Windows Technical Preview  

1031 members have voted

  1. 1. On a scale of 1-5, 1 being worst, 5 being best. What do you think of Windows 10 from the leaks so far?

    • 5.Great, best OS ever
      156
    • 4. Pretty Good, needs a lot of minor tweaks
      409
    • 3. OK, Needs a few major improvements, some minor ones
      168
    • 2. Fine, Needs a lot of major improvements
      79
    • 1.Poor, Needs too many improvements, all hope is lost, never going to use it
      41
  2. 2. Based on the recent leaks by Neowin and Winfuture.de, my next OS upgrade will be?

    • Windows 10
      720
    • Windows 8
      20
    • Windows 7
      48
    • Sticking with XP
      3
    • OSX Yosemite
      35
    • Linux
      24
    • Sticking with OSX Mavericks
      3
  3. 3. Should Microsoft give away Windows 10 for free?

    • Yes for Windows 8.1 Users
      305
    • Yes for Windows 7 and above users
      227
    • Yes for Vista and above users
      31
    • Yes for XP and above users
      27
    • Yes for all Windows users
      192
    • No
      71


Recommended Posts

Oh dear God... :rolleyes:

He has landed in my plonk file - in fact, he is one of only two Neowinians in it.  (And it takes a LOT to land in my plonk file.)

Windows has not been a single-API operating system ever - it was only a single-API operating environment before Windows 3.0, for that matter.

 

Still, the emotions of a Certain Poster make me wonder how many Windows users SHARE that rather convoluted (and easily disproved) theory that the most-used features are required by a particular API.

 

Have we forgotten the immediate predecessor to Win32 as an API (for the non-NT set), Win32s?

 

Win32s (the s stood for "subset") was designed to enable exactly that - a subset designed for use by specific Win32 (then, it meant Windows NT) applications.

 

Win32s was an optional add-in for Windows 3.x - not a standard feature - in fact, only two versions of Windows ever used it (Windows 3.x and Windows for Workgroups 3.x) - the only MICROSOFT application that ever required it was, oddly enough, the new networking add-in for these two versions of Windows (the Internet Connectivity Pack for Windows 3.x).

 

Yet even then (during the tailchase of the Windows 95 beta), the brouhaha over the Start menu was ongoing (even though the idea that Program Manager was roadblocked by the Start menu was being thoroughly disproven).

 

If you have access to old copies of Windows NT (specifically, NT 3.51 Workstation) and the original Office 95, the theory that Start menu = Win32 is easier than ever to disprove - install that productivity suite in your fresh NT 3.51 (after applying the last Service Pack for NT 3.5).  It will work.

 

Yet NT 3.51 has no Start menu - the default for all flavors of NT 3.x is, in fact, Program Manager/File Manager. How is that possible?

 

Simple enough - while the Start menu requires, at minimum, Win32s, Office 95 requires Win32.  It is a difference mismatch, but a critical one for each application.  Application?  Yes - application.  The Start menu is exactly that - an application, given away for free, but no less an application than Notepad - or Wordpad, or even Write.  (Yes - Wordpad would replace Write, but said replacement happened with NT first - specifically NT Workstation 4.0 and Service Pack 4; Write would, in fact, hang on through Windows 98 Classic or to finally have its chop called with Windows 98 SE.)

 

The Start menu originally required (and was part of) Windows Explorer (explorer,exe) - it is why General Protection Faults with Explorer.exe (in both 9x and NT) were so roundly and scathingly criticized.

I installed powerdirector and gave it a try, while it is certainly head and shoulders above 99% of other metro apps it simply fails to impress when compared to modern desktop programs.

 

Like what ?

 

it's equal to any comparable software like Pinnacle studio.  but let's keep the comparison fair and simple what free software is even remotely close to powerdirector ?  and on top o that, I can use powerdirector on my Lenovo Miix2 11 on the go. which I can't with any of the other software, without hooking up a mouse and other crap and sitting down. 

