Windows Technical Preview  

1031 members have voted

  1. 1. On a scale of 1-5, 1 being worst, 5 being best. What do you think of Windows 10 from the leaks so far?

    • 5.Great, best OS ever
      156
    • 4. Pretty Good, needs a lot of minor tweaks
      409
    • 3. OK, Needs a few major improvements, some minor ones
      168
    • 2. Fine, Needs a lot of major improvements
      79
    • 1.Poor, Needs too many improvements, all hope is lost, never going to use it
      41
  2. 2. Based on the recent leaks by Neowin and Winfuture.de, my next OS upgrade will be?

    • Windows 10
      720
    • Windows 8
      20
    • Windows 7
      48
    • Sticking with XP
      3
    • OSX Yosemite
      35
    • Linux
      24
    • Sticking with OSX Mavericks
      3
  3. 3. Should Microsoft give away Windows 10 for free?

    • Yes for Windows 8.1 Users
      305
    • Yes for Windows 7 and above users
      227
    • Yes for Vista and above users
      31
    • Yes for XP and above users
      27
    • Yes for all Windows users
      192
    • No
      71


Recommended Posts

 

I did an upgrade from the previous official build to 10074, and although some things appear to have been fixed, I can't for the life of me get Store Beta to work. It shows the splash screen, then crashes. Went to the event log and got: 

 

"Faulting application name: WinStore.Mobile.exe, version: 2015.4.1.2, time stamp: 0x551c8d52

Faulting module name: combase.dll, version: 10.0.10074.0, time stamp: 0x553ac73c
Exception code: 0xc000027b
Fault offset: 0x00149fd1
Faulting process id: 0x1e2c
Faulting application start time: 0x01d0831c361b5209
Faulting application path: C:\Program Files\WindowsApps\Microsoft.WindowsStore_2015.4.1.0_x86__8wekyb3d8bbwe\WinStore.Mobile.exe
Faulting module path: C:\WINDOWS\system32\combase.dll
Report Id: 0808c248-f8c1-4abf-bc27-f2363ed6da46
Faulting package full name: Microsoft.WindowsStore_2015.4.1.0_x86__8wekyb3d8bbwe
Faulting package-relative application ID: AppFaulting application name: WinStore.Mobile.exe, version: 2015.4.1.2, time stamp: 0x551c8d52
Faulting module name: combase.dll, version: 10.0.10074.0, time stamp: 0x553ac73c
Exception code: 0xc000027b
Fault offset: 0x00149fd1
Faulting process id: 0x1e2c
Faulting application start time: 0x01d0831c361b5209
Faulting application path: C:\Program Files\WindowsApps\Microsoft.WindowsStore_2015.4.1.0_x86__8wekyb3d8bbwe\WinStore.Mobile.exe
Faulting module path: C:\WINDOWS\system32\combase.dll
Report Id: 0808c248-f8c1-4abf-bc27-f2363ed6da46
Faulting package full name: Microsoft.WindowsStore_2015.4.1.0_x86__8wekyb3d8bbwe
Faulting package-relative application ID: App" 
 
Is there any way to fix this without a clean install of the build? 

 

  SO far, no.  It got to the point that I am looking hard at going back and doing a clean-install of 10074 Enterprise on my desktop.  (I DID go back and clean-install 10074 Pro.)

 

I did an upgrade from the previous official build to 10074, and although some things appear to have been fixed, I can't for the life of me get Store Beta to work. It shows the splash screen, then crashes. Went to the event log and got: 

 

"Faulting application name: WinStore.Mobile.exe, version: 2015.4.1.2, time stamp: 0x551c8d52

