Recommended Posts

If only NASA would have sent out an email asking if there is any reason at all to delay the launch of Challenger.

Got to give props to SpaceX for having such a candid open floor policy. It isn't as common as it should be in the aviation/aerospace industry.

And THIS is why SpaceX and the other NewSpace companies are the right people and technologies for the future. Because they have the right attitude and working environment, all the way up to Elon Musk himself. If something is wrong, anywhere, anytimesay something immediately and it'll be checked out with no backlash upon you or your coworkers. That's how it needs to be. :yes:

 

The complacency matter? Completely understandable how that could occur. The issue with the Strut Failure is so stupid, and it should never have happened in the first place. That was a quality control problem with the supplier (probably cutting corners and not keeping an eye on metallurgical purity) and I'd be willing to bet that supplier will never do business again. It's also likely that ALL Falcon 9's are currently in the process of having those struts removed and better replacements have already been built in-house using 3D Printing techniques.

 

A sad example of the current state of affairs in the U.S. Manufacturing Sector, and how we need to "get our mojo back".

In some ways, I see the accident as a good thing.  I'm really glad no one was hurt, but SpaceX needed an attention getter to stop them getting slack, and this sure did the job!

 

I don't ever want to see them losing a crew.

  • Like 1

If only NASA would have sent out an email asking if there is any reason at all to delay the launch of Challenger.

Got to give props to SpaceX for having such a candid open floor policy. It isn't as common as it should be in the aviation/aerospace industry.

I look back on my statement and realize it most likely wasn't available at the time. But NASA should of had an open door policy at the the time.

I look back on my statement and realize it most likely wasn't available at the time. But NASA should of had an open door policy at the the time.

 

In hindsight, they DID get plenty of warnings about the O rings, but it was ignored.

 

You really can't fix stupid.

In hindsight, they DID get plenty of warnings about the O rings, but it was ignored.

You really can't fix stupid.

That's correct. The SRB contractors were all but begging NASA not to fly because of the cold conditions, but the NASA managers were all-in on 'shedule-schedule-schedule.'

I still say the decisionmankers should have been charged with manslaughter.

NextGen Space report to NASA

 

 

 

Humans could return to the Moon in the next decade, and for "approximately 90% less than the previously estimated $100 billion," according to a new study by NextGen Space.

NASA can cut the cost of establishing a human presence on the Moon by utilizing existing partnerships with commercial service providers like SpaceX and Boeing, said Charles Miller, NexGen president and the study's lead author.

post-546174-0-43276700-1437760475.jpg

 

 

By tapping those partnerships, NASA could put humans on the Moon in five to seven years and even build a permanent base 10 to 12 years after that - all without exceeding its current $4 billion budget for human spaceflight, the study said.

Plus, a successful mission to the moon could assist in sending humans to Mars, which is where NASA really has its eyes fixed.

Mining fuel from lunar poles and transporting it to lunar orbit for use by other spacecraft reduces the cost of sending humans to Mars and other locations beyond low Earth orbit.

These commercial fuel depots in lunar orbit have the potential to cut the cost of sending humans to Mars by more than $10 billion per year, according to NextGen's estimates.

"You basically expand free enterprise to the Moon," Miller said

Christopher Kraft, NASA's first flight director, said that the NexGen team did well addressing how NASA could, in theory, get to Mars by way of the Moon.

"I think [the report is] a very good one," Kraft said in an interview. "It says that [a mission to the Moon] can be done. It will take good management and good leadership on the part of both the aerospace industry and NASA."

http://www.space-travel.com/reports/NASA_Could_Return_Humans_to_the_Moon_by_2021_999.html

 

If SpaceX Dragon V2 stays on schedule....they could do it in 3 years.... :)

  • Like 1

NextGen Space report to NASA

 

attachicon.giflunar-apollo-15-landing-site-lander-buggy-lg.jpg

http://www.space-travel.com/reports/NASA_Could_Return_Humans_to_the_Moon_by_2021_999.html

 

If SpaceX Dragon V2 stays on schedule....they could do it in 3 years.... :)

Boom. Put that in your pipes and smoke it, OldSpace. Overcharging, overdelaying, overestimating pieces of *snip*.

 

To be fair, I see that happening more in the 5~7 and 12~15 year timeframe, and perhaps for a >$8 billion USD budget. Lunar Missions aren't cheap, but they can be done for far, far less than the Apollo days now.

