[Official] Star Trek: Discovery Thread


Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, xMorpheousx416 said:

But.. there's only ten Star Wars movies, and we have 100s of SW books.  There's ten Star Trek movies along a single timeline, three more that throw all those under the bus... and how many ST books?  

Sadly, Star Wars canon is a total mess thanks to Disney declaring that the entire Star Wars Expanded Universe was no longer canon after their purchase, even though it was canon before.   With Trek things are a little simpler in that to be canon, it has to be an official TV or movie production from the official rights holders. That means that NONE of the books, excepting the rare few that are novelisations of TV episodes or movies, have ever been canon.

 

6 minutes ago, xMorpheousx416 said:

 

What keeps it interesting, is seeing what can be done in a limited time frame... Discovery is only ten years before Kirk.

This is why having Spock in Discovery is a mistake, especially this completely screwed up Spock we're seeing.  It's far too close to what we know of Spock for anyone to take this seriously.

I'm so very glad I found Star Trek Discovery. It lead me to this thread to discuss why it rubs me the wrong way and that, in turn, lead me to The Orville which does everything so absolutely right. I'm aware it's entirely subjective but Discovery has become a snoozefest with political messages I just can't get behind. It also takes itself far too seriously.

 

The Orville feels right. It feels like they knew exactly what I liked about Star Trek and made a new show about it. I didn't think I could handle Seth MacFarlane as a lead but it turns out I can. Anyways, no hard feelings to those who enjoy Discovery, I did for a bit and to each their own. 

  • Like 2
1 hour ago, astropheed said:

I'm so very glad I found Star Trek Discovery. It lead me to this thread to discuss why it rubs me the wrong way and that, in turn, lead me to The Orville which does everything so absolutely right. I'm aware it's entirely subjective but Discovery has become a snoozefest with political messages I just can't get behind. It also takes itself far too seriously.

 

The Orville feels right. It feels like they knew exactly what I liked about Star Trek and made a new show about it. I didn't think I could handle Seth MacFarlane as a lead but it turns out I can. Anyways, no hard feelings to those who enjoy Discovery, I did for a bit and to each their own. 

I agree, mostly. I too find The Orville incredible at this point, especially with the two parter that just aired. Simply amazing stuff honestly, and Trek would do well to get Seth MacFarlane at some point down the road if possible since he obviously loves Star Trek. However I just find that Discovery hasn't found its footing quite yet, unlike The Orville which most definitely has now. Let's not forget the amount of backstage drama so to speak behind the scenes with all the production stuff on Discovery. That can't be good for good story telling let alone "must adhere to canon or else!" stories. I'm sure many of us went through this exact same thing with TNG, DS9, VOY, and especially Ent. TNG was mostly HORRIBLE the first season right? Same with DS9 basically. Voyager didn't get really fun until they just embraced the insanity heh. And Enterprise, well, I say Enterprise was fine starting from S3 onwards. But those first two seasons, woof. Not to mention, they didn't even call it Star Trek until the 3rd or 4th season!

 

Anyway, I digress. I am always into time travel stories and timeline screwery (I just made up a word maybe? Nah) in my Trek. Always been a sucker for those stories. So I'm into Discovery just fine. Yes, it has problems (some BIG problems) but as I said in that Nerdrotic stream last night - I'm in my 40s I'll take whatever Trek I can get and I'm am not a stickler for canon like some Trek fans are apparently. Also I guess I'm a SJW by virtue of that? I dunno.

42 minutes ago, LOC said:

I'm in my 40s I'll take whatever Trek I can get and I'm am not a stickler for canon like some Trek fans are apparently. Also I guess I'm a SJW by virtue of that? I dunno.

Whilst I'm not against a certain amount of flexibility with canon, if you're going to completely pee all over it, why are you bothering to set your new show in the same universe?  That's just disrespectful and rude.

 

(Not you personally... I mean whoever is making the show).