Faulting module name: combase.dll, version: 10.0.10074.0, time stamp: 0x553ac73c
Exception code: 0xc000027b
Fault offset: 0x00149fd1
Faulting process id: 0x1e2c
Faulting application start time: 0x01d0831c361b5209
Faulting application path: C:\Program Files\WindowsApps\Microsoft.WindowsStore_2015.4.1.0_x86__8wekyb3d8bbwe\WinStore.Mobile.exe
Faulting module path: C:\WINDOWS\system32\combase.dll
Report Id: 0808c248-f8c1-4abf-bc27-f2363ed6da46
Faulting package full name: Microsoft.WindowsStore_2015.4.1.0_x86__8wekyb3d8bbwe
Faulting package-relative application ID: AppFaulting application name: WinStore.Mobile.exe, version: 2015.4.1.2, time stamp: 0x551c8d52
Faulting module name: combase.dll, version: 10.0.10074.0, time stamp: 0x553ac73c
Exception code: 0xc000027b
Fault offset: 0x00149fd1
Faulting process id: 0x1e2c
Faulting application start time: 0x01d0831c361b5209
Faulting application path: C:\Program Files\WindowsApps\Microsoft.WindowsStore_2015.4.1.0_x86__8wekyb3d8bbwe\WinStore.Mobile.exe
Faulting module path: C:\WINDOWS\system32\combase.dll
Report Id: 0808c248-f8c1-4abf-bc27-f2363ed6da46
Faulting package full name: Microsoft.WindowsStore_2015.4.1.0_x86__8wekyb3d8bbwe
Faulting package-relative application ID: App" 
 
Is there any way to fix this without a clean install of the build? 

 

try this script in PowerShell (admin):

Get-AppXPackage | Foreach {Add-AppxPackage -DisableDevelopmentMode -Register "$($_.InstallLocation)\AppXManifest.xml"}

This is what I got:

 

jHYKQsX.png

if you're on 64bit then you'll need to run the command on the 64bit powershell (i got a similar error then realized back on the builds were mail did not work)

if you're on 64bit then you'll need to run the command on the 64bit powershell (i got a similar error then realized back on the builds were mail did not work)

 

You make no sense..  Windows 10 has only 1 powershell app...   there is no two versions of it in OS.

 

If you have 64bit OS, then you have powershell for that OS.  32bit OS has own powershell.

 

 

I had similar problem with mail/calendar issue. I did the trick with powershell then problem solved. my OS is 64 bit.

You make no sense..  Windows 10 has only 1 powershell app...   there is no two versions of it in OS.

 

If you have 64bit OS, then you have powershell for that OS.  32bit OS has own powershell.

 

 

I had similar problem with mail/calendar issue. I did the trick with powershell then problem solved. my OS is 64 bit.

no there is 2 versions for whatever reason. i use search to bring it up and it lists a main & a 64bit version

 

edit: nvm there does seem to be only one version now. they must have changed it in the more recent builds then because there were definitely 2 versions back when I was repairing mail/people/calender on the second official build w/ the issue (first build I didn't have any problems fixing)

After using 10074 for a couple days I have to say, it is pretty outstanding on my desktop, but it is abominable on my tablet.  So unusable I'm rolling it back to 8.1 again.  The start menu keeps popping up whenever I try to do just about anything, whether I am in tablet mode or not.  I can't even rotate the screen without it popping up (in fact, rotation will consistently make it happen, which leads me to believe it is an intentional thing and I hope that changes because OMG it is annoying).  It is finally shaping up to a point where I can believe that I will want to switch to it at RTM, but right now it still has a long, long way to go before it is ready for tablets.  The Facebook bug persists (maybe nobody else is experiencing this?: FB (in)conveniently forgets my login credentials and I have to log in every time I open it, which wouldn't be nearly so annoying if I didn't use a 12-digit randomly-generated password that I can't remember easily).

I did a clean install of 10074 and it runs pretty good so far. Spartan works reasonable on the laptop, it doesn't hang up but once in a while, the task bar launch of it does nothing. Had to cut/paste book marks into Spartans favourite folder. Overall, 10074 is holding up for me. I am presently using VMware with Win2000Pro in the sandbox and am going to rerun some old engineering projects through it to see if 10074 holds up...Cheers

 

oops...forgot the quote....me nooobie....

I brought that up in windows 8 and some people, wont say names, told me I can't adapt to change and how Drag and drop was no longer a good workflow process :rolleyes:

D&D is something I sorely missed with the Modern UI. 

Using 10074 on my laptop, it works fine, it amazes me that the hardware is pretty outdated, and the system is running fine. The only thing that still bother me in W10 is the UI, i'm not a fan of the small window for the start menu, and some tiles doesn't look as good as they did on 8.1. Anyway, i know that's not a finish product. Since the rebrand to "Insider Version", can we assume that we moved from Alpha to Beta status?

