LAPD Officers Shoot Man Five Times in Broad Daylight


Recommended Posts

Spoken like a "good little citizen"TM  :x

 

Authority is to be questioned if it is being used to stifle or censor or destroy.

 

As for the rest of your post - "take your beating and then sue" ?? Seriously that's your plan if this happens ?

 

Unbelievable.

 

good little citizen? absolutely, whats wrong with following rules?  anarchy much?  I do agree that authority and rules/laws must be reviewed and questioned if they are failing to do what it was supposed to do, or if a certain group is abusing their powers, HOWEVER, it all needs to be done in its due time.

 

Timing is EVERYTHING!!!!  Questioning authority when being arrested is NOT the time to do so....later on, with good lawyer if you felt your rights were violated and taking action WOULD BE!!!

 

simply to question authority because is the "cool" thing to do is not the right answer.

fair enough, for the record, I still believe, further training would benefit not only the US Police, but Police around the world, however, as a law abiding citizen, I do understand the 'behave like a law abiding citizen and you have nothing to worry about' part of your post

 

Training can never be enough....better trained police officer should be something we should all want and hope we get...which i totally agree with you.

 

 

 

The problem with most of these situations, you are looking at it with an outside perspective after the event has happened.

 

People saying don't attack cops are looking it from the outside too.

 

Most of those homesless guys are mentally sick. Being mentally sick in a civilized society should not be a death penalty sentence.

 

The police officers in NA are not well trained enough to deal with mentally sick people imo.

Since when do we need to question authority at every step? Follow the rules......

 

 

Wait what? Are you actually serious?

 

Questionning authority at every step is what democracy is all about.

Think there needs to be a ban, or limit, on posting these kind of stories in Neowin.  Same old argument/discussion each time.  Ive posted a few topics like this, and sorry I did.

 

Agreed.  Always the same two people making the same flawed arguments every time while showing no compassion what-so-ever to fellow human beings.

It is?! You must've been watching another video then???

 

From the video the black cop first dropped his baton which the woman picked up, then he dropped his own gun behind him, presumably because he hadn't used his holster clip, he noticed his gun wasn't in it's holster and starts shouting "He has my gun!" believing the suspect had it so the rest of them just unloaded their clips into him.

Gross stupidity and incompetence leaving yet another unarmed man dead

If you watch the video the very first thing you see is man flailing about and moving in the direction of the cops, I would say that's him attacking the cops.

<snipped for brevity>

 

On the street, it isn't the place for you to state what should and should not happen, it is happening, it is happening to you, and it is happening at a very fast pace.  It is not your place to argue with the officer at the time, you are not the judge, jury, or executioner either (if that is the case I am robbing a bank, and it is legal for me to do so, nothing the cops say or any rules apply to me, so f the police --- yes there is a bit of sarcasm in that to show how it could go in the reverse mindset).  They are there to uphold the law, if they are there or questioning you it is because they believe that you aren't doing something right.  If you believe they are in the wrong, don't start an argument there, take your licks then take them to court (that is what the court system is for, that is when you get to face a judge for your actions, then get sentenced or are let free).

As I said earlier, I understand the danger of the job that police have. They should be capable of protecting themselves, but they should, and must, also be capable of ensuring they don't use severe force unless there are no other options. My point goes beyond this case... It is a recognition that we fundamentally need to reevaluate how we train and equip police. Possibly what we have is the best we can do, but I am not convinced this is the case.

 

The major problem with the "unlimited police power" whenever anyone isn't "fully complying" with police effectively leaves citizens without any real protection from bad police officers. If a police officer approaches a person and informs them they will be raped shortly by this officer. In your view, this person should submit to the abuse and their sole remedy is to hope they will be able to convince the peers of this officer they were/are being victimized by this officer. An extreme example, but rape by police officers while on duty isn't unheard of. Failing to comply with this officer would create a legitimate reason for this police officer to use whatever force, without limits, in your view to force compliance.

 

If we have no protection against abuse by police then we have, effectively, no protection, or rights, at all.

 

Your extreme, but common, view is even more concerning with the reality that almost anyone can setup a police force of their own in various parts of the US and run around "enforcing the law". Maybe I should setup my own force... Approach you and order you to do something nonsensical and immediately beat you into submission upon your failure to give me an entertainment show?

  • Like 2

It's pretty obvious that poor training is the cause. Even if someone is grabbing your gun there are procedures an officer must follow.

I'm sure it goes "If the Officers feels his life is being threatened he may use any type of force to get to safety". There are numerous officers at the scene of the crime, all of which could have carried a taser and prevented this fiasco. How safer being an officer of the law can you get? I would understand if there was one officer or maybe two because US males have huge bone density! I'm not saying they're fat but just big. 

