Neowin Think Tank: Mars Colony One (and Two ... and Three ... and ... )


Recommended Posts

Do we need to limit ourselves to a 100 tonne BFR launcher?  Can we not build a larger cargo vessel in orbit, that never lands? It's just a robot cargo ferry that travels between Mars & Earth on a slower trajectory. Load it on up, send it off on autopilot, then send the actual colonists later on a smaller, faster ship. When they get there, everything they'll need is already in orbit, they just need to send it down to the colony using Dragon 2 style landers.

  • Like 2

^ In fact, to add to that... They could bolt a bunch of bigelow modules together, stick a small booster (for initial acceleration and braking) and a couple of ion engines for main drive on it, and Bob's your auntie... Space only space ships don't have to be streamlined, or super-elegant looking, after all... You just need a bunch of containers to put stuff in to...

  • Like 1

We could build on this idea. Load up the cargo in batches (don't want to put all eggs in the same basket) and place them in orbit. These batches then join together to form a basic mothership and then send personnel and conduct any other analysis while in orbit(if needed) before finally sending a team to the ground. Then send in more batches to complete the ship. I believe there is no real need to send stuff directly back to earth (atleast initially, all the resources obtained would be used to satisfy the needs there). Send everything to the mothership,... repairs, maintenance and analysis, rather than sending it to Earth (only thing is that we need a large mothership) . Once a shop is setup on the ground, there's no need for that too. The mothership will later serve as an exchange center for people and new equipment. 

 

 

Another thought, what about the psychological stress the crew has to face? Travelling in space for months could take a huge toll on their mental and physical health. Also they need to get down to work immediately. Any ideas? I have heard about the Mars 500, but I believe its just staying in solitary confinement. What about their state of mind when they get to work, critical thinking and decision making skills? In all these experiments, the test crew were very well aware that they are on Earth. Even though many want to take the ride to Mars, how many are actually ready to face it?

It's not really too different situation to the early days of exploring Earth if you think about it.  At sea for months at a time, no idea how long until you discover something, and so on.  We just need to make sure the crew have plenty of leisure facilities to relax with, and have the ability to send/receive video messages with friends & family.

Keep up the good work guys....excellent suggestions........coffee is on me....... :D

 

I am a firm believer in having the mothership in orbit for an indefinite time...it does not leave. Like Doc said, we could have large freighters running both directions on a regular basis. We are starting a setup outpost, starting a small mining unit to see the equipment and processes work in a real situation. This will take time. Meanwhile in the mothership, crew could be dong surveys for more raw materials, carrying out science missions and monitoring Martian weather and  solar activity. As the plan progress's, a lot of equipment will be sent, and ships are expensive. Some trips will have equipment, samples, rovers/landers like Doc said, and personnel back to earth. If the ship is mostly empty, doesn't really matter....cheaper than building ships all the time.

 

The mother ship will become large over time by adding modules and/or ships to it on a regular basis. It will have many usefull modules as time goes by....ie: hospital module, life sciences, climatology, repair depots,computer engineering, environmental engineering, gym, chemical lab, orbital debris mitigation, lander maintenance and the list goes on.......Cheers

 

The mothership is going to need an upgrade in the future...gravity ring...asap, for crew well being during long stays.

  • Like 1

It could as as a sudo warehouse/staging point processing incoming and outgoing personnel and stock as required with a stabilization/transition area between long haul flight and ground postings.It might at some point also have extra lifeboats for those on the planet if theirs ship fails for whatever reason or if extreme radiation events are expected.

  • Like 1

It could as as a sudo warehouse/staging point processing incoming and outgoing personnel and stock as required with a stabilization/transition area between long haul flight and ground postings.It might at some point also have extra lifeboats for those on the planet if theirs ship fails for whatever reason or if extreme radiation events are expected.

Exactly.....Cheers

Can a single mothership handle it all? It sounds more like a city in the skies. We could have multiple motherships, one for personnel and another for equipments etc.., but that would make transportation between these a headache. How big will it be compared to the ISS? Discussing about just the mothership alone would require a separate thread :p

I don't think it really needs to be any bigger than 3 or 4 Bigelow modules. It's just somewhere for the cargo & passenger ships to dock, and hold a couple of lifeboat capsules for emergencies, plus a shield generator of course...

