Windows Technical Preview  

1031 members have voted

  1. 1. On a scale of 1-5, 1 being worst, 5 being best. What do you think of Windows 10 from the leaks so far?

    • 5.Great, best OS ever
      156
    • 4. Pretty Good, needs a lot of minor tweaks
      409
    • 3. OK, Needs a few major improvements, some minor ones
      168
    • 2. Fine, Needs a lot of major improvements
      79
    • 1.Poor, Needs too many improvements, all hope is lost, never going to use it
      41
  2. 2. Based on the recent leaks by Neowin and Winfuture.de, my next OS upgrade will be?

    • Windows 10
      720
    • Windows 8
      20
    • Windows 7
      48
    • Sticking with XP
      3
    • OSX Yosemite
      35
    • Linux
      24
    • Sticking with OSX Mavericks
      3
  3. 3. Should Microsoft give away Windows 10 for free?

    • Yes for Windows 8.1 Users
      305
    • Yes for Windows 7 and above users
      227
    • Yes for Vista and above users
      31
    • Yes for XP and above users
      27
    • Yes for all Windows users
      192
    • No
      71


Recommended Posts

Windows Technical Preview.

 

This is a discussion thread for that topic, I am voicing a legitimate concern, if you don't like it then I suggest you use the ignore feature, name calling, trolling, flame baiting, this seems to be the typical response and I am not guilty of any of it, I'm here to discuss windows 10 and its eventual failure/success.

 

Which metro apps are just as powerful and have matched, feature for feature, functionality for functionality, with modern desktop software?

You can't be so naive that expect metro app to be as powerful as the legacy app in such short amount of time which has improved for a very long time. Metro app might not have all the functionality compared to the desktop app but it provide a new way of interacting with it such as animation and more lively content. Missing feature will be slowly implement down the road.  :angry:

Not entirely true. You still can access to the old control panel and pin it to the task bar which isn't possible in previous version of windows. 

For now. It's being decommissioned though. Still people need to recognize that Windows is Metro. It's being rebuilt using the new properties of the MDL. Don't like that? Oh well. Switch to Android?

digging through the api (winrt), i noticed support for some new stuff

custom hardware devices

media casting devices

lights/lamps

serial ports

midi devices

battery reports/stats

audio devices input/output

call control(custom dialers?)

adaptive streaming

  • Like 2

There should be a Windows UI thread to put all this crap there. This thread has become a pile of stinking mess lately and is rather useless for those looking for new info.

I agree, this thread is way too long as it is, I'm thinking it's time to close it and start a new thread once we get a new build out be it a leaked one or the one released by MS on the 21st. Till then everyone try to stay on topic and quit trying to start arguments by calling others out by name.

digging through the api (winrt), i noticed support for some new stuff

custom hardware devices

media casting devices

lights/lamps

serial ports

midi devices

battery reports/stats

audio devices input/output

call control(custom dialers?)

adaptive streaming

It'll be very interesting to see just how much they can add to winrt by the time this hits RTM. One of the issues with apps is that the lack of API support for specific things holds the apps back. They need to be working double time to get winrt to feature parity with win32.

I agree, this thread is way too long as it is, I'm thinking it's time to close it and start a new thread once we get a new build out be it a leaked one or the one released by MS on the 21st. Till then everyone try to stay on topic and quit trying to start arguments by calling others out by name.

I have created a thread for the argument.

 

Members: you can post here:

https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1241422-the-great-modern-ui-debate-thread/?p=596699022

digging through the api (winrt), i noticed support for some new stuff

custom hardware devices

media casting devices

lights/lamps

serial ports

midi devices

battery reports/stats

audio devices input/output

call control(custom dialers?)

adaptive streaming

 

Not surprising - WInRT is being geared up as a replacement for win32 so eventually you'll see win32/win64 become an removable feature like how you can uninstall win32 on Windows Server. I wouldn't be surprised if at some point in the future we'll see Win32 completely removed from Windows RT in favour of a pure WinRT environment. 

Not surprising - WInRT is being geared up as a replacement for win32 so eventually you'll see win32/win64 become an removable feature like how you can uninstall win32 on Windows Server. I wouldn't be surprised if at some point in the future we'll see Win32 completely removed from Windows RT in favour of a pure WinRT environment. 

I would actualy expect that to happen with Windows 10 already. There is no need for the Win32 APIs on Windows RT anymore now Office is ported to WinRT and all other Desktop tools are as well (like calculator, etc).

