Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...
  • 1 month later...
3 hours ago, FloatingFatMan said:

Why so long a wait?  You'd think they'd want more frequent flights now they've proved the ship...

 

SpaceX Crew-(n) will be the SpaceX operational missions.
Starliner-(n) will be the Boeing operational missions.

 

SpaceX Crew-1 launches a few weeks after Crew Dragon DM-2 returns, which is next week. Most likely SpaceX Crew-1 launches mid-September, and it'll be at ISS for ~210 days so a return about mid-April.

 

With SpaceX Crew-2 launching in "early 2021" it's VERY possible there will be two Crew Dragons docked at ISS at the same time.

 

That'll be one helluva photo-op for SpaceX.

 

SpaceX Crew-2 has been filled out

 

Commander: Shane Kimbrough (NASA)
Pilot: Megan McArthur (NASA)
Mission Specialist: Akihiko Hoshide (JAXA)*
Mission Specialist: Thomas Pesquet (ESA)

Edited by DocM
  • Like 1
  • 3 weeks later...

SpaceX DM-2 and Crew-1 posters

 

Doug Hurley (NASA) & Bob Behnken (NASA)

nw-2020-05-004-jscdm-2launchamericaposte

 

SpaceX Crew-1 astronauts Shannon Walker (NASA; Commander), Victor Glover (NASA; Pilot), Michael Hopkins and Soichi Noguchi (ESA & JAXA; Mission Specialists)

nw-2020-07-010-jsc_iss_crew-1_poster_72_

 

Why does that just remind me of the movie, Team America?

 

TBH, I find it slightly silly that America is making such a big thing of regaining a capability it CHOSE to give up in the first place... It's like celebrating you're an idiot for screwing up!

7 hours ago, FloatingFatMan said:

Why does that just remind me of the movie, Team America?

 

TBH, I find it slightly silly that America is making such a big thing of regaining a capability it CHOSE to give up in the first place...

There wasn't much of a "choice" given the baked-in safety issues with Space Shuttle, 14 dead and all. There comes a time when the risks are too high. 

 

These defects were caused by bad design choices dating back to the 1960's and 1970's when the post-Apollo plans were being formulated.  There were better options, some quite amazing.

Quote

It's like celebrating you're an idiot for screwing up!

 

The cheerfulness is about achieving a hard-fought for goal.

 

There'll be more celebrating as more crew vehicles become operational giving the US redundancy and more capabilities; Starliner, Starship & Lunar Starship, Orion, Dream Chaser, whatever Blue Origin has in the hangar, etc.  Each brings something to the table.

 

Then there's whatever vehicle(s) the US Space Force & allies require for military satellite servicing, using & supplying their cislunar outposts, search & rescue, etc.

Edited by DocM
12 hours ago, DocM said:

There wasn't much of a "choice" given the baked-in safety issues with Space Shuttle, 14 dead and all. There comes a time when the risks are too high. 

 

These defects were caused by bad design choices dating back to the 1960's and 1970's when the post-Apollo plans were being formulated.  There were better options, some quite amazing.

Those issues where known about in plenty of time to get working on alternatives.  They did zilch.

12 hours ago, FloatingFatMan said:

Those issues where known about in plenty of time to get working on alternatives.  They did zilch.

 

NASA did plenty, the Dream Chaser spaceplane started development as two vehicles; HL-20 (crew & light cargo) and HL-42 (crew and medium cargo) after Challenger.  Special interests in Congress, basically the Shuttle contractors, got it killed.

 

This in turn killed 7 more people, which tipped the scale to end the Shuttle program in 2011 and start Commercial Crew.

  • Like 2
  • 5 weeks later...

Thomas Pesquet (ESA) is riding Crew Dragon's Crew-2 mission in March/April, 2021

 

 

 

Quote

45 years of cockpit evolution!! 🤩 I had the chance to be at the controls of the very analog (and hyper reliable) #Soyuz, the @ Airbus Airbus A310 from Novespace, the A350, then finally the @SpaceX Crew Dragon and its cockpit (almost) fully digital. #AvGeek 

 

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

CRS-21: Cargo Dragon 2 maiden flight, December 2, 2020

 

SpaceX's Benji Reed at the November 10, 2020 Crew-1 presser,

 

Quote

Over the next 15 months, we will fly seven Crew and Cargo Dragon missions for NASA. That means that starting with Crew-1, there will be a continuous presence of SpaceX Dragons on orbit. Starting with the cargo mission CRS-21, every time we launch a Dragon, there will be two Dragons in space – simultaneously – for extended periods of time. Truly, we are returning the United States’ capability for full launch services and we are very, very honored to be a part of that.

 

Meanwhile, Boeing's Starliner is still in the woodshed. Their CFT rerun (CFT-2) mission listed for January 4, 2021 is now listed as Q1, and that may slip to later in the year. 

 

Key to getting Boeing's software mess in order (Starliner CFT, SLS, 737 MAX, and other projects) is the hiring of former SpaceXer & Tesla software engineer Jinnah Hosein on board as Vice President of Software Engineering.

 

https://www.defensenews.com/industry/2020/11/06/boeing-hires-former-spacex-engineer-for-new-software-executive-job/

 

Quote

>

Hosein’s resume reads like a defense industry wish list of Silicon Valley stops. He worked as Google’s director of software engineering for cloud networking, helped design Tesla’s autopilot software and most recently worked as software lead for self-driving startup Aurora.