Isn't that why everyone just basically agrees this is Nu-Trek, and in a totally different timeline than Prime or Kelvin? So unless they merge with canon and bring it over to the Prime canon or whatever by the end of the season, I dunno.

1 hour ago, LOC said:

Isn't that why everyone just basically agrees this is Nu-Trek, and in a totally different timeline than Prime or Kelvin? So unless they merge with canon and bring it over to the Prime canon or whatever by the end of the season, I dunno.

Almost.. CBS are calling Discovery the "Prime" timeline, which has resulted in the fans calling "legacy" Trek (TOS, TNG and so on) the "canon" timeline.

 

So now we have:

 

Canon timeline (TOS, TAS, TNG, DS9, VOY, ENT + movies)

Kelvin timeline (New movies)

Prime timeline (Discovery)

 

Fun, eh?  Bloody CBS...

 

1 hour ago, LOC said:

Isn't that why everyone just basically agrees this is Nu-Trek, and in a totally different timeline than Prime or Kelvin? So unless they merge with canon and bring it over to the Prime canon or whatever by the end of the season, I dunno.

"Everyone basically agrees"? No such thing.

Well by "everyone basically agrees" I meant the internet community that despises the show and wants it off the air as fast as possible. If you watch any of those Youtubers (and even some of the more positive Youtubers) they always mention Nu-Trek and say "This isn't my Trek!" etc etc in regards to Discovery.

16 minutes ago, LOC said:

Well by "everyone basically agrees" I meant the internet community that despises the show and wants it off the air as fast as possible. If you watch any of those Youtubers (and even some of the more positive Youtubers) they always mention Nu-Trek and say "This isn't my Trek!" etc etc in regards to Discovery.

If you look back on Enterprise, it didn't have anywhere near the levels of hate that Disco is getting.  Whether that's due to the show itself, or just the way people express themselves lately (there's lots more aggressive polarisation these days), I don't know.

1 hour ago, FloatingFatMan said:

Almost.. CBS are calling Discovery the "Prime" timeline, which has resulted in the fans calling "legacy" Trek (TOS, TNG and so on) the "canon" timeline.

 

So now we have:

 

Canon timeline (TOS, TAS, TNG, DS9, VOY, ENT + movies)

Kelvin timeline (New movies)

Prime timeline (Discovery)

 

Fun, eh?  Bloody CBS...

 

Discovery is canon. Sigh. Prime timeline is canon.

 

It’s a reference to Kelvin timeline divergence.

 

Kelvin = Not prime 

Everything else = Prime

 

If you want to get technical, Kelvin is also canon, as it’s been established that anything on tv or movies falls into canon realm. The only thing Kelvin is not is prime timeline.

 

The only major issue with canon right now in Discovery is the Spore Drive, and it's not even a story line that has been wrapped up. No doubt this type of travel will either be destroyed or locked out at the eventual conclusion of that story. I also wouldn't be surprised if the spore drive caused some terrible destruction of ship, crew, death, etc... we've already saw two instances of spin outs, on the Glenn and then when Discovery traveled the network to get Tilly. It's definitely not the safest or reliable method of transportation. It's clearly not cut out for mainstream travel, it won't make it past Discovery. I also doubt it'll be coming to Picard series, if anything Quantum Slipstreams will be figured out by then.

 

Other things, like the look of sets, ship design, etc... it's called making a show in 2019 and not the 60s. When ENT did the mirror universe episodes, it looked cheesy then, especially in HD. And even then they used an artistic license with system interactions with computers, screens, etc... Just as it did in the DS9 trials and tribulations episode. It was a nice homage to the original series, but outside of that basing an entire series of of 60s designs would be laughable. Other things like holographic transmitters and holodecks are easily explained as specific to ship designs, and we've already had references to how holotransmissions wreak havoc with other systems and why Pike prefers video communication, as well as it looking more realistic to him. Just because the original enterprise didn't have a holodeck doesn't mean that the technology didn't exist in that time frame. It's an advanced test vessel anyways.