Not surprising - WInRT is being geared up as a replacement for win32 so eventually you'll see win32/win64 become an removable feature like how you can uninstall win32 on Windows Server. I wouldn't be surprised if at some point in the future we'll see Win32 completely removed from Windows RT in favour of a pure WinRT environment.

doesn't WinRT sit on top of Win32 though?

WinRT 1.0 maybe, because apps suddenly quit when I kill explorer.exe, and also microsoft loves leave everything half-baked, no wonder why right after Windows 8 release, Sinofsky geared Windows 10 development process (suspended because development of 8.1). Paul Thurrott already said no, but I read another article contracy about that. Heck, it is even possible to call Win32 APIs from WinRT

Perhaps Order_66 posts' similar to DOS 4.0 disaster, when MSFT introduce new shell?

MS makes it possible to call win32 from inside metro to help with porting legacy apps. They know you can't just port year old apps to want right away so for now it's a halfway measure, they're also not stopping with WPF. I think going forward you'll see the ability to call/use winrt through WPF apps on the desktop, something developers are asking for.

I would actualy expect that to happen with Windows 10 already. There is no need for the Win32 APIs on Windows RT anymore now Office is ported to WinRT and all other Desktop tools are as well (like calculator, etc).

 

Not gonna happen. WinRT is built on top of Win32.

WinRT 1.0 maybe, because apps suddenly quit when I kill explorer.exe, and also microsoft loves leave everything half-baked, no wonder why right after Windows 8 release, Sinofsky geared Windows 10 development process (suspended because development of 8.1). Paul Thurrott already said no, but I read another article contracy about that. Heck, it is even possible to call Win32 APIs from WinRT

Perhaps Order_66 posts' similar to DOS 4.0 disaster, when MSFT introduce new shell?

Actually, no - Microsoft does NOT like to have a half-baked API.  However, developers (and users) want to keep that legacy base around, because they are used to it being there.  How much cruft was in the original Start menu, because it had not had a cleanout in eighteen years?  The Start menu had become like a wallet after a few years - chockablock full of crud and cruft; one thing that two-OS gap between the Start menu's canning and the replacement (with mini-Start) did was enable a complete clean-out of the cruft and crud.

 

That's the REAL issue with not just new features, but improvement and advancement of existing features - it may not be doable without a complete reset.  (Linux has had to deal with the same thing in terms of desktop environments - GNOME and KDE come to mind.)  But will your userbase let you?

digging through the api (winrt), i noticed support for some new stuff

custom hardware devices

media casting devices

lights/lamps

serial ports

midi devices

battery reports/stats

audio devices input/output

call control(custom dialers?)

adaptive streaming

And support for most of it (if not all of it) is coming (or there already) in the Technical Preview (some of it has been present since prior to 9870 - 9901 exposed addition of a few more such features); other features are improvements due to additions to Device Manager itself going back to Windows 8 (the audio I/O is the biggest example).  Device Manager - starting with Windows 8 (and even Server 2012) is MUCH finer-grained at picking up new devices than previous versions of Windows - desktop or server.  The problem that Windows has is that - until the Technical Preview - adjustability didn't match up with the detection.  9901 is a major step toward fixing that - and the next major build will be another step in the same direction.

digging through the api (winrt), i noticed support for some new stuff

custom hardware devices

media casting devices

lights/lamps

serial ports

midi devices

battery reports/stats

audio devices input/output

call control(custom dialers?)

adaptive streaming

Windows IoT edition?

Windows IoT edition?

Nope - most of those features are becoming commonplace in all hardware (the MIDI/audio features already are); it's about greater control and adjustability of those features on a user-specific basis.

 

It's basically about making the User Experience more personal - and not only is it NOT a bad thing, it has been a cornerstone of Windows in particular nearly from the beginning.

Why are you (in particular) insisting on "do not advance"?

 

Primarily because I'm not stupid enough to think that new = advanced. WMP works just fine as it is, butchering it's functionality and turning it into another watered down piece of metro crap would not be an advancement.

QuoteFor now. It's being decommissioned though. Still people need to recognize that Windows is Metro. It's being rebuilt using the new properties of the MDL. Don't like that? Oh well. Switch to Android?

 

Huh? Is Android a desktop OS? I think not...

