LAPD Officers Shoot Man Five Times in Broad Daylight


Recommended Posts

Spoken like a "good little citizen"TM  :x

 

Authority is to be questioned if it is being used to stifle or censor or destroy.

 

As for the rest of your post - "take your beating and then sue" ?? Seriously that's your plan if this happens ?

 

Unbelievable.

 

good little citizen? absolutely, whats wrong with following rules?  anarchy much?  I do agree that authority and rules/laws must be reviewed and questioned if they are failing to do what it was supposed to do, or if a certain group is abusing their powers, HOWEVER, it all needs to be done in its due time.

 

Timing is EVERYTHING!!!!  Questioning authority when being arrested is NOT the time to do so....later on, with good lawyer if you felt your rights were violated and taking action WOULD BE!!!

 

simply to question authority because is the "cool" thing to do is not the right answer.

fair enough, for the record, I still believe, further training would benefit not only the US Police, but Police around the world, however, as a law abiding citizen, I do understand the 'behave like a law abiding citizen and you have nothing to worry about' part of your post

 

Training can never be enough....better trained police officer should be something we should all want and hope we get...which i totally agree with you.

 

 

 

The problem with most of these situations, you are looking at it with an outside perspective after the event has happened.

 

People saying don't attack cops are looking it from the outside too.

 

Most of those homesless guys are mentally sick. Being mentally sick in a civilized society should not be a death penalty sentence.

 

The police officers in NA are not well trained enough to deal with mentally sick people imo.

Since when do we need to question authority at every step? Follow the rules......

 

 

Wait what? Are you actually serious?

 

Questionning authority at every step is what democracy is all about.

Think there needs to be a ban, or limit, on posting these kind of stories in Neowin.  Same old argument/discussion each time.  Ive posted a few topics like this, and sorry I did.

 

Agreed.  Always the same two people making the same flawed arguments every time while showing no compassion what-so-ever to fellow human beings.

It is?! You must've been watching another video then???

 

From the video the black cop first dropped his baton which the woman picked up, then he dropped his own gun behind him, presumably because he hadn't used his holster clip, he noticed his gun wasn't in it's holster and starts shouting "He has my gun!" believing the suspect had it so the rest of them just unloaded their clips into him.

Gross stupidity and incompetence leaving yet another unarmed man dead

If you watch the video the very first thing you see is man flailing about and moving in the direction of the cops, I would say that's him attacking the cops.

<snipped for brevity>

 

On the street, it isn't the place for you to state what should and should not happen, it is happening, it is happening to you, and it is happening at a very fast pace.  It is not your place to argue with the officer at the time, you are not the judge, jury, or executioner either (if that is the case I am robbing a bank, and it is legal for me to do so, nothing the cops say or any rules apply to me, so f the police --- yes there is a bit of sarcasm in that to show how it could go in the reverse mindset).  They are there to uphold the law, if they are there or questioning you it is because they believe that you aren't doing something right.  If you believe they are in the wrong, don't start an argument there, take your licks then take them to court (that is what the court system is for, that is when you get to face a judge for your actions, then get sentenced or are let free).

As I said earlier, I understand the danger of the job that police have. They should be capable of protecting themselves, but they should, and must, also be capable of ensuring they don't use severe force unless there are no other options. My point goes beyond this case... It is a recognition that we fundamentally need to reevaluate how we train and equip police. Possibly what we have is the best we can do, but I am not convinced this is the case.

 

The major problem with the "unlimited police power" whenever anyone isn't "fully complying" with police effectively leaves citizens without any real protection from bad police officers. If a police officer approaches a person and informs them they will be raped shortly by this officer. In your view, this person should submit to the abuse and their sole remedy is to hope they will be able to convince the peers of this officer they were/are being victimized by this officer. An extreme example, but rape by police officers while on duty isn't unheard of. Failing to comply with this officer would create a legitimate reason for this police officer to use whatever force, without limits, in your view to force compliance.

 

If we have no protection against abuse by police then we have, effectively, no protection, or rights, at all.

 

Your extreme, but common, view is even more concerning with the reality that almost anyone can setup a police force of their own in various parts of the US and run around "enforcing the law". Maybe I should setup my own force... Approach you and order you to do something nonsensical and immediately beat you into submission upon your failure to give me an entertainment show?