 

So not only is it comparable to it's desktop counterpart that cost a lot more, it's superior to any comparably priced offering, and in some ways better than the more expensive desktop software.  you know if we take all features into consideration and not only the features that only exist on the desktop versions...

  • Like 2

I have used 9901 (the most recent leak) -  both in a bare install AND in a virtual machine.  It is no more broken (in my experience) than 9879 is - in fact, as a forward-pointer, there is a ton to look forward to in future builds.

 

1.  Cortana for Windows - 9901 has it active, and, despite some gimpage still, it was certainly plenty usable - it is no LESS usable than Google Now or Siri is today.  (Google Now and Siri are basically on-call personal assistants that only eat electrons, only sleep when the hardware that you are using is, and are waiting, with ears wide open, to go out and find what you are seeking.  Google Now is limited to Google software, while Siri is limited to iOS - there is no OS X version of Siri, much to Apple's shame.  This isn't war; this - is - BUSINESS.  Satya Nadella has outright declared business on Apple and Google.)

 

2.  Settings (9901) - 9901 goes a great deal further than 9879 does; Category View returned as the default because of that.  One thing that Windows 8 was justifiably faulted for was lack of adjustability - with 9901 it has adjustability far in excess of any version of Windows - or any other OS, for that matter. I referred to it as "adjustability up the wazoo" - and I haven't discovered everything.

 

3.  fbl_outlook - That is a rather large hint; is there also an fbl_word or fbl_excel?  As to why I don't use Office Online, who says I don't?  The only reason I don't use Office Online on my personal desktop (or notebook) is because I have Office installed locally - period.  It certainly is NOT feature lack - because there isn't any feature lack.  In fact, Outlook.com supports Yahoo Mail - which desktop Outlook does NOT do.  (While Outlook.com imports my Yahoo Mail on a daily basis, I can't export the imported mail to desktop Outlook.  It's not an Outlook issue, but a Yahoo Mail feature issue, and it's unique to the United States - POP3 access is a fee-generating issue for US users of Yahoo Mail; it's not the case anywhere else.)

 

4.  There may yet be more upcoming, and quite a lot could well be of interest to users that want no part of touch normally.  Note that none of what I have pointed to so far requires touch support - in fact, all of it can be used by keyboard and mouse users today.  (Cortana uses either keyboard or voice input - just as Google Now or Siri does today.)

Wasn't realy pointed to you, more to Order_66, and I would love to read his response to it, seems like he is ignoring my post for some reason.

Like what ?

 

it's equal to any comparable software like Pinnacle studio.  but let's keep the comparison fair and simple what free software is even remotely close to powerdirector ?  and on top o that, I can use powerdirector on my Lenovo Miix2 11 on the go. which I can't with any of the other software, without hooking up a mouse and other crap and sitting down. 

 

So not only is it comparable to it's desktop counterpart that cost a lot more, it's superior to any comparably priced offering, and in some ways better than the more expensive desktop software.  you know if we take all features into consideration and not only the features that only exist on the desktop versions...

 

I think a person should at least use powerdirector if they are going to proclaim it's better than something else, it's still a few steps behind free windows movie maker.

 

It is a good program, without a doubt the best metro program I've used so far, why can't other metro apps be anywhere close to this good? every other metro app I've tried was greatly lacking in features and functionality when compared to modern desktop programs.

 

It's been more than 2 years for skype, mail, video, music etc etc, why are metro apps lacking so badly in features and functionality? and why should I accept being forced into this metro environment?

seems like he is ignoring my post for some reason.

 

If you start your post directed at me with a lie, then call me a liar, followed with trolling semantics, then really I have no reply to you, I'm here to discuss windows technical preview, not to attack people because they don't drink the koolaid.

No body is forcing anything on you. Don't like it. don't use it. It's not like the MS blocked you from using a win32 version.

It's been more than 2 years for skype, mail, video, music etc etc, why are metro apps lacking so badly in features and functionality? and why should I accept being forced into this metro environment?

