Neowin Think Tank: Mars Colony One (and Two ... and Three ... and ... )


Recommended Posts

If you are going to go geothermal for heat and air-conditioning, Why not use it to generate power too?

That would be nice...Right now we will need to investigate Mars surface structure for drilling the dissipation and adsorption system (coiled closed loop flex line in hole)....there must be some reasonable areas to drill....glacial area would be an option as well. We also need to investigate the temperature below the surface...ie: what temp differential at that point compared to ground top...what is the "frost level" or "permafrost" level.......cheers 

  • Like 1

It has been my experience with residential "water furnaces", that they do a good job at maintaining a level, but...once a large temperature change occurs...ie: leave the door open in -30C for 5 minutes...it takes a while to get up to temp, which is why an auxiliary fireplace at home is nice. On Mars...those fuel cells (generated heat) which were mentioned may be able to replace  the "fireplace".  I assume any form of heat exchanger top up would assist as well....or...don't open the door too long on Mars....... :)

 

The drilling rover's Doc mentioned would be good, for a recce, instrument tests and pilot holes...as well as final installation boring...

  • Like 1

The test chamber....if we can use the vacuum system to get .5kpa.....then cool through the range of -90C to -145C......see link for system required....and have conventional power (bulk head) supplied for now....we can test the habitat.....fuel cells operation.....liquid furnace (variable temp heat wrap to see the differential required to operate)...thermal tech on machinery....suit tech, general and work wear...test battery storage "cell efficiency" in various temp containers...antennae and associated gear (keep what in or outside  ie amps, signal conductive medium).....module and greenhouse environmental controls, fluid to use for hydraulic systems, screw rams, "tire technology", "track technology".....test "rovers"....recovery time for energy storage system charge and discharge cycles...ease of repair for "replaceable units" with suits on ( do actual repair where warm then)...refueling mock Dragon in the cold....entering cold Dragon and "firing system up" ie...do we need standby heat in Dragon...I assume we do for the main cabin electronics...so we may need a "roll away transfer tube"...think Martian airport equipment.....Dragon lands...we drive a boarding rig up to it...transfer people and cargo, while maintaining some heat for cabin while not in use....test "transfer mini modules"...we will probably need to enter the small "hut" attached to main modules, close door, evac environment, then apply heat and air prior to entry to main module..Think Martian airlock....test enhanced  "arctic wire"..outdoor sub temp fine strand cabling with flex shield.....test heat wraps...insulation types....lots to test...

 

Big test for me....We will have to design a radiation suit to fit over main suit or make a new design for this......put a small reactor in it for testing...check out cooling systems and generators real time in real conditions and test mobility...we will have to decide on a small reactor design that affords the best safety with appropriate cooling system...It has to be done and my guess is we can't use others facilities for this due to insurance...may have to apply for permit and build a small test building for this in an isolated area or out at sea.....got to be done.......thoughts....Cheers.....

 

http://www.espec.com/na/chamber_faq/answer/low_temp_limit

https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Mars

http://www.polarwire.com/         example only...lots of manufacturers....

OK guys...DD's movie theater...........showing at a place near you..............at your keyboard........

 

The first two short clips are primers....but...the next 2 are documentaries...yes ......a bit of wishful thinking....but...there are some treats...the first one has an old plan to get to mars...and a few guys built a functioning methane extractor........the extractor works...and more so, its old tech.....they were not aware of the frozen water ice..(they should have been).....hence the hydrogen being brought along...........must see.

 

As far as the last 1....few treats there as well....take your time and bookmark...well worth it 

 

Primer....

 

2 documentaries....

           Some real neat stuff.....starting point....

          "Neil the science guy shows up"

 

Have fun........ :D

  • Like 1

Interesting videos thanks.

So going back to the geothermal collection we would need to select suitable areas with the least amount of drilling required hence if we did ground soundings as per my earlier notion what depth do you think we would need to go before we descended below the perma frost.If we could estimate this then we could do rough calculations on energy requirements to actually perform the task.

 

Talking of the wind erosion for us laymen like myself, Doc mentioned thinner air so what are we talking here.If I were in say a sand storm on Earth it would probably be similar to sand blasting under medium to high pressure so what is a good example of what the equipment and crew would have to stand up against on Mars?

The experience with the rovers is that winds known as 'cleaning events' actually cleared settled dust off the solar arrays and other rover parts, so they've not lost as much performance as the mission planners expected.

