Recommended Posts

Hi everyone!

 

A new build of Dopamine is available. This will most likely be the last preview build before the final 1.0 release.

Here is the changelog:

 

19-06-2016: Dopamine 1.0.0.655 (Preview)

  • Updated the Greek translation
  • Fixed a sporadic crash when cycling through songs
  • Fixed a bug in the update check
  • Changed the slider buttons and made the Micro and Nano player progress slider button easier to grab

Download here

4 hours ago, wetworker said:

Thanks for the new update.  Solid.

Will the cloud screen animate when you rollover albums or will it be some kind of random animation?

No it is rather static. What do you have in mind?

  • 2 weeks later...
On 20/06/2016 at 1:02 AM, Raphaël G. said:

No it is rather static. What do you have in mind?

What would be cool.  If we had  a image of an artist, with a bit of blur that fills the background,or random pictures of all the artist in your collection that cycles randomly. small thumbnails of Artist names/pic would be floating over that big image in the background . once you rollover  an artist name/pic all their albums would then expand out. so you can then play all or a single album. or even explore news, bio or other pics.  The explore stuff might be a bit too much work though. I would settle just for the albums part.

 

I could do a mock-up to better illustrate it if you like.

 

Hello everyone!

 

After almost 2 years of development, I’m proud to announce that Dopamine version 1.0 is released!

The road to 1.0 was long, but I had a lot of help from all around the world. That’s why I’d like to thank everyone who was involved in any way (donations, moral support, bug reports, feature requests and ideas, translations,…). Your input made Dopamine what it is today.

 

So does that mean the end of development for Dopamine? Far from it! The future will bring more fun stuff, like: scrobbling, album art preview in the Taskbar, online album art fetching, lyrics support, … A Windows mobile version of Dopamine is currently also in development. If you have a Windows Mobile 10 device, stay tuned.

So that’s it, go grab Dopamine 1.0 here and enjoy your music!

 

 

Dopamine release.png

Raphael, wonderful job. Congratulations. 

Q: Does your app have a functionality that if someone, not me, could develop a plugin to incorporate a CD Ripper? 

 

you've made the base app, but if there was a capability, I imagine someone here could develop a plugin for CD ripping Capabilities.

 

Just a thought. I know you have a lot on your plate. but wonderful job and GREAT!, milestone!

11 minutes ago, chrisj1968 said:

Raphael, wonderful job. Congratulations. 

Q: Does your app have a functionality that if someone, not me, could develop a plugin to incorporate a CD Ripper? 

 

you've made the base app, but if there was a capability, I imagine someone here could develop a plugin for CD ripping Capabilities.

 

Just a thought. I know you have a lot on your plate. but wonderful job and GREAT!, milestone!

There are lots of fantastic CD rip software out there... don't bloat it up with stuff that isn't needed.  Just keep it a player, ripping can be done with other free software that does a great job already.

  • Like 3
2 hours ago, Skiver said:

Congrats Raphael, have loved coming along for the journey from MusiX to now Dopamine. 

 

Sadly no Windows phone but I wish you the best of luck with that project.

Thanks!

 

I started development of Dopamine Mobile when Microsoft still seemed to care about their platform. Right now I have mixed feelings. I love UWP, but I don't want my work to be a waste of time. I don't like java, but there is Xamarin, which is now free, and allows creating Android apps using C#. So, my plans might change I don't know yet. Good news is I developed Dopamine in C# instead of VB. So the code is not lost. 

  • Like 1
2 minutes ago, Raphaël G. said:

Thanks!

 

I started development of Dopamine Mobile when Microsoft still seemed to care about their platform. Right now I have mixed feelings. I love UWP, but I don't want my work to be a waste of time. I don't like java, but there is Xamarin, which is now free, and allows creating Android apps using C#. So, my plans might change I don't know yet. Good news is I developed Dopamine in C# instead of VB. So the code is not lost. 

Android would certainly interest me to a degree however I don't know how others feel on this sort of thing but for me mobile media players I wouldn't really take a second look at because I'm so heavily subscribed into Google Music (my Library is stored there). I'd imagine there are countless others who subscribe to things like Spotify or Apple Music or even just taking advantage of cloud storage for streaming/offline play downloads that unless your App could hook into those and pull their libraries I can't see many people changing because of that.

 

Now if you could somehow develop an app that could mix your ITunes Library with your Google Music Library etc that would be amazing but I'd imagine both Google and Apple don't have any for of API's for that sort of thing otherwise It would have been done by now.

 

I don't mean to put you off in anyway, just sharing my 2 cents.