 

For the police though, they will have a good argument case and win. Not saying that's right or wrong but that's how the story goes!

It's pretty obvious that poor training is the cause. Even if someone is grabbing your gun there are procedures an officer must follow.

I'm sure it goes "If the Officers feels his life is being threatened he may use any type of force to get to safety". There are numerous officers at the scene of the crime, all of which could have carried a taser and prevented this fiasco. How safer being an officer of the law can you get? I would understand if there was one officer or maybe two because US males have huge bone density! I'm not saying they're fat but just big. 

 

For the police though, they will have a good argument case and win. Not saying that's right or wrong but that's how the story goes!

 

I agree, with that many police officers there shouldn't have been a death.  Whatever happened to Pepper Spray?

Most people will die from just one bullet, let alone getting shot by a firing squad.

Sorry but no.........if its a large enough caliber in a vital enough area, yes....but good luck hitting a vital area in meaningful time when under pressure, if you even have a gun large enough to do crap to the target.

 

It's been proven time and time again a single bullet, especially from the guns many police STILL carry, is not enough to even slow down some of the people they are forced to use them on, let alone kill them.....that's even if that one bullet hits the target to begin with.

 

 

I agree, with that many police officers there shouldn't have been a death.  Whatever happened to Pepper Spray?

Pepper spray is great and all, until you remember it tends to affect the area you spray it in, not just the target you want to hit with it. So when you have a bunch of cops surrounding a target, pepper spray is probably the worst of your options, plus it isn't very effective against some people (especially if they are on drugs at the time), much like the taser they used which didn't do enough to subdue the target.

 

 

I would like to see how some of the people on this forum handle a situation where they have already tried at least one non-lethal method for subduing a target, it didn't work, and the target potentially has a deadly weapon. Would you move onto the next non-lethal method knowing he may have a weapon and the last method didn't help? What happens when that second method doesn't work either....the next non-lethal option? How many non-lethal options would you be willing to go through when you have a hostile target that may have a deadly weapon?

 

I personally wouldn't hesitate to pull the trigger to protect myself or anyone else from a hostile target trying to injure them (and this is coming from someone who doesn't own a gun but is not afraid to use one).

all over a tent. a man is dead all over a tent....

 

6-7 officers against one man? no way... murder outright

 

The guy reached for an officers weapon, shows deadly intent, which you are then allowed to use deadly force.

I agree, with that many police officers there shouldn't have been a death.  Whatever happened to Pepper Spray?

Most law enforcement agencies that I know of only train you on either pepper spray or taser. Officers can't continue going through the motions to try and not get to deadly force. It's either the person is subdued via taser/pepper spray or deadly force if deadly intent is present.

People act like officers want to kill people, I'm sure all officers would rather get to retirement without having to put someone down.

 

The guy reached for an officers weapon, shows deadly intent, which you are then allowed to use deadly force.

Most law enforcement agencies that I know of only train you on either pepper spray or taser. Officers can't continue going through the motions to try and not get to deadly force. It's either the person is subdued via taser/pepper spray or deadly force if deadly intent is present.

People act like officers want to kill people, I'm sure all officers would rather get to retirement without having to put someone down.

 

When there are 6 police officers to one person, there should NEVER be a gun pulled.  If the 6 cops can't subdue one person, they should all be fired and capable people hired.  No matter how you look at it, it makes the officers look like a bunch of incompetent morons.  

  • Like 2

Reverend Al to the rescue. He will sort things out properly.

I don't think we should post things like this here. It really is not related to the story. There are quite a few members here who are African-American that might be offended (No, I am not African American). Sometimes we need a little training on empathy here.

 

The guy reached for an officers weapon, shows deadly intent, which you are then allowed to use deadly force.

Most law enforcement agencies that I know of only train you on either pepper spray or taser. Officers can't continue going through the motions to try and not get to deadly force. It's either the person is subdued via taser/pepper spray or deadly force if deadly intent is present.

People act like officers want to kill people, I'm sure all officers would rather get to retirement without having to put someone down.

With police brutality, being what it has been. my guess is, this is all meant to federalize the police around the nation. This is purely just simple speculation of course but seems to be somewhat reasonable.

 

problem, reaction, solution.

This whole thing is quite complicated. As a military man, I'm all for Cops protecting themselves and going home to their families. However, it's mind boggling that the number of Cops on the scene couldn't control one subject. Why did it have to escalate to a shooting? Anyhow, same old debate, same old answers.

I don't think we should post things like this here. It really is not related to the story. There are quite a few members here who are African-American that might be offended (No, I am not African American). Sometimes we need a little training on empathy here.