Before & after

Spirit_cleaning_event_PIA07492.jpg

So is the wind only moving small particulates and what sort of damage do they actually create?

 

Another thing that sprung to mind given the lower air pressures how does that affect the boiling points of our stored fluids i.e. water I take it it would act much like in a pressure cooker?

Good morning, Colonists. :)

 

Great plans of action for the Testing Phases, Doc and DD. I'm appointing you two as the Project "Test-N-Break-It" Engineering Team Leads. Your jobs are to checkout all gear meant for the Colony. Push it all to 105% -- if it breaks, it doesn't go. ;)

 

- Power Systems: We're going with Doc and DD's recommendations of using Geothermal-Atmospheric Heat Exchange. Those systems have the potential to work better on Mars than they will on Earth, once they are tested & (if need be) modified for the lower pressures. Turns out that we can use these systems for Climate Control as well as Power in the same loop -- nice bonus. Secondary Power will come from standard Fuel-Powered Generators. Tertiary/Supplemental Power will come from Solar + Battery Storage, and we'll test Wind Turbine Generation down the road for feasibility and practicality. Does this technology violate the rule about not developing new tech for this ThinkTank? No, since it already exists and works well on Earth. We can 3D Print/Fabricate most of what we need on-site once we are there, but work out the procedures and processes here on Earth during exploratory testing. The best part? We can use Methane that we've reclaimed from the Martian environment to do it all.

 

Mining/Reclamation: The second reason we're going to Mars, as far as the Company is concerned. There's money to be made ... lots of it, and with no competition. So to mine the stuff without crashing the prices on the Earth Market, damaging the Martian Ecology or putting Colonists at risk we need the best gear for the job. Reliable, robust, and safe. Following Doc and DD's recommendations, we'll use Methane to fuel on-board Electric Generators that charge batteries that in turn power the equipment. That should work well.

SpaceX's MCT (Mars Colonial Transporter) will be making round trips, and it'll be capable of hauling ~100 tonnes of cargo. Big, it'll be. Methinks a few samples on the return leg won't be a problem.

After the initial test flights, perhaps with checkout flights to the Moon, they plan on several flying in a "fleet" during each mission cycle (roughly every 2 years.)

This is no joke. The Raptor engine for the (monsterous) BFR launcher and MCT started testing at NASA Stennis over a year ago. We should get more info on the architecture specifics later this year.

Good afternoon folks, had my coffee, here goes another round......

 

Take Nothing For Granted

 

1) Wind can clear debris, it can cover things with debris, it will cause sand to cling due to wind creating static charged surfaces, it can slowly blast materials with abrasives, if there is an opening...wind will aid sand to find it's way in. Just check with a few veterans who saw action in desert environments.........machinery and sand do not mix.

2) Assumed definitions for descriptions....mention fuel cell to younger people, answer most times will be energy production...talk to old timers, answer will be, gas production or electrical production. One will see efficiency ratings as being high, as well as total power output being high. Now if we dissect the data, oxygen, water, hydrogen, atmospheric pressure, ambient operating temps, internal operating temperatures (some quite high...a problem in itself), power applied to a grid which in itself means nothing as the "grid" is what handles severe current draw, not the cell. Were the cost's of these input's considered...most times ...no. What process was used to create the input compounds and the cost in energy to produce them. Nothing is 100% efficient...therefore the more processes involved, the greater the energy losses.

2) Fuel cell use in light duty vehicles...Yes..Ballard Power has been doing this from the early 90's......light duty, atmosphere, contained environment for cell, unit is fueled....again cost of production....efficient on Earth...yes...efficient on Mars, only if we clone Earth environment around it.

3) Throw cells on what ever you want.....when you are done with device...what do you do...can you leave it unattended to freeze, to be exposed to a vacuum, does it consume power all the time to maintain an environment.

4) Most of the fuel cell technology that I have seen, has one or the other , or combinations of.........oxygen environment, addition of water to start or to continue at reduced levels, consumption of a gas...cost to produce this gas.....high reaction temps, some higher than others...thermal runaway...not good and parts can melt or assemblies explode, platinum use not overly dependable, transport medium made of what....wet, moist, temp sensitive....very critical.

5) Can the cells handle large current draws for extended time and keep up without overheating...light duty OK, medium to heavy...HD, I doubt....., think of a Terex mine truck or modern train...diesel engine driving a generator to supply large current loads to motors which drive the vehicle.

