[Official] Star Trek: Discovery Thread


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, xMorpheousx416 said:

Episode name, affectionately called: Sarek.  S3 E23.

 

To which Picard later disclosed those feelings to Spock in Unification pt 2... and we see Spock reel back from how intense Sarek's feelings truly were.

Thanks. I  remember the episodes, but not the names and was to lazy to look it up.  Glad there are bigger Trek nerds than I out there.  And I meant that as a compliment.

5 hours ago, techbeck said:

Thanks. I  remember the episodes, but not the names and was to lazy to look it up.  Glad there are bigger Trek nerds than I out there.  And I meant that as a compliment.

Appreciated.

 

I look things up, not to correct anyone.. but to make sure my memory still serves me.  Names escape me, and even though I can remember plots of books/movies and possibly characters, names of such elude me even on my best days.

Took me some time to catch up but I think I finally did, so this might have been brought up before, but... Saw the Baul / Ba'ul / spell it like you want. I kinda like the alien/horror vibe they were going for when it's revealed, but the effects looked cheap and off for some reason

6 hours ago, Brys said:

Took me some time to catch up but I think I finally did, so this might have been brought up before, but... Saw the Baul / Ba'ul / spell it like you want. I kinda like the alien/horror vibe they were going for when it's revealed, but the effects looked cheap and off for some reason

Just a rip off of Armis, the oil slick monster from the TNG episode "Skin of Evil" where Tasha is killed.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1

Just watched the newest ep, very interesting.

 

Spoiler

It seems like whatever this enemy from the future is, if you go by what the next ep preview shows, it's got it's hooks into section 31.  Also the whole idea about changing the current timeline is interesting to, could be a good way to bring things back closer to canon by the end of the season and into season 3.

 

Just IMO of course, but using time travel to fix broken story lines is just an excuse for bad writing.  It's always annoyed me, even in TNG and DS9 when they over-used time travel in their stories.  It's lazy story telling.

12 hours ago, FloatingFatMan said:

Just a rip off of Armis, the oil slick monster from the TNG episode "Skin of Evil" where Tasha is killed.

I thought about that too !

2 hours ago, FloatingFatMan said:

Just IMO of course, but using time travel to fix broken story lines is just an excuse for bad writing.  It's always annoyed me, even in TNG and DS9 when they over-used time travel in their stories.  It's lazy story telling.

Yeah I get what you're saying. I don't like time travel in general, as soon as they started mentioning it I was disappointed.

This episode for me was the first episode of discovery that felt like star trek, actually it's the first episode that felt like an actual episode of a programme... scenes where well paced , they took their time, there was other characters development,  It's basically what I wanted, especially  if you compare it to last week which seemed like two episodes in one ... I enjoyed it, now I need a lie down

8 minutes ago, techbeck said:

Ok, I watched the latest episode different than most.  Was it accurate to say that the "previously on Star Trek" aired showing the TOS episode what happened?  If so, that was pretty damn cool.

Yeah, that was a nice touch to start the episode, I liked it.

 

As far as the whole time travel bit, nothing new for trek and still the best way to change a timeline to be more canon.

8 hours ago, George P said:

Yeah, that was a nice touch to start the episode, I liked it.

I'd go further and say showing bits of the original pilot was a stroke of genius, so well done there to the writers and director!

 

8 hours ago, George P said:

 

As far as the whole time travel bit, nothing new for trek and still the best way to change a timeline to be more canon.

I just hope it works.  Things ARE definitely improving.  Quite liked the character dynamic going on between Spock and Michael. He's clearly quite ###### at her and I presume they're going to keep that up as a reason why she's never mentioned by Spock in TOS etc.  I wonder though, if they're going to stretch things and mention Sybock. Kind of odd that there's no mention at all of him, as he SHOULD have been around in the childhood flashbacks.

 

Sending the writers to canon school was clearly a wise choice on CBS's part. Even PJ on Egotastic Funtime is starting to enjoy it.