But it’s his experiences at SpaceX - where he was key to software development for the Falcon, Falcon Heavy, Dragon and Crew Dragon vehicles - that Boeing may look to draw from the most. 
>

  • Like 1
  • 4 weeks later...

We are a few months away from a 3-day slip sending Starliner OFT-2 into April, 2021. If an April OFT-2 succeeds, and they miraculously have have only 4 months between it and both CFT (crewed test flight) and Starliner-1 (first operational mission), then the latter could easily slip into 2022.

 

https://www.nasa.gov/feature/nasa-and-boeing-target-new-launch-date-for-next-starliner-flight-test

 

Quote

NASA and Boeing now are targeting March 29 for the launch of Starliner’s second uncrewed flight test to the International Space Station as part of the agency’s Commercial Crew Program. Orbital Flight Test-2 (OFT-2) is a critical developmental milestone on the company's path toward flying crew missions for NASA.

 

For the OFT-2 mission, the CST-100 Starliner spacecraft will launch on a United Launch Alliance Atlas V rocket from Space Launch Complex-41 at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station in Florida, dock to the International Space Station and return to land in the western United States about a week later as part of an end-to-end test to prove the system is ready to fly crew.

>

 

 

Edited by DocM
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

SpaceX Crew-3 and Crew-4

 

Crew-3

Date: September, 2021

Vehicle: C207 Resilience

Commander: Raja Chari - NASA

Pilot: Thomas Marshburn - NASA

Mission Specialist 1: Matthias Maurer - ESA

Mission Specialist 2: TBA

 

Crew-4

Vehicle: TBA

Date: ????, 2022

Commander: Kjell Lindgren - NASA

Pilot: Bob Hines - NASA

Mission Specialist 1: TBA

Mission Specialist 2: TBA

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Researchers claim Microsoft's quantum breakthrough is flawed by basic Python errors by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft's aggressive roadmap to deliver a commercial quantum supercomputer by 2029 has now hit a bit of a snag, and it's not because of a complex sub-zero dilution refrigerator, but rather because of a few lines of basic Python code. A new critique published in the scientific journal Nature argues that simple software errors effectively manufactured the breakthrough that Microsoft's foundational research claimed back in 2025 into Majorana-based topological qubits. Topological quantum computing, the path that Microsoft chose for its research, relies on creating and controlling "Majorana zero modes." These are exotic quasiparticles that theoretically offer vastly superior error resistance compared to the highly sensitive superconducting qubits currently being championed by rivals like Google and IBM. However, physically proving you have created these particles requires sifting through massive amounts of complex electrical conductance data to isolate a specific "topological gap." Because of the sheer volume of data, physicists rely heavily on custom software pipelines to process the results. This is where the Python scripts come in. Now, according to the critique, Microsoft’s data processing software contained fundamental programming errors that ultimately skewed the published results. By mishandling data arrays or deploying incorrect logic within the Python script, the software supposedly discarded "noisy" or contradictory data. Which is why it only highlighted the specific electrical measurements that supported the topological-gap claim. The researchers behind the critique argued that this makes the findings invalid, suggesting the heralded "quantum leap" was actually a false positive generated by bad code and not a product of groundbreaking physics. However, Microsoft is pushing back hard against these allegations. The Redmond giant has formally rejected the criticism, saying that it's just a minor anomaly rather than a fatal flaw. According to the company, while there may have been a minor oversight in the data parsing scripts, it does not alter the fundamental reality of their physical experiment. Just weeks ago, Microsoft unveiled the Majorana 2 quantum processor, a milestone so significant that the company boldly accelerated its timeline for a commercial quantum supercomputer from 2035 down to 2029. But the new software allegations reopen an old wound. Microsoft's quantum division faced a remarkably similar crisis when a landmark 2018 paper on Majorana particles was famously retracted in 2021 after independent physicists discovered the data had been inappropriately cropped. That historical baggage makes the current Python-related allegations particularly sensitive. If the foundational math and data processing for the 2025 breakthrough are genuinely flawed, the highly anticipated 2029 commercial timeline could easily be delayed or, worse, cancelled.
    • Because of what they have done to VMware I will never buy anything Broadcom again.
    • AMD releases hotfix for driver install issues on Windows 10 PCs by Taras Buria Earlier this week, AMD released an important graphics driver update. Version 26.6.2 brought AMD FSR 4.1 support to the previous-gen Radeon lineup, the RX 7000 series, giving users better upscaling tech that was previously locked to the newest GPUs. However, the driver turned out to be a little buggy, with users reporting installation issues on systems still running Windows 10. AMD quickly acknowledged the bug and today released a hotfix to resolve the problem. The AMD 26.6.3 Hotfix update is now available for download from the official website. Given that it is a hotfix release, it has only one change in its release notes: AMD announced the update on its official X account and added that a WHQL driver update with the necessary fixes would be released next week. Meanwhile, users can apply the hotfix or roll back to the previous driver using the official AMD Cleanup Utility. You can download AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.6.3 Hotfix Preview Driver from the official website here. It is compatible with all currently supported graphics cards and 64-bit Windows 10 and 11. Full release notes are available on the same page.
    • With Microsoft now listening to its core audience and acting upon received feedback, fans can finally expect a much better version of Windows 11 than what was available five years ago. Here is to five more years, Windows 11! I guess we all need a good laugh now and again...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      466
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      123
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!