 

For some that claim to be "trekkers" and not get caught up in the entire universe, sure do a good job at getting bent out of shape on the details...

Edited by shockz
  • Like 3
1 hour ago, shockz said:

Discovery is canon. Sigh. Prime timeline is canon.

 

It’s a reference to Kelvin timeline divergence.

 

Kelvin = Not prime 

Everything else = Prime

 

If you want to get technical, Kelvin is also canon, as it’s been established that anything on tv or movies falls into canon realm. The only thing Kelvin is not is prime timeline.

 

The only major issue with canon right now in Discovery is the Spore Drive, and it's not even a story line that has been wrapped up. No doubt this type of travel will either be destroyed or locked out at the eventual conclusion of that story. I also wouldn't be surprised if the spore drive caused some terrible destruction of ship, crew, death, etc... we've already saw two instances of spin outs, on the Glenn and then when Discovery traveled the network to get Tilly. It's definitely not the safest or reliable method of transportation. It's clearly not cut out for mainstream travel, it won't make it past Discovery. I also doubt it'll be coming to Picard series, if anything Quantum Slipstreams will be figured out by then.

 

Other things, like the look of sets, ship design, etc... it's called making a show in 2019 and not the 60s. When ENT did the mirror universe episodes, it looked cheesy then, especially in HD. And even then they used an artistic license with system interactions with computers, screens, etc... Just as it did in the DS9 trials and tribulations episode. It was a nice homage to the original series, but outside of that basing an entire series of of 60s designs would be laughable. Other things like holographic transmitters and holodecks are easily explained as specific to ship designs, and we've already had references to how holotransmissions wreak havoc with other systems and why Pike prefers video communication, as well as it looking more realistic to him. Just because the original enterprise didn't have a holodeck doesn't mean that the technology didn't exist in that time frame. It's an advanced test vessel anyways.

 

For some that claim to be "trekkers" and not get caught up in the entire universe, sure do a good job at getting bent out of shape on the details...

Oh, also, to add, holographic transmissions were present in the original series movies. Can't recall exactly, but pretty sure they were in Star Trek 6. Why then was this technology not reintroduced until DS9 and the defiant. 

Quote

Oh, also, to add, holographic transmissions were present in the original series movies. Can't recall exactly, but pretty sure they were in Star Trek 6. Why then was this technology not reintroduced until DS9 and the defiant. 

You'd be correct.

 

When the President is speaking to Azetbur, leader of the Klingon High Council after her father was killed.

Quote

This is why having Spock in Discovery is a mistake, especially this completely screwed up Spock we're seeing.  It's far too close to what we know of Spock for anyone to take this seriously.

I thought the same thing about Pike.  

 

From Captain of the Enterprise, to Discovery, to Fleet Admiral, to wheelchair.. within that ten year span, they will either leave a serious time gap between the end of Discovery, and the beginning of TOS.. or perhaps, tie it together by having members leave on the very missions that brought them to where they are in TOS.

 

Leaving a time gap, allows for anything to happen.  So this "screwed up" Spock as you put it, has plenty of time for some Kohlinahr, and pull his head back out of the chaos prior to joining Kirk.

Way Spock is acting is before the Kirk crew.  So who knows what happened then.  And even in TOS, he has emotional breakdowns as well as Serek over the Trek series.  Vulcans suppress emotion, but they can still have and experience it.   Like with Serek and Picard in TNG.  Forget the Episode name.  And Spock is half Vulcan and half human.  So makes him more prone to it.  Shall see how the Spock character plays out in Discovery.

11 hours ago, FloatingFatMan said:

Almost.. CBS are calling Discovery the "Prime" timeline, which has resulted in the fans calling "legacy" Trek (TOS, TNG and so on) the "canon" timeline.