 

And there's an important thing.  These ships are going to need a shield generator against the solar winds.. Have NASA got theirs working yet?  It's gonna be kinda important!

Can a single mothership handle it all? It sounds more like a city in the skies. We could have multiple motherships, one for personnel and another for equipments etc.., but that would make transportation between these a headache. How big will it be compared to the ISS? Discussing about just the mothership alone would require a separate thread :p

Just my opinion......The mothership would be a reasonable size to start, then expand with additions as we go....it has a very vital role to play in our survival on Mars....will it get big..very much so...is it going to be bigger than the ISS, it will probably the same size as module assembly, if not bigger on first launch...We have a mess of cargo to move and that will demand a large ship...being in orbit...as long as orbital velocity is maintained....we stay there for any length of time    hope that helps...Cheers

 

Note...it is going to take years to get a functioning site to where we want it...the mothership is everything.....

I don't think it really needs to be any bigger than 3 or 4 Bigelow modules. It's just somewhere for the cargo & passenger ships to dock, and hold a couple of lifeboat capsules for emergencies, plus a shield generator of course...

 

And there's an important thing.  These ships are going to need a shield generator against the solar winds.. Have NASA got theirs working yet?  It's gonna be kinda important!

If shield generators are not available...still not a big deal...the mothership can have a shielded central core "safe area"......we will also have to incorporate this on the surface in some manner........we can track the dangerous event times and deal with them.....Cheers

 

Just a note....This is going to be a difficult place to deal with initially....crew rotation up and down will be required...tough on machines and the body initially.....we need a lot of resources in a "friendly" spot to achieve this....

Good afternoon, Colonists. :)

 

Great discussions going on. Keep up the great work!

 

Can a single mothership handle it all? It sounds more like a city in the skies. We could have multiple motherships, one for personnel and another for equipments etc.., but that would make transportation between these a headache. How big will it be compared to the ISS? Discussing about just the mothership alone would require a separate thread :p

I don't think it really needs to be any bigger than 3 or 4 Bigelow modules. It's just somewhere for the cargo & passenger ships to dock, and hold a couple of lifeboat capsules for emergencies, plus a shield generator of course...

 

And there's an important thing.  These ships are going to need a shield generator against the solar winds.. Have NASA got theirs working yet?  It's gonna be kinda important!

Depends on what launchers are used to get the gear off Earth, and where everything is assembled once it's in space. All of that has yet to be determined.

 

Remember (as DD has just said) that building the CoS, the Mining Sites and the Mothership will take several years and several missions. It's a committed process. The Mothership will obviously take priority as that one will be arriving at Mars first. It'll be many times larger than the ISS and likely get larger as the need requires.

 

As for Solar Wind shielding. There could be Shelter Locations inside the Water Storage areas with Physical Shielding that will more than protect crews during times of need. We can generate artificial Magnetic Fields around our areas (and they don't need to be particularly powerful, either) to mitigate Solar Wind exposure to Crews, since that's the majority of the Radiation they would experience in space and on Mars. We would need to test this during the "Proving & Testing Process" on Near-Earth and Lunar Missions for viability, though.

Much as any military campaign its also about getting the right stuff to the right place when its required so having cargo and crew disembark before going onwards will help no end in the logistics,Especially in the packaging and unpacking of equipment and storage of spares locally within a few hours of where it could end up being an urgent requirement.

 

Given the bigallow technology we could in theory make the structure much larger than the present restriction caused by rocket size too.Think of it as a vast warehouse where storage is on all four walls.

  • Like 1

These units may very well be used. I imagine the mothership will dwarf present versions of the modules...but they are scalable...... :D

  • Like 1

Mar's atmosphere really presents some problems...as NASA is finding out with the LDSD parachute trials.....Mars is a little smaller than earth but gravity still applies. Next, the atmospheric density is 1/100th of the Earth;s...therefore heat shield still required for entry of a fast moving vehicle. Once through and into the atmosphere, the density is not enough to slow us down unless we have a light load and big chute due to free fall speed (low resistance)...hence NASA's problem. Then, depending on where you land, hope it is not in a really sandy area or the sand will be churned every where.