I suppose you meant "switch to mac", in that case, well, we have other alternatives, we can stick to older versions of windows like XP, Vista and 7... not everyone needs to have the latest piece of software all the time... Windows 8 (with some tweaks and with 8.1 update 1 installed) works great for me but I really really miss the start menu.

For now. It's being decommissioned though. Still people need to recognize that Windows is Metro. It's being rebuilt using the new properties of the MDL. Don't like that? Oh well. Switch to Android?

i'm confused. what does Android have to do with Windows 10 TP? So you're saying users who don't all agree that windows is metro now, should switch to android? One is a mobile OS and the other is a desktop OS.  :/  Being a bit rude... hey

i'm confused. what does Android have to do with Windows 10 TP? So you're saying users who don't all agree that windows is metro now, should switch to android? One is a mobile OS and the other is a desktop OS.  :/  Being a bit rude... hey

The other is  a mobile OS, a desktop OS, a tablet OS, and a Game Console OS.  Android is a Mobile OS and Tablet OS.

 

:)

i'm confused. what does Android have to do with Windows 10 TP? So you're saying users who don't all agree that windows is metro now, should switch to android? One is a mobile OS and the other is a desktop OS.  :/  Being a bit rude... hey

There are those here who are under the impression Android will replace Windows.

doesn't WinRT sit on top of Win32 though?

 

