Recommended Posts

FloatingFatMan

I'm more excited for this than I am for seeing Star Wars on the 19th... :p

 

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
Draggendrop

misc info...

 

:)

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Draggendrop

Now, this is a class act...well done...

Read the commentary, it's great....

 

https://www.flickr.com/photos/jurvetson/7547788856 )

redirect on the link...or ....remove brackets for the full link and posting of commentary  for this picture.

 

An Apollo Tribute to SpaceX

 

:D

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
DocM

BFR and BFS, via GQ

http://www.gq.com/story/elon-musk-mars-spacex-tesla-interview?utm_source=10370

>


>


SpaceX exists to further this quest on several fronts: to develop the reusable rocket technology that would be needed to ferry large numbers of people, and large amounts of cargo, to Mars; to earn money to finance this goal; and to work out exactly what it would take to get to and from Mars in the way that Musk envisions. If you didn't know what "Mars colonial transport architecture" was—that's what it is.

 

Musk and his colleagues aren't vaguely hypothesizing about what people might like to do in some distant future generation—he believes the first manned Mars mission will be possible by the time he's in his fifties. He is now 44. The rocket that they are working on is referred to internally by the code name BFR. And it doesn't stand for some arcane, smarty-pants science term. It stands for Big F***ing Rocket.

 

I ask Musk whether he really calls it that; his answer is both delightfully nerdy, and not.

 

"Well, there's two parts of it—there's a booster rocket and there's a spaceship. So the booster rocket's just to get it out of Earth's gravity because Earth has quite a deep gravity well and thick atmosphere, but the spaceship can go from Mars to Earth without any booster, because Mars's gravity is weaker and the atmosphere's thinner, so it's got enough capability to get all the way back here by itself. It needs a helping hand out of Earth's gravity well. So, technically, it would be the BFR and the BFS." As in "Big F***ing Spaceship."
>
>
Musk has previously said that he would publicly present some specifics of his Mars-colonization plans later this year, though he tells me that it may now be early next year. "Before we announce it, I want to make sure that we're not gonna make really big changes to it," he says. "Um, yeah. I think it's gonna seem pretty crazy, no matter what."

 

Just because it's so far beyond what people would imagine?

 

He laughs. "It's really big." And laughs again. "It's really big. There's not been any architecture like this described that I'm aware of."
>
>

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
Unobscured Vision

We always knew that's what it stood for ... but "BFS" must be the Colonial Transport itself. 50 souls at a time, from what I understand.

 

Gotta love SpaceX's moxy. I bet Marty is the one that called it the "BFR", 'cause "that's what it is". :yes: 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Draggendrop

/s      Built For Reuse.....Big Frontier Rocket........Bound For Realestate

 

:woot:

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Unobscured Vision

Because Flowers Respawn ...

 

I got a few of those too. :D 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
DocM
2 hours ago, BetaguyGZT said:

We always knew that's what it stood for ... but "BFS" must be the Colonial Transport itself. eventually up to 50 100 souls at a time, from what I understand.

 

Gotta love SpaceX's moxy. I bet Marty is the one that called it the "BFR", 'cause "that's what it is". :yes: 

Fixed. 100 is what they've mentioned.

 

BFR is expected to have 15 meter core diameter, and a payload fairing is often 1.5x the core diameter. That could mean a BFS up to 22.5 meters wide, and some multiple of its diameter high. If the BFS is a " Super Dragon" in proportions (1.65h:1w)  it could be 37+ meters tall.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
Unobscured Vision

Thank you kindly. (Y) 100 Colonists at a time it shall be then.

 

Can't wait to see what they come up with.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Draggendrop
4 hours ago, DocM said:

Fixed. 100 is what they've mentioned.

 

BFR is expected to have 15 meter core diameter, and a payload fairing is often 1.5x the core diameter. That could mean a BFS up to 22.5 meters wide, and some multiple of its diameter high. If the BFS is a " Super Dragon" in proportions (1.65h:1w)  it could be 37+ meters tall.

