together against what is clearly a graphical masterpiece just makes you seem silly.

But that's the thing. The PS4 IS under powered (as is the X1).

BTW I also quoted RAD stating what they said about it being an artistic choice. But to make that choice and be sure they could reach their goals they also compensated for the lack of juice in these already dated consoles.

Link to post
Share on other sites
+Audioboxer

But that's the thing. The PS4 IS under powered (as is the X1).

BTW I also quoted RAD stating what they said about it being an artistic choice. But to make that choice and be sure they could reach their goals they also compensated for the lack of juice in these already dated consoles.

 

It's a bit of an occams razor insight here for me.

 

If the game struggled to do 1920x1080/30 stable, then you scale it back to reach 30FPS. When you have to scale something back you take it to the highest possible solution to hit your stable framerate. Why would you do anything else? You want the best possible graphical fidelity at a stable framerate. If they done that, as any dev would, that would leave no room to introduce something as resource intensive as 4xmsaa. In the quotes I highlighted they even said themselves, 1920x800 with 4xmsaa is harder to do than 1920x1080 with no AA. That isn't an outlandish claim, any PC gamer will know how taxing it can be to apply a high level of AA.

 

Take a look at console games, can you name any other one with 4xmsaa? That in itself is proof at how difficult it is to introduce a high level of AA. A lot of console games regardless of resolution have a very poor level of AA, jaggies aren't hard to find.

 

So to conclude if the game really did need to drop the resolution to hit 30FPS, where did the ability to introduce 4xmsaa come from? Running at 1920x1080 you're not going to get 4xmsaa, too much for these consoles, but 1920x800 isn't so far away from 1920x1080 (it's more taxing than 900p as proven already) that it would seem soo outlandish that The Order could run at 1920x1080 with no AA, or a very basic method of AA.

 

Couple that with a history of 1080/30 on the PS4 for an abundance of games (open world/FPS/TPS, all genres really), and it really seems to be grasping to make the connection many of you are trying to in suggesting they couldn't do a version of The Order at 1920x1080, but without 4xmsaa.

 

Like it or not graphical fidelity has gone up with the choice of 1920x800, it hasn't gone down in comparison to other PS4 games at 1920x1080 like other games becoming blurrier (usually happens when a game has to upscale or stretch textures). Hence why The Order is being called the best looking PS4 game to date. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Ironman273

I don't know if you realize this but that's exactly what everyone is saying!  It is the most graphically impressive game to date.  They decided "let's make sure all the effects are maxed out but in order to achieve that we need to make it 30fps and remove all the graphics from the top and bottom of the screen."  It was a choice they made in order to have such a visually breathtaking game.  What people have issue with is instead of them saying that they did it for those reasons they say it was to make it more "artistic."

 

They could've run the game at 1080 without AA as you mentioned but then the game would not only be a dull player but also an average looker.  With the decision to cut the pixels rendered on screen they have that one boasting point.  Basically they have a great tech demo (that they're asking $60 for).

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
BajiRav

It's a bit of an occams razor insight here for me.

 

If the game struggled to do 1920x1080/30 stable, then you scale it back to reach 30FPS. When you have to scale something back you take it to the highest possible solution to hit your stable framerate. Why would you do anything else? You want the best possible graphical fidelity at a stable framerate. If they done that, as any dev would, that would leave no room to introduce something as resource intensive as 4xmsaa. In the quotes I highlighted they even said themselves, 1920x800 with 4xmsaa is harder to do than 1920x1080 with no AA. That isn't an outlandish claim, any PC gamer will know how taxing it can be to apply a high level of AA.

 

Take a look at console games, can you name any other one with 4xmsaa? That in itself is proof at how difficult it is to introduce a high level of AA. A lot of console games regardless of resolution have a very poor level of AA, jaggies aren't hard to find.

 

So to conclude if the game really did need to drop the resolution to hit 30FPS, where did the ability to introduce 4xmsaa come from? Running at 1920x1080 you're not going to get 4xmsaa, too much for these consoles, but 1920x800 isn't so far away from 1920x1080 (it's more taxing than 900p as proven already) that it would seem soo outlandish that The Order could run at 1920x1080 with no AA, or a very basic method of AA.

