Windows Technical Preview  

1031 members have voted

  1. 1. On a scale of 1-5, 1 being worst, 5 being best. What do you think of Windows 10 from the leaks so far?

    • 5.Great, best OS ever
      156
    • 4. Pretty Good, needs a lot of minor tweaks
      409
    • 3. OK, Needs a few major improvements, some minor ones
      168
    • 2. Fine, Needs a lot of major improvements
      79
    • 1.Poor, Needs too many improvements, all hope is lost, never going to use it
      41
  2. 2. Based on the recent leaks by Neowin and Winfuture.de, my next OS upgrade will be?

    • Windows 10
      720
    • Windows 8
      20
    • Windows 7
      48
    • Sticking with XP
      3
    • OSX Yosemite
      35
    • Linux
      24
    • Sticking with OSX Mavericks
      3
  3. 3. Should Microsoft give away Windows 10 for free?

    • Yes for Windows 8.1 Users
      305
    • Yes for Windows 7 and above users
      227
    • Yes for Vista and above users
      31
    • Yes for XP and above users
      27
    • Yes for all Windows users
      192
    • No
      71


Recommended Posts

The whole Insider thing turned out to be nothing more than just having early access to the OS. What is the point in even writing feedback, when we in the end turn out to be nothing more than the average lab rats. Just... disappointing.

 

I was a deeply passionate guy for anything Windows, but no more. I feel burned out and a very invaluable user. Thanks Microsoft, I guess, I got what I deserved for so blindly having a passion for your products which the people in charge of them don't seem to give a ###### to fix.

 

There was a lot of things changed due to feedback though. 

 

of course it's harder to see that when the feedback said 4+ different things and you weren't one the side that won. the phone version had a lot more consistent feedback and there you see how much effect the insider feedback really had an they want back on a lot of design decisions. 

And Microsoft also ignored the #1 voted on item on UserVoice: the return of Aero Glass. 50,000 votes which mean nothing to Microsoft apparently.

 

Its clear a lot of highly popular feedback gets sent to /dev/null

 

"Windows Insider" is just a marketing program. A genius one, I admit. 

 

If it were truly about beta testing we'd have at least view access to Microsoft's internal bug tracker. And Microsoft would actually publish the changelogs, and not keep them private until Wzor leaks them. 

 

We'd be able to download the checked debug builds off Connect.

 

We'd have access to the private mailing list for Connect.

 

We'd be able to choose different branches. 

 

And we'd be able to get Canary builds. 

 

Just because a stupid suggestion was a the most voted doesn't mean they have to listen to it.

glass wouldn't fit the design language at all. it looks messy and doesn't fit with the style they're going for, it was a dead suggestion from the start. 

 

on top of that they did listen and implemented glass where appropriate like the start menu and taskbar. 

 

Also it's insider, not official beta tester and QnA specialist, in which case you would have to spend hours every day repeatedly going through use cases described step by step to find repeatable bugs and issue. 

  • Like 2

There's people that think that just because they reported some feedback that it HAS to make it into the final build?

 

I find that hard to believe. I'm genuinely shocked.

 

The entitlement some of you "insiders" have is a little disturbing lol

 

Dot....I could have sworn I saw this huge rant posted a ways back about you being "done". Doesn't look like that at all lol.

  • Like 3

Anyone else's explorer freezing and force closing since the last app updates, especially the store on? Trying to use Cortana is still randomly locking up explorer.

 

This isn't ready for Joe Public !

Well you didn't check well enough because RTM is due this week.

yes, so OEMs can start loading machines. doesn't mean MS isn't going to continue releasing bug fixes

 

edit: HAH sniped by freak180  :laugh:

  • Like 1

The latest leaked build is 10163 and the previous ones pushed were 10161 and 10162 right? How could they possibly have almost 700 builds between then and RTM? Or are the build numbers non sequential?

The latest leaked build is 10163 and the previous ones pushed were 10161 and 10162 right? How could they possibly have almost 700 builds between then and RTM? Or are the build numbers non sequential?

RTM releases usually have a bumped up 'nice' build number. For example XP was 2600.

Checked the Feedback app, and it's amazing how many requests there are regarding being able to set a custom color for the title bars. Amazing that Microsoft still hasn't responded to this. Why can't there just be a simple toggle in Settings? Something like "apply accent color to title bars," and be done with it?

 

It's a noted feature request.

 

There's a crap ton of feedback Microsoft never responded to.

 

Generally there are enough people and enough sources of feedback in the world that it's hard to respond to all of it excellently: that'd take an incredible amount of people.  Things are noted.

 

And Microsoft also ignored the #1 voted on item on UserVoice: the return of Aero Glass. 50,000 votes which mean nothing to Microsoft apparently.

 

If you could stick to speaking for yourself, that'd be tight.  I strongly disagree with you. :)

 

Its clear a lot of highly popular feedback gets sent to /dev/null

 

Or takes time to do right.  One of the two.  But hey maybe MS hasn't been working hard and has instead been playing mini-golf everyday.  That's not the world I know of, but w/e. ;)

 

The further requests/comments in your post as regards what "beta/Insider" should be are generally shattered by the issue of scale.  MS has done a lot of things along these lines in the past, and they've been destroyed by the scale of what's involved here: it gets unmanageable quickly.  If they can keep up the current approach and keep improving upon it, more power to them.  This is a brave new world, and I'm hearing about feedback more than ever, and seeing it incorporated now more than ever.  As a fan of the community (which is why I've been here and elsewhere for a very long time now), I'm pretty pleased.