No body is forcing anything on you. Don't like it don't use it. It's not like the MS blocked you from using a win32 version.

 

Actually MS is replacing the modern control panel with a metro version, that is forcing people into metro.

Have they said that? It seems like you're from the furture using the final build.

Actually MS is replacing the modern control panel with a metro version, that is forcing people into metro.

Making a single settings panel in metro isn't forcing you to use skype\mail\music\video metro app.

Have they said that?

Making a single settings panel in metro isn't forcing you to use skype\mail\music\video metro app.

Never mind it's very likely to be functionally near identical to the old version. Mobile users will probably get a full screen version (like the PC Settings from 8.x), desktops will get the iconized in a window version, like they're doing with the start menu.

I mean, placeholder icons aside, how much different is it, really? Icons? Search box? A typical dialog box? Check, check and check. (If you missed it, modern apps aren't necessarily full screen anymore.) Quite the learning curve there, never mind having to re-master clicking icons and all that.

untitlmtm.png

The people are whinning about the new metro settings is because the lack of view by small icon\large icon\category. Since this is a leak beta and very early on the beta phase. We have no idea if its going to have those option or not have those option.

 

But ya this discussion has being going on muti threads and muti threads have been closed, because the same users saying the same thing.

Never mind it's very likely to be functionally near identical to the old version. Mobile users will probably get a full screen version (like the PC Settings from 8.x), desktops will get the iconized in a window version, like they're doing with the start menu.

I mean, placeholder icons aside, how much different is it, really? Icons? Search box? A typical dialog box? Check, check and check. (If you missed it, modern apps aren't necessarily full screen anymore.) Quite the learning curve there, never mind having to re-master clicking icons and all that.

untitlmtm.png

If you start your post directed at me with a lie, then call me a liar, followed with trolling semantics, then really I have no reply to you, I'm here to discuss windows technical preview, not to attack people because they don't drink the koolaid.

I'm sorry, but where do I lie in my post? It's obvious that you just hate it because you hate it, otherwise there is no reason to not respond to my post, which simply is a build up out of facts.

I think a person should at least use powerdirector if they are going to proclaim it's better than something else, it's still a few steps behind free windows movie maker.

 

It is a good program, without a doubt the best metro program I've used so far, why can't other metro apps be anywhere close to this good? every other metro app I've tried was greatly lacking in features and functionality when compared to modern desktop programs.

 

It's been more than 2 years for skype, mail, video, music etc etc, why are metro apps lacking so badly in features and functionality? and why should I accept being forced into this metro environment?

 

Where is Microsoft forcing this upon you? You can still download the traditional desktop Skype, Live Mail, Windows Media Player etc. I don't see any of that being taken away and when they do eventually replace it with a WinRT version it will be 90% of the way that that will satisfy 90% of the end users.

Actually windows 8, and now 10, is demonstrably "dumbed down" with metro garbage.

 

Metro is backwards thinking, regressive in every way and with demonstrably reduced features and functionality it really has no place on a truly modern desktop whatsoever.

 

Here are just a few examples:

 

Metro Skype: No audio or video adjustments, modern desktop skype has all of this and much more.

Metro video: Extremely limited video adjustments, modern desktop windows media player has these settings and many more.

Metro mail: Lacking horribly in all areas, even modern desktop windows live mail completely demolishes it, and that is truly a sad fact.

 

This list could go on and on but you get the idea.

Totally agree with you. 

Metro apps are dumbed down versions of desktop apps, dumbed down so much that the apps drag your IQ down with them by using them.

Thankfully Windows 10 allows you to never ever see any metro what so ever, which is perfect for us users with a IQ that is higher than a whinging baby.

I can't wait to see what the excuses will be when we get more and more feature rich metro apps.  I also get a kick out of comparing apps that are one to two years into development with desktop counterparts that have been worked on for more than 10 years, in some cases over twenty.