 

That is why SpaceX is for propulsive and controlled landings....once established on Mars...landing pads can be constructed with local materials ....first one to design a good space concrete gets a dozen donut's.

After pouring over the Science and Engineering data and opinions that we've collected and analyzed, it is the conclusion of the first Neowin ThinkTank concerning a theoretical Martian Colony to conclude the following:

 

- A cooperative, dedicated, sustained and committed long-term Mars Mission which would include an orbiting Outpost (called "Mothership"), a Colony Site (referred to as a "Colony Operations Site", or "CoS") and several Mining Outposts and Processing Facilities is achievable in the near future (~8-15 Earth years) if an equally dedicated and committed push to develop and/or perfect the needed technologies and procedures were to begin as soon as possible.

 

- It is more likely, however, that the necessary funding, research and development required for such a massive undertaking would not be made available in the volume needed in the aforementioned timeframe; thus, the likely timeframe expands to 21-40 Earth years until such technology is developed, perfected, and built. Likewise, the scale of such a project would require a commitment that few Corporations (if any) would likely sign on to.

 

Thank you for your participation, everyone. :)

We began this think tank with a budget of 200 Billion US dollars.....is this a lot of money, and would it have been sufficient. Yes, this is a lot of money, and No, it would not have been sufficient for a full fledged community, but it would have put us there with production to sustain a small crew following the SpaceX pattern of achievements.

 

Let's put 200 billion dollars into perspective.

 

NASA was created in 1958....and since that time, this organization has been accused of bloating the cost's due to the constructs that they are forced to operate under. True...BUT...some of the greatest discoveries and achievements of mankind have had their stamp on it....everything we take for granted was some way influenced by their research and exploration.

 

NASA budget total since 1958 to today...slightly under 1 trillion dollars for 57 years of work...yes..includes the moon landing......amazingly reasonable cost.

 

US Bank Bail outs...due to "criminal activity and corruption", incompetence, and willful negligence by many......This cost gas been analysed by many think tanks and university reports, as well as financial institutions....THE COST

 

                                                                                7 TRILLION to 29 TRILLION

 

                                                THE GDP of Planet Earth 5 years ago was estimated at 83 TRILLION

 

                           So I don't want to hear that it is too expensive from any politician.....find another excuse....greed.

 

http://www.cnbc.com/id/45674390

http://www.usfederalbailout.com/

http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2011/12/bailout-total-29-616-trillion-dollars/

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/12/05/nasas-cost-versus-the-bailout/

 

Just a reminder.........

 

Agreed. The ones who make the "big decisions" in the U.S. Government (generally Lawyers and Career Soldiers whom have learned to be Politicians) generally are not those who are interested in what is better for Humanity -- they are interested in the next Election and their own interests.

 

It's a shame that things as petty and foolish as greed and the need to control others will be our undoing.

  • Like 1

Elon Musk on the Mars Colonial Transport fleet CONOPS,

I mean, if you do a densified liquid methalox rocket with on-orbit refueling, so like you load the spacecraft into orbit and then you send a whole bunch of refueling missions to fill up the tanks and you have the Mars colonial fleet - essentially - that gets built up during the time between Earth-Mars synchronizations, which occur every 26 months, then the fleet all departs at the optimal transfer point.

So the plan seems to be to send a fleet of MCT's at once, which could provide redundancy if one fails. Assuming it's not in an uncontrolled state a "good" one does a rendezvous and takes off part of the cargo and/or crew. Rinse, wash, repeat. Presumably reserve space would be left empty on each MCT for such a contingency.

Seeing a fleet of MCT's lighting up in orbit for Mars departure could be quite a backyard show. Pop the corn and chill the beer.

  • Like 1

Elon Musk on the Mars Colonial Transport fleet CONOPS,

So the plan seems to be to send a fleet of MCT's at once, which could provide redundancy if one fails. Assuming it's not in an uncontrolled state a "good" one does a rendezvous and takes off part of the cargo and/or crew. Rinse, wash, repeat. Presumably reserve space would be left empty on each MCT for such a contingency.

Seeing a fleet of MCT's lighting up in orbit for Mars departure could be quite a backyard show. Pop the corn and chill the beer.