 

So now we have:

 

Canon timeline (TOS, TAS, TNG, DS9, VOY, ENT + movies)

Kelvin timeline (New movies)

Prime timeline (Discovery)

 

Fun, eh?  Bloody CBS...

 

Much of this has to do with the drama around the CBS/VIACOM merger and former CBS exec Moonves (no Trek fan.) Viacom had some rights, CBS other rights, and this caused the split timelines. 

 

If the merger goes through they could collapse the timelines wave functions with some slick writing  and get back on track.

2 hours ago, DocM said:

Much of this has to do with the drama around the CBS/VIACOM merger and former CBS exec Moonves (no Trek fan.) Viacom had some rights, CBS other rights, and this caused the split timelines. 

 

If the merger goes through they could collapse the timelines wave functions with some slick writing  and get back on track.

Yes, I know.  CBS and Viacom merging would be the best option and finally resolve the total mess Trek canon has become because of the split years ago.

"Canon is only important to certain people because they have to cling to their knowledge of the minutiae. Open your mind! Be a STAR TREK fan and open your mind and say, 'Where does STAR TREK want to take me now'." - Leonard Nimoy

Just saw this weeks episode.  I totally did NOT see that coming!

 

Spoiler

Clearly, we must be in a timeline that's AFTER the events of the original Trek pilot where Pike met the Talosians, but as Talos IV was made out of bounds, Michael should not have been able to set a course there without getting all sorts of warning messages...

 

Spoiler

Yeah I think its pretty clear we are either in a new timeline completely or a really messed up "prime" universe at this point. I think its pretty obvious with all the time stuff and anomalies now we are either getting a timeline reset or things will be set "correct" at some point by the time S3 comes along. At least I hope so, because man if they somehow keep 3 different timelines going, nope.

 

  • Like 3

That episode gave me a headache... it felt like two full episodes were spliced into one. ... personally if I was in charge this is how it would have gone....

michael burnham... "i've off to vulcan ....byeeeeeeeeeeee"

 

then the first episode is about the time vortex thing on discovery and other character building....

... next weeks episode .... focus on burnham on vulcan... but that's just me....   

 

Vulcan looked pretty though.  

 

I don't understand why it has to be all so fast-paced. It seems to aimed and the "Suicide Squad" audience, where they think if there isn't an explosion or flashing light or shouting then the audience will loose focus.   I watched mindhunter this week and there where 10 minute scenes with characters in a single room just talking and it was riveting.  Also why do people keep going on about the orville, it's pretty terrible

 

 

3 hours ago, Som said:

Also why do people keep going on about the orville, it's pretty terrible

Mainly because, not counting the recent 2 part conclusion, the Orville IS people talking without explosions every 5 seconds.

  • Like 2
19 hours ago, techbeck said:

Way Spock is acting is before the Kirk crew.  So who knows what happened then.  And even in TOS, he has emotional breakdowns as well as Serek over the Trek series.  Vulcans suppress emotion, but they can still have and experience it.   Like with Serek and Picard in TNG.  Forget the Episode name.  And Spock is half Vulcan and half human.  So makes him more prone to it.  Shall see how the Spock character plays out in Discovery.

Episode name, affectionately called: Sarek.  S3 E23.

 