 

I'm happy to have a casual friendly and cordial conversation upon these subjects via PM.  But point blank: anybody who says that feedback is being ignored is (happily!) wrong.  I'd very much appreciate people not being misled upon this subject as I am relying upon y'all to keep supplying feedback so I can help make my pet projects happen.

 

I've heard a dark and fanciful rumor that y'all have at least one friend "on the inside" that generally is already well aware of most of the feedback here and is highly interested in helping make that happen.  Keep the relevant feedback upon features/bug fixes YOU want to see happen coming.

 

 

Yeah, given how long that change took, I still have hope they'll allow for a simple way to choose the title bar color. Heck, I'd even be okay with 10-20 predefined colors, at least offer SOMETHING.

 

Yeah: turns out some colors look really bad as title bar colors.  And then you get into the (solvable) issue of text and item contrast against that, etc.

 

Just because a stupid suggestion was a the most voted doesn't mean they have to listen to it.

glass wouldn't fit the design language at all. it looks messy and doesn't fit with the style they're going for, it was a dead suggestion from the start. 

 

on top of that they did listen and implemented glass where appropriate like the start menu and taskbar. 

 

Sure, maybe glass doesn't fit Basel or Metro or whatnot, but -- that's why you have On/Off toggles.  I hope when we have discussions we always remember the simple concept of on/off toggles: they simply and readily address a lot of concerns.  But then again, hey maybe that's just me: I love customization. :)

 

And yes, that glassification there was indeed based off of user feedback about love of glass.

 

 

You're all awesome -- I've been on neowin for a long time and can confirm it's an excellent community 99.9% of the time -- and have been and will be listened to, even if nobody has the godlike powers to make great stuff happen instantly.  Stuff takes time.  <3

  • Like 2

 

If you could stick to speaking for yourself, that'd be tight.  I strongly disagree with you. :)

 

 

Uh, what? I linked to a feedback item that is CLEARLY [FACT, not opinion] the #2 item on Uservoice - which for a time was #1 but only recently was overtaken. How is that speaking for everybody?

 

 

http://i.imgur.com/3ZBCNAu.png

 

So at most I am speaking for myself AND those who voted in favor of that feedback item

 

How many other feedback items received over 50,000 votes? Either in the feedback program or uservoice? Not many. 

 

So I am NOT the ONLY one who wants Aero Glass returned, clearly. 

Is there a way to adjust gpu scaling / overscan within windows itself?

 

Have a PC with a radeon 4850, tried installing the AMD Suite for it, display driver fails, CCC installs but CCC won't open, just gives an error.

 

Right now the display doesn't fill the entire monitor, all AMD cards are underscanned via hdmi

Here, to make it ABUNDANTLY clear: http://i.imgur.com/3ZBCNAu.png

I do not think that the user was debating that. Either way, a screenshot of the feedback requests would have sufficed. Your crude drawings make nothing easier to understand

'which mean nothing to Microsoft apparently'

 

Strongly disagree.  Imagine we're building a house together.  You want items X, Y, Z.  The architect feels that A, B, C are awesome and need to meet their vision.  You probably also need to worry about D, E, F, and if you don't pay attention to G, H, I you're dumb and just asking for trouble.  You have finite amounts of time.  Compromises get made.  Pretending that XYZ feedback means nothing to someone that is not you does a disservice to the community.  Speak for yourself.  Even in the Glass case you noted, that feedback was used to guide implementation of features.

 

I can't repeat strongly enough and often enough that you should not be discouraging the feedback of other users.  Stop trying to thwart the progress that we all are trying to make together.  I need y'all providing feedback.  Please.  Thanks!

 

If for some reason you're frustrated, PM me (I find that PMs lead to better conversations) and let's talk it out.  Feedback is important and vital to getting management to buy off on changes we all want.  Stop trying to thwart that.

 

edit: If you can't use PMs, hit me up at zachdms at hotmail dotty com.  <3

  • Like 1

Well you didn't check well enough because RTM is due this week.

 

So you're saying it's being released to Joe Public this week?  They can still patch it between now and the 29th, and vendors can still release new drivers before then.

 

The RTM build means very little to the general public until they can actually download it without going through the Insider (or leaked) channels.

Has anyone tried to clear the cache/cookies in MS Edge in 10162?   And if so,  did it make your whole Explorer/Edge/Start menu freeze up?   Just wondering - if you're brave, try it.  :)  It resets after about 30 minutes to back to normal.

Has anyone tried to clear the cache/cookies in MS Edge in 10162?   And if so,  did it make your whole Explorer/Edge/Start menu freeze up?   Just wondering - if you're brave, try it.  :)  It resets after about 30 minutes to back to normal.

No freeze here.

Nope, it's carefully planned. There's a method to what seems like madness.

 

I did wonder if they would jump to 11200 which would make sense but it is a pretty huge jump from 10163 or whatever they are at today. The build number change from 9600 to 10163 is only 563 and in the past it has always been 1600 builds between releases. 

Has anyone had issues with sleep mode? Mine goes into sleep and wakes around 30 seconds later. I've unchecked every bloody thing that has the ability to wake the computer with no success.

 

disable 'allow this device to wake up the computer' in the device manager

 

for both keyboard and mouse.

 

that fixed the problem for me.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • It's amazing that anyone still uses this bloated trash.
    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Gotenks98 is right... Outlook (new) is absolute trash. Doesn't Mozilla have an Enterprise Version of Firebird?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      510
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      273
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!