 

Summary...fuel cells will have to be environmentally shielded to a cloned Earth environment..ALL the time to prevent destruction...unless someone can show me an exception...I'm all ears....Next... large sustained current draw...all day...industrial....For community site use, definitely and will produce module heat from system waste heat...50% efficiency means the rest is wasted as heat...so is it an energy generator or a heat generator... :) 

 For heavy current draw....will require testing in chamber...but I won't hold my breath on this one.....

 

Overall, if we can get the best cell tech of the bunch, operating "reliably", in an environmental case, this will solve the majority of energy demand. The way to prolong these devices may be operating them till battery system charged and resting cells...cycle system on and off...still giving solar use a go for site and vehicle top ups....very promising now...too many years of prior disappointments.

 

If we can determine the processes that we will use to convert raw materials into the products we want, all of them..ie" pure water, oxygen, methane, hydrogen...then we can pick the most power (input) efficient method to use and see if cells can handle it.

The last big one will be surface miner...can we modernize the rotary cutters drive system to reduce current demand on the device..to a point...where multiple cells may work...good question and we may be able to do this....if we can extract enough material to keep processes going non stop...there may not be a need to run the "mine" 24/7...we may be able to intermittently fire things up, get the "raw" and shut gear off while processing...lets test the processes and the outputs. If all works well...no reactor.......Realistically...well.....lets find out.

 

Have at her guys...start shooting...and lets dig up some cell tech with details.....excited about this...... :D

 

And please..NO Hyperbole like this spin control silliness....seen decades of this junk....reality specs needed......

http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2014/12/f19/fcto_state_of_states_2014_1.pdf

Good afternoon, DD. :)

 

From http://www.energy.gov/eere/articles/fuel-cells-providing-power-despite-winter-s-chill

 

While record low temperatures have stranded many East Coast drivers, Toyota

Just thinking out the box but how about the speculative use of orbital solar panels sending power to a collector on the planet via microwave?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space-based_solar_power

 

JAXA announced on 12 March 2015 that they wirelessly beamed 1.8 kilowatts 50 meters to a small receiver by converting electricity to microwaves and then back to electricity.On 12 March 2015 Mitsubishi Heavy Industries demonstrated transmission of 10 kilowatts (kW) of power to a receiver unit located at a distance of 500 meters (m) away.[31]

 

In space applications

A laser SBSP could also power a base or vehicles on the surface of the Moon or Mars, saving on mass costs to land the power source. A spacecraft or another satellite could also be powered by the same means. In a 2012 report presented to NASA on Space Solar Power, the author mentions another potential use for the technology behind Space Solar Power could be for Solar Electric Propulsion Systems that could be used for interplanetary human exploration missions.[49][50][51]

 

 

c85ca3b1289d0fdda373146663e07049.png

Neat idea...been around for a while , but really difficult to justify the cost and development. We have a limited budget with a mountain to climb...Cheers...and good digging...keep it up...Cheers

Musk is no fan of space solar power, but he did meet with JAXA last September during a trip to Japan. They called it a courtesy call, but I would imagine SpaceX soon having a heavy launcher and JAXA not would help their space solar power project.

And FH's LC-39A home is getting close. Big enough to process 5 Falcon 9's, or 2 Falcon 9's and a Falcon Heavy, at once.

Spx39Ahangar-1024x474.jpg

While we round up data and examples of the power generating cells...

Lets cut to the chase...We are probably going to have to have a pressurized container for them and heated. A battery back up to maintain temp and pressure would seem logical when not in use and as soon as it fires up and generates heat, we tap some of the heat to heat the unit as well as use the rest of the heat for module, cabin heat. Any non used heat, depending on application, will have to be "radiated" away. The heat can also supply energy for thermal fans.

 

We will need to make these as "replaceable units, that we can do with suits on, replace module...then take damaged unit to "inside" shop to repair.

 

Would also make sense to make all units in two sizes, with as many interchangeable parts as possible. This would allow one size for small loads and larger ones for modules and transportation....If we need larger outputs...use multiples of these units.......we need standardization and it would be nice if some parts were able to be produced from printing...carry lots of spares of difficult parts for now, till we get "established" and printer tech progresses..... :D

Backup power from Tesla Energy, a new Musk company making energy storage batteries for homes (Powerwall: 7-10 kWh per unit, array-able) and utilities & business (100 kWh per unit, arrays to 10+ MW). In the first week (a few weeks ago) Tesla Energy scored $800 million in orders.