I'll bring the lawn chairs....... :woot:

  • Like 1
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Save 74% on this Complete 2026 CompTIA Certification Training Bundle by Steven Parker Today on offer via our Online Courses section of the Neowin Deals store, you can save 74% on the Complete 2026 CompTIA Certification Training Bundle. This comprehensive 2026 CompTIA training bundle is created for aspiring IT professionals who want a faster, clearer way to earn multiple industry-recognized certifications while building practical, job-ready skills. Designed around real-world expectations, the curriculum guides you from foundational IT concepts to hands-on technical mastery across A+, Network+, Security+, Cloud+, Server+, and Pentest+ domains. You'll develop the confidence to troubleshoot systems, secure networks, manage cloud and on-prem environments, and tackle complex technical challenges with a methodical approach that employers value. By focusing on practical application and exam-aligned content, this bundle helps you stand out in the job market, prove your capabilities, and prepare for roles such as IT technician, network specialist, cybersecurity analyst, and system administrator with clarity and confidence. Certificate of Completion only. You will not receive official CompTIA certificates upon completion of each course. It's only designed to help you prepare for the covered certification exams. You need to take and pass the exams to get certified. Courses included in this bundle A Plus Certification - CompTIA A+ 220-1202 Training Master hardware, software, networking, and security essentials Covers the full Core 1 & Core 2 scope with inclusive materials that reflect real-world IT work CompTIA Cloud+ (CV0-004) Comprehensive pathway to mastering essential cloud concepts & acing the certification exam Practical skills in cloud architecture, security, and DevOps CompTIA Network+ (N10-009) Training Course Design, configure, manage & secure modern networks Covers OSI & DoD models, IP addressing, subnetting, routing technologies, VLANs, wireless networking, structured cabling, and robust disaster recovery planning CompTIA Server+ (SK0-005) Master server management, administration, and security Practical skills for server hardware installation, disaster recovery & enhancing data security CompTIA Pentest+ Course (PT0-003) Gain demonstrable capabilities in penetration testing, security testing & risk assessment Hands-on pentest labs online and real-world deliverables CompTIA Security+ Certification Course (SY0-071) Essential skills in security concepts, threats & risk management Compliance considerations & authentication mechanisms, with a practical lens to implement them in real-world networks CompTIA Cybersecurity Analyst CySA+ (CS0-004) Hands-on experience in threat modeling, vulnerability assessment & incident response Effective security measures that protect networks & data Tangible outcomes you'll achieve Validated hands-on skills across operating systems, networks, cloud, and security Confidence to pass multiple certification exams on or before your target dates A versatile toolkit for diagnosing, securing, and optimizing IT environments Ability to communicate technical concepts clearly to both technical and non-technical stakeholders Who is this course for Aspiring IT technicians and support professionals who want a clear, practical pathway to multiple industry‑recognized CompTIA certifications IT learners looking to build real‑world skills in hardware, networking, cloud, security, servers, and penetration testing Those aiming to qualify for roles like help desk technician, junior network engineer, system administrator, security analyst, or cloud administrator by earning key certificates efficiently About Vision Training Systems Since 2012 and more than 100,000 students, Vision Training Systems has been delivering expertly crafted online IT training courses to help you earn industry-recognized certifications like CompTIA A+, Network+, Security+, Cisco CCNA, Project Management, CEH V13, Microsoft Azure, AWS, and more. Plus dive into the world of AI, IT Leadership, and core soft skills needed to excel in an IT Career. Whether you’re launching your IT career or looking to grow into a senior role, our flexible, on-demand platform empowers you with the skills and certifications employers demand. Good to know Length of access: lifetime Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Access options: desktop or mobile Maximum number of device(s): 1 Available to BOTH new and existing users Certificate of Completion ONLY Experience level required: all levels Closed captioning NOT available NOT downloadable for offline viewing Here's the deal The Complete 2026 CompTIA Certification Training Bundle normally costs $199, but you can pick it up for just $40, that's a saving of $159. For terms, specs and license info, click the link below. Deal Price $40.00 with code SAVE20 (was $199) Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. Why we post these deals We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. So for those that keep moaning and complaining, be thankful we're still online for you to even do that. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      244
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      66
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!