 

Oh, and guess what: It could a nice testing and proof-of-concept mission set for the BFR too. Let's get all the kinks, protocols and procedures worked out for Mars (and more) by sending all the gear needed to the Lunar Colonies.... 150t at a time. If we're going to stick a nice, big middle finger in the eye of OldSpace, let's do it nice and loud -- with the equivalent of Twisted Sister's "Come On Feel The Noise" of Rockets. :yes:

NextGen Space report to NASA

 

attachicon.giflunar-apollo-15-landing-site-lander-buggy-lg.jpg

http://www.space-travel.com/reports/NASA_Could_Return_Humans_to_the_Moon_by_2021_999.html

 

If SpaceX Dragon V2 stays on schedule....they could do it in 3 years.... :)

It would be awhile...But, If SpaceX wanted to do a remote flight and orbit the moon, I could see them doing it in a lot less time...they have the technology....But the big show is Mars...and I want my seat..... :woot:

  • Like 1

Something interesting I found in a rather cursory Google search for information on the BFR ..

 

http://www.spaceflight101.com/spacex-launch-vehicle-concepts.html -- Source of the article, and a mighty awesome read it is.

 

post-23589-0-79980000-1437804520.jpg

 

Apparently this nastiness is an early idea for the BFR, also called "Falcon XX".

 

 

 

Falcon XX

Falcon XX is a single core launch vehicle with a diameter of 10 meters and an estimated length of about 100 meters using six Merlin 2 engines operating at the 100% thrust setting on its first stage creating a liftoff thrust of 45,360 Kilonewtons (4,625 metric tons).

Again, the upper stage of the vehicle was not specified at the time, but a one or two-engine Raptor design would have been one likely way to go. Falcon XX would have engine-out capability for a portion of its ascent. Low Earth orbit payload capability has been estimated at 140 metric tons.
 

A heavy-version of the Falcon XX with three cores has not been presented by SpaceX, but would be an option to boost the vehicle's payload capability to more than 400mt.

BFR
BFR or Big Falcon Rocket (or Big F... Rocket) was a phrase coined around 2005 as a title for future heavy-lift SpaceX rockets including the Falcon X/XX and other potential designs.

 

Holy ... just ... the structural wizardry needed to hold that 3-Cored BEAST together would be sheer insanity.  :o

Musk ruled out a tri-core. He's talking about a VERY large single core.

The rocketeers at NSF who have been modelling BFR, based on what Musk & Co. have said about it and Raptor, put it at a height at least as high as Saturn V, 110.6 meters/363 feet, but up to 50% wider at about 12.5-15 meters vs Saturn V's 10.1 meters. The S1 engine count guesses run from 9 to 30, depending on where Raptors sea level thrust level ends up.

It's also unlikely to taper like Saturn V or Russia's N1, more parallel similar to the Falcon XX pic. Such a parallel structure could allow the payload to be over 22 meters wide (rule of thumb: payloads or fairings can be 1.5-1.8x the upper stage width.)

This makes it easy to visualize a spacecraft about 22 meters at its base and maybe 30-40 meters high.

One of Chris Bergin's articles at NSF used this image of a BFR concept, and yes it would have a blue plume.

http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2014/08/battle-heavyweight-rockets-sls-exploration-rival/

Z63-350x242.jpg

  • Like 1

You'll have to see it from about 10 miles away lest your innards tie in knots and eardrums burst from the acoustics.

Yeah, I recommend earplugs or noise-cancelling headphones if attending a BFR launch. :D And I highly recommend attending a BFR launch ... 

  • Like 1

M1D is now 170,000 lbf S/L, 210,000 lbf VAC.  Big damned bump for Falcon 9 v1.2

https://twitter.com/StephenClark1/status/626099566840918016

From NASA’s Phil McAlister’s presentation to NASA Adv Council, an overview of human-rated F9/Crew Dragon. http://t.co/gcQTn9N9wa

IMG_20150728_221945.thumb.jpg.0897de6b05IMG_20150728_221928.thumb.jpg.b361f81a99

 

IMG_20150728_221936.jpg

Edited by DocM
  • Like 1

I can't wait to see this puppy doing it's thing again.....September is too far away.......:(

I know! We needs the precioussss! Hehe ...

Seriously, she's a right looker, that Dragon Mark 2. And I'm starting to show my Welsh roots. Can't help it, DocM always posts the best stuff with SpaceX material. :yes:

I can't wait to see this puppy doing it's thing again.....September is too far away.......:(

I know! We needs the precioussss! Hehe ...