 

Couple that with a history of 1080/30 on the PS4 for an abundance of games (open world/FPS/TPS, all genres really), and it really seems to be grasping to make the connection many of you are trying to in suggesting they couldn't do a version of The Order at 1920x1080, but without 4xmsaa.

 

Like it or not graphical fidelity has gone up with the choice of 1920x800, it hasn't gone down in comparison to other PS4 games at 1920x1080 like other games becoming blurrier (usually happens when a game has to upscale or stretch textures). Hence why The Order is being called the best looking PS4 game to date.

So they couldn't get to their target IQ without dropping resolution, isn't that another way of saying PS4 couldn't hit 1080p at a stable 30fpps?

btw, IIRC Forza Horizon 2 is 1080p @30fps and uses 4xMSAA and has much larger map(s).

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
+Audioboxer

So they couldn't get to their target IQ without dropping resolution, isn't that another way of saying PS4 couldn't hit 1080p at a stable 30fpps?

btw, IIRC Forza Horizon 2 is 1080p @30fps and uses 4xMSAA and has much larger map(s).

 

Yeah... you have to be realistic, good luck with 1920x1080 with 4xmsaa on anything other than a racing game. To make my point go ahead and list all of the other XB1 games at 1920x1080, 30FPS and 4xmsaa...

 

I have no issue in saying 1920x1080 with 4xmsaa may not be possible on the PS4, none at all. Moreso confusion over those who really think The Order couldn't do 1920x1080 at 30 without 4xmsaa in the face of all the evidence (devs saying so as well as plenty of other games from mixed genres doing so).

 

This isn't a diss on Horizon but you know better BajiRav, racing games are the easiest to up the fidelity on - That trend has been with us for generations.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Hedon
Ironman273, on 25 Feb 2015 - 07:56, said:

I don't know if you realize this but that's exactly what everyone is saying!  It is the most graphically impressive game to date.  They decided "let's make sure all the effects are maxed out but in order to achieve that we need to make it 30fps and remove all the graphics from the top and bottom of the screen."  It was a choice they made in order to have such a visually breathtaking game.  What people have issue with is instead of them saying that they did it for those reasons they say it was to make it more "artistic."

 

They could've run the game at 1080 without AA as you mentioned but then the game would not only be a dull player but also an average looker.  With the decision to cut the pixels rendered on screen they have that one boasting point.  Basically they have a great tech demo (that they're asking $60 for).

Yup, you nailed it. I have also stated it is the best looking game on console to date when you take into consideration the trade offs made with maps size, ai numbers, black bars, physics, linear nature. It's hard not to. And I enjoyed playing the game, which is the important part here. Not my favorite game, that is for sure, but it was enjoyable and I don't regret spending full price for it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
BajiRav

Yeah... you have to be realistic, good luck with 1920x1080 with 4xmsaa on anything other than a racing game. To make my point go ahead and list all of the other XB1 games at 1920x1080, 30FPS and 4xmsaa...

 

I have no issue in saying 1920x1080 with 4xmsaa may not be possible on the PS4, none at all. Moreso confusion over those who really think The Order couldn't do 1920x1080 at 30 without 4xmsaa in the face of all the evidence (devs saying so as well as plenty of other games from mixed genres doing so).

 

This isn't a diss on Horizon but you know better BajiRav, racing games are the easiest to up the fidelity on - That trend has been with us for generations.

Well you asked

Take a look at console games, can you name any other one with 4xmsaa?

and I answered. As simple as that.

I am not sure what you are trying to get that. RAD couldn't achieve target IQ at 1080p and hence dropped resolution. The "artistic" choice is just bullcrap on top. If that ratio was really better than a full 1080p frame, we wouldn't be having our TVs in that ratio. Heck IMAX is a waste of money by that logic.

I can't imagine 75% frame height being better for gameplay than a full 100% frame.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
gohpep

They couldn't do 4xMSAA and those graphics at 1080p, 60FPS, so they scaled back it to 900p, 30FPS. It was either that, or keep the game at 1080p 60FPS and make it look worse.