These dimensions are incredible.......the things that can be put on it are astounding.....:)

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Draggendrop

 

Some unofficial rumors are that the initial launch spacing may have been coverage for the Cygnus launch as well as extra time for Cygnus unloading and the Dragon cargo reshuffle to put the new spare sequential shunt unit on the load.....power channel problem from a few weeks ago. 

 

The high beta angle will be over during the first part of January, and the crew will have time to move all the cargo from the enhanced Cygnus, as well as new crew members getting their "wings"

 

What do you guys figure?    Gives a bit of breathing room anyway.    :)

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
DocM

And time to get ORBCOMM, SES-9 and Jason 3 off the ground.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Draggendrop

Bit of info from Space.com article......

 

SpaceX, ULA Transforming Historic Launchpads for Commercial Crew Flights

http://www.space.com/31357-spacex-ula-transforming-historic-launchpads-for-commercial-crew-flights.html

 

 

Quote

Tower takedown

NASA's Launch Pad 39A has been steadily losing its iconic space shuttle-era configuration as SpaceX has worked to bring it up to code and modify it for commercial operations.

 

"In an essentially a year, they've built a processing facility, finished up all the construction for their fluid and electrical systems, and they built the transporter erector," recounted Scott, who's been focusing on SpaceX's launchpad work as the ground and mission ops technical lead in NASA's Commercial Crew Program. "They've made huge strides in this past year to get [this pad] ready."

 

When the shuttle was flying (and before it the Apollo-era's Saturn rockets), it was moved from the Vehicle Assembly Building some three and a half miles away to the pad by a crawler transporter. Standing vertical atop a mobile launch platform, the shuttle was positioned next to a fixed gantry tower and then a rotating service structure swung around to load cargo and further prepare the shuttle for launch.

SpaceX is taking a different approach. The company has built a horizontal integration facility — a long hangar — at the entrance to the pad, inside of which the Falcon rockets will be processed. A transporter erector will then move the booster by rail to the top of the pad, where the Falcon will be raised to the vertical, its Dragon spacecraft or payload already mounted atop it.

 

For crewed launches, the astronauts will board the Dragon using the same fixed service structure as was used for the shuttle, but modified for the Falcon. The gantry will gain a new crew access arm in Spring 2016 and will lose its top-mounted mast in favor of a new set of lightning protection towers positioned in a Y-shape around the pad.

Further, the rotating service structure (RSS) is set to come down.

 

"That is going to start coming down in January," Scott said, referring to the RSS. "They have the contractors [selected] who are going to be doing that disassembly and bringing that down. It will come down in pieces, it won't come down in one big chunk."

SpaceX had originally said it wanted to preserve as much of the pad's historic structures as possible, but leaving the no-longer-needed RSS in place would pose a safety risk, noted Scott.

 

"It is a maintenance kind of issue, a [foreign object debris] FOD issue," she explained. "In this [sea air] environment, it does not take long for corrosion to begin happening. Then you create some type of FOD that would be damaging to your rocket during launch."

The RSS and other hardware removed from Pad 39A will be returned to NASA for artifact screening and disposition.

 

SpaceX is intending to launch its first Falcon from the pad next year. If the schedule holds, the first spaceflight of the Crew Dragon, albeit without astronauts, could lift off from Pad 39A by the end of 2016.

 

"We just got through a couple of weeks ago — just before Thanksgiving, doing an evaluation of the pad, all their fluid, electrical and mechanical systems, [and] also their launch control system, and have given it an okay to move out of the construction phase into where they are ready to begin processing," Scott described. "They're ready to have a first stage piece out here and start doing some processing."

:)

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Unobscured Vision

Aha, so now we have a better idea of when the crewed Dragon will do a test flight.

 

Popcorn night and NASA-HD on the big screen! 48" of SpaceX in all its' HD glory ... I wanna see it! :yes: 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Draggendrop

Just browsing through a generic SpaceX article ......

 

Falcon 9’s near-term manifest coming into focus

http://spaceflightnow.com/2015/12/13/falcon-9s-near-term-manifest-coming-into-focus/

 

I knew about the large backlog, and this puts it in perspective....

 

Quote

SpaceX’s manifest, with a backlog of more than 50 launches the company claims is worth $7 billion, 

Not only will this be high cadence...but prolonged....

