Recommended Posts

Correct, plus there is something called the "Run" box. Which I use quite freqent on XP .... want the control panel on XP? ...Windows key +R then type control and press enter.

 

services? Services.msc and press enter

 

I like to assign shortcut keys to apps as well. I have paint opening with CTRL+ALT+P and notepad with CTRL+ALT+N

I know how to use Windows.

 

A true Windows pro isn't going to waste their time clicking around like a madman, like you're forced to in XP. Windows XP is very much the definition of "Anti-productive".

 

A true windows pro.  Funny.  Now I understand why you like big square buttons.

  • Like 3

That's utter nonsense, settings really aren't that hard to find in XP if you actually know what you're doing. I can set up XP machines just as quickly as 7/8.x machines.

Again, that's not nonsense, it's fact. The Control Panel, and Windows XP Start Menu is nothing but an endless stream of pop up dialogs that force you to click, click, click, and click to get to where you need to go. Between clicking "Properties", "Advanced", different tabs, menus, sub menus, etc, you're leading yourself, and the end user on a wild goose chase. Something which they try to bypass, by creating a thousand and one desktop shortcuts - leading to a whole new mess to sort through.

 

There is nothing at all efficient about this method of computing.

Again, that's not nonsense, it's fact. The Control Panel, and Windows XP Start Menu is nothing but an endless stream of pop up dialogs that force you to click, click, click, and click to get to where you need to go. Between clicking "Properties", "Advanced", different tabs, menus, sub menus, etc, you're leading yourself, and the end user on a wild goose chase.

 

Those settings are in much the same place in Windows 8.1, though the important things like changing resolution require about the same amount of clicks. In fact changing the setting to stop the OS turning off the hard disk after 20 minutes requires me to go through 5 different sub menus in 8.1. You're talking crap.

Correct, plus there is something called the "Run" box. Which I use quite freqent on XP .... want the control panel on XP? ...Windows key +R then type control and press enter.

 

services? Services.msc and press enter

 

is what you do when you can't find what you are looking for :D

 

You make it sound like it takes 100 clicks to do anything, you are just being overly dramatic.

Run forces you to know the correct file name you're looking to run. Again, a highly inefficient method.

Those settings are in much the same place in Windows 8.1, though the important things like changing resolution require about the same amount of clicks.

No, they're not. There are major differences between XP and Windows 8.1 system settings and file paths.

No, they're not. There are major differences between XP and Windows 8.1 system settings and file paths.

 

To change the setting to stop the computer turning HDD's off after 20 minutes in 8.1.

 

Right click on desktop > personalise > screensaver > change power settings > change plan settings > change advanced power settings

 

I reiterate: you're talking nonsense.

To change the setting to stop the computer turning HDD's off after 20 minutes in 8.1.

 

Right click on desktop > personalise > screensaver > change power settings > change plan settings > change advanced power settings

 

I reiterate: you're talking nonsense.

See? You just proved my point. Click, click, click, click. All you have to do is type "Power" into Start, and go - All without having to pick up your hands from the keyboard. And who is still playing around with Screensavers to even see that?

See? You just proved my point. Click, click, click, click. All you have to do is type "Power" into Start, and go - All without having to pick up your hands from the keyboard. And who is still playing around with Screensavers to even see that?

 

Still requires you to go through 3 menus. And you do realise start menu search offered that same functionality, right?

Still requires you to go through 3 menus. And you do realise start menu search offered that same functionality, right?

Windows XP has no start menu search. It has some sad, 90's era window that may or may not locate anything at all you're searching for, and is further compounded by a dog which makes me want to punch the screen each time I see it.

Still requires you to go through 3 menus.

That is just one way to get to the option in Windows 8.1. I believe that you deliberately chose one of the longest routes to suit your agenda; I can find at least one example where Windows XP requires that many clicks / menus: Start menu -> Control Panel -> Power Options.

With Windows 8.1, one can just use instant search to location the option from the Start screen. This is simply not possible with the Windows XP Start menu.

  • Like 1

Windows XP has no start menu search. It has some sad, 90's era window that may or may not locate anything at all you're searching for, and is further compounded by a dog which makes me want to punch the screen each time I see it.

 

And yet you could achieve what you were looking for with about the same number of clicks. I've been setting up XP machines since it was released and I've never had trouble setting one up once. The only thing more time consuming is the update system.

That is just one way to get to the option in Windows 8.1. I believe that you deliberately chose one of the longest routes to suit your agenda; I can find at least one example where Windows XP requires that many clicks / menus: Start menu -> Control Panel -> Power Options.

With Windows 8.1, one can just use instant search to location the option from the Start screen. This is simply not possible with the Windows XP Start menu.