It really depends on what one defines as win32 given that it appears that gradually what Microsoft has defined as Win32 has either been spun off and categorised as its own or it has been relabelled as a 'low level library' that sits as an low level library for WinRT. When I'm thinking of Win32 I probably should be more accurate - removing dependency on GDI/GDI+, Common Control and Dialogues along with other legacy technologies. I guess in the case of Microsoft they're gradually, piece by piece, replacing legacy code whilst ensuring that a move forward has as minimal disruption as possible. Eventually WinRT once 'complete' will include parts of what used to be part of win32, the re-classification of some win32 parts as low level (which pushes them down the stack and shared between Windows Phone, Windows RT and Windows x86/x64).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • It STILL has horrid theme support. Hard to look at for me. The white is too bright, and the black too dark. I'm using classic outlook for the Dark Grey theme. It's just right for me.
    • inb4 someone leaves the usual "what an unfortunate name" comment
    • Cuktech 10 Ultra charger review: big display, four ports, 110W total power by Taras Buria Cuktech recently announced a couple of Ultra-branded chargers, including a desktop 300W charger, which I reviewed a few weeks ago. For those who do need that much (or who do not want to spend that much on a charger), Cuktech also offers the 10 Ultra, a traditional wall charger with similar features. Four ports, a big display, and up to 110W of power output. After using it for a few weeks, here are my impressions. Disclaimer: Cuktech provided the review unit without any editorial input or pre-approval. Like the 30 Ultra, the 10 Ultra arrived in a box made of nice cardboard with quality print all over it. Inside, besides the charger, you will find a 240W 6A charger, which, this time, is fully braided. While Cuktech always bundles high-power cables with its chargers and power banks, they are usually regular and unassuming. This time, the cable is much nicer, matching the charger's $59.99 price tag. The charger itself measures 67 x 76 x 33 mm or 2.6 x 3.0 x 1.3 inches and weighs about 250 grams. Considering the charger has four ports and a big display, I would say the compact size is quite impressive, albeit a little hefty. The overall design is similar to other chargers from the manufacturer, minus the chrome Cuktech logo next to the four ports. The Cuktech 10 Ultra has retractable prongs for better portability. Its front side is covered with piano black plastic housing two elements: a capacitive button with backlight and a quite large display for various charging stats. Ports are downward-facing, and I have mixed feelings about such a design. It is not the most convenient when you frequently connect and disconnect cables. It makes you bend over to find the right port to connect, and it is a no-go with outlets mounted closer to the floor. On the bright side, design like this eliminates clutter and sagging, especially when using four cables at once. Plus, you get plenty of space for a big display. Ports include two high-speed USB Type-C ports, one Type-C for less demanding devices, and one classic USB Type-A. The first two ports deliver full 100W, while the third is capped at 45W. As for the Type-A port, its maximum output is 18W. In total, the charger delivers 110W of power, but in my testing, I managed to squeeze 117W when charging two power banks and a tablet. Quite impressive. Type-C1 Type-C2 Type-C3 Type-A Single-port 100W 100W 45W 18W Two ports 80W 20W - - Three ports 65W 20W 20W - Four ports 65W 20W 10W 10W The charger can detect handshake protocols and balance power across all four ports according to each device's needs. As such, power is not limited to the values in the table above. You can have two ports charging at 55W, three ports at 45W + 20W, and more. For some reason, Cuktech is not listing the supported protocols, but a quick test showed that it is compatible with PD3.0, PPS, QC5, DCP, and UFCS. When you connect a compatible device, the charger automatically detects its charging standard and displays it on the screen, for example, Apple 6A or Samsung 3A. Speaking of the screen. The main highlight of the 10 Ultra is its 1.57-inch display with a maximum brightness of 700 nits and 160-degree viewing angles. The display takes up most of the front, and it shows various charging-related information, including total output power, current temperature, power distribution across ports with watts, volts, and amps, a screensaver, and more. You can toggle between the different views by tapping the button, and holding it changes the screen orientation (portrait or horizontal, plus flipped) according to your socket position. The screen is very nice. It is sharp, vivid, and the fonts are easy to read. As for settings, you can change the following: Keep the screen on or off Lock the screen orientation (hold the button to change the screen orientation) Keep the USB Type-A port on Toggle power modes The charger has three power modes: AI: standard mode that automatically allocates power to each connected device. Power Priority: prioritizes power for high-demand devices, such as laptops or power banks. Balanced: splits power evenly across connected devices according to their needs I was skeptical at first, but after testing a few devices in different modes, I can see the benefit of these three modes. The most useful is power priority, which gives the first Type-C port more power. When I was charging a 100W power bank (port 1) alongside a 140W power bank (port 2), Power Priority split the total output about 75-30. Balanced mode, as the name suggests, splits the total output between the two ports more or less equally. As for AI mode, the charger uses its brain to detect which device needs more power. In my testing, it figured out that the 140W power needs a bit more juice. As I said, I expected this to be more of a gimmick, but the three built-in modes turned out quite useful. For example, you can prioritize your laptop while giving other ports a little less power, but still enough to charge at acceptable speeds. Unfortunately, unlike the 30 Ultra, this charger cannot display the battery level of the device being charged. This small feature turned out to be very useful when I was testing the 30 Ultra, as it allowed me to see my phone's battery level without picking it up. Like other Cuktech chargers I tested, the 10 Ultra one proved itself reliable and well-made. It uses Gallium nitride semiconductor technology to reduce the charger's size and improve efficiency. It is also better at dissipating heat, but I have to say that when charging two power banks at 117W total, the charger got hotter than what I would call comfortable (hold it for a few seconds, and you start feeling a burning sensation at your fingertips). However, the built-in thermal indicator remained below the temperature threshold, with the screen reassuring that the device operated at "High performance" (I tested it in a 21 °C / 69 °F room). Overall, the Cuktech 10 Ultra is a solid choice. If you need four ports and you like to nerd out on various stats, it is a very easy recommendation. It will take care of your laptop, phone, tablet, and power bank without breaking a sweat, plus the build, material, and cable quality are top-notch. The mode switcher is handy when charging different devices with different power needs, too. I cannot say a display is a must-have in a charger, especially when it makes you more conscious about where to plug it, but it is a neat addition if you have a socket at your table or bed level, so that you can actually use the display and its features. The more important fact is that despite its size and quality, the display does not make the charger that much more expensive than similarly powerful chargers from competitors. Plus, you can save 10% on the 10 Ultra with a promo code on Amazon. Buy Cuktech 10 Ultra charger - $53.99 on Amazon with a promo code As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Last week I was investigating an issue with contacts and tried using the new Outlook. In the real (Classic) Outlook, you can easily go to any Outlook folder and present it in a Table View, then customize the columns to show/sort any field, which was exactly what I needed. But of course, the new Outlook doesn't have this feature at all. I gave up. Oh, and can we possibly stop claiming the new Outlook has PST support? What it really has is the ability to use the real Outlook in the background to pretend to have PST support. There is no PST support without the real Outlook installed.
    • Honestly just before Panos left it started to feel like MS just wasnt interested in them so they were being less innovative with them, and then when he DID leave for Amazon its kind of clear the direction is gone. It felt like Panos had both goals and drive, and a vision, but it felt like no matter what his title/department was the Surface devices never had the full interest of the rest of management and he was just pushing a bolder up a hill that MS was adding dirt to as he went.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      477
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      247
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!