 

Comparing metro mail and windows live mail for example. Windows live mail was/is just a repackaged outlook express which has been around since windows 95. It's apples to oranges but it's the only defense left for those who don't like metro apps. How about we compare mail to outlook express v2 and see just how far apart they really are feature wise or how dumbed down they are.

Especially because the way Windows 10 aims to go for, at least considering the changes happening in the 9901 build, indeed some of the in-built applications are getting replaced with the WinRT counterpart. Calculator got replaced with the WinRT one already, heck, even if you type calc in the Run dialog, you'll end up starting that one instead of the older Win32. Sound Recorder might be next that gets only one version remaining, mainly the WinRT one.

 

However, this presents one advantage, as these apps are being also part of the Windows Store ecosystem, meaning that these can have updates independently of the OS, as long as it supports the said OS' API. However, if Windows 10 is going to have larger updates going on throughout its support, then both the API might get major upgrades from time to time too, meaning more WinRT functionalities without waiting for a whole new major Windows version and such. Also, Windows 8.1 Update 1 changed the defaults to be the Win32 apps for Music, Video, Pictures and such, Windows 10 apparently switched it back to the WinRT ones. :rofl: 

I think a person should at least use powerdirector if they are going to proclaim it's better than something else, it's still a few steps behind free windows movie maker.

 

It is a good program, without a doubt the best metro program I've used so far, why can't other metro apps be anywhere close to this good? every other metro app I've tried was greatly lacking in features and functionality when compared to modern desktop programs.

 

It's been more than 2 years for skype, mail, video, music etc etc, why are metro apps lacking so badly in features and functionality? and why should I accept being forced into this metro environment?

 

 

I use power director and Pinnacle Studio which is miles beyond Windows movie maker.

 

the fact you even claim power director isn't as good as Windows movie maker shows you haven't used Director at all. It's miles beyond WMM, WMM doesn't even use a timeline view anymore, and it has far more limited control of effects, audio, and basic editing. And then there's the coup de grace, WMM has extremely limited support of input videos, so it can't even edit the movies from my SJ4000. 

 

So it's far beyond WMM, and up to par with Pinnacle studio for the most part. 

Actually MS is replacing the modern control panel with a metro version, that is forcing people into metro.

 

a MODERN(not metro) control panel that recreates all the functions of the old classic and very very badly aged control panel, and it can be run in windowed mode as the old one. 

 

so what exactly is your problem ? Maybe take your own(albeit in that case misguided and misinformed) suggestion and use it first. 

Totally agree with you. 

Metro apps are dumbed down versions of desktop apps, dumbed down so much that the apps drag your IQ down with them by using them.

Thankfully Windows 10 allows you to never ever see any metro what so ever, which is perfect for us users with a IQ that is higher than a whinging baby.

 

Liked for comedy.

Totally agree with you. 

Metro apps are dumbed down versions of desktop apps, dumbed down so much that the apps drag your IQ down with them by using them.

Thankfully Windows 10 allows you to never ever see any metro what so ever, which is perfect for us users with a IQ that is higher than a whinging baby.

Made my day.

 

Anyway, that's simply how some of these apps where designed. Sure, the Modern UI interface is much simpeler then the interface we've gotten used to. But that doesn't make an app a dumbed down version feature wise. Like I've said earlier. The apps that are fully replacing old screens in 9901 have a much simpeler interface, yet are so much more powerful (I'm looking at you Windows Update and Calculator). Sure, only 2 have been truely replaced - and that's not forcing something upon a user, that's simply replacing a thing that is better than its precessor - but more are coming. Like it or not, WinRT is the future.

 

The fact is that you have no reason to not like it. Like I said: it's perfectly possible that you can make a very complex application in WinRT. A replacement for Photoshop CC 2014.1 is perfectly possible (it just takes some time to build an application people have been working on for years upon a new framework). In fact, Microsoft is about to prove it with rebuilding Office in WinRT. WinRT is just much better then Win32, as it is based on modern development principles. If you're a developer, you would know that. Beside, Metro apps don't have to be touch-friendly. Continuum will probably also provide developers an option to switch between touch optimized interfaces and mouse-optimized interfaces for  their apps, instead of just the Windows interface.

