Windows Technical Preview  

1031 members have voted

  1. 1. On a scale of 1-5, 1 being worst, 5 being best. What do you think of Windows 10 from the leaks so far?

    • 5.Great, best OS ever
      156
    • 4. Pretty Good, needs a lot of minor tweaks
      409
    • 3. OK, Needs a few major improvements, some minor ones
      168
    • 2. Fine, Needs a lot of major improvements
      79
    • 1.Poor, Needs too many improvements, all hope is lost, never going to use it
      41
  2. 2. Based on the recent leaks by Neowin and Winfuture.de, my next OS upgrade will be?

    • Windows 10
      720
    • Windows 8
      20
    • Windows 7
      48
    • Sticking with XP
      3
    • OSX Yosemite
      35
    • Linux
      24
    • Sticking with OSX Mavericks
      3
  3. 3. Should Microsoft give away Windows 10 for free?

    • Yes for Windows 8.1 Users
      305
    • Yes for Windows 7 and above users
      227
    • Yes for Vista and above users
      31
    • Yes for XP and above users
      27
    • Yes for all Windows users
      192
    • No
      71


Recommended Posts

tell that to Sir. Dotmatrix then, since he brings up Android, android on the desktop and what knows...... :rolleyes:

And I was addressing Windows 10  - and facing the reality that Android CAN be competition to it - and not just on tablets. (Remember, I posted "Kitkat vs. Kentsfield" in the Android subforum before the first Technical Preview of Windows 10 was released - and things HAVE improved in Android since then, and even on x86.)

All the things that were true of Kitkat are still true of Lollipop - and then some.  The biggest reason why Android (specifically on Atom/x86) has issues is due to the existing ARM-specific native code in existing applications.  A lot of that code WILL be going away because DALVIK (which is the reason for most of it) is itself going away - ART, in and of itself, is more code-neutral than DALVIK.  As much as Microsoft would wish otherwise (and the same is true of Windows developers), ignoring Android makes no sense - even without platform similarities.

 

After all, the biggest reason why Android is where it is is due to it being cheap.

Strange, because I find it works incredibly well on tablets. It resolution scales substantially better than iOS (meaning phone apps don't look like crap), and doesn't consume all of the 16GB of storage available because it's developers insisted on bastardising instead of developing separately. And unlike Windows metro it actually has good support from AAA devs.

But look at WHY Android has support from "AAA" developers.  Do you see an "AAA" developer as a developer that isn't locked into Windows?  Then you are correct - most of these developers hate native code with a passion.  Still, even Linux has their share of "political food fights" - the biggest has, in fact, been over OpenGL.  (Windows itself plays no part in that, except on the periphery.)  Where Android differs from most Linux distributions is due to the high reliance on OpenGL - any attempt in using an OGL-driven desktop environment in any Linux distribution has devolved into infighting and squabbling.  However, what will happen when Android and Linux can play equally on the same battlefield?  (If the OGL issues with Android can be solved, that will be far sooner than any Linux distribution maintainer would want.)  There is also the issue that Android development can actually make money - that largely isn't the case with Linux development.  If Linux fails to address the DE squabbling, Android minus the extant OGL woes - and especially on x86 - can make a lot more hay than it does right now in an ARM-dominant marketplace. And after shooting up Android, who is left?

 

The reason why MDL (Modern Design Language) has poor support from AAA developers is twofold - it's new AND it's connected to Microsoft; those are two major strikes.  MDL is still being fleshed out - it has support in multiple APIs (not merely WinRT, but even Win32 and .NET).  However, other than .NET, there is no way to write to MDL outside of Windows - and the support for it outside of Windows is low compared to within Windows (and I'm referring to non-Microsoft tools, such as Xamarin).  Worse, Windows DOES have a nasty reputation of being native-code-reliant to a very large degree - which is why it still gets short shrift.

The big question is whether the promises made when they talked about OpenGL NG [link] which is supposed to unify OpenGL 'Desktop' and 'Embedded' into a single modern API set or whether it ends up like 'Long Peaks' but then again developers don't really have much of a choice - either put up with OpenGL and its issues or use Direct X and tie yourself to the Windows wagon and hope that everything works out for the best. As for Windows Phone 8.1, from what I understand it is based on Windows RT and now has the complete WinRT framework available which provides compatibility from the desktop to the laptop, tablet and the phone but there is still the issue about Microsoft being behind the 8th ball when it comes to supporting standards compliant C++, the compiler is still pretty behind the time even if the saving grace of the development tools has been Visual Studio - there was a recent comparison of LLVM/Clang and GCC to Microsoft's own compiler toolchain and it wasn't a pretty sight. I sometimes wonder whether it would be easier for Microsoft just to start using the LLVM libc++ library, Clang and add .NET/MSIL support to the tool chain given that even as of today their developer tools are trailing behind when it comes to standards support.

