Windows Technical Preview  

1031 members have voted

  1. 1. On a scale of 1-5, 1 being worst, 5 being best. What do you think of Windows 10 from the leaks so far?

    • 5.Great, best OS ever
      156
    • 4. Pretty Good, needs a lot of minor tweaks
      409
    • 3. OK, Needs a few major improvements, some minor ones
      168
    • 2. Fine, Needs a lot of major improvements
      79
    • 1.Poor, Needs too many improvements, all hope is lost, never going to use it
      41
  2. 2. Based on the recent leaks by Neowin and Winfuture.de, my next OS upgrade will be?

    • Windows 10
      720
    • Windows 8
      20
    • Windows 7
      48
    • Sticking with XP
      3
    • OSX Yosemite
      35
    • Linux
      24
    • Sticking with OSX Mavericks
      3
  3. 3. Should Microsoft give away Windows 10 for free?

    • Yes for Windows 8.1 Users
      305
    • Yes for Windows 7 and above users
      227
    • Yes for Vista and above users
      31
    • Yes for XP and above users
      27
    • Yes for all Windows users
      192
    • No
      71


Recommended Posts

tell that to Sir. Dotmatrix then, since he brings up Android, android on the desktop and what knows...... :rolleyes:

And I was addressing Windows 10  - and facing the reality that Android CAN be competition to it - and not just on tablets. (Remember, I posted "Kitkat vs. Kentsfield" in the Android subforum before the first Technical Preview of Windows 10 was released - and things HAVE improved in Android since then, and even on x86.)

All the things that were true of Kitkat are still true of Lollipop - and then some.  The biggest reason why Android (specifically on Atom/x86) has issues is due to the existing ARM-specific native code in existing applications.  A lot of that code WILL be going away because DALVIK (which is the reason for most of it) is itself going away - ART, in and of itself, is more code-neutral than DALVIK.  As much as Microsoft would wish otherwise (and the same is true of Windows developers), ignoring Android makes no sense - even without platform similarities.

 

After all, the biggest reason why Android is where it is is due to it being cheap.

Strange, because I find it works incredibly well on tablets. It resolution scales substantially better than iOS (meaning phone apps don't look like crap), and doesn't consume all of the 16GB of storage available because it's developers insisted on bastardising instead of developing separately. And unlike Windows metro it actually has good support from AAA devs.

But look at WHY Android has support from "AAA" developers.  Do you see an "AAA" developer as a developer that isn't locked into Windows?  Then you are correct - most of these developers hate native code with a passion.  Still, even Linux has their share of "political food fights" - the biggest has, in fact, been over OpenGL.  (Windows itself plays no part in that, except on the periphery.)  Where Android differs from most Linux distributions is due to the high reliance on OpenGL - any attempt in using an OGL-driven desktop environment in any Linux distribution has devolved into infighting and squabbling.  However, what will happen when Android and Linux can play equally on the same battlefield?  (If the OGL issues with Android can be solved, that will be far sooner than any Linux distribution maintainer would want.)  There is also the issue that Android development can actually make money - that largely isn't the case with Linux development.  If Linux fails to address the DE squabbling, Android minus the extant OGL woes - and especially on x86 - can make a lot more hay than it does right now in an ARM-dominant marketplace. And after shooting up Android, who is left?

 

The reason why MDL (Modern Design Language) has poor support from AAA developers is twofold - it's new AND it's connected to Microsoft; those are two major strikes.  MDL is still being fleshed out - it has support in multiple APIs (not merely WinRT, but even Win32 and .NET).  However, other than .NET, there is no way to write to MDL outside of Windows - and the support for it outside of Windows is low compared to within Windows (and I'm referring to non-Microsoft tools, such as Xamarin).  Worse, Windows DOES have a nasty reputation of being native-code-reliant to a very large degree - which is why it still gets short shrift.

The big question is whether the promises made when they talked about OpenGL NG [link] which is supposed to unify OpenGL 'Desktop' and 'Embedded' into a single modern API set or whether it ends up like 'Long Peaks' but then again developers don't really have much of a choice - either put up with OpenGL and its issues or use Direct X and tie yourself to the Windows wagon and hope that everything works out for the best. As for Windows Phone 8.1, from what I understand it is based on Windows RT and now has the complete WinRT framework available which provides compatibility from the desktop to the laptop, tablet and the phone but there is still the issue about Microsoft being behind the 8th ball when it comes to supporting standards compliant C++, the compiler is still pretty behind the time even if the saving grace of the development tools has been Visual Studio - there was a recent comparison of LLVM/Clang and GCC to Microsoft's own compiler toolchain and it wasn't a pretty sight. I sometimes wonder whether it would be easier for Microsoft just to start using the LLVM libc++ library, Clang and add .NET/MSIL support to the tool chain given that even as of today their developer tools are trailing behind when it comes to standards support.