I use power director and Pinnacle Studio which is miles beyond Windows movie maker.

 

the fact you even claim power director isn't as good as Windows movie maker shows you haven't used Director at all. It's miles beyond WMM, WMM doesn't even use a timeline view anymore, and it has far more limited control of effects, audio, and basic editing. And then there's the coup de grace, WMM has extremely limited support of input videos, so it can't even edit the movies from my SJ4000. 

 

So it's far beyond WMM, and up to par with Pinnacle studio for the most part. 

 

a MODERN(not metro) control panel that recreates all the functions of the old classic and very very badly aged control panel, and it can be run in windowed mode as the old one. 

 

so what exactly is your problem ? Maybe take your own(albeit in that case misguided and misinformed) suggestion and use it first. 

 

It sounds (he's in my plonk file, so I have no idea what he actually is thinking since I placed him there - and its a question I HAVE asked before) like he is thinking like some others - that there is no need for simple and concise software for PCs and/or Windows.

 

That is so wrong (and so false) that I cannot believe that anyone even THINKS that.

 

There has ALWAYS been a need - if not outright DEMAND - for simple and concise software for Windows - in fact, look at exactly what Windows 3.1 (and Windows NT 3.1, for that matter) included, and what has replaced those very same inclusions.

 

Calculator goes back that far - so does WordPad (which started as Write).  Pretty much ALL the included software in every version of Windows has had one particular reasoning behind it - simple and concise.

 

What did Write add on the way to WordPad?  It added a grand total of ONE feature - cross-compatibility with Word documents.  That's it.

 

What did Windows Messaging (formerly Exchange Client) add?  Again, just a single feature - IMAP support (in fact, it dropped POP3 support - however, a large number of ISPs have ALSO dropped POP3 support).  Net change - zero.

 

Not everyone needs or even WANTS a big (and over-featured, and thus bloated) application for anything. Under normal circumstances, I wouldn't need - let alone purchase - the entirety of Microsoft Office Professional Plus - ninety percent of the time, I can find what I need in Word, Outlook, or (VERY occasionally) Excel - I certainly have no need for Access any more.  (The lack of a need for Access is because of the greater ease of use, greater feature set, and MUCH lower price of - of all software, Microsoft's own SQL Server (the Express iteration, to be precise); I can use SQL Server Express for anything I used to use Access for - and then some - all for a cost of NONE.  Therefore I need Access *why*?)

 

By definition, a bloated application (or software suite of any sort) includes too many features that too many users don't use - both Nero and Microsoft Office have been thrown into that category - and that is since 1997.

 

The need for simple and concise has not gone away - and especially not in terms of Windows.  In fact, if anything, as more and more Win32 applications have added and added (and added ad infinitum) features to where they have gotten overly complex and complicated/bloated, the need for simple and concise has gone up - not down.

 

How do you satisfy that still-existing need for simple and concise AND use features that Win32 (as an API mind you) flat-out lacks?  You need a new API that doesn't roadblock the old one.  Microsoft created the Modern design language and the WinRT API to tackle the issue of missing feature support while still allowing small and concise applications, while adding support for managed code (Win32 support for managed code has severe issues still - and that is from developers).  The Modern design language can, in fact, be used by Win32 applications (Server Manager uses it - and that's included with Windows Server 2012); so does MetroIRC (today) and MetroTwit (now dead/moribund).

 

WinRT-based applications CAN compete with Win32 applications - or not; however, that is up to developers (at both ends), as one doesn't block the other.  Which application wins is entirely user-dependent.  Bragging that you need this big bloated complicated application is just that - bragging.  Not everyone needs something that big - or even has USE for something that big.