  • Like 2

It's pretty obvious that poor training is the cause. Even if someone is grabbing your gun there are procedures an officer must follow.

I'm sure it goes "If the Officers feels his life is being threatened he may use any type of force to get to safety". There are numerous officers at the scene of the crime, all of which could have carried a taser and prevented this fiasco. How safer being an officer of the law can you get? I would understand if there was one officer or maybe two because US males have huge bone density! I'm not saying they're fat but just big. 

 

For the police though, they will have a good argument case and win. Not saying that's right or wrong but that's how the story goes!

It's pretty obvious that poor training is the cause. Even if someone is grabbing your gun there are procedures an officer must follow.

I'm sure it goes "If the Officers feels his life is being threatened he may use any type of force to get to safety". There are numerous officers at the scene of the crime, all of which could have carried a taser and prevented this fiasco. How safer being an officer of the law can you get? I would understand if there was one officer or maybe two because US males have huge bone density! I'm not saying they're fat but just big. 

 

For the police though, they will have a good argument case and win. Not saying that's right or wrong but that's how the story goes!

 

I agree, with that many police officers there shouldn't have been a death.  Whatever happened to Pepper Spray?

Most people will die from just one bullet, let alone getting shot by a firing squad.

Sorry but no.........if its a large enough caliber in a vital enough area, yes....but good luck hitting a vital area in meaningful time when under pressure, if you even have a gun large enough to do crap to the target.

 

It's been proven time and time again a single bullet, especially from the guns many police STILL carry, is not enough to even slow down some of the people they are forced to use them on, let alone kill them.....that's even if that one bullet hits the target to begin with.

 

 

I agree, with that many police officers there shouldn't have been a death.  Whatever happened to Pepper Spray?

Pepper spray is great and all, until you remember it tends to affect the area you spray it in, not just the target you want to hit with it. So when you have a bunch of cops surrounding a target, pepper spray is probably the worst of your options, plus it isn't very effective against some people (especially if they are on drugs at the time), much like the taser they used which didn't do enough to subdue the target.

 

 

I would like to see how some of the people on this forum handle a situation where they have already tried at least one non-lethal method for subduing a target, it didn't work, and the target potentially has a deadly weapon. Would you move onto the next non-lethal method knowing he may have a weapon and the last method didn't help? What happens when that second method doesn't work either....the next non-lethal option? How many non-lethal options would you be willing to go through when you have a hostile target that may have a deadly weapon?

 

I personally wouldn't hesitate to pull the trigger to protect myself or anyone else from a hostile target trying to injure them (and this is coming from someone who doesn't own a gun but is not afraid to use one).

all over a tent. a man is dead all over a tent....

 

6-7 officers against one man? no way... murder outright

 

The guy reached for an officers weapon, shows deadly intent, which you are then allowed to use deadly force.

I agree, with that many police officers there shouldn't have been a death.  Whatever happened to Pepper Spray?

Most law enforcement agencies that I know of only train you on either pepper spray or taser. Officers can't continue going through the motions to try and not get to deadly force. It's either the person is subdued via taser/pepper spray or deadly force if deadly intent is present.

People act like officers want to kill people, I'm sure all officers would rather get to retirement without having to put someone down.

 

The guy reached for an officers weapon, shows deadly intent, which you are then allowed to use deadly force.

Most law enforcement agencies that I know of only train you on either pepper spray or taser. Officers can't continue going through the motions to try and not get to deadly force. It's either the person is subdued via taser/pepper spray or deadly force if deadly intent is present.

People act like officers want to kill people, I'm sure all officers would rather get to retirement without having to put someone down.

 

When there are 6 police officers to one person, there should NEVER be a gun pulled.  If the 6 cops can't subdue one person, they should all be fired and capable people hired.  No matter how you look at it, it makes the officers look like a bunch of incompetent morons.  

  • Like 2

Reverend Al to the rescue. He will sort things out properly.

I don't think we should post things like this here. It really is not related to the story. There are quite a few members here who are African-American that might be offended (No, I am not African American). Sometimes we need a little training on empathy here.

 

The guy reached for an officers weapon, shows deadly intent, which you are then allowed to use deadly force.