That's exactly what I meant by the squabbling, Mr. N - any attempt to create a unifying OGL standard, even one just for a Linux DE (Wayland, anyone?) devolves rather quickly and messily.  The issue with non-standard tools has always been about performance - as opposed to being standards-compliant just to be standards-compliant.  Standards-compliant code - in any programming language - does nobody any good if it runs like a snail compared to optimized-but-non-standard code.  But the need is there for a truly-impartial referee or standardization body - right now, there isn't one.  (Yes, I am not merely including ISO, but specifically referring to it - ISO has gotten as political as ANSI was before it.)

Does someone know why Brad Sams article related to Spartan New look uncovered by BGR got removed?

 

BGR link - http://bgr.com/2015/01/06/microsoft-spartan-pictures-release-internet-browser/

Does someone know why Brad Sams article related to Spartan New look uncovered by BGR got removed?

 

BGR link - http://bgr.com/2015/01/06/microsoft-spartan-pictures-release-internet-browser/

Because BGR is a source that one shouldn't use as a source. Their "exclusive" was BS, just like their previous reports.

Does someone know why Brad Sams article related to Spartan New look uncovered by BGR got removed?

 

BGR link - http://bgr.com/2015/01/06/microsoft-spartan-pictures-release-internet-browser/

Those in the know say it's fake, that's what I've seen tweeted so I guess they pulled it.

Just popping by to make a statement for folks to try to stay on topic. I know with threads this long sometimes things can get a bit off tangent for a while. I wont be cleaning things but just making a statement.

Yea.

You can create your own Uservoice from Microsoft Feedback in Windows 10 or vote on this: https://wpdev.uservoice.com/forums/257854-internet-explorer-platform/suggestions/6513228-font-rendering

 

Just popping by to make a statement for folks to try to stay on topic. I know with threads this long sometimes things can get a bit off tangent for a while. I wont be cleaning things but just making a statement.

 

Trying as hard as I can to keep it on topic.

Well now we have a better screenshot from brad that looks more legit.

No they aren't official, not from MS, so no. They were poor images stolen not meant for public display. 

 

"'ll make sure to pass it along once we verify the information." from Brads "article". So these may also be fake.

No they aren't official, not from MS, so no. They were poor images stolen not meant for public display. 

 

"'ll make sure to pass it along once we verify the information." from Brads "article". So these may also be fake.

 

" if I hear anything more about the browser"

 

How can Brad talk about USAGE OF SPARTAN in ARTICLE without being using it. He was the first to tell about IE UI change and extension support since he has access to latest information somehow (Magic). So pictures are legit.

" if I hear anything more about the browser"

 

How can Brad talk about USAGE OF SPARTAN in ARTICLE without being using it. He was the first to tell about IE UI change and extension support since he has access to latest information somehow (Magic). So pictures are legit.

nope. Let's wait on MS to actually put this out officially (and not get ahead of ourselves..), before I listen to journalists and their "leaks".

nope. Let's wait on MS to actually put this out officially (and not get ahead of ourselves..), before I listen to journalists and their "leaks".

Why are you picking on Brad? Apple had tons of leaks not meant for public view all the time. You don't hear anyone complaining on the Mac sites. Plus Brad is well known within the Microsoft community up there with Tom, Mary Jo, and Thurrott. Most, if not all of his leaks are true as he has trusty sources and Neowin rarely posts their own leaks except from other sources. I certainly trust him over BGR who do not cover Microsoft for a living or those analysts.
  • Like 3

Why are you picking on Brad? Apple had tons of leaks not meant for public view all the time. You don't hear anyone complaining on the Mac sites. Plus Brad is well known within the Microsoft community up there with Tom, Mary Jo, and Thurrott. Most, if not all of his leaks are true as he has trusty sources and Neowin rarely posts their own leaks except from other sources. I certainly trust him over BGR who do not cover Microsoft for a living or those analysts.

i have no idea what you are attempting to blame me for doing. I have no part in that. All I'm saying is Brad himself said that he has to confirm officially with MS on the validity of the "leaked" info. Now when MS comes back and actually let's their reps release the info, thats what actually matters. This is not a game of he/she said, with blurry photos pics until confirmed by MS themselves.

Does this new Login Screen has been discussed already or not, I deleted my VM, so can't test here: http://news.softpedia.com/news/Windows-10-Build-9901-Features-New-Login-and-Lock-Screen-Design-468942.shtml

mpccvH5o.jpg

 

While I still think that those primitive monochromatic icons look absolutely awful, it's a good idea that we now have a little start menu with login screen related entries on the login screen :woot:

Looks like MS is really serious about bringing back the start menu in full force.

To put all rumors to rest, I found out the name of the software used for those icons (yes they are not official). It's called Ease Of Access Replacer v2

Could this icon replacer software also be used to replace the Metro Windows 1 icons with actually decent looking ones?

 

Nice, but there is a small issue with Softpedia, who doesn't have a great forum like we have, so they got the instructions wrong.

 

The Path is

HKEY_LOCAL_Machine\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Authentication\LogonUI\TestHooks

The DWORD (32 Bit) Value in the TestHooks Key is called Threshold with its value set to 0 by default, change that to 1 there is no field with a value of Threshold that you change to '1'. Rather There is a DWORD (32 Bit) Value called "Threshold" located under TestHooks which is under LogonUI that has its value set to 0 but needs to be changed to 1.