Seriously, she's a right looker, that Dragon Mark 2. And I'm starting to show my Welsh roots. Can't help it, DocM always posts the best stuff with SpaceX material. :yes:

  • Like 1

I know! We needs the precioussss! Hehe ...

Seriously, she's a right looker, that Dragon Mark 2. And I'm starting to show my Welsh roots. Can't help it, DocM always posts the best stuff with SpaceX material. :yes:

/s...I think he works part time for SpaceX..........DragonWorks.............:woot:

  • Like 1

US Air Force Pushing for more ULA RD-180's

WASHINGTON – The U.S. Air Force contends United Launch Alliance needs as many as 22 RD-180 rocket engines to compete against SpaceX for dozens of national security launches that start going out for bid later this year, according to a U.S. senator.

ULA has ordered 29 RD-180 engines from Russia for its Atlas 5 rocket. Fifteen of those engines are for Air Force launches already under contract. The remaining 14 are what ULA has said it needs to import in order to compete for military launches until its next generation rocket, known as Vulcan and powered by a U.S.-made engine, is ready around 2020.

The Air Force plans to begin soliciting bids later this year for an initial batch of nine missions, all of which Air Force officials say Atlas 5 is suited to launch. A further 28 missions will be put out for bid starting in 2018, with 25 of those suited to the Atlas 5.

Specifically, the 2015 National Defense Authorization Act bars the Defense Department from entering into new contracts or modifying existing contracts for launch services with companies that rely on Russian suppliers.

Because ULA has only partially paid for the 14 engines it ordered from the RD-180’s Florida-based importer RD-Amross in anticipation of winning new Air Force business, Pentagon lawyers have said a strict interpretation of the law could limit ULA to using just five of those engines for the upcoming launch competitions.

That could eventually create a new national security launch monopoly in SpaceX, the Air Force has said.

 

ULA says it is committed to phasing out the RD-180 and switching to Vulcan, a next-generation rocket featuring a main engine being developed by Kent, Washington-based Blue Origin.

But Vulcan is not expected to make its debut before 2019 and win certification to launch military payloads until 2022. That schedule, ULA has said, assumes no technical setbacks and that ULA does not find itself a few years from now sitting on the sidelines with no Atlas 5 and a Delta 4 it admits is too expensive to give SpaceX’s Falcon 9 a run for the Air Force’s money.

 http://spacenews.com/air-force-says-ula-will-need-18-22-rd-180s-to-compete-with-spacex/

Report states that the US Air Force may have to guarantee launches?

The U.S. Air Force may need to guarantee SpaceX and United Launch Alliance a set number of national security launches if the service hopes to have to two financially viable families of rockets available in the future, according to a report completed in April.

The report, formally known as Broad Area Review 15 and led by retired Gen. Larry Welch, a former Air Force chief of staff, raises anew a persistent question about the U.S. national security launch market: Is there enough business for two companies?

The report was commissioned by Air Force Secretary Deborah Lee James in January following delays to the Air Force’s certification process for SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rocket. The process, which had been expected to be completed by the end of December, dragged on until June, when Falcon 9 was cleared to carry military payloads.

 

The combination of ULA’s high prices and the introduction of the privately funded Falcon 9 has driven the Air Force to reintroduce competition to the military market. The first of those competitive missions, to launch a GPS 3 satellite, is expected to be awarded later this year.

ULA currently operates the Delta 4 rocket family alongside the workhorse Atlas 5, but plans to phase out all but the heavy variant of the Delta 4 over the next few years due to its high costs. That, coupled with a congressional ban on future military use of the Russian-built engine that powers the Atlas 5, could eventually force ULA out of the market, the report said, a concern that has been voiced by Air Force officials in recent months.

 

In what Welch describes as the most likely scenario, the report envisions a continued Delta 4 monopoly for the biggest national security payloads — there is no Atlas 5 heavy-lift variant — despite the fact that Hawthorne, California-based SpaceX is working on a Falcon Heavy rocket that is expected to make its first flight next year.

The Falcon 9 would have a monopoly for medium-class missions, the report said.

In essence, Welch appears to be warning the service not to repeat the mistake of counting on the commercial market to keep two healthy providers available to serve the government.

To that end, the report calls on the commander of Air Force Space and Missile Systems Center, which buys military space systems, to prepare a contingency plan to ensure that two providers stay in the national security market “in the face of lack of a viable business case for competitive launch services.”

Meanwhile, the report also suggests that the Air Force’s mission assurance requirements for launch have become too stringent, to the point of being unreasonable.