 

Insisting that everyone needs big and bloated applications is like insisting that everyone needs a six-core CPU - flatly and patently false.

If you're using Classic Shell in Windows 10, then you shouldn't use Windows 10. There is a reason Microsft blocked CS, they need feedback, and you're just not giving it to them, which in the long run, only hurts you.

 

Here's the problem with that thinking. while they want feedback, they are preventing a developer from creating an app for use by users. If users of CS give feedback to the developer, the developer can then relay info to MSFT about issues. either way, MSFT will get the feedback they desire

Here's the problem with that thinking. while they want feedback, they are preventing a developer from creating an app for use by users.

That's what the developer previews are typically for, too early for third party testing as stuff is still very much in a state of flux. Why test now when it's likely going to break next month, etc.
  • Like 2

For those saying that you can "avoid" Metro, I hate to break it to you, but Windows *is* Metro. Metro is more than just the live tiles, it's an entire design principle. Perhaps you should read up on it.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Cuktech 10 Ultra charger review: big display, four ports, 110W total power by Taras Buria Cuktech recently announced a couple of Ultra-branded chargers, including a desktop 300W charger, which I reviewed a few weeks ago. For those who do need that much (or who do not want to spend that much on a charger), Cuktech also offers the 10 Ultra, a traditional wall charger with similar features. Four ports, a big display, and up to 110W of power output. After using it for a few weeks, here are my impressions. Disclaimer: Cuktech provided the review unit without any editorial input or pre-approval. Like the 30 Ultra, the 10 Ultra arrived in a box made of nice cardboard with quality print all over it. Inside, besides the charger, you will find a 240W 6A charger, which, this time, is fully braided. While Cuktech always bundles high-power cables with its chargers and power banks, they are usually regular and unassuming. This time, the cable is much nicer, matching the charger's $59.99 price tag. The charger itself measures 67 x 76 x 33 mm or 2.6 x 3.0 x 1.3 inches and weighs about 250 grams. Considering the charger has four ports and a big display, I would say the compact size is quite impressive, albeit a little hefty. The overall design is similar to other chargers from the manufacturer, minus the chrome Cuktech logo next to the four ports. The Cuktech 10 Ultra has retractable prongs for better portability. Its front side is covered with piano black plastic housing two elements: a capacitive button with backlight and a quite large display for various charging stats. Ports are downward-facing, and I have mixed feelings about such a design. It is not the most convenient when you frequently connect and disconnect cables. It makes you bend over to find the right port to connect, and it is a no-go with outlets mounted closer to the floor. On the bright side, design like this eliminates clutter and sagging, especially when using four cables at once. Plus, you get plenty of space for a big display. Ports include two high-speed USB Type-C ports, one Type-C for less demanding devices, and one classic USB Type-A. The first two ports deliver full 100W, while the third is capped at 45W. As for the Type-A port, its maximum output is 18W. In total, the charger delivers 110W of power, but in my testing, I managed to squeeze 117W when charging two power banks and a tablet. Quite impressive. Type-C1 Type-C2 Type-C3 Type-A Single-port 100W 100W 45W 18W Two ports 80W 20W - - Three ports 65W 20W 20W - Four ports 65W 20W 10W 10W The charger can detect handshake protocols and balance power across all four ports according to each device's needs. As such, power is not limited to the values in the table above. You can have two ports charging at 55W, three ports at 45W + 20W, and more. For some reason, Cuktech is not listing the supported protocols, but a quick test showed that it is compatible with PD3.0, PPS, QC5, DCP, and UFCS. When you connect a compatible device, the charger automatically detects its charging standard and displays it on the screen, for example, Apple 6A or Samsung 3A. Speaking of the screen. The main highlight of the 10 Ultra is its 1.57-inch display with a maximum brightness of 700 nits and 160-degree viewing angles. The display takes up most of the front, and it shows various charging-related information, including total output power, current temperature, power distribution across ports with watts, volts, and amps, a screensaver, and more. You can toggle between the different views by tapping the button, and holding it changes the screen orientation (portrait or horizontal, plus flipped) according to your socket position. The screen is very nice. It is