 

12 hours ago, George P said:

Yeah, that was a nice touch to start the episode, I liked it.

 

 

 

3 hours ago, FloatingFatMan said:

I'd go further and say showing bits of the original pilot was a stroke of genius, so well done there to the writers and director!

 

 

Yea, had be scratching my head a little.  Thought, are they showing the right episode?..haha

On 3/9/2019 at 1:23 PM, FloatingFatMan said:

if they're going to stretch things and mention Sybock. Kind of odd that there's no mention at all of him, as he SHOULD have been around in the childhood flashbacks.

Sybok was a child between Sarek and a Vulcan princess before Amanda, so it might not be strange that he wasn't even in the household, or childhood flashbacks.

 

I also really enjoyed this episode, I also loved that they did the TOS intro and the first shot after that was Anson Mount's Pike on the Discovery, which really isn't a world away from TOS Pike Jeffrey Hunter's looks, which makes the casting even more believable :) 

4 minutes ago, Steven P. said:

Sybok was a child between Sarek and a Vulcan princess before Amanda, so it might not be strange that he wasn't even in the household, or childhood flashbacks.

But he was also present during Spock's childhood, so.. yeah. What we have here is a situation caused by the writers probably not knowing about Sybok, compounded by everyone in the entire Trek fandom having done their best to forget Star Trek V ever happened. :p

 

1 hour ago, FloatingFatMan said:

But he was also present during Spock's childhood, so.. yeah. What we have here is a situation caused by the writers probably not knowing about Sybok, compounded by everyone in the entire Trek fandom having done their best to forget Star Trek V ever happened. :p

 

We don't know how long or how frequently Sybok was around, but I bet it wasn't often since he was probably off with his mother and from what I remember shunned because he gave in to his emotions and not logic. 

 

On another note I think st5 gets hated on too much. In my opinion it hits all the trek points, going to a new place no one has gone to before, running into a new entity etc.  It also has a good chunk of character development even after all those years, heck Kirks line to Sybok about "I need my pain" has stuck with me since I first saw the movie. 

Just saw the newest ep, good character development, it also seems like we've answered a few questions while, as always, bringing up some new ones.

 

Spoiler

It seems like the big bad from the future is the control AI that's evolved and that the red angel is one of the main characters time traveling to try and stop it in the past etc.   Who that is we'll probably find out either in the next episode or the one after.

 

13 minutes ago, George P said:

J

  Hide contents

It seems like the big bad from the future is the control AI that's evolved and that the red angel is one of the main characters time traveling to try and stop it in the past etc.   Who that is we'll probably find out either in the next episode or the one after.

 

Spoiler

Well, Airiam said something along the lines that Burnham was the reason why things were happening.  I forget the exact line/quote..

Spoiler

Still kinda shocked they killed off cyborg lady (I keep forgetting her name sorry! lol) especially in that way. That was some dark ass stuff. I just hope Nerdrotic and his minions don't go nuts and say Discovery was trying to airlock someone like Orville did a few weeks ago, ugh.

 

As for the control AI, its a nice way to tie in future Section 31 stuff aka why they went underground so badly by DS9 era events etc. I'm still curious if they are going to go with the safe bet and have Burnham be the red angel. Cyborg lady said right before she got spaced that everything revolved around her. Which also ties into the whole "the timeline is messed up cuz Burnham lived" theory.

 

12 minutes ago, LOC said:
  Hide contents

Still kinda shocked they killed off cyborg lady (I keep forgetting her name sorry! lol) especially in that way. That was some dark ass stuff. I just hope Nerdrotic and his minions don't go nuts and say Discovery was trying to airlock someone like Orville did a few weeks ago, ugh.

 

As for the control AI, its a nice way to tie in future Section 31 stuff aka why they went underground so badly by DS9 era events etc. I'm still curious if they are going to go with the safe bet and have Burnham be the red angel. Cyborg lady said right before she got spaced that everything revolved around her. Which also ties into the whole "the timeline is messed up cuz Burnham lived" theory.