Link to post
Share on other sites
+Audioboxer

Well you asked

and I answered. As simple as that.

I am not sure what you are trying to get that. RAD couldn't achieve target IQ at 1080p and hence dropped resolution. The "artistic" choice is just bullcrap on top. If that ratio was really better than a full 1080p frame, we wouldn't be having our TVs in that ratio. Heck IMAX is a waste of money by that logic.

I can't imagine 75% frame height being better for gameplay than a full 100% frame.

 

Like for like examples, or why don't people just start saying but this indie game can do it! That is sarcasm to an extent, but driving games are bottom of the ladder when comparing to TPS/FPS or open world.

 

They couldn't do 4xMSAA and those graphics at 1080p, 60FPS, so they scaled back it to 900p, 30FPS. It was either that, or keep the game at 1080p 60FPS and make it look worse.

 

It's not 900p... Have you even read the last 5 pages? Not once has the dev even mentioned 60FPS. All they've said is 1920x1080 without AA or 1920x800 with 4xmsaa, and it's always been 30FPS.

 

I swear sometimes reading the Neowin forums could drive a sane person insane.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Hedon
Audioboxer, on 25 Feb 2015 - 10:37, said:

 

I swear sometimes reading the Neowin forums could drive a sane person insane.

Now you know how I feel!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
gohpep

It's not 900p... Have you even read the last 5 pages? Not once has the dev even mentioned 60FPS. All they've said is 1920x1080 without AA or 1920x800 with 4xmsaa, and it's always been 30FPS.

 

I swear sometimes reading the Neowin forums could drive a sane person insane.

1920x800 is closer to a 900p resolution than what other people have been saying, 800p.

If the PS4 was more powerful, of course they would be targeting 1080p, 60FPS with 4xmsaa.

Link to post
Share on other sites
+Audioboxer

1920x800 is closer to a 900p resolution than what other people have been saying, 800p.

If the PS4 was more powerful, of course they would be targeting 1080p, 60FPS with 4xmsaa.

 

But it's not, we get what we pay for!

Link to post
Share on other sites
1337ish

The youtube videos that appeared after your video made me LOL..
 

bpNMQw5.png

Link to post
Share on other sites
soniqstylz

But it's not, we get what we pay for!

 

There's a $60 for 5-hour game joke there, but I can't seem to find it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
trag3dy

There's a $60 for 5-hour game on the hardest difficult with no replayability joke there, but I can't seem to find it.

 

FTFY

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
soniqstylz

The ICE team lends a hand in most SCEA games.

 

And they're not Naughty Dog (technically), they're just housed within their studio.

Link to post
Share on other sites
+Asmodai

The ICE team lends a hand in most SCEA games.

 

And they're not Naughty Dog (technically), they're just housed within their studio.

Ready at Dawn is the main developer of the game though and they aren't owned by Sony.  They're a privately held independent studio so some may not be aware that Sony helped out with the game beyond simply acting as the publisher.  It's not exactly a secret of you spend the time to look though as SCE Santa Monica Studio is also listed as a developer and Ready at Dawn is made up of ex-Naughty Dog (and Blizzard) members but most people aren't interested enough to do the digging required to take note of that.

Link to post
Share on other sites
soniqstylz

Ready at Dawn is the main developer of the game though and they aren't owned by Sony.  They're a privately held independent studio so some may not be aware that Sony helped out with the game beyond simply acting as the publisher.  It's not exactly a secret of you spend the time to look though as SCE Santa Monica Studio is also listed as a developer and Ready at Dawn is made up of ex-Naughty Dog (and Blizzard) members but most people aren't interested enough to do the digging required to take note of that.

 

I was referring to AB's post.  ICE team isn't officially a part of Naughty Dog, but they are based in ND's studio.  And ICE team generally develops tools that get used by SCEA-produced AAA titles.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By zikalify
      5G-enabled Xperia 10 III is now available for pre-order
      by Paul Hill



      Sony has announced that its Xperia 10 III, which comes with 5G is now available for pre-order. It’s available in black, blue, pink, and white and retails for €429 making it very much a mid-range phone.