The Reno, NV Tesla Gigafactory One battery favtory is under construction and there are plans for more. GF1 is good for 500,000 battery units a year.

It would seem to me that we might as well get real good at environmental containment for equipment and standardize the subsystems as well. We will need it for the power cells, for the Tesla batteries, for "hydraulic power packs", electronic equipment bays/modules, compressed gas storage area's, water storage in liquid or frozen....etc...

 

This would be similar to this scenario.......we need power at place B, this cell and battery combo will work...therefore choose environment container A for cell, choose environment container C for batteries, choose atmosphere pack A for this container, choose heating/cooling pack B for this container....you see where I am going...standard packs to be used by themselves or in combo's ......plug them in and go.......built in test equipment for "on unit" and "remote" monitoring and control with redundancy.

 

This way if demand changes for ie: new equipment added to an existing module, new module constructed, new temp shelter, new storage requirements...etc.....We can handle it by "plug and play"....no major design work.....Cheers...

Elon Musk,

And then one of the key questions is can you get to the surface of Mars and back to Earth on a single stage. The answer is yes, if you reduce the return payload to approximately one-quarter of the outbound payload, which I thought made sense because you are going to want to transport a lot more to Mars than you

  • Like 1

Regarding return payload to Earth my question would be: What would you want to return to Earth anyway?

 

(Besides personnel and their personal belongings obviously)

 

What would you mine on Mars that would need transportation back to Earth? The way I see it basic minerals would be only be used for construction on site (in situ).

Science samples at the least. Failed equipment for detailed analysis & replacement - some heavy, rotating operational crew, folks who are short timers or didn't like Mars, consumables for the trip, retrieved rovers/landers for the Smithsonian etc. 100 tonnes to Mars implies a huge cargo bay.

