[Official] Star Trek: Discovery Thread


Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, Son_Of_Dad said:

Section 31 IS part of Starfleet though, it's where the name comes from. And their already was a "section 31 isn't actually real" line used in season 7 of DS9. Look I liked the idea of 31 and even that they hooked it back into ENT but if you want to do your own revamped though meant to fit in ST series then rely on original ideas they've already used the most noted alien species and many would say made a mess of them.

Just because S31 has shown up in a few episodes of ds9 and the others doesn't mean that it's been shown to the extent where it's been overused. There is no reason you can't use it as part of a new show, specially one that uses the war with the klingons as its backdrop, something that hasn't been shown in detail yet.  They're doing a new spin and view of star fleet we haven't seen before,  that to say it's not original is silly. 

The thing that really bugs me is the Discovery was effectively following Michael but when they picked her and the other criminals up m, it was after the pilot of the craft had floated away. So desperate to have her that they would kill an innocent?

9 hours ago, George P said:

doesn't mean that it's been shown to the extent where it's been overused.

Which is not in the slightest what I posted

 

9 hours ago, George P said:

specially one that uses the war with the klingons as its backdrop, something that hasn't been shown in detail yet.  They're doing a new spin and view of star fleet we haven't seen before,  that to say it's not original is silly. 

They made the choice to use probably the most used alien species in Star Trek and it's silly to say it's not original  :/

 

 

 

7 hours ago, Fahim S. said:

The thing that really bugs me is the Discovery was effectively following Michael but when they picked her and the other criminals up m, it was after the pilot of the craft had floated away. So desperate to have her that they would kill an innocent?

Making the crew as unlikable as possible seems to be high on the agenda for some reason.

13 hours ago, Fahim S. said:

The thing that really bugs me is the Discovery was effectively following Michael but when they picked her and the other criminals up m, it was after the pilot of the craft had floated away. So desperate to have her that they would kill an innocent?

wasn't the pilot just knocked off by the space storm? maybe discovery was following them? maybe the plot holes are just too obvious?

 

bit weird that after enterprise everyone in starfleet is a dick and a bit sinister, but yeah, they aren't making any character likable at the moement, well except the room mate, but maybe she's a red shirt in disguise.... 

13 hours ago, Fahim S. said:

The thing that really bugs me is the Discovery was effectively following Michael but when they picked her and the other criminals up m, it was after the pilot of the craft had floated away. So desperate to have her that they would kill an innocent?

Maybe Discovery just arrived to late to save the pilot.  But I wouldnt think to much or pick it apart to much.  Otherwise, may not enjoy it. 

 

Personally, I enjoyed all the star treks and continue to watch them from time to time.  Got all the seasons of TNG on BR since TNG is my fav out of all of them.

2 minutes ago, Nick H. said:

I just watched episode 3, and I can now say that I'm digging it. It's just the direction I wanted Star Trek to go, darker and more mysterious with grander storylines.

I got a little worried but not necessarily shaken after episode 2 but after watching episode 3, this show is growing on me. I do like its direction.  I hope the story stays strong.

40 minutes ago, techbeck said:

Maybe Discovery just arrived to late to save the pilot.  But I wouldnt think to much or pick it apart to much.  Otherwise, may not enjoy it. 

 

Personally, I enjoyed all the star treks and continue to watch them from time to time.  Got all the seasons of TNG on BR since TNG is my fav out of all of them.

It's said in the episode that the shuttle changed course unexpectedly, so it was headed to the discovery, the pilot getting knocked off and maybe dying was just done to build up tension. They kept flying for a while after till the discovery locked on to them . 

Just now, George P said:

It's said in the episode that the shuttle changed course unexpectedly, so it was headed to the discovery, the pilot getting knocked off and maybe dying was just done to build up tension. They kept flying for a while after till the discovery locked on to then. 

I missed that.  Probably just bad timing from the Discovery then

11 minutes ago, George P said:

It's said in the episode that the shuttle changed course unexpectedly, so it was headed to the discovery, the pilot getting knocked off and maybe dying was just done to build up tension. They kept flying for a while after till the discovery locked on to them . 

The captain said it was no accident that she ended up on the ship.  That suggests they were following her.

18 hours ago, Fahim S. said:

The thing that really bugs me is the Discovery was effectively following Michael but when they picked her and the other criminals up m, it was after the pilot of the craft had floated away. So desperate to have her that they would kill an innocent?

She was probably beamed aboard. She had her suit on, it should've had a locator beacon.

On 04/10/2017 at 9:00 AM, Slarlac249 said:

^ just do what most of us do to watch it, anyone who says they don't is probably a liar.

Paying for Amazon Prime and Netflix for the shows I want, I've no need to lie about anything.  Don't judge others by your own standards.

18 hours ago, Nefarious Trigger said:

Paying for Amazon Prime and Netflix for the shows I want, I've no need to lie about anything.  Don't judge others by your own standards.