 

Spoiler

Airiam is the cyborg.  And really hope Burnham is not the red angel.  To predictable really.  I replied earlier and couldnt remember exactly what Airiam said to Bernham...so thanks for that.

 

Spoiler

Having her be the red angel would be pretty obvious, there's the theory that it's future Spock but I don't think that holds up either.    If it was either of them, when current Spock did his mind meld I think he would've been able to tell.   Anyways, it does make things interesting and it's good for a overarching plot to keep you guessing till the time is right.

 

 

 

I'll be so disappointed if Burnham is the Red Angel. Or Spock. They've continually inferred that it's tech is from about 500 years in the future, so I've got hope that it's neither of them. Would be an interesting tie in to either Braxton/Relativity or Daniels org. The big bad being AI is also a let down. The storyline had a lot going for it, and AI going nuts is kind of a cop out. 

 

Was nice getting a Voyager reference to Kadis-kot, the game Seven and Naomi played.

Edited by shockz
22 minutes ago, shockz said:

I'll be so disappointed if Burnham is the Red Angel. Or Spock. They've continually inferred that it's tech is from about 500 years in the future, so I've got hope that it's neither of them. Would be an interesting tie in to either Braxton/Relativity or Daniels org. The big bad being AI is also a let down. The storyline had a lot going for it, and AI going nuts is kind of a cop out. 

Except that the AI is Section 31's control AI and thus easily ties into several issues people have with the show as it is. Specifically S31 itself being so out in the open, and this would also help explain away a lot of little things as well. I still kinda hope that someone from the future S31 is helping this AI in the Discovery era and its someone we know already. But that's unlikely.

On 3/15/2019 at 3:55 PM, FloatingFatMan said:

Well, you can certainly see the difference when Frakes is directing.  Damned good episode, that one!

 

 

Airiam is going to be back in some form. Guys, this is Star Trek. No one really dies. Let's look at the history of "deaths" of important characters:

 

Everyone knows Spock was/is one of the most lovable, favorite characters in Star Trek. In Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan, they killed Spock. Before Spock died, he transferred (backed up) his Katra ( his mind, memories) into Doctor McCoys mind with a mind meld after he knocked him unconscious.

 

In Star Trek III: The Search for Spock they brought him back to life and transferred all his mind and memories back to him on Vulcan. In Star Trek: Nemesis DATA sacrificed himself to save The Enterprise but not before transferring his mind and memories earlier to his prototype brother B4. In a sense, DATA was gone and not gone because B4 is actually DATA but not as advanced as he was. So in a sense, DATA is still alive.

 

In Star Trek: Into Darkness, the same formula in Trek II and III was repeated. Kirk died and he was brought back.

 

In Discovery, the doctor was killed and brought back and Captain Georgio was killed and brought back.

 

Now, in Discovery we see the same Trek II formula being repeated, but in a different way. Airiam downloaded all her memories and mind stuff to Discovery's computer, as if she knew he fate was going to be a bad one. She essentially "backed up" herself. Airiam was ejected out into space through an airlock. Yes, she appeared as if she went "offlilne" and died, but her body is still out there, floating in space. Who is to say her body is not going to be recovered by the AI, the Red Angel or someone else and brought back to life somehow? Anyone remembers V-Ger from Star Trek: The Motion Picture? Voyager was recovered/grabbed from Space by an entity and turned into a menace, so yes, anything is possible in the Star Trek world.

 

Airiam is a very important character. She is a fan favorite, like DATA was to STNG and Spock to TOS, so I seriously doubt we have seen the end of her. Maybe the actress that plays her is taking a break to go do another project? It is very possible, but one thing I am sure of is that we have not seen the last of her.

 

And one more thing: For all we know, she could be The Red Angel. Ever thought of that?  Saru did say The Red Angel is humanoid. Airiam is/was 67% human.

 

And yes, Frakes is an awesome director.

Edited by spacelordmaster

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!