 

-------------------------

 

Some of the guys on reddit had been playing with the size comparison for a 15 meter core and came up with this...all unofficial and just for fun...

 

n2mJI8s.jpg

 

This will need a meteor crater or mine hole, for a flame trench.......

 

and this... with Saturn 5 and F9

 

MBMZDaj.jpg

 

BFR may be an understatement...need more verbs

 

:D

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Unobscured Vision

... it's going to be a vulgar display of power when that candle gets lit. Eye, ear and blast protection will be required for anyone within 5 km of that beast.

 

And no, I'm not kidding.

 

It's going to be on a whole other level of power. It'll likely destroy the launch tower as it lifts off, at least partially, from the acoustic energy alone. The transient force from all of those Raptor engines will expand outward and downwards at 1/8th of the vehicle length below (if not further) and to the side, making that area a literal "kill zone" for anything nearby when those engines are at full thrust. Yeah ... it's gonna be a force of destruction, certainly.

 

Not to say that SpaceX won't take every conceivable safety precaution necessary and possible for both life and property, because they will. I'm just saying that the Launch Tower is not likely to remain standing in one piece & undamaged unless it's designed to account for those forces and be well away from the vehicle when it launches. I suggest a "Retractable Tower", one that pulls away from the entire LV just before it fires those engines. The Russians are professionals when it comes to retraction -- literal masters of it. I recommend that SpaceX follow the same line of thinking. :yes: 

 

Can't wait to see what they come up with.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Draggendrop

This may require a remote site, far away from civilian damage. It would be a major complex, for multiple launches and infrastructure tailored to these missions....downtown Florida will not do.....:D

 

In fact, this may have the makings of a huge dedicated space port in the future....

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Unobscured Vision

Agreed. And if this monstrosity goes boom, it's going to have the force of ... let's do the math ... roughly 3~5 Megatons off the first stage alone in propellant (Methane + Oxidizer) as an explosion, potentially. You'll need 10km to avoid injury from the force of the blast if you're standing at ground level, since it'll be an air burst. And it'll potentially cause deafness to anyone as far as 18km of the blast, depending on how high the vehicle is and how much propellant remained when the failure occurred.

 

Let's just hope there's no failure.

 

So yeah, I agree. They can't launch this thing at the Cape. There's no way. It's too big, and too close to populated areas. Sure, it's a hell of a spectacle -- but too much of a risk. Saturn/Apollo being launched at the Cape was the top end of the scale as far as risk goes -- any larger (like the Super Geminii program that was being planned in place of Saturn/Apollo) and they wouldn't have been able to launch there.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Draggendrop

Just as a jump back in history...the N1 was big....but this "old girl" was a drawing board monster.....

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_Dragon_(rocket)

 

The BFR will be phenomenal...and we can be pretty sure, more than just on the "drawing board"

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites
DocM

Calm down guys, the signal to noise ratio in those reddit posts is low and many dimensions & specs posted there are still uncertain.

 

The pic depicting the height of a BFR vs F9 and Saturn V should be taken with a dash of salt. 

 

As to the blast from a failed BFR, those blast wave calculators predict detonation events - very short duration events with high peak pressure waves. A failing launcher is usually a conflagration, which takes place over a much longer time frame and creates a much smaller peak pressure wave. In those that aren't it's usually a detonating solid booster at fault.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Draggendrop

Actually,...all forums are speculating. The above image is for a 15 meter core...49.2 feet , if the core diameter is 12, 10 or other dimension, will only be known when SpaceX is in final design some time in the future. The upper image gives one a perspective for a 15 meter core...that is all. The lower photo is only an exercise in fun with F9 proportionality...everyone knows it's speculative and the purpose was again, as a reference...that is all. 

 

The sheer size of that unit, the launch pad requirements and noise level, if at 15 meters, would reflect some of our concerns. F9 test fires out west are heard by residents....imagine this unit test firing...I would be very surprised if a 15 meter core was even allowed anywhere near a populated area. As we approach down to 10 meter, I would assume Saturn 5 sizes would still be a go.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Draggendrop

This is a reminder of when things go wrong...Wallops

 

Shockwave from Antares Orbital Science Rocket Explosion Knocks Down Spectator

video is 1:07 min

 

 

 

 

This is 11 rail cars of LNG..a single rail car length could be the diameter of a large launcher.