Imagine it this way: a 15 meter BFR indicates the spacecraft will be at least that wide, perhaps 1.5x as wide (22+ meters) if its a hammerhead design like F9's fairing. Especially if the spacecraft and second stage are one and the same.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Hello, Hope all is well. I am in UK.  
    • I'm not happy with myself for it, but I've gone and got hold of it. Just another 45 minutes and I'll be Bond, James Bond. In my defence, IO's Hitman series is awesome, and I'm a sucker for 007. So while it might seem a bit simplified compared to Hitman, I'm sure I'll be right at home.
    • Or just check the script yourself ^^. I hate having a Microsoft account tied to my windows install.
    • 007 First Light review: Satisfying spy adventure that James Bond needed by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe I have fond memories of classic James Bond games from the Electronic Arts era. Using high-tech gadgets, sneaking into parties, and dispatching bad guys were wildly exciting activities for my younger self. In recent years, Bond games have entirely disappeared, alongside the super spy genre. Fast forward to 2020, imagine my surprise when IO Interactive announced it had secured the Bond IP to make a game. Considering the studio’s Hitman history, this project is one I keenly kept an eye on. Six years later, 007 First Light is finally here, and after spending time inside this globe-trotting adventure, I can safely say that my excitement for this developer’s take on this universe was not unfounded. IO has taken lessons it has learned from Hitman and combined them with what I would expect from a directed cinematic experience like James Bond. I have refrained from mentioning major plot points to save you from story spoilers in this review. This is an original story that doesn’t tie into any movies, so there isn’t an expectation of knowing the backstory or the decades of movies either. Bond, James Bond When 007 First Light begins, Bond is just Bond. There isn’t a spy angle, fancy gadgets, or even a secret mission. The introductory mission is framed to show how James Bond handled himself and how he does not care about the odds when it comes to saving lives. It’s a gorgeous level as well, showing off an island scattered with cliffs in the middle of a storm. Looking back, this is probably the best-looking level in the game, with IO showing off all its abilities with its custom engine, Glacier. But my favorite ended up being the follow-up to this level. Once the United Kingdom's foreign intelligence agency, MI6, recruits our daring youngster into its super-spy “00” program, training begins. However, instead of treading through the same tutorial missions where the game teaches you to run and jump and drive, IO opted for a montage, and it’s amazing. The scenes cut between Bond practicing and improving his marksmanship, parkour, hand-to-hand combat, and driving as weeks go by in his training. What impressed me here was the lack of any loading screens or stutters as scenes instantly switched to different locations entirely, as if I was watching a movie. This creativity is a trend I noticed in most levels, where there is some sort of gameplay or choreography mechanic being introduced to keep things interesting. Soon, the rest of the cast is introduced, bringing other agents that our favorite secret agent will be working with, the scientists and engineers that build MI6’s spy gadgets, as well as higher-ranking officers that either appreciate or (at best) tolerate Bond’s rebellious attitude. It’s a tight cast, all with incredibly good voice acting and personalities that quickly grew on me. The casting for Bond himself is also an excellent one. From showing his iconic soft spot for women to the condescending smiles that get a rise out of enemies, I had no issues getting immersed into this universe as this new face of James Bond. The missions take place in a wide range of locations as MI6 sends Bond to tackle dangers that are growing everywhere from the UK to Africa. These aren’t unrelated adventures where MI6 is sending secret agents, which is an angle I would love to see in another game, but a part of a bigger conspiracy affecting the entire world. Some of the twists and turns were all too predictable, and the character that Lenny Kravitz played made me cringe a little too much. But all in all, I enjoyed the campaign’s storyline that sets the stage for this new agent joining the illustrious “00” program. Plenty of Possibilities The third-person style of IO Interactive fits this role quite well. Bond is presented as a master at hand-to-hand combat as well as firearms, while also having a knack for being stealthy when required. Most sections of missions have a lot of freedom. This means I could beat up every goon and security guard on the way to an objective, slip past them without sounding a single alarm, or do a mix of both. My sessions usually end up with the third option because I tend to be impatient about waiting for a patrol to move. Drawing from its Hitman genes, the developer almost always gives multiple routes for going through missions. Levels can be massive, sometimes sporting hundreds of NPCs going their own ways and having conversations. If my objective is to break into a security room on the third floor, I could look around for roof access, eavesdrop on conversations to find out where someone lost a key, create a distraction and pickpocket a guard for a keycard, sneak in through the vents, or simply kick down the offending door. I enjoyed the variety on offer, especially because the same solutions didn’t usually show up in different missions. Before heading out into a secret MI6 escapade, the gadget specialist of the branch walks Bond through the organization's latest and greatest achievements. This can be cool little devices like a laser built into the watch, a phone that fires poison darts, or a camera that emits a powerful shockwave. The choice of what can be taken into the mission is up to the player. I could usually find fresh routes or get out of tough situations with a punch or two, so I never had the feeling of missing out by not choosing the right equipment. It’s still a fun practice. Choosing the armaments before a mission enhanced the super spy feeling quite a bit. As I mentioned, stealth comes in as a very viable option for most of the missions, letting Bond sneak past foes or knock them out silently. While it is satisfying to clear entire areas of goons and walk away without any alarms, the way of accomplishing this could have been done better. Bond can lure enemies, sneak up and knock them out, or use a gadget to disorient them before dealing a nasty blow. Bodies cannot be moved or hidden afterward either. It’s a very simple system, which I wish were more exciting to pull off. Perhaps more stealth-orientated gadgets, distraction options, or multi-takedowns could have helped here, I think. Getting caught while attempting to be in stealth does not mean a game over. Other than getting into a fist fight, an interesting twist of 007 First Light is the bluffing option. While an enemy is confused