“There was not an expectation of the 100% launch success rate for [national security] payloads over the past decade,” the report says. “Nonetheless, this has become the standard.”

The report suggests that the Air Force follow a certification standard closer to NASA’s, which requires “significantly fewer resources, accepting more flexibility in processes, relying more on provider engineering processes, and conducting less independent testing.”

http://spacenews.com/report-u-s-air-force-may-need-to-guarantee-number-of-launches/

We can see where this is going...How dare SpaceX be competitive and have a monopoly when only ULA can have this. Hopefully, as the article states, military launch guidelines will be reduced to follow NASA's example. Quite frankly, the money would be nice, but if certain groups don't get their act together, SpaceX can do without them, they have the commercial ability. The only abilities ULA has is money squandering and the pursuit of subsidies. I am really beginning to dislike ULA (and their cronies) business practices.

Cheers..... 

Sooooo .... let's see if I have this straight. ULA no longer has a monopoly. The US Air Force people representing ULA are suddenly griping about SpaceX having a foreseeable monopoly sooner rather than later.

I think someone got stiffed on the bill during date night and is now crying about it.

I'm with DD on his conclusions. ULA has done nothing but squander the money that was given to them for Engine Development, and they've got nothing to show for it except a lot of out-of-work middlemen who were thrown under the bus when they couldn't maintain the charade anymore.

This is Politics, and nothing more. A "Dog and Pony Act". These people are playing the only game they know how to play, because they've already lost and are defaulting back to old tactics.

  • Like 1

Dragon Chute Software To Be Installed

SpaceX CEO and Chief Designer Elon Musk has ordered the installation of contingency abort software into all future Dragon cargo spacecraft, providing them with an option to deploy their parachutes after an off-nominal launch scenario. Such software may have allowed the CRS-7 Dragon to save herself after she was thrown free of the failing Falcon 9 during June’s ill-fated launch.

 Z2GF-350x139.thumb.jpg.384a5d3988d19f1fd

2015-07-24-171802-350x251.thumb.jpg.f1cf

2015-07-24-172648-350x240.thumb.jpg.4003

The Dragon spacecraft actually survived the rocket’s mishap, as the Falcon 9’s second stage began to disintegrate via an overpressure event in the Second Stage, in turn freeing the spacecraft.

“Dragon actually survived not only the Second Stage overpressure but continued to communicate until the vehicle dropped below the horizon and out of range,” Mr. Musk confirmed.

However, Dragon’s fate was already sealed as she headed for an unsurvivable high-velocity impact into the Atlantic below.

“It is somewhat tragic that it, unfortunately, hit the water quite hard and is at the bottom of the ocean.

 

 

“We are actually trying to send a remote submersible down to the region where the debris hit the water and see if we can retrieve additional elements of debris to either confirm our initial conclusions or point us in a different direction,” Mr. Musk added, speaking about the ongoing investigation into the failure, believed to have been caused by a failed strut that released a helium pressurization system bottle (Composite Overwrapped Pressure Vessel) that led to the overpressure event.

SpaceX had focused on Dragon’s systems from a post-first stage ascent standpoint, ensuring her ability to deal with contingency events in space and during her return. Dealing with a first stage launch failure was not a consideration until after the CRS-7 event.

“The issue is that, in this case, Dragon is inert on ascent. The software to initiate the parachute deployment was not in Dragon,” added Mr. Musk. “That is probably the saddest thing about this, is that, with just a bit of different software, Dragon would have made it.”

 

 

That software relates to Dragon being able to open and release her nose cone – which remains in place during first stage ascent – in turn allowing for the deployment of her parachutes, the latter following the procedures of the nominal End Of Mission (EOM) events or during an abort from orbit.

“With the cargo Dragon, it (off-nominal ascent software) was just not something that had been done yet. It was on the agenda, but it hadn’t been done yet,” added Mr. Musk.

“For future missions, even for the cargo version of the Dragon spacecraft, we’re now including contingency software that, if something were to go wrong with the vehicle, Dragon will always attempt to save itself.”

This software inclusion will be live from the next Dragon – CRS-8, believed to be targetting the end of this year – onwards.

 

Extra's 

Dragon 2’s maiden flight into space won’t be crewed, with current manifest showing SpaceX plans to conduct the first test mission to the ISS via an uncrewed Dragon 2 mission, designated SpX-DM1, in December, 2016 – with the 30-day mission ending with a parachute assisted landing in the Pacific ocean.

This mission will make use of its capability, carrying cargo to the Station during its test flight.