Most law enforcement agencies that I know of only train you on either pepper spray or taser. Officers can't continue going through the motions to try and not get to deadly force. It's either the person is subdued via taser/pepper spray or deadly force if deadly intent is present.

People act like officers want to kill people, I'm sure all officers would rather get to retirement without having to put someone down.

With police brutality, being what it has been. my guess is, this is all meant to federalize the police around the nation. This is purely just simple speculation of course but seems to be somewhat reasonable.

 

problem, reaction, solution.

This whole thing is quite complicated. As a military man, I'm all for Cops protecting themselves and going home to their families. However, it's mind boggling that the number of Cops on the scene couldn't control one subject. Why did it have to escalate to a shooting? Anyhow, same old debate, same old answers.

I don't think we should post things like this here. It really is not related to the story. There are quite a few members here who are African-American that might be offended (No, I am not African American). Sometimes we need a little training on empathy here.

Interesting your take on my comment. I meant it in a positive way and you took it the opposite way.  Love Al or hate him he definitely get's people thinking.

The major problem with the "unlimited police power" whenever anyone isn't "fully complying" with police effectively leaves citizens without any real protection from bad police officers. If a police officer approaches a person and informs them they will be raped shortly by this officer. In your view, this person should submit to the abuse and their sole remedy is to hope they will be able to convince the peers of this officer they were/are being victimized by this officer. An extreme example, but rape by police officers while on duty isn't unheard of. Failing to comply with this officer would create a legitimate reason for this police officer to use whatever force, without limits, in your view to force compliance.

 

If we have no protection against abuse by police then we have, effectively, no protection, or rights, at all.

 

Your extreme, but common, view is even more concerning with the reality that almost anyone can setup a police force of their own in various parts of the US and run around "enforcing the law". Maybe I should setup my own force... Approach you and order you to do something nonsensical and immediately beat you into submission upon your failure to give me an entertainment show?

The way I see it, and it could be wrong, is that we have given them the power to do their jobs.  In any situation we can be victimized, it happens in the workplace, it happens on the streets, it happens in our homes, it happens when in front of a law enforcement officer.  You can't control every situation.  Again, I go back to the courts is where you handle these matters...that is what we have as a civilized society to be able to get justice to what has happened to us.  Officers are sworn in to uphold the law and to enforce it, not to abuse it. 

When there are 6 police officers to one person, there should NEVER be a gun pulled.  If the 6 cops can't subdue one person, they should all be fired and capable people hired.  No matter how you look at it, it makes the officers look like a bunch of incompetent morons.  

This.

 

The police mishandled the situation from start to finish. It looked like a slapstick comedy, only with tragic consequences. This is what happens when your have confrontational policing and a system in which officers rarely face any criminal charges, where officers are effectively above the law. At the end of the day you don't see videos like this emerging from other developed nations. It's sad that so many people are defending the officers.

  • Like 2

This.

 

The police mishandled the situation from start to finish. It looked like a slapstick comedy, only with tragic consequences. This is what happens when your have confrontational policing and a system in which officers rarely face any criminal charges, where officers are effectively above the law. At the end of the day you don't see videos like this emerging from other developed nations. It's sad that so many people are defending the officers.

 

Exactly!