Interesting your take on my comment. I meant it in a positive way and you took it the opposite way.  Love Al or hate him he definitely get's people thinking.

The major problem with the "unlimited police power" whenever anyone isn't "fully complying" with police effectively leaves citizens without any real protection from bad police officers. If a police officer approaches a person and informs them they will be raped shortly by this officer. In your view, this person should submit to the abuse and their sole remedy is to hope they will be able to convince the peers of this officer they were/are being victimized by this officer. An extreme example, but rape by police officers while on duty isn't unheard of. Failing to comply with this officer would create a legitimate reason for this police officer to use whatever force, without limits, in your view to force compliance.

 

If we have no protection against abuse by police then we have, effectively, no protection, or rights, at all.

 

Your extreme, but common, view is even more concerning with the reality that almost anyone can setup a police force of their own in various parts of the US and run around "enforcing the law". Maybe I should setup my own force... Approach you and order you to do something nonsensical and immediately beat you into submission upon your failure to give me an entertainment show?

The way I see it, and it could be wrong, is that we have given them the power to do their jobs.  In any situation we can be victimized, it happens in the workplace, it happens on the streets, it happens in our homes, it happens when in front of a law enforcement officer.  You can't control every situation.  Again, I go back to the courts is where you handle these matters...that is what we have as a civilized society to be able to get justice to what has happened to us.  Officers are sworn in to uphold the law and to enforce it, not to abuse it. 

When there are 6 police officers to one person, there should NEVER be a gun pulled.  If the 6 cops can't subdue one person, they should all be fired and capable people hired.  No matter how you look at it, it makes the officers look like a bunch of incompetent morons.  

This.

 

The police mishandled the situation from start to finish. It looked like a slapstick comedy, only with tragic consequences. This is what happens when your have confrontational policing and a system in which officers rarely face any criminal charges, where officers are effectively above the law. At the end of the day you don't see videos like this emerging from other developed nations. It's sad that so many people are defending the officers.

  • Like 2

This.

 

The police mishandled the situation from start to finish. It looked like a slapstick comedy, only with tragic consequences. This is what happens when your have confrontational policing and a system in which officers rarely face any criminal charges, where officers are effectively above the law. At the end of the day you don't see videos like this emerging from other developed nations. It's sad that so many people are defending the officers.

 

Exactly!