SpaceX is then scheduled to conduct the SpX-DM2 crewed flight, launching in April of 2017 on a 14-day mission.

However, Mr. Musk has pointed to a flexible outlook with the potential for up to two flights being uncrewed before astronauts finally get to launch on the Dragon 2.

Such a second uncrewed mission could also provide an extra ISS resupply run boost, in tandem with a second dress rehearsal ahead the historic arrival of a crew onboard the new Dragon spacecraft.

 http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2015/07/saving-spaceship-dragon-contingency-chute/

Cheers....:D

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why you need to take back control of your synced passwords and how to go about doing that by Paul Hill Credit: Pixabay Last month, when Google decided to introduce daily and weekly caps for Gemini, it reignited an anxiety of mine, that you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever, and it got me looking into free software (as in freedom) in other areas too. One app I quickly came across was KeePassXC on desktop and KeePassDX on Android as an alternative to password manager lock-in within the Chrome or Firefox ecosystems. I personally like to switch around with browsers, and using either password manager is inconvenient, so something like KeePassXC was interesting to me. The main issue with it now is syncing; I was not sure how to do that. After a bit of research, I came across Syncthing, a tool I was vaguely familiar with but had never used because it seemed complicated. However, I was completely wrong, and honestly, I think everyone should use it if they use multiple devices. It essentially lets you share folders peer to peer across all of your devices, no cloud services that you don’t control necessary! And it was fairly simple to set up, if not a bit clunky. Since setting it up, I’ve also started using Syncthing to back up other apps too, so don’t think it’s limited to just saving password databases. You can use it for pretty much anything you use Dropbox or Google Drive for. Before continuing to talk about those apps a bit more, let’s walk back a bit and talk about browser sync. Ever since the late 2000s and early 2010s, really, since we have been using smartphones, browser sync has been a necessity of life. I don’t know about you, but I have hundreds of passwords saved. For the most part, they’re all unique, so I don’t remember them and rely on software to manage them for me. Until recently, I’ve relied on password managers in Chrome and Firefox, but what I always found annoying was that it can be hard to transfer them between browsers. Sure, on Windows it is simple enough, but on Linux, exporting bookmarks has been temperamental. It works OK nowadays, but not too long ago, Chrome required you to enable exporting passwords in chrome://flags. The situation is even worse on mobile; there is no exporting or importing of passwords of any kind. You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. Sync also lets us take out bookmarks, history, tabs, and autofill data easily. To enable sync, it’s just a matter of signing into the browser once, and it handles the rest. It’s nice and easy. Obviously, all this has some issues, including those I’ve outlined above about it being hard to transfer data between browsers, but also things such as account suspension, lost account passwords, and other lock-in mechanisms, such as passkeys, being tied to a specific browser. On a sidenote, I have just removed all of my passkeys because they can make it harder to move browsers. I think the biggest threat to your synced passwords, especially if doing this with Google, is having your account suspended. I don’t ever expect mine to be suspended, but you do hear horror stories on Reddit where people lose access to their Google accounts. Imagine if you have hundreds of passwords, then suddenly lose access to them because Google froze your account, what would you do? So yes, it can be nice to use these syncing services for their convenience, but they also have risks. You may have seen me going on about free software quite a bit in my editorials. It’s essentially a concept championed by the Free Software Foundation. It’s software under particular licenses that grant you four freedoms: run the program for any purpose (0), study and change the source code (1), redistribute copies to others (2), and the freedom to distribute modified copies to others (3). For example, if there is an app I use and one day it gets abandoned by the developer, I can keep running it or even clone the software and continue developing it. Look at the myriad of cool services Google has run over the years before killing them. You can’t take the source code for those because they are proprietary, for the most part. Both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so I get the freedoms listed above. In my use case where I’m syncing a database full of my passwords, I also get proper ownership over my data, there is no losing access to the database due to a frozen account, I can access the code of the tools I’m using, and I can get support from real people online if I run into issues, rather than having to consult a vague help page from an opaque company. With the KeePassXC password manager, you create a .kdbx file, which is what will be synced between devices. KeePassXC has cross-platform apps and also has browser extensions so that the browser can fetch passwords from the database once it is unlocked. Meanwhile, Syncthing is a peer-to-peer file sync tool where you can select folders to sync between your devices. Just pop files in the folders you choose, and then they will be available across your other devices whenever they come online. Syncthing is resilient as it works over both LAN and the internet and only ever sends content between your devices, never to a third-party server somewhere else. By combining these two pieces of software, you