Apple products are priced too high?


Recommended Posts

So you really don't know what a comparison is?

 

You said iWork affects your productivity.  Well Pixelmator affects mine.  Does that mean it is a bad product?  No

 

We are discussing a product that affects productivity.  We are not discussing different things.

I do know what a comparison is. I also know what irrelevant material is, but I just don't think you do.

 

BRB, I need to go do an online comparison of the off road abilities of a Jeep and a Ferrari.

 

 

Edit:

I'm back. The Jeep is superior.

I do know what a comparison is. I also know what irrelevant material is, but I just don't think you do.

 

BRB, I need to go do an online comparison of the off road abilities of a Jeep and a Ferrari.

 

I seriously doubt you can follow this conversation then.

 

What did you say about iWork?  It affects your productivity?  THAT is what we are discussing here.  You are saying ANY product that affects your productivity is a BAD product which is false.  Why is it false?  For the exact reason I mentioned.  I ran into an issue JUST LIKE YOU.  Except yours was with office suites, and mine was with graphics.  The issue was the same though.  Product X was not available at the time so I used Product Y which affected my productivity.  

 

However, Product Y is NOT a bad product.  It worked and it worked as advertised.  That is the definition of a good product to me.

 

So iWork is not a bad product JUST BECAUSE it doesn't do every single thing that Office does.  JUST LIKE Pixelmator is not a bad product because it doesn't do everything Photoshop does.  It is the same.  We are not talking two different topics here.  We are talking about products affecting productivity.  It doesn't matter if it is Office, Photoshop, 3DS Max, ...

Nice cop out. Please continue. Nowhere did I state that as fact. Do you believe everything you read as fact?

Thats kinda funny :D

Of course not, ignorance is usually shown when facts aren't used. See the irony? Now that's kinda funny.

PS: editing after posting is the best cop out. Continue...

I seriously doubt you can follow this conversation then.

 

What did you say about iWork?  It affects your productivity?  THAT is what we are discussing here.  You are saying ANY product that affects your productivity is a BAD product which is false.  Why is it false?  For the exact reason I mentioned.  I ran into an issue JUST LIKE YOU.  Except yours was with office suites, and mine was with graphics.  The issue was the same though.  Product X was not available at the time so I used Product Y which affected my productivity.  

 

However, Product Y is NOT a bad product.  It worked and it worked as advertised.  That is the definition of a good product to me.

 

So iWork is not a bad product JUST BECAUSE it doesn't do every single thing that Office does.  JUST LIKE Pixelmator is not a bad product because it doesn't do everything Photoshop does.  It is the same.  We are not talking two different topics here.  We are talking about products affecting productivity.  It doesn't matter if it is Office, Photoshop, 3DS Max, ...

No, I was discussing iWork. You on the other hand went another direction in an attempt to deflect.  A poor attempt at that.

No, I was discussing iWork. You on the other hand went another direction in an attempt to deflect.  A poor attempt at that.

 

How is it a deflect?  IT IS THE SAME THING!  Again, look up what a comparison is.  I had your EXACT same situation, except with graphics.

 

The bottom line is, iWork is not a bad product.  It works and it works as advertised.  It isn't advertised to do every little bit that Office does.  The definition of a good product is it works and it works as advertised.  If it's features don't work for you, then get a different product.  That doesn't mean it was a bad product.

How is it a deflect?  IT IS THE SAME THING!  Again, look up what a comparison is.  I had your EXACT same situation, except with graphics.

 

The bottom line is, iWork is not a bad product.  It works and it works as advertised.  It isn't advertised to do every little bit that Office does.  The definition of a good product is it works and it works as advertised.  If it's features don't work for you, then get a different product.  That doesn't mean it was a bad product.

The same thing? Sure, it is software.

 

Of course, thats like saying tennis and football are the same thing.

 

We were not discussing Google Docs, Photoshop, or Pixelmator. We were discussing iWork.

 

Well, you were with some entity, but it wasn't I.

They surely aint building a resume with it......