      In terms of its specifications, the Xperia 10 III is powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G Mobile Platform which Sony says makes it fast and capable of handling your apps. While having a good processor is important, having enough charge to see you through the day is also necessary, therefore, Sony has packed in a 4500mAh battery which represents a 25% increase over the battery that came with the Xperia 10 II.

      In addition to long battery life and good performance, the Xperia 10 III is quite sturdy and should last for several years. It is IP65/IP68 water and dust resistant and comes with Corning Gorilla Glass 6 which can survive multiple drops from greater heights compared to Gorilla Glass 5. The display is a 21:9 Wide 6” notch-less FHD+ OLED display that comes with HDR support to improve movie viewing.

      Discussing the connectivity available on the device, Sony said:

      To find out more about pre-ordering the device, head to your regional Sony website and navigate to the smartphone section where you should see the Xperia 10 III listed if it’s due to arrive in your country. Sony did not give a launch date for the phone in its announcement but GSM Arena says it’s expected on June 11.

    • By Usama Jawad96
      PlayStation Remote Play now supports DualSense on iOS devices
      by Usama Jawad

      Sony's PlayStation Remote Play allows you to stream your games to other devices such as PCs and handsets, allowing you to pick up where you left off across multiple platforms. The feature was announced back in 2015 and supports PS5, PS4, PC, Mac, iOS, and Android devices. Previously, mobile devices only offered Remote Play with the DualShock 4 controller. This changes now as Sony has rolled out support for the PlayStation 5's DualSense on iOS devices.

      As of now, iOS 14.5 or above is required to pair a DualSense controller with an iPhone via Bluetooth. Other requirements such as having a minimum of 5MB broadband internet remains the same.

      IGN tested the DualSense controller with an iPhone and noted some issues with support. For example, haptics seemingly do not work with Sony-published titles such as Astro's Playroom and MLB The Show 21. Similarly, while Adaptive Triggers function, haptics once again fail in Remedy's Control. Moreover, the headphone jack and the built-in speaker don't seem to be working yet either. It's unclear when and if these issues will be fixed. In a sort of a disclaimer at the bottom of its product page, Sony has cautioned that "availability of DualSense features such as audio output and haptic effects vary when using remote play on PC, Mac, iPhone or iPad; some features may not be available."

      While Remote Play does not provide support for DualSense on Android devices at this point in time, it's likely that this support will be rolled out sooner rather than later. In the meantime, if you have a compatible iPhone and a DualSense controller, you can give Remote Play a shot by downloading the application from the App Store here.

    • By indospot
      Finding a PlayStation 5 may continue to be difficult until 2022, says Sony
      by João Carrasqueira

      The latest generation of consoles from Sony and Microsoft have been notoriously hard to find since their launch back in November, and if you've been hoping things will get better, it may still be a while. As reported by Bloomberg, the company has warned a group of analysts that supply restraints may continue into 2022 as demand continues to outpace supply.

      Despite the production limits it's been hit by, Sony's sales of the PlayStation 5 are nothing to scoff at. In less than half a year, its next-gen console has sold 7.8 million units, which is in line with sales of the PlayStation 4, one of the best-selling consoles of all time. The company also expects to sell 14.8 million units this year, despite saying it won't be able to keep up with demand. Sony's chief financial officer, Hiroki Totoki, said that the company will need to ramp up production as early as possible, but even then, it will be hard to meet consumer demand:

      Many facets of technology have been affected by supply issues in semiconductors over the past year thanks to the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic, with the latest next-gen consoles being one of the more affected products. Likewise, the latest graphics card from both Nvidia and AMD have been very hard to find. In all of these cases, the situation has been made all the more complicated by people who buy the products as soon as they're available to resell at above-market values.

      In the console business, Nintendo also issued a warning that component shortages could still cause road bumps in sales of its Switch hybrid console, though it's projecting 25.5 million unit sales for the current fiscal year. As some of the restrictions around COVID-19 are lifted in the coming months in some countries around the world, the situation could get better, but it seems as though some companies aren't banking on that recovery just yet.