1 hour ago, Skiver said:

Android would certainly interest me to a degree however I don't know how others feel on this sort of thing but for me mobile media players I wouldn't really take a second look at because I'm so heavily subscribed into Google Music (my Library is stored there). I'd imagine there are countless others who subscribe to things like Spotify or Apple Music or even just taking advantage of cloud storage for streaming/offline play downloads that unless your App could hook into those and pull their libraries I can't see many people changing because of that.

 

Now if you could somehow develop an app that could mix your ITunes Library with your Google Music Library etc that would be amazing but I'd imagine both Google and Apple don't have any for of API's for that sort of thing otherwise It would have been done by now.

 

I don't mean to put you off in anyway, just sharing my 2 cents.

That's actually useful info. Maybe a music player (offline, without subscription) doesn't make much sense on a mobile device. Plus, I guess (didn't check) there are probably a massive amount of alternatives. On Windows Phone it makes some kind of sense. There is room for improvement :). I'll think about it.

Best music player on earth in 1.0 ! Congratulations ! :)

I would love a C# UWP version ! I own a Lumia 930, Surface Pro 3, Xbox One, and bought recently a Lumia 950 XL, it would fit perfectly on all these devices :).

 

In C# it could be more powerful than VB version :).

 

On 29/06/2016 at 7:46 PM, Raphaël G. said:

Hello everyone!

 

After almost 2 years of development, I’m proud to announce that Dopamine version 1.0 is released!

The road to 1.0 was long, but I had a lot of help from all around the world. That’s why I’d like to thank everyone who was involved in any way (donations, moral support, bug reports, feature requests and ideas, translations,…). Your input made Dopamine what it is today.

 

So does that mean the end of development for Dopamine? Far from it! The future will bring more fun stuff, like: scrobbling, album art preview in the Taskbar, online album art fetching, lyrics support, … A Windows mobile version of Dopamine is currently also in development. If you have a Windows Mobile 10 device, stay tuned.

So that’s it, go grab Dopamine 1.0 here and enjoy your music!

 

 

Dopamine release.png

Congrats on the great news and milestone for Dopamine, @Raphaël G. :)

It's been a long way as you said, and I'm grateful to have been able to colaborate on some degree.

 

All the best moving forward, mate! You surely deserve it!
Thank you! :laugh:

Congrats on the 1.0 milestone.  Dopamine has been my default music player since you started releasing the previews and I'm sure it will continue to be for years to come.  It's a wonderful piece of software, so thank you so much for all the hard work you have put in and your continued efforts.

On 6/30/2016 at 7:31 PM, Raphaël G. said:

Maybe a music player (offline, without subscription) doesn't make much sense on a mobile device. Plus, I guess (didn't check) there are probably a massive amount of alternatives. On Windows Phone it makes some kind of sense. There is room for improvement :). I'll think about it.

While I understand the point of an online player, I'm one that ripped 100s of CDs and managed my library locally over the years. Don't see the point in paying Apple for listening to something I already own, so I'm definitely an offline player user. I've used Track8 on iOS as my default player since iOS5, and despite it being abandoned ~ iOS7 it still works well on iOS9. I'd pay for Dopamine on iOS but I know that won't happen.

 

Anyways, contrats on 1.0

Well done! I'm still using Dopamine as my main/only player and loving it.

 

Regarding UWP, as an owner of a Surface and Lumia 950, I personally wouldn't use another player on my phone other than Groove as it does the job just fine for my usage, but I would really love to have Dopamine on my Surface.

Maybe if that means we get both then I would definitely give it a try on my phone and try to help you find any issues.

 

Someone has attempted to make a Zune like player in UWP but it isn't up to Dopamine standards - https://www.microsoft.com/en-gb/store/apps/bloom-music-player/9nblggh4ls1s

On 6/30/2016 at 7:31 AM, Raphaël G. said:

That's actually useful info. Maybe a music player (offline, without subscription) doesn't make much sense on a mobile device. Plus, I guess (didn't check) there are probably a massive amount of alternatives. On Windows Phone it makes some kind of sense. There is room for improvement :). I'll think about it.

If you go with UWP, you get the Windows 10 Phones and also the Windows 10 tablets which are a rapidly growing segment due to the surge in the "2 in 1" devices.

 

You also get Windows 10 Desktop but you already have that. Depending on how your code is structured, the Xamarin Forms could be just another 10 to 20% to get Android and IOS but then there are a ton of mobile issues you haven't had to deal with. Even UWP adds the need to consider a lot more power states, device variations, storage management and sandboxing issues which can be non-trivial depending on your current code layout.

 

The VLC project has source code to a Windows 10 player which could be interesting for you to examine but of course they have a lot of baggage to deal with so maybe not...

 

Anyways, congrats on your 1.0 milestone!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      244
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      66
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!