sharp, vivid, and the fonts are easy to read. As for settings, you can change the following: Keep the screen on or off Lock the screen orientation (hold the button to change the screen orientation) Keep the USB Type-A port on Toggle power modes The charger has three power modes: AI: standard mode that automatically allocates power to each connected device. Power Priority: prioritizes power for high-demand devices, such as laptops or power banks. Balanced: splits power evenly across connected devices according to their needs I was skeptical at first, but after testing a few devices in different modes, I can see the benefit of these three modes. The most useful is power priority, which gives the first Type-C port more power. When I was charging a 100W power bank (port 1) alongside a 140W power bank (port 2), Power Priority split the total output about 75-30. Balanced mode, as the name suggests, splits the total output between the two ports more or less equally. As for AI mode, the charger uses its brain to detect which device needs more power. In my testing, it figured out that the 140W power needs a bit more juice. As I said, I expected this to be more of a gimmick, but the three built-in modes turned out quite useful. For example, you can prioritize your laptop while giving other ports a little less power, but still enough to charge at acceptable speeds. Unfortunately, unlike the 30 Ultra, this charger cannot display the battery level of the device being charged. This small feature turned out to be very useful when I was testing the 30 Ultra, as it allowed me to see my phone's battery level without picking it up. Like other Cuktech chargers I tested, the 10 Ultra one proved itself reliable and well-made. It uses Gallium nitride semiconductor technology to reduce the charger's size and improve efficiency. It is also better at dissipating heat, but I have to say that when charging two power banks at 117W total, the charger got hotter than what I would call comfortable (hold it for a few seconds, and you start feeling a burning sensation at your fingertips). However, the built-in thermal indicator remained below the temperature threshold, with the screen reassuring that the device operated at "High performance" (I tested it in a 21 °C / 69 °F room). Overall, the Cuktech 10 Ultra is a solid choice. If you need four ports and you like to nerd out on various stats, it is a very easy recommendation. It will take care of your laptop, phone, tablet, and power bank without breaking a sweat, plus the build, material, and cable quality are top-notch. The mode switcher is handy when charging different devices with different power needs, too. I cannot say a display is a must-have in a charger, especially when it makes you more conscious about where to plug it, but it is a neat addition if you have a socket at your table or bed level, so that you can actually use the display and its features. The more important fact is that despite its size and quality, the display does not make the charger that much more expensive than similarly powerful chargers from competitors. Plus, you can save 10% on the 10 Ultra with a promo code on Amazon. Buy Cuktech 10 Ultra charger - $53.99 on Amazon with a promo code As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Last week I was investigating an issue with contacts and tried using the new Outlook. In the real (Classic) Outlook, you can easily go to any Outlook folder and present it in a Table View, then customize the columns to show/sort any field, which was exactly what I needed. But of course, the new Outlook doesn't have this feature at all. I gave up. Oh, and can we possibly stop claiming the new Outlook has PST support? What it really has is the ability to use the real Outlook in the background to pretend to have PST support. There is no PST support without the real Outlook installed.
    • Honestly just before Panos left it started to feel like MS just wasnt interested in them so they were being less innovative with them, and then when he DID leave for Amazon its kind of clear the direction is gone. It felt like Panos had both goals and drive, and a vision, but it felt like no matter what his title/department was the Surface devices never had the full interest of the rest of management and he was just pushing a bolder up a hill that MS was adding dirt to as he went.