SW methane explosion

video is 7:21 min

 

 

If a larger launcher is using a mess of Raptors or variations of, and using liquid methane and liquid oxygen........one better hope we don't have an ooops.

A very large core with that amount of fuel is something to worry about, particularly when methane explosions draw massive amounts of oxygen from the environment. Methane is the way to go...definitely...but caution will be required and I am sure SpaceX is aware of it.

 

The above posts dealing with explosive concerns are more than warranted.

Link to post
Share on other sites
DocM

One possibility: Spaceport Camden, Camden County Georgia. West of Little Cumberland Island. 11,000 acres, basically the old Thiokol rocket test site. The EIS process has started, public comments end Jan 4, targeting a 2018 first launch. 

 

There have been rumors since Boca Chica was selected, and Falcon 9 & Dragon are all over their website.

 

http://spaceportcamden.us 

 

29TM_EH_spaceport_map.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Draggendrop

Spaceport Camden looks like it will be a great generic site. I am curious as to the size of Boca Chica, as this was to be a launch site for SpaceX use only, and if it had a lot of separation.......then again, this is speculation....to which, as of late ...is at silly levels. So much silliness, in fact, that I do a general quick view and get the hoot out fast....it is starting to get real bad lately. I will be slowing down the posting myself in the new year as a few projects require attention.

 

A bit of speculation is fun as a diversion, but I feel any more is a waste of constructive time. I am a huge SpaceX fan, but I feel that 3 prior decades of low level activity has almost created a media monster. SpaceX has a great qualified workforce, are making huge strides...but...are venturing into a lot of new territory. They are doing well, and try their best to inform the general public and can only do so much...which leads to crazy levels of speculation, at all sites.

 

We know SpaceX has Mars as the target. F9 is doing well, FH should follow suit. To get to the size of MCT will take at least one intermediary size...ie FX or FXX, whatever name, doesn't really matter, time matters. For a large craft by 2030 era, they have their work cut out and will probably be on Mars with smaller units before that time.

 

Myself, I don't loose any sleep over it now, SpaceX will progress and will probably have an ooops or two, but's that progress. There are many fields that SpaceX are not working on, and others are, that will also be game changers for them to use by 2030. The future looks bright...but it is going to take time. The only real problem that I see is dumb ##### politicians, and they have picked the wrong time for games.

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites
DocM

There will be no intermediate sized Raptor vehicle before BFR.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By zikalify
      SpaceX launches record-breaking number of satellites
      by Paul Hill



      SpaceX successfully launched its Transporter-1 mission earlier today atop one of its Falcon 9 rockets. The mission is the first from the SmallSat Rideshare Program that lets organisations launch their satellites into different orbits for as low as $1,000,000. The mission broke records in terms of the number of satellites carried into space, the record was previously held by India which launched 104 satellites in 2017.

      On today’s flight, SpaceX said there were 133 commercial and government spacecraft and 10 Starlink satellites. The commercial and government spacecraft consisted of CubeSats, microsats and orbital transfer vehicles while the Starlink satellites are the first of their kind to be going into a polar orbit which means they’ll pass over the North and South Poles each time they go around the Earth.

      If you were not following along live, you can watch the entire mission as it happened below:

      As with other SpaceX launches, the rocket’s first stage takes the satellites up so far before separating. After separating, the company said the first stage performed a flip manoeuvre, deployed the grid fans, made an entry burn and then underwent aerodynamic guidance before performing a vertical landing on a droneship which was sitting in the waters of the Atlantic Ocean.

      According to the company’s Rideshare page, it will be launching missions into Sun-synchronous orbit (SSO) approximately every four months. As SpaceX continues to find more efficiencies in rocket launches it will be able to continue to drive down its already comparatively low satellite launch prices.