    • By Copernic
      Universal Media Server 10.5.0
      by Razvan Serea



      Universal Media Server is a DLNA-compliant UPnP Media Server. UMS was started by SubJunk, an official developer of PMS, in order to ensure greater stability and file-compatibility. The program streams or transcodes many different media formats with little or no configuration. It is powered by MEncoder, FFmpeg, tsMuxeR, AviSynth, MediaInfo and more, which combine to offer support for a wide range of media formats. Because it is written in Java, Universal Media Server supports all major operating systems, with versions for Windows, Linux and Mac OS X.

      To see a comparison of popular media servers, click here.

      Universal Media Server 10.5.0 changelog:

      General:

      Added new option to mark a fully played video after moving it to a new folder Implemented external API to allow users to perform actions on their UMS instance from an authorized external source, please see docs at https://support.universalmediaserver.com/books/configuration/page/external-api (thanks, ikrahne!) Fixed TV series metadata not saving for some series Improved episode detection from filenames Optimized network use and handling of unimplemented UPnP actions for some renderers Fixed audio cover art extraction (thanks, ik666!) Fixed database upgrade for some users Fixed recognition of some renderers Renderers:

      Improved support for H.264 on Panasonic VT60 Dependencies:

      Bump checkstyle from 8.41 to 8.42 Bump com.sun.xml.bind-version from 3.0.0 to 3.0.1 Bump commons-lang3 from 3.11 to 3.12.0 Bump icu4j from 68.2 to 69.1 Bump JRE from 15 to 8u292 Bump maven-project-info-reports-plugin from 3.1.1 to 3.1.2 Bump MediaInfo from 20.09 to 21.03 Bump metadata-extractor from 2.15.0 to 2.16.0 Bump spotbugs-maven-plugin from 4.2.2 to 4.2.3 Bump twelvemonkeys-imageio-version from 3.6.4 to 3.7.0 Translation updates via Crowdin:

      Danish (99%) (thanks, NCAA and GurliGebis!) Finnish (99%) (thanks, Esko Gardner!) French (100%) (thanks, Archaos!) Italian (98%) (thanks, tiwi90!) Korean (99%) (thanks, VenusGirl!) Polish (100%) (thanks, Karol Szastok!) Portuguese (99%) (thanks, mariopinto!) Portuguese (Brazilian) (96%) (thanks, Mauro.A!) Serbian (97%) (thanks, Slobodan Simić (Слободан Симић)!) Spanish (100%) (thanks, Gerardo Ruiz, fafranco82, Eduardo Martin, and manuel fernandez!) Turkish (100%) (thanks, Burak Yavuz!) Ukrainian (17%) (thanks, Paul Furlet!) Download: Universal Media Server 10.5.0 | 153.0 MB (Open Source)
      Download: Other operating systems
      View: Universal Media Server Website

      Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware

    • By zikalify
      Sony brings the €2,499 Xperia PRO to European markets
      by Paul Hill

      Sony has announced the availability of the Xperia PRO smartphone in European markets including the UK, Germany, and the Nordic countries. The premium device which includes 5G and a dedicated HDMI input will set customers back a whopping €2,499.

      With the dedicated HDMI input, users can connect their phone to a camera and use the 5G to stream content online from the camera. If shooting videos isn’t for you, the HDMI input can be used with the External Monitor feature which turns the device into a 6.5-inch 4K OLED 10-bit monitor.

      The phone is powered by a Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 5G Mobile Platform chipset and it includes a 4,000mAh battery with support for fast charging. According to previous Neowin coverage, the phone comes packed with 12GB of RAM and 512GB of internal storage that’s expandable up to 1TB with a microSD card.

      Commenting on the launch, Tsutomu Sato, Director of Mobile Product Marketing at Sony Europe, said:

      If you’re interested in picking up the Xperia PRO in the UK, Nordic, or German regions you can pre-order it today and have it shipped from May 10. As mentioned earlier, the device comes with a hefty €2,499 price tag but this may be something that professionals can justify if it fits their use case.