[Official] Star Trek: Discovery Thread


Recommended Posts

20 hours ago, George P said:

That's right out of the Star Trek Motion Picture, Spock does the same thing at one point, though it's more flashy in Discovery, it's not exactly something new to the show.  

There were many such nods to earlier Trek in Discovery. I kinda like it and try not to worry too much about the nitty gritty. Star Trek has never been about hardcore scifi.

Genuinely enjoyed it.  It got straight into things, the pacing felt like a movie, the tone was set and I've basically no issues with anything shown.  Considering how weak some Trek series have started, I'd call this a success.  And to those who complain "This isn't MY Trek" - you're right, it's not.  Bye, I guess?

15 minutes ago, Nefarious Trigger said:

Genuinely enjoyed it.  It got straight into things, the pacing felt like a movie, the tone was set and I've basically no issues with anything shown.  Considering how weak some Trek series have started, I'd call this a success.  And to those who complain "This isn't MY Trek" - you're right, it's not.  Bye, I guess?

IMO, such people are not actually fans of Trek itself, but are fans of the particular series of it they saw, be it TOS, TAS, TNG, DS9, VOY or ENT.  Myself, I love ALL of Trek and will gladly watch any new show.  I even watch the various fan productions...  Hell, I even enjoyed Enterprise. ALL of it, not just the last season.  Scott Bakula made a pretty good captain and didn't deserve his run to be cut short or vilified so much!

 

If you're a true fan of Trek, you won't care about the shortcomings of a new show, especially one so new.  You'll just be happy that Trek is back!

 

  • Like 3
Just now, FloatingFatMan said:

If you're a true fan of Trek, you won't care about the shortcomings of a new show, especially one so new.  You'll just be happy that Trek is back!

 

(Y)  Looking forward to the next episode.  Like STD (sorry, going to say it like this..haha) better than the Orville.  Yes, cannot compare both but the effects on STD are better on the Orville and so far there is a good story/main plot. 

3 minutes ago, techbeck said:

Don't for get 3.5 in floppy disks....at least that is what they look like.

I thought they were like a updated form of punch cards? :p

20 minutes ago, Nefarious Trigger said:

it's not.  Bye, I guess?

 

Really great way to nail a coffin shut. Not even JJ was dumb enough to say lets completely forget the back story when he took over Star Wars. Imagine if he had and needed to rely on completely new audience.

2 minutes ago, Son_Of_Dad said:

 

Really great way to nail a coffin shut. Not even JJ was dumb enough to say lets completely forget the back story when he took over Star Wars. Imagine if he had and needed to rely on completely new audience.

The overall reaction has been great.  So the coffin is not nailed shut.

The viewing figures have been great.  So the coffin is not nailed shut.

You can opt to not watch it and sit and watch your old Trek DVDs and lament how that's "your Trek".  So the coffin is not nailed shut.

 

And JJ relying on a completely new audience?  Much like he did with his Trek reboot - that well received, financial success of a reboot...

3 minutes ago, techbeck said:

(Y)  Looking forward to the next episode.  Like STD (sorry, going to say it like this..haha) better than the Orville.  Yes, cannot compare both but the effects on STD are better on the Orville and so far there is a good story/main plot. 

I wouldn't expect Orville to have top of the line effects.. It IS a comedy show after all. Trek though, needs to have them.

2 minutes ago, techbeck said:

(Y)  Looking forward to the next episode.  Like STD (sorry, going to say it like this..haha) better than the Orville.  Yes, cannot compare both but the effects on STD are better on the Orville and so far there is a good story/main plot. 

Since you bring the Orville into it, I like that one as well, it's not like you have to like one or the other or something.  But one thing I want to point out here, some of the hate going towards discovery seems to be how it's trying to be too politically correct or something.  I have to ask these people, did they bother watching the 3rd episode of the Orville yet or not?   That whole ep was PC stuff down your throat with some jokes tossed in so it didn't get too heavy.

Just now, Nefarious Trigger said:

The overall reaction has been great.  So the coffin is not nailed shut.

Who's a few hollywood types who never say anything is less than brilliant. You could probably do yourself a favour by checking comments on Youtube for example it's being savaged pretty badly with some people longing for S3-4 Enterprise opening credits.

Just now, George P said:

Since you bring the Orville into it, I like that one as well, it's not like you have to like one or the other or something.  But one thing I want to point out here, some of the hate going towards discovery seems to be how it's trying to be too politically correct or something.  I have to ask these people, did they bother watching the 3rd episode of the Orville yet or not?   That whole ep was PC stuff down your throat with some jokes tossed in so it didn't get too heavy.

I like to Orville as well and will continue to watch it. 

  • Like 2
Just now, Son_Of_Dad said:

Who's a few hollywood types who never say anything is less than brilliant. You could probably do yourself a favour by checking comments on Youtube for example it's being savaged pretty badly with some people longing for S3-4 Enterprise opening credits.

YouTube is not the best place in the world to poll for opinons on a new show... It's full of trolls...

  • Like 2
4 minutes ago, Son_Of_Dad said:

 

Really great way to nail a coffin shut. Not even JJ was dumb enough to say lets completely forget the back story when he took over Star Wars. Imagine if he had and needed to rely on completely new audience.

For all the good JJ did on his Star wars movie, you do understand that just like with this new Trek show, even that movie has a number of star wars fans hate on it, how it's not original, just retelling the A New Hope story over with different characters and so on?    It's not like TFA was a huge fan fav, not by a long shot.  It did great at the box office, sure, because it was a new star wars movie after such a long time and everyone wanted to wash the prequels out of their minds so bad it seems.

4 minutes ago, FloatingFatMan said:

I wouldn't expect Orville to have top of the line effects.. It IS a comedy show after all. Trek though, needs to have them.

I'd be willing to bet they have a far lower budget also

4 minutes ago, FloatingFatMan said:

They were memory wafers if I remember correctly.

Everything was big back then, except skirts which were very short.  heh.

1 minute ago, George P said:

For all the good JJ did on his Star wars movie, you do understand that just like with this new Trek show, even that movie has a number of star wars fans hate on it, how it's not original, just retelling the A New Hope story over with different characters and so on? 

You did take note of what I posted didn't you?

1 minute ago, George P said:

It did great at the box office, sure, because it was a new star wars movie after such a long time 

 

The exact same could be said for Discovery given Star Trek has been absent from TV for a decade however,

 

4 minutes ago, Son_Of_Dad said:

Who's a few hollywood types who never say anything is less than brilliant. You could probably do yourself a favour by checking comments on Youtube for example it's being savaged pretty badly with some people longing for S3-4 Enterprise opening credits.

I am not referencing anyone in Hollywood, but the fact you are and your tone surrounding them shows your absolute bias here.

 

Look at aggregation sites, look at the reflected appreciation for the series.

 

YouTube comments?  Again the fact you reference them says so much more about you than it does the 2 episodes shown.  Absolute cliche...

2 minutes ago, Son_Of_Dad said:

Star Trek has been absent from TV for a decade

No it has not.  May stations still air re-runs, and their target is not people who have seen it before.  DVD sales, or Blue Ray sales still maintain numbers.  Trek hasn't "been" anywhere, there's been a market still.

6 minutes ago, techbeck said:

I liked the short skirts.  In TNG, the outfits were tight. 

I guess in TNG there were going for a more equal uniform setup, but then again so did they in the movies starting with ST2 and on, skirts were gone and females had the same uniforms as guys, which makes more sense because it's like any type of military  force that uses uniforms and that type of command structure.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!