To which Picard later disclosed those feelings to Spock in Unification pt 2... and we see Spock reel back from how intense Sarek's feelings truly were.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why you need to take back control of your synced passwords and how to go about doing that by Paul Hill Credit: Pixabay Last month, when Google decided to introduce daily and weekly caps for Gemini, it reignited an anxiety of mine, that you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever, and it got me looking into free software (as in freedom) in other areas too. One app I quickly came across was KeePassXC on desktop and KeePassDX on Android as an alternative to password manager lock-in within the Chrome or Firefox ecosystems. I personally like to switch around with browsers, and using either password manager is inconvenient, so something like KeePassXC was interesting to me. The main issue with it now is syncing; I was not sure how to do that. After a bit of research, I came across Syncthing, a tool I was vaguely familiar with but had never used because it seemed complicated. However, I was completely wrong, and honestly, I think everyone should use it if they use multiple devices. It essentially lets you share folders peer to peer across all of your devices, no cloud services that you don’t control necessary! And it was fairly simple to set up, if not a bit clunky. Since setting it up, I’ve also started using Syncthing to back up other apps too, so don’t think it’s limited to just saving password databases. You can use it for pretty much anything you use Dropbox or Google Drive for. Before continuing to talk about those apps a bit more, let’s walk back a bit and talk about browser sync. Ever since the late 2000s and early 2010s, really, since we have been using smartphones, browser sync has been a necessity of life. I don’t know about you, but I have hundreds of passwords saved. For the most part, they’re all unique, so I don’t remember them and rely on software to manage them for me. Until recently, I’ve relied on password managers in Chrome and Firefox, but what I always found annoying was that it can be hard to transfer them between browsers. Sure, on Windows it is simple enough, but on Linux, exporting bookmarks has been temperamental. It works OK nowadays, but not too long ago, Chrome required you to enable exporting passwords in chrome://flags. The situation is even worse on mobile; there is no exporting or importing of passwords of any kind. You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. Sync also lets us take out bookmarks, history, tabs, and autofill data easily. To enable sync, it’s just a matter of signing into the browser once, and it handles the rest. It’s nice and easy. Obviously, all this has some issues, including those I’ve outlined above about it being hard to transfer data between browsers, but also things such as account suspension, lost account passwords, and other lock-in mechanisms, such as passkeys, being tied to a specific browser. On a sidenote, I have just removed all of my passkeys because they can make it harder to move browsers. I think the biggest threat to your synced passwords, especially if doing this with Google, is having your account suspended. I don’t ever expect mine to be suspended, but you do hear horror stories on Reddit where people lose access to their Google accounts. Imagine if you have hundreds of passwords, then suddenly lose access to them because Google froze your account, what would you do? So yes, it can be nice to use these syncing services for their convenience, but they also have risks. You may have seen me going on about free software quite a bit in my editorials. It’s essentially a concept championed by the Free Software Foundation. It’s software under particular licenses that grant you four freedoms: run the program for any purpose (0), study and change the source code (1), redistribute copies to others (2), and the freedom to distribute modified copies to others (3). For example, if there is an app I use and one day it gets abandoned by the developer, I can keep running it or even clone the software and continue developing it. Look at the myriad of cool services Google has run over the years before killing them. You can’t take the source code for those because they are proprietary, for the most part. Both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so I get the freedoms listed above. In my use case where I’m syncing a database full of my passwords, I also get proper ownership over my data, there is no losing access to the database due to a frozen account, I can access the code of the tools I’m using, and I can get support from real people online if I run into issues, rather than having to consult a vague help page from an opaque company. With the KeePassXC password manager, you create a .kdbx file, which is what will be synced between devices. KeePassXC has cross-platform apps and also has browser extensions so that the browser can fetch passwords from the database once it is unlocked. Meanwhile, Syncthing is a peer-to-peer file sync tool where you can select folders to sync between your devices. Just pop files in the folders you choose, and then they will be available across your other devices whenever they come online. Syncthing is resilient as it works over both LAN and the internet and only ever sends content between your devices, never to a third-party server somewhere else. By combining these two pieces of software, you can essentially replicate the browser sync functionality. I have had a weird, conflicting issue where a new file is appearing, but it doesn’t seem to be impacting my main password database, which is updating between devices