    • By zikalify
      UKSA and Rolls-Royce to study nuclear-powered space travel
      by Paul Hill



      The UK Space Agency (UKSA) and Rolls-Royce have signed a research contract that will bring the two together to investigate nuclear energy as a source for deeper space exploration. UKSA said that nuclear is a plentiful source of energy that could propel spacecraft at huge speeds which could “revolutionise” space travel.

      In terms of results, nuclear propulsion is expected to be twice as efficient as chemical engines which are in use today and a trip to Mars could be cut in half and take just three to four months. According to the government, the new agreement will also generate skilled employment across the country.

      Commenting on the partnership, UKSA Chief Executive Dr Graham Turnock said:

      Aside from faster travel, nuclear propulsion would help cut astronauts’ dosage of radiation that they get hit with when in space. UKSA said that the longer you spend in space, the greater the amount of radiation that you’re exposed to so faster journeys would mean less radiation exposure.

      In the outer Solar System, the sunlight is too dim to power solar panels and fuel cells are not a reliable store of energy according to UKSA. Using nuclear power, therefore, would help to enable more missions in the outer Solar System.

    • By indospot
      How to create recovery media for your Windows 10 PC
      by João Carrasqueira



      Computers and their operating systems are incredibly complex pieces of technology, and they may just last you a good number of years from the day you buy it. Because of that, at some point, there's a very good chance you'll run into some problems or performance may just not be as good as it used to be, so you might just need a fresh start for your OS.

      There are many ways to go about restoring your system to a blank slate, as most computer manufacturers offer some sort of recovery tool, but in this guide, we'll show you how to get started by creating recovery media, so you can always get back to a functional state later. This guide should work on any computer running Windows 10 and while it specifically refers to Windows 10 version 20H2, these features should be available in most of the recent versions of the OS.

      Backing up your drivers
      Performing a clean installation of Windows means you'll probably be installing the OS without the appropriate drivers for your PC. In some cases, you may be alright with the generic drivers in Windows, and from there, you can connect to the internet to download the drivers that are missing from Windows Update. However, you'll be dependent on whether drivers are available on Windows Update if you even manage to connect to the internet with the built-in generic drivers.

      Most of the bigger OEMs will likely provide driver downloads from their support website, but that may not always be the case. Thankfully, you can backup the drivers you're using right now, and you can just install them later. You'll want an external drive, be it a flash drive or an external HDD/SSD. You may want to create a new folder in the drive you're using to back up the drivers, so you can find them more easily.

      To backup your current drivers, you'll need to use Command Prompt or PowerShell. You can right-click the Start icon or press the Windows key + X, then choose either Command Prompt (Admin) or Windows PowerShell (Admin) from the context menu.

      To backup your drivers, you need to enter the following command: dism /online /export-driver /destination:"{Path}", where {Path} is the location of the folder you want to use on your external drive. You can copy the path from the address bar in File Explorer when the folder is open. In our example, we're using a Drivers folder on the root of drive E:, so the command is dism /online /export-driver /destination:"E:\Drivers". It should look like this:



      If all goes well, the folder you chose will look something like this once the process is done (you will see more folders depending on how many drivers are backed up):

      Creating installation media
      Finally, you'll want to create installation media for Windows 10. For this, you'll need another external USB drive, and it can't be the same you used to backup your drivers and data. Creating installation media will delete all other data on the drive, so you need a drive with no important data. The drive also needs at least 8GB of capacity for the latest version of Windows 10.

      Option 1 - Using the Media Creation Tool

      The easiest way to create Windows 10 installation media is to use Microsoft's Media Creation Tool. You can download it by going to this page and using the Download tool now button (not the Update now button).

      Open the file you downloaded and accept the license terms that show up. You'll then be asked whether you want to upgrade now or create installation media, and in this case, we want to do the latter. You can then choose which language, architecture, and edition of Windows 10 you want to install. The program will automatically apply the settings that match your current system, but you can always change them if you want to.



      Then, you get the option to either create an ISO file or use a USB flash drive as installation media. An ISO file can be used to create installation media later, which we'll get to in a bit. For now, we want to use a USB drive, which needs to have at least 8GB of space for the latest version of Windows 10. Then, choose the flash drive you want to use. Remember that this will erase all the data on the drive, and that it can't be the same drive you used to backup your drivers.