That's exactly what I meant by the squabbling, Mr. N - any attempt to create a unifying OGL standard, even one just for a Linux DE (Wayland, anyone?) devolves rather quickly and messily.  The issue with non-standard tools has always been about performance - as opposed to being standards-compliant just to be standards-compliant.  Standards-compliant code - in any programming language - does nobody any good if it runs like a snail compared to optimized-but-non-standard code.  But the need is there for a truly-impartial referee or standardization body - right now, there isn't one.  (Yes, I am not merely including ISO, but specifically referring to it - ISO has gotten as political as ANSI was before it.)

Does someone know why Brad Sams article related to Spartan New look uncovered by BGR got removed?

 

BGR link - http://bgr.com/2015/01/06/microsoft-spartan-pictures-release-internet-browser/

Does someone know why Brad Sams article related to Spartan New look uncovered by BGR got removed?

 

BGR link - http://bgr.com/2015/01/06/microsoft-spartan-pictures-release-internet-browser/

Because BGR is a source that one shouldn't use as a source. Their "exclusive" was BS, just like their previous reports.

Does someone know why Brad Sams article related to Spartan New look uncovered by BGR got removed?

 

BGR link - http://bgr.com/2015/01/06/microsoft-spartan-pictures-release-internet-browser/

Those in the know say it's fake, that's what I've seen tweeted so I guess they pulled it.

Just popping by to make a statement for folks to try to stay on topic. I know with threads this long sometimes things can get a bit off tangent for a while. I wont be cleaning things but just making a statement.

Yea.

You can create your own Uservoice from Microsoft Feedback in Windows 10 or vote on this: https://wpdev.uservoice.com/forums/257854-internet-explorer-platform/suggestions/6513228-font-rendering

 

Just popping by to make a statement for folks to try to stay on topic. I know with threads this long sometimes things can get a bit off tangent for a while. I wont be cleaning things but just making a statement.

 

Trying as hard as I can to keep it on topic.

Well now we have a better screenshot from brad that looks more legit.

No they aren't official, not from MS, so no. They were poor images stolen not meant for public display. 

 

"'ll make sure to pass it along once we verify the information." from Brads "article". So these may also be fake.

No they aren't official, not from MS, so no. They were poor images stolen not meant for public display. 

 

"'ll make sure to pass it along once we verify the information." from Brads "article". So these may also be fake.

 

" if I hear anything more about the browser"

 

How can Brad talk about USAGE OF SPARTAN in ARTICLE without being using it. He was the first to tell about IE UI change and extension support since he has access to latest information somehow (Magic). So pictures are legit.

" if I hear anything more about the browser"

 

How can Brad talk about USAGE OF SPARTAN in ARTICLE without being using it. He was the first to tell about IE UI change and extension support since he has access to latest information somehow (Magic). So pictures are legit.

nope. Let's wait on MS to actually put this out officially (and not get ahead of ourselves..), before I listen to journalists and their "leaks".

nope. Let's wait on MS to actually put this out officially (and not get ahead of ourselves..), before I listen to journalists and their "leaks".

Why are you picking on Brad? Apple had tons of leaks not meant for public view all the time. You don't hear anyone complaining on the Mac sites. Plus Brad is well known within the Microsoft community up there with Tom, Mary Jo, and Thurrott. Most, if not all of his leaks are true as he has trusty sources and Neowin rarely posts their own leaks except from other sources. I certainly trust him over BGR who do not cover Microsoft for a living or those analysts.
  • Like 3

Why are you picking on Brad? Apple had tons of leaks not meant for public view all the time. You don't hear anyone complaining on the Mac sites. Plus Brad is well known within the Microsoft community up there with Tom, Mary Jo, and Thurrott. Most, if not all of his leaks are true as he has trusty sources and Neowin rarely posts their own leaks except from other sources. I certainly trust him over BGR who do not cover Microsoft for a living or those analysts.

i have no idea what you are attempting to blame me for doing. I have no part in that. All I'm saying is Brad himself said that he has to confirm officially with MS on the validity of the "leaked" info. Now when MS comes back and actually let's their reps release the info, thats what actually matters. This is not a game of he/she said, with blurry photos pics until confirmed by MS themselves.

Does this new Login Screen has been discussed already or not, I deleted my VM, so can't test here: http://news.softpedia.com/news/Windows-10-Build-9901-Features-New-Login-and-Lock-Screen-Design-468942.shtml

mpccvH5o.jpg

 

While I still think that those primitive monochromatic icons look absolutely awful, it's a good idea that we now have a little start menu with login screen related entries on the login screen :woot:

Looks like MS is really serious about bringing back the start menu in full force.