What I find sad is all of you who had to run to the page showing the situation. . .I bet those that went to that page are those who when in heavy traffice have to slow way down to see if someone is laid out dead on the street . . . oh darnm, I forgot this is a human interest situation . . .my bad. . . :shifty:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Nvidia GeForce NOW gains support for Dark Scrolls, Empulse, and more by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe The final update of June for Nvidia's cloud gaming service GeForce NOW is now available, and it is touting support for six more games. The company is also drawing subscriber attention towards the summer sales kicking off across stores, so they can stock up on more cloud-supported titles. Of course, the Steam Summer Sale is the biggest promotion, which is kicking off later today. "Supported Steam games can be streamed across devices with GeForce NOW, making it easy to buy a game once, keep progress synced and pick up where the gameplay left off on PCs, Macs, handheld devices, phones, TVs and more," says the company. "In other words, the Steam Summer Sale brings the deals; GeForce NOW adds the flexibility." Don't forget that the GeForce NOW summer sale is still active as well. This limited-time offer drops the 12-month Performance membership from $99.99 to $64.99, saving members $35. At the same time, the 12-month Ultimate membership is currently going for $129.99, dropping the price by $70 from the original $199.99. Here are the games joining GeForce NOW's supported list this week: Dark Scrolls (New release on Steam, available June 22) SAND: Raiders of Sophie (New release on Steam, available June 22) Deer & Boy (New release on Steam, available June 23) EMPULSE (New release on Steam, available June 24) The Adventures of Elliot: The Millennium Tales (Steam) FATAL FURY: City of the Wolves (Steam) With the June expansions coming to an end, Nvidia should be announcing its July GeForce NOW plans next week. Keep in mind that, unlike subscription services like Game Pass or EA Play, a copy of a game must be owned by the GeForce NOW member (or at least have a license via PC Game Pass) to start playing via Nvidia's cloud servers. There is also a limit to how many hours subscribers can use the service per month.
    • Davinci Resolve 21.0.1 by Razvan Serea DaVinci Resolve is the world’s only solution that combines editing, color correction, visual effects, motion graphics and audio post production all in one software tool! Its elegant, modern interface is fast to learn and easy for new users, yet powerful for professionals. DaVinci Resolve lets you work faster and at a higher quality because you don’t have to learn multiple apps or switch software for different tasks. That means you can work with camera original quality images throughout the entire process. It’s like having your own post production studio in a single app! Best of all, by learning DaVinci Resolve, you’re learning how to use the exact same tools used by Hollywood professionals! DaVinci Resolve is the only post production software designed for true collaboration. Multiple editors, assistants, colorists, VFX artists and sound designers can all work on the same project at the same time! Whether you’re an individual artist, or part of a larger collaborative team, it’s easy to see why DaVinci Resolve is the standard for high end post production and is used for finishing more Hollywood feature films, episodic television programing and TV commercials than any other software. Davinci Resolve 21.0.1 release notes: Addressed multiple DNG and Apple ProRAW color issues. Addressed issue with automatic smart bins after deleting keywords. Addressed issue with multiple linked audio in media management. Addressed multiple Resolve FX issues in photo page. Addressed issue with key shortcut to switch viewer in photo page. More consistent creation of new photo albums. Addressed color thumbnail refresh for photo transform indicator. Transcription now honors project settings language. Improved face recognition in IntelliSearch. Addressed exported bins not retaining generator and title properties. Addressed ease control display and sensitivity issues. Addressed keyframe issue when copying clips with Fusion effects. Addressed keyframe refresh for Fusion effects in the edit page. Addressed issue with 3D renders in Linux with non-English locales. Addressed Fusion viewer color issue for some RCM settings. Addressed issue with saturation limits in Fusion gradient controls. Addressed Fusion display issues with dual screen layouts. Addressed issue with non-English character inputs in Linux. Disabling MultiMaster now disables trim blanking controls. Addressed crash in some scenarios with CineFocus. Addressed lag when toggling bypass grades and Fusion effects. Addressed occasional issue with Fairlight loudness meters. Addressed data burn display of good take tag in upgraded projects. Addressed project manager scroll lag for large project libraries. Support for Sony Alpha 7R VI ARW RAW stills. Support for decoding Affinity RGB 16-bit formats. Addressed a color issue with MainConcept H.265 HDR renders. Addressed a color issue with Windows native H.265 HDR renders. RemoveMotionBlur API now uses correct encode parameters. Addressed character limit consistency in GenerateSpeech API. General performance and stability improvements. Download page: Davinci Resolve 21.0.1 | 3300 MB (Free, paid upgrade available) Links: DaVinci Resolve Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • There are so many of these apps now that do this, what do people recommend?
    • Just the price of doing business. The scamble to pull as much from the web as possible is happening, and it's happening before a case like this changes how or what is legal do to with AI in terms of data harvesting. But even then as we've seen with the likes of Google who ignore cookie requests and just accept the fact they'll get fined, it's built into their business price model now. AI is here, its not going away. Their reward if any from the court case would be best suited to trying to incorprate AI or licence their end points as authentic human verified content. The problem is, as we've seen these same news papers are using AI themselves.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      462
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      137
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!