can essentially replicate the browser sync functionality. I have had a weird, conflicting issue where a new file is appearing, but it doesn’t seem to be impacting my main password database, which is updating between devices just fine. If you want to get a setup similar to what I have, you will need to go here to download KeePassXC for your computer. Once you have that, you will need to download your passwords from your web browser to a CSV file. In Chrome, you can type chrome://password-manager/settings into the URL bar, and you should see an option to download your passwords under Export Passwords. This will give you the CSV file you need for importing into KeePassXC. If you use a different browser, just use a search engine and type “browser-name export passwords” and muddle along. In KeePassXC, you’ll want to press Import File from the home screen, select the CSV file, and create a new database from it. On one of the screens of the wizard, there will be a Title field with a drop-down selected to none. Change this to Title and continue. You’ll select a name for the database, the encryption level (the defaults are fine), and then you will pick a password. I would choose four unrelated words that are easy for you to remember, as you’ll be typing them fairly often to access your passwords. When you have all your passwords in your new database, you will want to set up the browser extension so that your browser can fetch passwords from KeePassXC. Rather than explain how to do that here, refer to KeePassXC’s guide on how to set it up properly. Once you’ve got that set up, you want to install KeePassDX on Android. You can grab it on the F-Droid store and the Google Play Store. For iPhone users, there are other .kdbx-supporting apps, but I haven’t tried any of them, so have a look around and use what suits you. Once you have that done, you will want to install Syncthing on your computer and find a third-party app for your mobile device. On Android, I use an app called BasicSync; there are also options for iOS, but again, I’ve not tried these. Once you’ve got SyncThing, you’ll want to set it up and connect all of your devices together and share a folder between your gadgets. PCWorld has a good tutorial on setting up a synchronized file between your devices using SyncThing. Once you’ve set it up, congrats, you’ll never have to touch that stuff again except for adding or removing devices. I’ll be honest, I didn’t particularly like setting up Syncthing. It didn’t take me a massive amount of time, but I think I had to check online because I found it a bit confusing. That said, I’ve had it running for several weeks now and never need to touch the Syncthing settings, so that’s very nice. I also mentioned a conflicting file. I’m not sure why this is appearing, but the main .kdbx file seems to be updating and syncing just fine. What’s nice is that both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so they won’t just vanish one day; you can take the code and fork the project or use a range of alternative implementations that others have made. It’s also nice that it works over LAN, so even if your ISP is having problems, your passwords will still sync. One area where you will want to be a bit more careful with this setup is if you only have one device. I am OK because I have a computer and two phones, all synced up. If you just have one device, you will probably want to store a backup of your .kdbx file somewhere else. Obviously, you’ll also want to remember your password really well, too. If you get locked out, it's game over. Overall, if you want to take back control of your computing from big tech, taking control of your passwords is an important part of this. You don’t need to immediately clear out your browser’s password manager; try running KeePassXC and the password manager concurrently for a while to see if you run into any problems. If you do try this out, let us know some other creative ways to use Syncthing. I haven’t really come up with a solution about what to do with my bookmarks, for example.
    • If the price was a dollar, someone would complain "Why isn't it free?" If it was free, someone would complain they weren't being paid to play it.
    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
    • 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD drops to its lowest price in over three months by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the 2TB WD_Black SN7100 internal solid-state drive at its lowest price in over three months, so you may want to check it out, if you have been considering a storage upgrade, before the deal dries up (purchase link is toward the end of the article). Featuring a PCIe Gen 4.0 interface and M.2 2280 form factor, the SN7100 promises to deliver sequential read speeds of up to 7,250MB/s and sequential write speeds reaching 6,900MB/s, offering as much as a 35% improvement in performance compared with the previous generation. It also achieves random read speeds of 1,000,000 IOPS and random write speeds of 1,400,000 IOPS. The drive uses Western Digital’s TLC 3D NAND technology for reliable performance and is further supported by a five-year limited warranty. It also offers strong endurance, rated at up to 1,200TBW, making it suitable for demanding workloads such as gaming, content creation, and high-speed recording. Moreover, its DRAM-less architecture claims to improve power efficiency (the SSD relies on system memory for caching via HMB), while the WD_Black Dashboard software enables users to monitor drive health, install firmware updates, and activate Game Mode for potentially better performance. Finally, it operates within an operating temperature range of 0°C to 85°C, and can withstand storage temperatures from -40°C to 85°C. 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD: $242.96 (Amazon US) Check this deal out if you want a 4TB option. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!