Using 10074 on my laptop, it works fine, it amazes me that the hardware is pretty outdated, and the system is running fine. The only thing that still bother me in W10 is the UI, i'm not a fan of the small window for the start menu, and some tiles doesn't look as good as they did on 8.1. Anyway, i know that's not a finish product. Since the rebrand to "Insider Version", can we assume that we moved from Alpha to Beta status?

I have the classic shell program (free ware) that I use but the glitch is I have to uninstall it to get the options applet to work, luckily I don't need it to often. It is pretty funny to configure it into 2 column and use full desktop to see all my programs....then again, I'm old...Cheers

  • Like 1

Start Menu is crashing way too many times for me with this build. Once it crashes all the apps do not start up anymore making the OS feel like a subscription based "you ran out of license" experience.

 

There still seem to be huge issues with the Synaptics drivers for my laptop. Maybe this is what makes it feel especially tacky.

 

Still no IDT drivers. I guess it has partly got to do with the fact that IDT doesn't exist anymore.

 

It just doesn't feel like it can be all finished within the next few months.

 

I guess the Control Panel is staying for RTM. No way they can integrate that into apps.

Start Menu is crashing way too many times for me with this build. Once it crashes all the apps do not start up anymore making the OS feel like a subscription based "you ran out of license" experience.

 

There still seem to be huge issues with the Synaptics drivers for my laptop. Maybe this is what makes it feel especially tacky.

 

Still no IDT drivers. I guess it has partly got to do with the fact that IDT doesn't exist anymore.

 

It just doesn't feel like it can be all finished within the next few months.

 

I guess the Control Panel is staying for RTM. No way they can integrate that into apps.

I actually like Control Panel, but then again MS trained us for many years to use it. I found the latest builds are not very good at driver selection or recognition of particulars, especially video drivers...I made a folder with all the latest drivers for my rig and used them off a flash. Once all the proper drivers were updated/installed, build 10074 has been good to me so far...Cheers 

Start Menu is crashing way too many times for me with this build. Once it crashes all the apps do not start up anymore making the OS feel like a subscription based "you ran out of license" experience.

 

There still seem to be huge issues with the Synaptics drivers for my laptop. Maybe this is what makes it feel especially tacky.

 

Still no IDT drivers. I guess it has partly got to do with the fact that IDT doesn't exist anymore.

 

It just doesn't feel like it can be all finished within the next few months.

 

I guess the Control Panel is staying for RTM. No way they can integrate that into apps.

 

They are trying so hard to get rid of Control Panel, I'm sure there is just so many commands to integrate into Settings. I think that the reason Phone builds are so slow and the interactive tiles development was must aside, was they realized they are behind on Windows 10 development.

 

I have issues with Start as well, resulting in it crashing. Spartan crashes. Settings hangs. Cortana does not talk at all even though volume is working and Hey Cortana is working. Nothing is fast of fluid like the Modern UI on Windows 8 was. Windows 10 will absolutely never be ready by "this summer", however it will ship this summer.

  • Like 2

Anyone having problems with Spartan in 10074? It's is freezing up a lot for me. It's pretty much unusable.

 

been using it all day,and surprisingly, ive only had a few minor issues. once, the right click stopped working, and another time tabs wouldn't close. a simple restart and back to normal.

 

I have issues with Start as well, resulting in it crashing. Spartan crashes. Settings hangs. Cortana does not talk at all even though volume is working and Hey Cortana is working. Nothing is fast of fluid like the Modern UI on Windows 8 was. Windows 10 will absolutely never be ready by "this summer", however it will ship this summer.

 

I don't know, its seems to run pretty fluid here so far aside from a few insignificant bugs. im now making it my main os on one of my dev machines.

As a person who only wants the latest OS to take advantage of newer hardware and to only use it in desktop environments for 3rd party programs, I usually forget how frustrating it must be for higher end users. Those of you trying to get these apps working on touch devices must have a lot of patience. I too feel that the summer release will mostly appease desktop users to a degree but may leave touch users in limbo till ongoing mods are done. Hope I am wrong...Cheers. 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      250
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!