just fine. If you want to get a setup similar to what I have, you will need to go here to download KeePassXC for your computer. Once you have that, you will need to download your passwords from your web browser to a CSV file. In Chrome, you can type chrome://password-manager/settings into the URL bar, and you should see an option to download your passwords under Export Passwords. This will give you the CSV file you need for importing into KeePassXC. If you use a different browser, just use a search engine and type “browser-name export passwords” and muddle along. In KeePassXC, you’ll want to press Import File from the home screen, select the CSV file, and create a new database from it. On one of the screens of the wizard, there will be a Title field with a drop-down selected to none. Change this to Title and continue. You’ll select a name for the database, the encryption level (the defaults are fine), and then you will pick a password. I would choose four unrelated words that are easy for you to remember, as you’ll be typing them fairly often to access your passwords. When you have all your passwords in your new database, you will want to set up the browser extension so that your browser can fetch passwords from KeePassXC. Rather than explain how to do that here, refer to KeePassXC’s guide on how to set it up properly. Once you’ve got that set up, you want to install KeePassDX on Android. You can grab it on the F-Droid store and the Google Play Store. For iPhone users, there are other .kdbx-supporting apps, but I haven’t tried any of them, so have a look around and use what suits you. Once you have that done, you will want to install Syncthing on your computer and find a third-party app for your mobile device. On Android, I use an app called BasicSync; there are also options for iOS, but again, I’ve not tried these. Once you’ve got SyncThing, you’ll want to set it up and connect all of your devices together and share a folder between your gadgets. PCWorld has a good tutorial on setting up a synchronized file between your devices using SyncThing. Once you’ve set it up, congrats, you’ll never have to touch that stuff again except for adding or removing devices. I’ll be honest, I didn’t particularly like setting up Syncthing. It didn’t take me a massive amount of time, but I think I had to check online because I found it a bit confusing. That said, I’ve had it running for several weeks now and never need to touch the Syncthing settings, so that’s very nice. I also mentioned a conflicting file. I’m not sure why this is appearing, but the main .kdbx file seems to be updating and syncing just fine. What’s nice is that both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so they won’t just vanish one day; you can take the code and fork the project or use a range of alternative implementations that others have made. It’s also nice that it works over LAN, so even if your ISP is having problems, your passwords will still sync. One area where you will want to be a bit more careful with this setup is if you only have one device. I am OK because I have a computer and two phones, all synced up. If you just have one device, you will probably want to store a backup of your .kdbx file somewhere else. Obviously, you’ll also want to remember your password really well, too. If you get locked out, it's game over. Overall, if you want to take back control of your computing from big tech, taking control of your passwords is an important part of this. You don’t need to immediately clear out your browser’s password manager; try running KeePassXC and the password manager concurrently for a while to see if you run into any problems. If you do try this out, let us know some other creative ways to use Syncthing. I haven’t really come up with a solution about what to do with my bookmarks, for example.
    • If the price was a dollar, someone would complain "Why isn't it free?" If it was free, someone would complain they weren't being paid to play it.
    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
    • 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD drops to its lowest price in over three months by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the 2TB WD_Black SN7100 internal solid-state drive at its lowest price in over three months, so you may want to check it out, if you have been considering a storage upgrade, before the deal dries up (purchase link is toward the end of the article). Featuring a PCIe Gen 4.0 interface and M.2 2280 form factor, the SN7100 promises to deliver sequential read speeds of up to 7,250MB/s and sequential write speeds reaching 6,900MB/s, offering as much as a 35% improvement in performance compared with the previous generation. It also achieves random read speeds of 1,000,000 IOPS and random write speeds of 1,400,000 IOPS. The drive uses Western Digital’s TLC 3D NAND technology for reliable performance and is further supported by a five-year limited warranty. It also offers strong endurance, rated at up to 1,200TBW, making it suitable for demanding workloads such as gaming, content creation, and high-speed recording. Moreover, its DRAM-less architecture claims to improve power efficiency (the SSD relies on system memory for caching via HMB), while the WD_Black Dashboard software enables users to monitor drive health, install firmware updates, and activate Game Mode for potentially better performance. Finally, it operates within an operating temperature range of 0°C to 85°C, and can withstand storage temperatures from -40°C to 85°C. 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD: $242.96 (Amazon US) Check this deal out if you want a 4TB option. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!