as to what you are doing in a restricted location, Bond has the option to improvise and persuade them that you are exactly where you’re supposed to be. These are fun little dynamic interactions with unique dialog depending on the mission and location, giving a few extra moments for Bond to go past suspicious guards smoothly. It’s the first time I’ve witnessed this system in a game, and I hope to see more. License to Kill Bond isn’t just dealing with security guards or civilians. From time to time, entire gangs of gun-toting mercenaries show up in levels looking to take down our protagonist. It is then that License to Kill mode is activated for Bond, letting him use firearms with no restrictions. I was surprised by just how tight gunplay is in 007 First Light. The weapons feel powerful and satisfying to fire, with single bullets capable of taking down an enemy with a headshot. Ammo is scarce, and enemies don’t drop weapons with full magazines most of the time. This forces a hectic kind of gameplay where I am always advancing towards enemies to take their weapons after they are downed. Things like shooting legs to immobilize, aiming at the hands to make their weapon go flying, blowing up nearby fire extinguishers for cover, and using gadgets to halt a goon in their tracks while I reload, make up enjoyable levels. I had to hold back my disappointment when the enemy count in these action sequences dropped to zero and I had to go non-lethal again. Speaking of action sequences, First Light isn’t just offering sandbox levels to complete at the player’s own leisure either. Each level comes with specific linear and directed scenes to move the story forward and put Bond in tight situations. These usually end up with high-octane chases or driving sections, offering the chance to witness chaining explosions, hails of gunfire, and scripted parkour scenes that remind me of Mission Impossible movies more than Bond. Elements like seeing James Bond jump out of a plane without a parachute or drive through buildings in London inside a trash truck were fantastic and always left me at a high point when finishing a mission. The classic James Bond theme is sprinkled in here too, which only happens a handful of times in the game, but at just the right moments. Visuals and Performance Compared to Unreal Engine 5 games we are seeing nowadays, 007 First Light isn’t flexing a huge amount of realism when it comes to graphics. The models, textures, and effects all feel a little dated, with the starting mission that I mentioned being the most visually striking. However, the complete lack of stutters, the hundreds of NPCs that can be on screen without a single hitch, massive sandbox levels, and smooth transitions between them all play a part in making this an immensely immersive and complex experience. The in-engine cutscenes are gorgeous as well, offering an upgraded visual style and model detail over the gameplay sections. Animations are one aspect that jumps out at me about any new game, and First Light has nailed what a third-person action game should feel like. Walking, sneaking, and running all have a heaviness to them that I appreciate. Whenever Bond moves past a wall or a ledge, his arms reach out to lightly hold those structures until he moves away. NPCs actually react to my character and move out of the way. Even during melee combat or takedown animations, the fists impacting a body or a head hitting a wall all have that same weight. Even the more frivolous animations, like catching a gun in midair or chucking an empty one at a goon (yes, you can do that), are satisfying to pull off. Of course, the in-engine cutscene animations are remarkably well done too, with facial animations and the upgraded model details improving my engagement with the characters. I have an AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT 16GB paired with an eight-core Ryzen 7 3700X and 32GB of RAM, with the game running at 1440p resolution. Deciding to completely max out all the graphics options gave me a range of frame rates between 60 and 100 depending on the scene and level. While I did try to enable AMD FSR, which bumped up the frame rates by a good 20% at Quality mode, IO Interactive’s implementation of the technology wasn’t that great. Every corner and edge in levels began shimmering, and I was also seeing smearing issues in fast-moving sections. The title seemingly uses the older generation FSR 3.1 and not the machine learning-assisted FSR 4, leading to these artifacts. Unfortunately, there isn't a way to manually upgrade this right now either. I opted to turn off the upscaling and play the game in native 1440p to avoid problems. I would say the FPS range I was getting was an acceptable one for a single-player action game for my setup. I do wish there were an FOV slider option in the settings. While the camera is far enough back for my tastes in most situations in this third-person adventure, at times the perspective is far too close. When trying to look around quickly and spot targets, I realized I was getting a slight headache at times due to the use of an almost over-the-shoulder close-up camera. Conclusion Being James Bond in 007 First Light is a treat. Traveling around the world chasing conspiracies, using high-tech gadgets disguised as everyday accessories, and improvising on the spot to fool foes all give a fantastic feeling of being a super spy. For an origin story, IO Interactive has done a great job at introducing the character and his motives for doing what he does. The satisfying combat animation and fantastic voice acting are definitely high points, with the License to Kill moments being my favorite. Not being able to move bodies and the simplistic stealth of mechanics does hurt its presentation a little. The NPC logic and intelligence is easy to manipulate and trick, repeating the same actions over and over again if I keep making distractions. The lack of an FOV slider was also a pain (quite literally) at times, and the FSR implementation is quite poor. These are things I hope the studio will improve upon with updates. Even with its faults, IO Interactive and James Bond are a match made in heaven. The studio knows how to make a main character that oozes charm and competency while also leaning heavily into its Hitman experience to make gigantic levels with what looks like hundreds of NPCs roaming around. Being an origin story, IO’s Bond has a way to go before he becomes the highly effective agent we see in the movie world. I am hoping the studio will continue this series alongside its Hitman ventures going forward, just so we get to experience the journey for longer. 007 First Light is available on PC (Steam, Epic Games Store, and Xbox PC), Xbox Series X|S, and PlayStation 5 for $69.99. This review was conducted on the PC version of the game provided by IO Interactive.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rising Star
      olavinto went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      271
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      75
    4. 4
      Skyfrog
      74
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!