What I find sad is all of you who had to run to the page showing the situation. . .I bet those that went to that page are those who when in heavy traffice have to slow way down to see if someone is laid out dead on the street . . . oh darnm, I forgot this is a human interest situation . . .my bad. . . :shifty:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Micron reveals AI companies are spending billions to lock up its memory years in advance by Karthik Mudaliar The demand for more memory is far from over, and Micron is turning the AI-driven memory shortage into a much more predictable business. The company has revealed that it has signed 16 strategic supply agreements backed by roughly $22 billion in customer deposits and other financial commitments. The contracts cover DRAM and NAND deliveries over several years, with some running through 2030. With the AI boom, demand for high-bandwidth memory (HBM) has grown so quickly that large customers are now prepared to help finance future production in exchange for a guaranteed supply. According to Micron’s latest financial results, the company received commitments worth about $22 billion across its new agreements. Around $18 billion is expected to arrive as cash deposits, while the rest will come through other financial arrangements. Micron says the agreements could generate approximately $100 billion in future contracted obligations. They cover around 20% of its expected DRAM shipments and one-third of its NAND shipments during their respective terms. It should be noted that although AI infrastructure is the main force behind the current shortage, not all 16 agreements with Micron involve AI companies. Micron said the customers also include consumer electronics and automotive businesses, two sectors that increasingly compete with data centers for the same manufacturing capacity. HBM is consuming an increasing share of that supply. Unlike conventional desktop or server RAM, HBM stacks multiple memory dies vertically and places them close to an AI accelerator. This gives GPUs and other AI chips access to data at much higher speeds, but it also requires more complicated manufacturing and packaging. Micron says its 12-layer HBM4 memory is now shipping in high volume for a lead customer, with samples also supplied to other companies. The chipmaker has already generated more than $1 billion in HBM4 revenue and says the product is ramping twice as quickly as its earlier HBM3E generation. Samsung has similarly warned that the memory shortage could continue into 2027 and beyond. Consumer memory companies have also had to address sharp increases in DDR5 pricing, suggesting the effects are already reaching beyond the data center. For consumers, that could mean the AI memory crunch lasts longer than expected, even as manufacturers invest heavily in new production.
    • XnConvert 1.112 by Razvan Serea  XnConvert is a cross-platform batch image-converter and resizer with a powerful and ease of use experience. All common picture and graphics formats are supported (i.e. JPG, PNG, TIFF, GIF, Camera RAW, JPEG2000, WebP, OpenEXR) as well as supporting over 500 other image formats. Also available within the batch operations include rotating, adding of watermarks, adding of text along with many image-adjustment features such as brightness, shadows and more. Among the features included are: Batch adding of files and folders Support for drag and drop of files Batch rotating, cropping, resizing and more Adding of photo masks Preserving or removing image metadata in conversions Multipage image file support (i.e animated GIF, APNG, TIFF) Command line integration via NConvert Filters - such as 'Blur', 'Gaussian Blur', 'Emboss', "Sharpen' and much more Effects - such as 'Old camera' and much more Download: XnConvert 64-bit | Standalone | ~30.0 MB (Freeware) Download: XnConvert 32-bit | Standalone Links: XnConvert Website | Screenshot | Release Announcement Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Microsoft updates Visual Studio Code with chat cost tracking and multi-agent chats by Paul Hill Microsoft has just launched Visual Studio Code 1.126, its latest weekly release. This time, the company has focused on letting you see the total cost of chat sessions to spot expensive conversations; enabling multiple chats per session that run side-by-side in one agent host Copilot session; and letting you browse new folders safely in restricted mode. We have now reached the stage where free AI in IDEs is coming to an end. To help you keep track of your costs, VS Code now lets you see the entire cost of a chat session, rather than just individual turns. This should give you more transparency about which sessions consume the most credits, so you can better manage your usage over time and spend less. For those of you using the Agents window, you know it is possible to run and manage multiple agent sessions at once. In this update, a Copilot session started from an agent host can hold several chats at once. Explaining how this feature works, Microsoft writes: Finally, from this update forward, Microsoft will remove the pop-up when opening an untrusted folder. When you open a new folder now, it will automatically open in Restricted Mode. You will see a banner that lets you manage the trust level of the folder. Microsoft has made this change so that it’s easier to start inspecting code without giving it trust right away. If you have VS Code, you can check for updates within the app now to get this new version. Otherwise, you can download it from the Visual Studio Code website.
    • Anthropic accuses Alibaba of using 25,000 fake accounts to copy Claude's capabilities by Karthik Mudaliar Anthropic has accused Alibaba of using nearly 25,000 fraudulent accounts to extract capabilities from Claude on a huge scale. According to a report from Reuters, Anthropic told US lawmakers that operators linked to Alibaba and the company’s Qwen AI team generated 28.8 million exchanges with Claude between April 22 and June 5, 2026. That is a lot of Claude conversations, but Anthropic says this was not ordinary chatbot use. The company believes the accounts were part of a coordinated effort to collect answers that could help train or improve rival AI systems. The alleged campaign reportedly focused on some of Claude’s most valuable skills, including software development, multi-step reasoning, and agentic tasks. In practical terms, that means getting an AI model to plan and complete work across several stages rather than simply answering a single question. This is called 'distillation,' where AI companies use outputs from a larger model to train a smaller and cheaper one. The smaller model learns to imitate useful parts of the more capable system without needing the same amount of computing power. The distillation process isn't automatically suspicious, but the problem comes when one company gathers another provider's outputs without permission and at an industrial scale. Also, this does not mean Alibaba obtained Claude’s source code, model weights, or original training data. Instead, Anthropic claims the accounts repeatedly asked Claude carefully designed questions and collected the answers. Those answers could then be used as training material for another model. Anthropic has made similar accusations against DeepSeek, Moonshot AI, and MiniMax earlier this year. As Neowin previously reported, Anthropic said those three companies collectively generated more than 16 million Claude exchanges through roughly 24,000 accounts. Anthropic says the new campaign produced almost twice as many exchanges in a matter of weeks. Anthropic reportedly told lawmakers that the campaign could help Chinese AI developers approach the capabilities of its Mythos Preview model. Mythos is focused on advanced cybersecurity work, including finding and exploiting complex software vulnerabilities. via Reuters | Photo via DepositPhotos.com
    • An Indian manufacturer that assembles roughly one-third of Apple's iPhones and supplies semiconductor components to Tesla confirmed Monday that attackers had stolen and publicly published a 630-gigabyte cache of confidential files — including engineering blueprints stamped "TRADE SECRET," a 52-page quality inspection document for iPhone circuit board components, and cryptographic certificates that security experts say could be weaponized in follow-on attacks. https://www.techtimes.com/articles/319019/20260624/apple-tesla-supplier-tata-electronics-confirms-630-gb-data-theft-iphone-specs-dark-web.htm
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      441
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      176
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      133
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!