I don't know, it never mattered to me how other people spend their money or use their products. I also never got worked up when someone else uses a product that I don't like. Some people though wish they could stop the presses...

The same thing? Sure, it is software.

 

Thats like saying tennis and football are the same thing.

 

In some conversations it is valid to compare tennis to football, depending on what the topic is.

 

People make comparisons in computing to real world objects.  And it is valid.  Comparisons and analogies.  Like CPU cores and highways.

In some conversations it is valid to compare tennis to football, depending on what the topic is.

 

People make comparisons in computing to real world objects.  And it is valid.  Comparisons.

Depending on the topic.

 

Correct you are sir.  iWork isn't one of those topics.

 

I also wouldn't discuss Pages or Word in a discussion regarding Photoshop, either.

Depending on the topic.

 

Correct you are sir.  iWork isn't one of those topics.

 

I also wouldn't discuss Pages or Word in a discussion regarding Photoshop, either.

 

I am not discussing how to create something in Photoshop.  I was giving MY Example of YOUR situation.  I had the same situation as you but with graphics.  I am not talking about the features of Photoshop, and we did not talk about the features of Office.

 

We are comparing apples to apples here.  Product X affects productivity since I use Product Y.  SAME EXACT THING.  The product names do not matter here.

So, to summarise, some people like iWork, and some people don't.

 

Exactly, if you don't like it that doesn't mean it is a BAD product.

I am not discussing how to create something in Photoshop.  I was giving MY Example of YOUR situation.  I had the same situation as you but with graphics.  I am not talking about the features of Photoshop, and we did not talk about the features of Office.

 

We are comparing apples to apples here.  Product X affects productivity since I use Product Y.  SAME EXACT THING.  The product names do not matter here.

 

Exactly, if you don't like it that doesn't mean it is a BAD product.

So much deflection. Next time we discuss something, try to stay on topic.

 

Thanks!

And feel very strongly about it :angry:  :argh:

Im beyond feeling strongly about it. I'm just trying to comprehend how xWhiplash went from iWork to Pixelmator in the same thread. It is really quite impressive.

So much deflection. Next time we discuss something, try to stay on topic.

 

Thanks!

 

Explain to me how it is off topic?  We were discussing the same thing!  The product names do not matter AT ALL.  I can make the same reference to Blender and 3DS Max.  Or FL Studio and Logic.  Or Premiere Pro and Final Cut.

 

What you said about iWork affecting your productivity had nothing to do with iWork specifically.  It became a WORKFLOW discussion.  You made that generalized statement which made it become a WORKFLOW discussion where the products are irrelevant to the conversation.  If you were discussing how to bold text a certain way, then yes it would be limited to the product category that those products belong.  But this ultimately became a workflow discussion.  Different products affect your workflow.  It doesn't mean they all are BAD.

Explain to me how it is off topic?  We were discussing the same thing!  The product names do not matter AT ALL.  I can make the same reference to Blender and 3DS Max.  Or FL Studio and Logic.  Or Premiere Pro and Final Cut.

 

What you said about iWork affecting your productivity had nothing to do with iWork specifically.  It became a WORKFLOW discussion.  You made that generalized statement which made it become a WORKFLOW discussion where the products are irrelevant to the conversation.  If you were discussing how to bold text a certain way, then yes it would be limited to the product category that those products belong.  But this ultimately became a workflow discussion.  Different products affect your workflow.  It doesn't mean they all are BAD.

I made one comment about productivity and it by no means was my topic of discussion. You have just decided to latch onto it. Then you brought in Google Docs, Photoshop, Pixelmator, etc.

 

If you are just using random names to make some perceived point, then you clearly have not followed the conversation at all.

I made one comment about productivity and it by no means was my topic of discussion. You have just decided to latch onto it. Then you brought in Google Docs, Photoshop, Pixelmator, etc.

 

If you are just using random names to make some perceived point, then you clearly have not followed the conversation at all.