    • A roguelike and a 4X strategy game are free to claim on the Epic Games Store by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe The final leg of the Epic Games Store's mystery giveaways promotion just landed, and it brought along two more games to keep. Last week's Lonestar and Calico giveaways have now been replaced with copies of Rogue Waters and Songs of Conquest to claim for PC gamers. As always, the game is yours to add permanently to your Epic Games Store library within the next seven days. Diving into the games, Songs of Conquest is developed by Lavapotion. This is a turn-based 4X strategy experience that has players making tough decisions and participating in tactical combat while also managing their kingdom. "Songs of Conquest is a turn-based strategy game inspired by 90s classics. Lead powerful magicians called Wielders and venture to lands unknown," explains the developer. "Wage battles against armies that dare oppose you, hunt for powerful artifacts and expand your territory. The world is ripe for the taking – seize it." Meanwhile, Rogue Waters comes from developer Ice Code Games. This rogue-lite experience has you taking the role of Captain Cutter as he commands his ship and crew through procedurally generated encounters. You'll be recruiting and training crew, use sea creatures, and battle with other ships and pirates. "Set sail as Captain Cutter, a pirate caught in a deadly struggle for power and vengeance," adds the developer. "Navigate dangerous waters, unleash mythical sea creatures, and outwit enemies as you chase legendary treasure and confront dark secrets." The newly available Rogue Waters and Songs of Conquest giveaways on the Epic Games Store are set to run until June 11, giving PC gamers seven days to claim the latest offer. Once this closes out, a new freebie will take its place on the same day, which is slated to be Warhammer 40K Speed Freeks. Don't forget that mobile gamers can check out the Epic Game Store's weekly giveaways on Android and iOS to grab a freebie there as well.
    • Still using Classic Outlook? Microsoft highlights 15 reasons to switch to New Outlook by Usama Jawad As many of you may know, Microsoft has been trying to get customers to ditch Classic Outlook in favor of New Outlook for quite some time now. To that end, it has added numerous capabilities to the latter, including PST features, and it is working on several more, such as a unified inbox. However, customer response has been a bit lukewarm so far, with many considering the New Outlook to be "hot garbage". Now, Microsoft has highlighted 15 features that users can leverage in New Outlook in yet another attempt to get customers to migrate. Although not all of the 15 capabilities are exclusive to New Outlook, in fact, most of them are available in Classic Outlook as well. But Microsoft hopes that this combination of familiar and fresh features will be able to attract existing users as well as new ones. For ease of readability, we have summarized the 15 features below: Pin an email: This makes it easier to track important emails Snooze an email: You can temporarily snooze an email thread for a specific time frame until it becomes relevant again. This can be very useful in scenarios where you don't feel like actively following a thread or simply want to follow up on a later date Add multiple categories at the same time: You can assign multiple categories to an email through a single, simplified interface Sweep: As the name implies, you can define automated move processes on your inbox to declutter it, rather than cleaning it up manually Schedule send: Does exactly what it says on the tin, and can be useful when accommodating recipients in different timezones Simplified folder sharing: The sharing process has been simplified so permissions are automatically applied on parent folders Follow a meeting: This is an RSVP option that lets people know that you won't be able to join the meeting but would still like to access a recap Save calendar views: You can save different views for the calendar based on different workflows Improved meeting tracking: Organizers have more controls in viewing meeting responses, such as the ability to sort and download them. Typically useful when there is a large audience Meeting recap: The Outlook Calendar surfaces a meeting recap with recordings, transcripts, and shared files Filtered views: Allows you to declutter your Calendar so that it's easier to scan and schedule Change a recurring event: Users can modify future events of a series of meetings while preserving the configuration of previous ones Rename your email account: This labeling makes it easier to identify multiple accounts in Outlook Modern themes: Exactly what the name says, plus Dark Mode Keyboard shortcuts: This facilitates flexible user behavior as customers can choose between Outlook for Windows shortcuts, Outlook for the web, or turn them off completely There you have it. It's a decent list, but it remains to be seen if it will move the needle in a meaningful way for users who are attached to Classic Outlook. Again, a lot of the aforementioned features are already available in Outlook Classic, but for some, native functionality is not present, and people typically resort to workarounds. Microsoft will be hoping that it's primarily those capabilities that get people to finally switch.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      478
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      247
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!