I was just saying most of us who can't watch certain shows because country restrictions or because out tv networks are so rubbish obtain them via torrents, seen many people post on neowin who say they don't download anything which is hard to believe in this day and age.

 

it's got nothing to do with standards, if we can't watch stuff, we look for alternatives, and if such alternatives are free and not full of adverts, then why not, not waiting months for it to appear on our ad infested channels for sure.

31 minutes ago, Slarlac249 said:

I was just saying most of us who can't watch certain shows because country restrictions or because out tv networks are so rubbish obtain them via torrents, seen many people post on neowin who say they don't download anything which is hard to believe in this day and age.

 

it's got nothing to do with standards, if we can't watch stuff, we look for alternatives, and if such alternatives are free and not full of adverts, then why not, not waiting months for it to appear on our ad infested channels for sure.

1

Maybe 3 years ago. today. not so much.  especially if you have a life and family. There's only so much media you have time to consume among all the other things you need to do. 

  • Like 2
7 hours ago, Slarlac249 said:

I was just saying most of us who can't watch certain shows because country restrictions or because out tv networks are so rubbish obtain them via torrents, seen many people post on neowin who say they don't download anything which is hard to believe in this day and age.

 

it's got nothing to do with standards, if we can't watch stuff, we look for alternatives, and if such alternatives are free and not full of adverts, then why not, not waiting months for it to appear on our ad infested channels for sure.

It has everything to do with standards, and your post is admitting to pirating content which is not allowed on Neowin.  Also your comments may have been relevant 10 years ago...

2 hours ago, Slarlac249 said:

Guess i'm lucky then, I have lots of time to watch stuff, I work from home, I also stay clear of social media and other distracting stuff online.

No you don't, else you'd not have made a weird, pointless thread about banning them due to their content.  Neowin (or forums) is basically social media anyway!

11 hours ago, Nefarious Trigger said:

It has everything to do with standards, and your post is admitting to pirating content which is not allowed on Neowin.  Also your comments may have been relevant 10 years ago...

No you don't, else you'd not have made a weird, pointless thread about banning them due to their content.  Neowin (or forums) is basically social media anyway!

This a discussion forum, there is a difference between a forum and a social media platform, one is for silly little pointless messages, selfie / meme pictures, the other is for meaningful discussions, and no it wasn't a pointless thread, the lack of people signing the petition just proved that people thrive on being nasty and bad news.

 

 

 

 

1 hour ago, ThisSiteHasLostItsCharm said:

This a discussion forum, there is a difference between a forum and a social media platform, one is for silly little pointless messages, selfie / meme pictures, the other is for meaningful discussions, and no it wasn't a pointless thread, the lack of people signing the petition just proved that people thrive on being nasty and bad news.

 

 

 

 

no. forums ARE social media. 

4 hours ago, ThisSiteHasLostItsCharm said:

This a discussion forum, there is a difference between a forum and a social media platform, one is for silly little pointless messages, selfie / meme pictures, the other is for meaningful discussions, and no it wasn't a pointless thread, the lack of people signing the petition just proved that people thrive on being nasty and bad news.

This is probably a reflection of who you 'follow' or 'friend' on what you believe to be social media platforms rather than an artifact of the platforms themselves.  I see plenty of thoughtful discussion on "social media", and plenty of inane chatter on "discussion forums" (including this one).  Forums are social media.

 

As for the previous comment about downloading, torrenting, or obtaining illegally.  I genuinely don't do it.  For one reason and one reason only, it's theft.  I wouldn't want to be stolen from, therefore I don't steal.

 

Now can we get back to discussing the show?

13 hours ago, Rigby said:

These have to be the most unlikeable officers in Star Fleet history. Are they all obnoxious jerks?

 

I'm starting to wonder if maybe we are actually in the mirror universe.

I agree. THe more I watch, the more I'm really turned off by these characters. I wish a knew why they were so two dimensional.

13 hours ago, ThisSiteHasLostItsCharm said:

the lack of people signing the petition just proved that people thrive on being nasty and bad news

You know, those sorts of elitist yet isolationist, alienated comments are often the first signs of someone becoming radicalised.  What they actually show is that you are wrong and that nobody takes you seriously.

On 10/7/2017 at 6:32 PM, Rigby said:

These have to be the most unlikeable officers in Star Fleet history. Are they all obnoxious jerks?

 

I'm starting to wonder if maybe we are actually in the mirror universe.

Well, before the Shenzhou, they appear different and not so much like jerks.  But of course now there is war, people tend to act more serious.

 

Anyway, not sure about last nights episode...

On 10/7/2017 at 3:34 PM, Nefarious Trigger said:

It has everything to do with standards, and your post is admitting to pirating content which is not allowed on Neowin. 

You know, there is a function of the forums in where you can report a post.  May want to look in to that.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!