      At this point, the tool will begin downloading the latest version of Windows 10 and flashing it onto the drive you chose. This will take a while, but you can just leave the program open and wait for it to finish, and you'll be good to go.

      Option 2 - Using Rufus

      Using the Media Creation Tool is the most straightforward way to create installation media, but it's not ideal for everyone. It may happen that you don't have an internet connection available at the same time you have the flash drive, so you use the Media Creation Tool to download an ISO file first, and then flash it later. Or you may already have an ISO file for a specific version of Windows, or even a different operating system.

      If that applies to you, a tool like Rufus can help you flash an ISO file to a USB flash drive, though the most recent versions also give you the option to download some operating systems from the internet. We'll be focusing on using an ISO file you already have, whether you created it with the Media Creation Tool or got it elsewhere.

      First, download the latest version of Rufus from this page (it should be the first file on the list). Install it and run it, and you'll see this interface:



      There are plenty of options here, but for most people, you should be fine focusing on a couple of items. At the top, you can choose the USB flash drive. Just like with the Media Creation Tool, remember this process will delete all data on the drive, so you'll need to make sure you don't need it for anything else. For the Boot selection option, you'll want to choose Disk or ISO image (Please select) then click the SELECT button to find the ISO file you want to use. The arrow next to the button allows you to switch to download mode, so you can download the operating system you want instead. In our example, this isn't what we want.

      Once you have selected an ISO (image) file, some of the default options in the app will change to match. You shouldn't need to worry about any of this, and you can simply click START at the bottom to begin flashing the image to the flash drive. Once the process is fully completed, you should be able to use the drive to install the operating system you chose.

      Option 3 - Create a recovery drive

      If the PC you want to recover is still fully functional, you can create a recovery drive through existing methods in Windows 10. Some manufacturers, such as Dell and (naturally) Microsoft, actually recommend this as the method to create a recovery drive for their PCs. This will create a drive containing not only the operating system but programs bundled with the original installation, so if you have a brand-new PC, you can use this as a failsafe in case the computer fails later.

      The easiest way to access this is by opening the Start menu or Windows search and typing "create a recovery drive". Otherwise, you can open the legacy Control Panel, choose System and Security, then Security and Maintenance, Recovery, and finally, Create a recovery drive. Click Next in the first window and you'll be able to choose a drive to store the backup.



      As usual, this process will delete all the content in the drive. Choose the flash drive you want to use as a recovery drive, which will need to be at least 16GB in size, though the requirements vary depending on your laptop brand. Dell, for example, recommends a minimum of 32GB. If you meet the requirements, start the process and wait for it to finish.

      OEM-specific solutions
      Many PC manufacturers offer tools that let you create recovery images for your specific device. If you'd rather go that route, here are some options for the biggest PC manufacturers out there.

      For Microsoft's Surface devices, you can download a recovery image from here. You need to select your Surface model and provide your serial number to be able to download it, then you can unzip the file to a flash drive. This requires a flash drive with at least 16GB of storage, or 8GB if you're using a Surface RT or Surface 2.

      HP offers the Cloud Recovery Tool, which can be used to create a recovery image for your specific PC. You can download the app from the Microsoft Store and follow the instructions in the app. HP also provides instructions on how to use the tool here. Bear in mind you'll need a flash drive with at least 32GB of storage, since these recovery images include more than just a Windows installation, but also all the drivers and software that would come in an HP PC out of the box.

      Lenovo has a similar tool, called Digital Download Recovery Service. First, you need to go to Lenovo's recovery website to request a digital download for your PC. You'll need your serial number and Machine Type Model (MTM). Then, you'll need Lenovo's USB Recovery Creator tool, which you can download here for Windows 7 and here for Windows 8 or later (including Windows 10). Download the appropriate version and follow the instructions in the app to download the image and create recovery media for it.

      Finally, Dell also has a similar tool, the Dell OS Recovery Tool. You can download it here, and then follow the instructions to create the recovery media. You'll have to provide the service tag for the device you want to recover, and you need a flash drive with at least 16GB of data.