 

RIGHT THERE.  You made a comment about PRODUCTIVITY.  Which is what I have been doing too.  Like I said, the product names do not matter.  Product X limits productivity if you are used to Product Y.  It became a workflow/productivity discussion and it stayed that way.  Therefore, it was on topic.

 

Thanks!

RIGHT THERE.  You made a comment about PRODUCTIVITY.  Which is what I have been doing too.  Like I said, the product names do not matter.  Product X limits productivity if you are used to Product Y.  It became a workflow/productivity discussion and it stayed that way.  Therefore, it was on topic.

 

Thanks!

smh

It all depends on how you look at it. If you are strictly looking at hardware then yes its pretty high. However if you are looking at the entire package you are getting a great deal. From quality design, quality customer support, products that last and the rest of the apple software/hardware eco system.

 

What people don't always realize is that every type of product out there has premium brands and crap brands. As someone who worked in the outdoor gear retail industry, I can say for sure there are plenty of brands that can be considered the Apple of the clothing industry. 

That's the thing that tends to get overlooked, the customer service, and support, I see the value in it. (it just wasn't for me)

Wow - this thread really has people's claws and fangs showing - its just a discussion about a company's products... would anyone get this upset over the cost/utility of Dyson vacuum cleaners ?

 

HEY!

Dyson had nothing on the Oreck XL :p

HEY!

Dyson had nothing on the Oreck XL :p

NO !!!  Nothing beats a Dyson !  Besides... mine is Purple !! top that !

(Read that "NO!" like the Adam Sandler skit "no! They're all gonna laugh at you" - then you will get the full effect) ;)

ON TOPIC:

FWIW About a year ago I bought a Carbon X1.  It was the same price as a similarly spec'd rMBP - $2499

What does that mean ?  I dont know really -  just sayin

  • Like 1
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Amazon Prime Day 2026: Best Dolby soundbar deals from Sony, Samsung, JBL, Polk, and more by Sayan Sen Yesterday we covered the JBL BAR 800 which is a 5.1.2 Dolby Atmos/Vision soundbar. The unit is on sale for its lowest ever price of just $800 making it a solid offer. However, there are many more options to choose from and in this article, we have made a compilation of the best deals including from Sony, Polk, Yamaha, Denon, Samsung and more. Sony's BAR models are currently at their lowest prices which makes them solid offerings. The company's BRAVIA Theatre Bar lineup is designed to suit different home cinema needs. The Bar 5 is an entry-level 3.1-channel soundbar with a wireless subwoofer, supporting Dolby Atmos®, DTS:X, S-Force PRO Front Surround, and Vertical Surround Engine for immersive audio with clear dialogue. The Bar 6 upgrades to a 3.1.2-channel configuration by adding dedicated up-firing speakers for more convincing overhead Atmos effects while retaining the wireless subwoofer. At the premium end, the Bar 7, Bar 8, and flagship Bar 9 are single-soundbar solutions featuring Sony’s 360 Spatial Sound Mapping technology, which creates phantom speakers for a wider surround field. Bar 7 includes nine speaker units, Bar 8 increases this to eleven, and Bar 9 offers thirteen speaker driver units promising the most expansive soundstage and acoustic performance. All models should integrate seamlessly with compatible BRAVIA TVs and support the BRAVIA Connect app for setup and control. Get them at the links below: Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 9 Soundbar (HT-A9000): $998.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $1498) Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 8 Soundbar (HT-A9000): $798.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $998) Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 7 Soundbar (HT-A7100): $618.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $768) Sony BRAVIA Theater System 6: $548.00 | Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 6: $448.00 Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 5 (HT-B500): $278.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $348) Sony HT-S400 2.1 soundbar: $198.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $248) Aside from those, we also have more discounts including from Samsung, Polk Audio, and more: Samsung Q-Series Soundbar HW-QS90H 7.1.2: $797.99 (Amazon US) (Was: $998) Polk Audio Signa S4: $336.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $449) Hisense AX3120Q: $229.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $259) Check out more soundbar deals that you may like at this link. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!