Recommended Posts

Rocket & night sky porn!

 

http://petapixel.com/2016/05/18/captured-spacex-falcon-9-landing-front-milky-way/

 

How I Accidentally Captured the SpaceX Falcon 9 Landing

 

At 1:21am on May 6, 2016, SpaceX continued its run of aerospace brilliance with a night launch of its Falcon 9 rocket, carrying its Japanese communication satellite payload to geostationary orbit.

 

The most spectacular portion of this event was the first successful night landing of the Falcon 9s first stage onboard their floating platform called Of Course I Still Love You. While this was not the first successful landing for SpaceX, it was the first one at sea at night and also one that they predicted to have a high probability of failure due to the dynamics involved with the much higher energy needed to send the satellite to a higher orbit than previous launches.

 

What does that have to do with me? Well, at the time, I was on Hunting Island in the southern portion of South Carolina doing what I love to do, shooting the Milky Way and I captured the moment!

 

This was very reminiscent of my capture of the International Space Station a couple of years ago. If youve followed me at all you might remember the night I went out to shoot star trails above Weavers Needle in the Superstition Mountains just outside of Phoenix, Arizona, and the ISS photobombed me. Maybe I have a knack for being in the right place at the right time.
>

 

GIF video

 

  • Like 3

This video is a year old, but I thought it was worth posting, see what you think.....

 

Untold Stories from the Rocket Ranch: New Kids on the Pad

video is 2:21 min.

 

 

:D

 

  • Like 1

Trip Harris is celebrating 9 years with SpaceX today. The video clip he chose to link to this tweet is interesting. Trip is Manager of Falcon landings.

 

Picard: Somehow I doubt this will be the last ship to carry the name Enterprise.

 


 

  • Like 1

Lordy!!

 

After all the background  info that the JCSAT-14 stage was too damaged to fly again we get this,

 

Elon Musk ‏@elonmusk
@SchaFFFFFF Flight 24 is def capable of flying again, but it makes sense to apply ground delta qual to rocket w toughest entry conditions.

 

:woot:

  • Like 2

Usually we hear and/or see a snippet of a video, an image or paragraph on movement of a first stage, but , myself, don't usually see anything on the second stage.

 

Here are 2 images of a second stage being moved...

second stage image

 

-------------------

 

A lot of work has gone into developing fairing recovery, due to expense and future manufacturing considerations. The last few launches, we have also been able to catch a fairing thruster in an image or two. 

 

It reminded me of this video....

Falling Back to Earth | HD Footage From Space

video 1:54 min.

 

:)

  • Like 1

Earlier info about F9 being partially reused from @FLSPACErePORT at SpaceTechExpo has been corrected - Ed misheard the conversation.

@FLSPACErePORT
Correction on Falcon-9 reusable components: entire stage would be reused, not individual components. Eventually the complete system would.

 

and,

Smilodonjack ‏@RokBottomGamers 
@elonmusk What re-usability rate are you going with for falcon? (realistically)

Elon Musk ‏@elonmusk 
@RokBottomGamers 100+ for almost everything 10+ for heat shields and a few other items.

Also,

 

Crew Dragon lead and former astronaut Garrett Reisman reports that the DragonFly vehicle At McGregor has been retired. Milestones met. 

  • Like 1

And for good measure,

 

http://tass.ru/en/science/877803
 

Russia has no intention of concluding more contracts for delivering US astronauts to the International Space Station after 2018, the deputy chief of the state-run corporation Roscosmos, Sergey Saveliev, has told the media.

  • Like 1
1 hour ago, DocM said:

Had to giggle today; several articles where space & business reporters just noticed F9 now has a mission capability listing for commercial Mars launches up to 4 tonnes.

SpaceX has had Mars listed on the Destination Manifests for a few years now. And they're just now noticing? Ugh.

 

Can do a lot with 8,800 lbs (if we're counting it as Metric Tonnes). We talking Orbital or Lander? :D 

More on the insurers.

 

http://spacenews.com/spacex-to-brief-underwriters-on-the-road-to-falcon-9-reusability/


Falcon 9 is now getting the same rate (% of launch price) as Arians 5, which amounts to $3.72m for F9 and about $6m for Arians 5 because of the price difference. 

Also, they're automating launch prep and are still targeting rollout to vertical and launch in 1 hour.

 

Also,

 

The Thaicom-8 core should arrive at Cape Canaveral between 2000E and 0100E tonight.

Edited by DocM
  • Like 1
1 hour ago, DocM said:

More on the insurers.

 

http://spacenews.com/spacex-to-brief-underwriters-on-the-road-to-falcon-9-reusability/


Falcon 9 is now getting the same rate (% of launch price) as Arians 5, which amounts to $3.72m for F9 and about $6m for Arians 5 because of the price difference. 

Also, they're automating launch prep and are still targeting rollout to vertical and launch in 1 hour.

 

Also,

 

The Thaicom-8 core should arrive at Cape Canaveral between 2000E and 0100E tonight.

If I was a competitor I would read the above statements and struggle not to cry. The amount of progress in those three sentences is incredible! 

  • Like 1

Yup, and the CRS-8 core having 2 customers in line for it deals the demand case. 

 

And make no mistake: a Raptor powered methane commercial launcher with both stages reusable has to be coming, leveraging (qualifying?) BFR and BFS construction and reuse techs. Most likely capable of both F9 and FH's jobs, simplifying the inventory.

 

That's without doubt the real future, even though it's unannounced. Once it is announced it really puts their competitors in a bind as they're still targeting F9/FH.

  • Like 1

Enjoy the next Delta-IV launch ... that particular species is not long for this world. The final one being built (in-progress) is going to be put on display in the Air & Space Museum. ULA won't allow it, never mind.

 

Oh, and I saw Falcon Heavy T-Shirts in the camera view during the Thaicomm Launch. I gotta order some shirts, posters, and those double-tall coffee mugs ... wonder if they have any of our guy Marty? :yes: 

 

[EDIT] And an Occupy Mars Wall Clock. I must have the Wall Clock. :D 

Edited by Unobscured Vision
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • This got me thinking, would you rather a self driving car prioritise protecting its passengers or everyone else? I'd choose the one that keeps me and my kids safest. At some point, these cars have to make those choices already, don't they? Wonder if we have a way to find out what way they lean.
    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      561
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      78
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!