      That should cover every option you could want for creating recovery media for your PC. These are the things you need in order to have an operational computer after the recovery process. We'll have a separate guide focused on the actual process of restoring a PC later, but you'll want to follow these steps first.

      Did you try any of the methods listed above? Did you find them helpful? Is there another method you prefer? Let us know in the comments!

    • By Ather Fawaz
      "Mars, here we come!!" exclaims Elon Musk despite explosive ending to Starship's test flight
      by Ather Fawaz

      Image via Trevor Mahlmann (YouTube) The Starship initiative by SpaceX is meant to make spaceflights to Mars a reality. After a scrubbed launch yesterday courtesy of an auto-abort procedure in the Starship's Raptor engines, once again, SpaceX geared up for a re-run of the test a few hours back. This time, Starship SN8 successfully took flight from its test site in Boca Chica, Texas. A trimmed version of the complete event is embedded below from Trevor Mahlmann's YouTube channel.

      Compared to the scrubbed launch, things went better on this one, but not entirely. The gargantuan 160-feet tall rocket, propelled by three Raptor engines, took flight, and intended to rise to a height of 41,000 ft (12,500 m). SpaceX founder Elon Musk called the ascent a success, but it's not clear whether the rocket reached its intended altitude. Nevertheless, after reaching its highest point, the rocket began its journey back to its earthly test site.

      Image via Trevor Mahlmann (YouTube) The SN8 prototype performed a spectacular mid-air flipping maneuver to set itself on course to land vertically back to the earth—a feat we've all grown accustomed to seeing with SpaceX's Falcon 9 rocket. The SN8 executed the landing flip successfully, and SpaceX tweeted a closer look at the event as it happened. Impressively, SpaceX claimed that by doing so, the SN8 became the largest spacecraft to perform a landing maneuver of this sort.

      But as the rocket prepared to touch down and its boosters tried to slow down its descent to cushion the landing, the rocket's fuel header tank pressure got low. This caused the "touchdown velocity to be high & RUD," during the landing burn, Musk tweeted. Unfortunately, this meant that upon touchdown, the Starship SN8 prototype exploded into flames.

      Image via SpaceX Livestream Notwithstanding the fiery, unfortunate event right at the final few moments, SpaceX and Musk hailed the test as a success. For the company, "SN8 did great! Even reaching apogee would’ve been great, so controlling all way to putting the crater in the right spot was epic!!" Musk tweeted, "We got all the data we needed. Congrats SpaceX team hell yeah!!", he continued; before following up with another tweet exclaiming "Mars, here we come!!"

    • By Ather Fawaz
      NASA approves SpaceX and the Crew Dragon for regular crewed missions to the ISS
      by Ather Fawaz

      Image via NASA/SpaceX It has been a big year so far for SpaceX. Back in May, its Crew Dragon spacecraft completed its first manned voyage to the International Space Station (ISS). With Elon Musk accrediting Starship as the top priority for the company, the famed project has also picked up pace. So has the Starlink initiative, with its recent expansion to include more beta customers. The firm is also gearing up for Dragon's second manned mission, Crew-1, to the ISS in a few days as well. Amidst all this, it has now finally gained NASA's approval that it has been striving towards with the Commercial Crew program.

      The approval came after NASA signed the Human Rating Certification Plan for SpaceX’s crew transportation system yesterday. The signing was completed after conducting a thorough flight readiness review ahead of the agency’s Crew-1 mission, with astronauts onboard, to the space station. NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine commended the success of the Commercial Crew Program and the achievements of both companies, stating:

      The founder and CEO of SpaceX, Elon Musk marked it as an honor and a motivating force in the company's vision to make flights to the Moon and Mars a reality:

      This is a milestone for both companies. For SpaceX, this system of the Crew Dragon plus the Falcon 9 rocket along with the associated ground systems is the first to be NASA-certified for regular manned flights since the space shuttle nearly 40 years ago. This obviously means that SpaceX's hefty investment in the Commercial Crew program has paid off. For NASA, this is the first time that the agency has certified a commercial spacecraft system in history that is capable of transporting humans to and from the ISS. This directly means that astronauts can regularly make trips to the ISS to and from American soil, which could be a vital step towards commercializing space flights.