 

So was dot choosing irrelevant examples to suit his. People who actually know what they are doing will have no problem speedily setting up an XP computer.

People who actually know what they are doing will have no problem speedily setting up an XP computer.

While I agree with this, I believe that instant search does make things faster even for those who do know how (and where) to navigate within the interface.

Again, that's not nonsense, it's fact. The Control Panel, and Windows XP Start Menu is nothing but an endless stream of pop up dialogs that force you to click, click, click, and click to get to where you need to go. Between clicking "Properties", "Advanced", different tabs, menus, sub menus, etc, you're leading yourself, and the end user on a wild goose chase. Something which they try to bypass, by creating a thousand and one desktop shortcuts - leading to a whole new mess to sort through.

 

There is nothing at all efficient about this method of computing.

What are you trying to find.  You do realize that Jimmy Hoffa isn't buried within all these "pop dialogs" and "click, click, clicks"

 

Any "Pro" should be able to walk people through the various XP settings...it really isn't that difficult nor is it a wild goose chase.

 

See? You just proved my point. Click, click, click, click. All you have to do is type "Power" into Start, and go - All without having to pick up your hands from the keyboard. And who is still playing around with Screensavers to even see that?

 

In XP all you had to do was type powercfg ... am I right?  Been a while but I'm fairly certain that works.

  • Like 2

intel should build logic in their cpus from now on that will prevent old and outdated windows from running. and just to be on the safe side, the cpu will self destruct after 10 years.

This is a ridiculous idea. I hope you're not serious.

What are you trying to find.  You do realize that Jimmy Hoffa isn't buried within all these "pop dialogs" and "click, click, clicks"

 

Any "Pro" should be able to walk people through the various XP settings...it really isn't that difficult nor is it a wild goose chase.

 

 

In XP all you had to do was type powercfg ... am I right?  Been a while but I'm fairly certain that works.

IP address settings are buried underneath a dozen clicks. (Thankfully, that is changing in Windows 10.) Other important networking settings are buried. The Start Menu offers no search... Need to find an app? There's more time spent clicking around. Display properties are also buried in clicks. The list goes on.

Run forces you to know the correct file name you're looking to run. Again, a highly inefficient method.

 

Unless you actually remember what things are called without having to search for them then it's highly efficient.

 

From the way you are talking, it's amazing anybody got anything done in these last 35+years. :p

Unless you actually remember what things are called without having to search for them then it's highly efficient.

 

From the way you are talking, it's amazing anybody got anything done in these last 35+years. :p

Joe user hasn't been using computers for much of the past 35 years.

while joe user has not, many people who are in their 30's-50's have..there was no easy way around dos until windows came around.  you had to know commands.  memorizing a dozen or so commands that you use frequently isn't that big of a deal.  It also helps knowing those commands when a computer search isn't as fast as you typing in a command and hitting enter (most are, but sometimes computers run slow)  knowing the command is much faster in some cases than waiting for the search to complete. . 

  • Like 1

while joe user has not, many people who are in their 30's-50's have..there was no easy way around dos until windows came around.  you had to know commands.  memorizing a dozen or so commands that you use frequently isn't that big of a deal.  It also helps knowing those commands when a computer search isn't as fast as you typing in a command and hitting enter (most are, but sometimes computers run slow)  knowing the command is much faster in some cases than waiting for the search to complete. . 

 

Plus, depending on how fast you type, I can the c:\ location I want to go in about 5 seconds or less.

 

I can type c:\users\owner\appdata\local\microsoft\windows\temporary internet files\content.ie5

 

in about 10 seconds.

 

I typed some of that in the Start Screen search and all it gave me options to do was search for it on bing.

 