Neowin can be the first news site to get it right!

Does this only work on 9901 or also on 9879?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft launches Godot Sample to streamline Xbox PC game development on the engine by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Microsoft today announced a new endeavor that aims to make it simpler for Godot developers to get their products into the Xbox PC ecosystem. Dubbed the "XBOX Godot Sample," this is a new public reference for developers using the open-source engine. This is set to serve as an example of how Microsoft GDK, Xbox Services, and PlayFab can be integrated into their projects. The sample is available now on GitHub as a working example. This covers key features in gaming projects that developers may need to release their projects on Xbox PC, with everything from matchmaking and game sign-in to gamepad compatibility with Godot being covered. This release is being called the first step in giving Godot developers the tools to bring their games over to Xbox PC, with more changes to come based on feedback and issue reports. However, the company was clear that this is not related to bringing Godot projects to Xbox consoles. The engine's open development model stops it from accessing console SDKs due to the requirement of NDAs and legal contracts. Here's how it explained this Godot sample project's focus: This is a source-only sample, not a product. It's MIT-licensed at the wrapper layer; the GDK and PlayFab dependencies still require their own installs and license acceptance, consistent with our other XBOX samples. There is no set update cadence for support or maintenance. We’ll watch the repo, monitor issues, and iterate where it makes sense, but this isn't a commercial release. That said, we’re excited to hear your feedback and see any community PRs, as we evolve this together. This is the first step in bringing Godot for XBOX on PC. We plan to evolve it over time based on what the community tells us is most valuable. This sample is built specifically for XBOX on PC. It doesn’t include support for XBOX Series X|S or XBOX One. If you’re already building for XBOX Series X|S or XBOX One, please talk with your XBOX representative. If not, you can get started by signing up here. Game developers can find the XBOX Godot Sample by heading to GitHub over here. Documentation on how to get started with Godot for building an Xbox PC project can be seen here.
    • I don't understand the vision. Do people really want to buy a new computer from Dell with 6 browsers installed? We all keep asking for Microsoft to stop having so much junk on their OS, and adding a bunch of browsers seems to go against that. Ideally, we would just be asked what browser we want during OOBE but Google is just going to pay Dell a bunch of money to include Chrome. Additionally, would you want your phones to start including all the browsers too when you get them? The only thing I ever wanted was to be able to uninstall IE or edge and I believe you are now able to. I do agree that microsoft needs to chill with their "are you sure you don't want to try edge before you install chrome" ads when going to download chrome.
    • It is notable that around 70% of web browser users choose Google Chrome. However, it is puzzling why anyone on Windows would opt for Chrome when Microsoft Edge is often superior in many aspects and comes pre-installed. Edge collects less data, uses less RAM, and is more optimized for Windows as a native Microsoft product. While some may point to bloat in Edge, much of it can be removed with simple tools, requiring no more effort than installing Chrome. Meanwhile, Chrome reportedly downloads large amounts of AI data (4 GB) without explicit consent. I'm sure you Chrome users love that, or? Although Microsoft’s aggressive promotion of Edge may be questionable, the browser’s current advantages make it a preferable choice over Chrome today, even if Chrome may have been better in the past.
    • JetBrains rolls out IntelliJ IDEA update with Markdown preview fixes and more by David Uzondu Image via JetBrains IntelliJ 2026.1.3 from JetBrains has landed, bringing several highly requested bug fixes that target common UI glitches and terminal rendering issues. If you run tmux inside the integrated terminal, the IDE no longer renders the cursor above the active line. The Markdown preview bug, which was fixed in this release, had annoyed developers for quite some time, as the preview pane failed to render images saved outside the project directory. Instead of displaying the actual image, the IDE simply showed a broken image icon, a problem that stuck around for two years before this update. Over on Windows, developers running WSL can now use wsl.exe to spin up their environments without losing terminal functionality. In previous builds, launching a terminal shell with something like wsl.exe -d ubuntu inside a Windows-based project broke both shell integration and active process detection. Other bug fixes in this release include: An issue where Gradle sync incorrectly reported success as a failure on WSL when using Gradle 9.5.0. A syntax highlighting bug that flagged valid Java for-loop initialization blocks with multiple statements as incorrect. A warning bug that triggered a false non-null local variable alert when using JSpecify annotations. A database generation bug that hid the option to use a DELETE statement instead of a TRUNCATE checkbox. A Kotlin highlighting failure where an assertion error in the Gradle redundant library inspection broke error highlighting. A UI bug where the ComboBox popup lacked a maximum height restriction. A Snowflake syntax error where DataGrip failed to support the "create temp" command. A Svelte syntax parsing failure that incorrectly flagged quotes inside inline expressions. A VCS repository manager deadlock that triggered thread pool exhaustion. A memory leak where the LazyTree component kept all previous versions of a tree in memory. IntelliJ 2026.1.3 is the third bug fix release for the IntelliJ 2026.1 series. The first one landed back in April with a fix for the WSL Python interpreter freeze, another fix for guest participants using Emmet abbreviations, and corrected WildFly server deployment errors.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      Asgardi earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      469
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      243
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      73
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!