To put all rumors to rest, I found out the name of the software used for those icons (yes they are not official). It's called Ease Of Access Replacer v2

Could this icon replacer software also be used to replace the Metro Windows 1 icons with actually decent looking ones?

 

Nice, but there is a small issue with Softpedia, who doesn't have a great forum like we have, so they got the instructions wrong.

 

The Path is

HKEY_LOCAL_Machine\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Authentication\LogonUI\TestHooks

The DWORD (32 Bit) Value in the TestHooks Key is called Threshold with its value set to 0 by default, change that to 1 there is no field with a value of Threshold that you change to '1'. Rather There is a DWORD (32 Bit) Value called "Threshold" located under TestHooks which is under LogonUI that has its value set to 0 but needs to be changed to 1.

Neowin can be the first news site to get it right!

Does this only work on 9901 or also on 9879?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • inb4 someone leaves the usual "what an unfortunate name" comment
    • Cuktech 10 Ultra charger review: big display, four ports, 110W total power by Taras Buria Cuktech recently announced a couple of Ultra-branded chargers, including a desktop 300W charger, which I reviewed a few weeks ago. For those who do need that much (or who do not want to spend that much on a charger), Cuktech also offers the 10 Ultra, a traditional wall charger with similar features. Four ports, a big display, and up to 110W of power output. After using it for a few weeks, here are my impressions. Disclaimer: Cuktech provided the review unit without any editorial input or pre-approval. Like the 30 Ultra, the 10 Ultra arrived in a box made of nice cardboard with quality print all over it. Inside, besides the charger, you will find a 240W 6A charger, which, this time, is fully braided. While Cuktech always bundles high-power cables with its chargers and power banks, they are usually regular and unassuming. This time, the cable is much nicer, matching the charger's $59.99 price tag. The charger itself measures 67 x 76 x 33 mm or 2.6 x 3.0 x 1.3 inches and weighs about 250 grams. Considering the charger has four ports and a big display, I would say the compact size is quite impressive, albeit a little hefty. The overall design is similar to other chargers from the manufacturer, minus the chrome Cuktech logo next to the four ports. The Cuktech 10 Ultra has retractable prongs for better portability. Its front side is covered with piano black plastic housing two elements: a capacitive button with backlight and a quite large display for various charging stats. Ports are downward-facing, and I have mixed feelings about such a design. It is not the most convenient when you frequently connect and disconnect cables. It makes you bend over to find the right port to connect, and it is a no-go with outlets mounted closer to the floor. On the bright side, design like this eliminates clutter and sagging, especially when using four cables at once. Plus, you get plenty of space for a big display. Ports include two high-speed USB Type-C ports, one Type-C for less demanding devices, and one classic USB Type-A. The first two ports deliver full 100W, while the third is capped at 45W. As for the Type-A port, its maximum output is 18W. In total, the charger delivers 110W of power, but in my testing, I managed to squeeze 117W when charging two power banks and a tablet. Quite impressive. Type-C1 Type-C2 Type-C3 Type-A Single-port 100W 100W 45W 18W Two ports 80W 20W - - Three ports 65W 20W 20W - Four ports 65W 20W 10W 10W The charger can detect handshake protocols and balance power across all four ports according to each device's needs. As such, power is not limited to the values in the table above. You can have two ports charging at 55W, three ports at 45W + 20W, and more. For some reason, Cuktech is not listing the supported protocols, but a quick test showed that it is compatible with PD3.0, PPS, QC5, DCP, and UFCS. When you connect a compatible device, the charger automatically detects its charging standard and displays it on the screen, for example, Apple 6A or Samsung 3A. Speaking of the screen. The main highlight of the 10 Ultra is its 1.57-inch display with a maximum brightness of 700 nits and 160-degree viewing angles. The display takes up most of the front, and it shows various charging-related information, including total output power, current temperature, power distribution across ports with watts, volts, and amps, a screensaver, and more. You can toggle between the different views by tapping the button, and holding it changes the screen orientation (portrait or horizontal, plus flipped) according to your socket position. The screen is very nice. It is sharp, vivid, and the fonts are easy to read. As for settings, you can change the following: Keep the screen on or off Lock the screen orientation (hold the button to change the screen orientation) Keep the USB Type-A port on Toggle power modes The charger has three power modes: AI: standard mode that automatically allocates power to each connected device. Power Priority: prioritizes power for high-demand devices, such as laptops or power banks. Balanced: splits power evenly across connected devices according to their needs I was skeptical at first, but after testing a few devices in different modes, I can see the benefit of these three modes. The most useful is power priority, which gives the first Type-C port more power. When I was charging a 100W power bank (port 1) alongside a 140W power bank (port 2), Power Priority split the total output about 75-30. Balanced mode, as the name