I also typed in system32 ... same thing.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Google is opening the world's first AI museum in Los Angeles by Ivan Jenic Image via: Google Ever since AI image generators went mainstream, the debate over whether AI-generated art is real art hasn't let up. Those who don’t consider AI to be art say that if a machine does the creating and anyone can prompt it, there’s no skill involved, and therefore no art is produced. The counter-argument is equally persistent, as defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool, and that every major technological breakthrough, like the camera or the computer, was met with the same skepticism before eventually being accepted as a legitimate creative medium. Google’s position in this debate is clear. Which is no surprise, as the company is investing billions in AI infrastructure. And now, in efforts to encourage people to use its AI even more, Google is opening Dataland on June 20, which it's calling the world's first AI arts museum. Located inside The Grand LA, a Frank Gehry-designed building in Los Angeles, the museum spans 25,000 square feet. The museum is built around a collaboration with media artist Refik Anadol, who has worked with Google since 2016. The inaugural exhibition is called Machine Dreams: Rainforest, and is powered by an AI model trained on “an extensive dataset of the natural world.” It generates 1.2 billion pixels of visuals in real time and reacts to visitors dynamically. The space also generates soundscapes, real-time emotion sensing, and algorithmically produced scents. Image via: Refik Anadol Studio / Google Google says that the museum is powered by its Gemini models, which run on Google Cloud. So, everything is generated inside one of Google’s AI data centers and is streamed to the museum. Alongside the museum opening, Google Arts & Culture is funding an AI Artist Residency, giving four artists $25,000 grants each, along with mentorship from Refik Anadol Studio and access to Google's machine learning tools. Their work will be shown at Dataland and on the Google Arts & Culture website later this year. Google’s AI museum will undoubtedly initiate a fired-up debate on social media, and we can’t wait to see the first reactions. Via: Smithsonian Magazine
    • Calling GTA 6 overhyped crap doesn’t make you edgy, it just makes you sound like someone who hasn’t enjoyed anything since the PS2 era.
    • I’m not arguing whether Rockstar likes money. Obviously, they do, they’re a business. I’m saying this isn’t new. They’ve always launched console first. This is just how Rockstar operates.
    • I'm not sure how old the school is, but they've been doing this since GTA 3. Back in those days we'd be lucky for game companies to release on the PC at all. And with the current state of Sony (or Microsoft) their gaming wing won't be getting a penny from me.
    • We now know when and how the Universe may truly end by Sayan Sen Image by Marek Pavlík via Pexels| Not representative A study by physicist Henry Tye of Cornell University suggests that the universe may not expand forever. Instead, it could eventually stop expanding, begin contracting and end in a "Big Crunch" roughly 20 billion years from now. The research, published in the Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, was conducted by Tye, Horace White Professor of Physics Emeritus at Cornell University. Using recent observations from major dark-energy surveys, Tye and his collaborators developed a cosmological model that predicts the universe could have a total lifespan of about 33 billion years. Since the universe is currently estimated to be 13.8 billion years old, the model places it near the midpoint of its existence. According to Cornell University's summary of the research, the study centers on the cosmological constant, a term introduced by Albert Einstein in his theory of general relativity. In modern cosmology, the cosmological constant is commonly used to describe the simplest form of dark energy, the unknown phenomenon believed to be driving the accelerating expansion of the universe. "For the last 20 years, people believed that the cosmological constant is positive, and the universe will expand forever," Tye said in a Cornell University news release. "The new data seem to indicate that the cosmological constant is negative, and that the universe will end in a big crunch." The study draws on data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), two major projects designed to investigate the nature of dark energy. According to Tye, recent observations suggest that dark energy may not behave exactly like a simple cosmological constant. To account for those observations, Tye and his collaborators proposed a model involving an extremely light hypothetical particle that evolves over time. In their calculations, this produces a negative cosmological constant and leads to a future collapse of the universe. The model predicts that cosmic expansion would continue for approximately another 11 billion years before reaching a maximum size, after which the universe would begin contracting and eventually collapse. Scientists have long debated how the universe might end. As explained in an article published in The Conversation by Stephen DiKerby of Michigan State University, several possibilities have been proposed. If dark energy remains constant and positive, the universe could continue expanding indefinitely, gradually becoming colder, darker and more diffuse in a scenario often called the "heat death" of the universe. Other theoretical possibilities include a Big Rip, in which cosmic expansion accelerates so dramatically that galaxies, stars and even atoms are torn apart, or a Big Crunch, in which expansion reverses and the universe collapses back into an extremely dense state. DiKerby notes that the Big Crunch idea itself is not new. What distinguishes Tye's work is that it attempts to use current observational data to estimate when such a collapse might occur and how it could unfold. Much of the universe's long-term evolution remains uncertain. According to current astrophysical understanding, stars will continue to form and die for billions of years. The Sun, for example, is about halfway through its expected lifespan. Galaxies are also expected to continue merging; the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies are projected to collide several billion years from now. At the same time, the nature of dark energy remains one of the biggest unanswered questions in cosmology. While observations indicate that the universe's expansion is accelerating, scientists still do not know what is causing that acceleration. Future observations may therefore alter current predictions about the cosmos's ultimate fate. Tye emphasized that additional evidence will be needed before firm conclusions can be drawn. DESI continues to collect data, while upcoming observations from missions and observatories including Euclid, SPHEREx and the Vera C. Rubin Observatory are expected to provide more precise measurements of dark energy. "People have said before that if the cosmological constant is negative, then the universe will collapse eventually. That's not new," Tye said. "However, here the model tells you when the universe collapses and how it collapses." For now, the study presents one possible future for the cosmos rather than a settled prediction. Whether the universe ultimately ends in a Big Crunch, expands forever, or follows another path entirely remains an open question that future observations will help answer. Source: Cornell University, The Conversation This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      570
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      175
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      73
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!