suggests, splits the total output between the two ports more or less equally. As for AI mode, the charger uses its brain to detect which device needs more power. In my testing, it figured out that the 140W power needs a bit more juice. As I said, I expected this to be more of a gimmick, but the three built-in modes turned out quite useful. For example, you can prioritize your laptop while giving other ports a little less power, but still enough to charge at acceptable speeds. Unfortunately, unlike the 30 Ultra, this charger cannot display the battery level of the device being charged. This small feature turned out to be very useful when I was testing the 30 Ultra, as it allowed me to see my phone's battery level without picking it up. Like other Cuktech chargers I tested, the 10 Ultra one proved itself reliable and well-made. It uses Gallium nitride semiconductor technology to reduce the charger's size and improve efficiency. It is also better at dissipating heat, but I have to say that when charging two power banks at 117W total, the charger got hotter than what I would call comfortable (hold it for a few seconds, and you start feeling a burning sensation at your fingertips). However, the built-in thermal indicator remained below the temperature threshold, with the screen reassuring that the device operated at "High performance" (I tested it in a 21 °C / 69 °F room). Overall, the Cuktech 10 Ultra is a solid choice. If you need four ports and you like to nerd out on various stats, it is a very easy recommendation. It will take care of your laptop, phone, tablet, and power bank without breaking a sweat, plus the build, material, and cable quality are top-notch. The mode switcher is handy when charging different devices with different power needs, too. I cannot say a display is a must-have in a charger, especially when it makes you more conscious about where to plug it, but it is a neat addition if you have a socket at your table or bed level, so that you can actually use the display and its features. The more important fact is that despite its size and quality, the display does not make the charger that much more expensive than similarly powerful chargers from competitors. Plus, you can save 10% on the 10 Ultra with a promo code on Amazon. Buy Cuktech 10 Ultra charger - $53.99 on Amazon with a promo code As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Last week I was investigating an issue with contacts and tried using the new Outlook. In the real (Classic) Outlook, you can easily go to any Outlook folder and present it in a Table View, then customize the columns to show/sort any field, which was exactly what I needed. But of course, the new Outlook doesn't have this feature at all. I gave up. Oh, and can we possibly stop claiming the new Outlook has PST support? What it really has is the ability to use the real Outlook in the background to pretend to have PST support. There is no PST support without the real Outlook installed.
    • Honestly just before Panos left it started to feel like MS just wasnt interested in them so they were being less innovative with them, and then when he DID leave for Amazon its kind of clear the direction is gone. It felt like Panos had both goals and drive, and a vision, but it felt like no matter what his title/department was the Surface devices never had the full interest of the rest of management and he was just pushing a bolder up a hill that MS was adding dirt to as he went.
    • A roguelike and a 4X strategy game are free to claim on the Epic Games Store by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe The final leg of the Epic Games Store's mystery giveaways promotion just landed, and it brought along two more games to keep. Last week's Lonestar and Calico giveaways have now been replaced with copies of Rogue Waters and Songs of Conquest to claim for PC gamers. As always, the game is yours to add permanently to your Epic Games Store library within the next seven days. Diving into the games, Songs of Conquest is developed by Lavapotion. This is a turn-based 4X strategy experience that has players making tough decisions and participating in tactical combat while also managing their kingdom. "Songs of Conquest is a turn-based strategy game inspired by 90s classics. Lead powerful magicians called Wielders and venture to lands unknown," explains the developer. "Wage battles against armies that dare oppose you, hunt for powerful artifacts and expand your territory. The world is ripe for the taking – seize it." Meanwhile, Rogue Waters comes from developer Ice Code Games. This rogue-lite experience has you taking the role of Captain Cutter as he commands his ship and crew through procedurally generated encounters. You'll be recruiting and training crew, use sea creatures, and battle with other ships and pirates. "Set sail as Captain Cutter, a pirate caught in a deadly struggle for power and vengeance," adds the developer. "Navigate dangerous waters, unleash mythical sea creatures, and outwit enemies as you chase legendary treasure and confront dark secrets." The newly available Rogue Waters and Songs of Conquest giveaways on the Epic Games Store are set to run until June 11, giving PC gamers seven days to claim the latest offer. Once this closes out, a new freebie will take its place on the same day, which is slated to be Warhammer 40K Speed Freeks. Don't forget that mobile gamers can check out the Epic Game Store's weekly giveaways on Android and iOS to grab a freebie there as well.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      477
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      247
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!